Showing posts sorted by relevance for query masks. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query masks. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2020

"MASKS REPRESENT SLOW SUFFOCATION . . . HEALTH WILL BE DEPRESSED, AND DEATH FROM ALL CAUSES WILL INCREASE"

Acupuncturist, Doctor of Oriental Medicine, and Pastoral Medicine, Dr. Mark Sircus is out with an excellent piece slamming the use of masks at business establishments and civic assemblies around the world.  It is excellent.  If you are forced to wear a mask by your employer, this is a must-read.  
In the opening of his letter, he laments how the fools we've granted power to have found a way to control more and more of our lives from our social interaction right down to how and what we breathe.  And their hysterical prescription for handling a common virus is killing people, killing more people than any virus they concoct could.  Dr. Sircus begins, 
They did it this time. A group of men and women executed a well thought out plan to drive the health of the human race into the toilet. Attacking the very basics of life, they have deprived people, en mass, of the life/health-giving rays of the sun (depressing vitamin D levels) with their lock-downs. And through wearing masks, public health officials are forcing the public into hypoxic breathing conditions. Wearing a mask reduces the oxygen we breathe in and increases the CO2 intake.

Dr. Sircus reminds us that the masks cut off the amount of oxygen that is available to us, a kind of mandated, self-imposed slow suffocation, while we are forced to inhale more amounts of our own CO2.  This is not healthy folks.  And let's say that it's not healthy.  Many of us would endure mild discomfort for the sake of a deadly virus to pass.  But again, that's not how viruses work.  That's not how immunity works.  And that's not how masks work.  Sircus points to the YouTube video made by a gentleman from Canada, a man whom it is difficult to find any information on other than from the owner of the YouTube channel on which he appears.  The YouTube channel owner is Gareth Icke, and the video has only 46,000 views as of July 10, 2020.  Though the idea is gaining some traction, it certainly hasn't reached viral status.  Which means that it's going to take some effort to get that message out.  

Sircus writes
We've already seen the video presented by Canadian, There was a video showing people testing masks for the quality of air in terms of oxygen and CO2. The video has been removed (no surprise there) because it showed that wearing a mask is a health hazard. See the details below. And here is a video of Dr. Rashid Buttar giving a passionate presentation of the dangers of wearing masks. His words are perhaps crude, but he hits the right points. 
This video is excellent.  And though it may confirm some biases, for I develop sinus congestion each time I put one on, it also corroborates similar observations by lots of other medical officials, including Dr. Fauci.

Dr. Sircus asks some poignant questions that no company manager or few medical officials are even asking.  He asks
What will be the effect will be of depriving oxygen to billions of people for years? How happy will that make people? Or inhaling dangerous amounts of CO2, what is that going to do to peoples’ health after several years or even after only a few weeks or months. 
Here is the evidence that wearing a mask is bad for you


Decreasing the amount of oxygen people are breathing, by forcing people to wear masks, is cruel and medically stupid, as Dr. Buttar points out. Under the mask, O2 readings drop from a regular 21 to an unhealthy 17.5, ringing the alarm of the official OSHA devices that measure such things.
The usual amount of CO2 in the air is approximately 400 ppm, when measured around the nose of mouth would be higher. But wear a mask and concentrations shoot up to 5,000. This is not healthy! Carbon dioxide in the air we breathe usually is at 0.0390 percent. When we breathe out, it is 4.0 percent. It is not the concentration we want to be breathing in.
The minimum oxygen concentration in the air required for human breathing is 19.5 percent. Approximately 78 percent of the air we breathe is nitrogen gas, while only about 20.9 percent is oxygen. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA, determined the optimal range of oxygen in the air for humans runs between 19.5 and 23.5 percent.
SIDE EFFECTS OF WEARING A MASK
What a searing indictment of the official/unofficial mandate to wear masks: they're slowly suffocating us:
Serious side effects can occur if the oxygen levels drop outside the safe zone. When oxygen concentrations drop from 19.5 to 16 percent, and you engage in physical activity, your cells fail to receive the oxygen needed to function correctly. So wearing masks is not indicated for any reason because masks represent slow suffocation.  Not quite as bad as strangling a person or killing them outright by completely cutting off their breath, but across the board, health will be depressed, and death from all causes will increase.
Please, finish reading his article., where he talks about how vitamin D effectively eliminates death from the coronavirus, and where he calls health officials death officials.  I have often called hospitals abattoirs.  

Find Dr. Mark Sircus' Facebook page here.
His website is here.

So the question then if wearing masks produces a state of chronic hypoxia in our tissues from lungs to brain to liver, then is there an antidote?  Turns out there are vitamins that can reverse this.  One is the go-to of all vitamins, vitamin D.  PubMed cites a study that reported that
Loading cells with vitamin C by DHA treatment [omega 3 fatty acids] resulted in resistance to hypoxia and hypoxia-  reoxygenation-induced cell death associated with the quenching of reactive oxygen species. 

B vitamins also do an excellent job of reversing the effects of hypoxia as reported by PubMed
Supplementations of vitamin B6/B12/folate+choline could significantly ameliorate the hypoxia-induced memory deficits, observably decreased Hcy concentrations in serum, and markedly attenuated tau hyperphosphorylation at multiple AD-related sites through upregulating inhibitory Ser9-phosphorylated GSK-3β. Our finding give further insight into combined neuroprotective effects of vitamin B6, B12, folate, and choline on brain against hypoxia. 
P-5-P is vitamin B6.

Friday, April 22, 2022

Microplastics commonly used in surgical masks have been discovered in lungs of most peoplel


Thank you to G. Edward Griffin.

Not only are they uncomfortable, make it hard to breathe, and essentially pointless, but surgical masks worn during the pandemic could have a far unhealthier effect than we all thought. According to a new study published in the Science of the Total Environmentmicroplastics commonly used in surgical masks have been discovered in the lungs of most people.

Researchers in the United Kingdom looked at lung tissue obtained from study participants and found microplastics in all regions of the lungs, including the deeper section. According to the study, this is the first time microplastics have been found in human lung tissue samples using μFTIR spectroscopy.

The abundance of MPs (microplastics) within samples, significantly above that of blanks, supports human inhalation as a route of environmental exposure. MPs with dimensions as small as 4 μm but also, surprisingly, >2 mm were identified within all lung region samples, with the majority being fibrous and fragmented.

Though the researchers did not confirm the source of the microplastic contamination, the plastic fibers found in the lungs are commonly used in surgical masks.

Researchers identified 39 microplastics in 11 of the 13 lung tissue samples, with an average of 3 microplastics per sample.

There were 12 types of microplastic found in samples.

The 4 microplastics present in the most considerable quantities included:

  • polypropylene (PP): found in carpets, clothing, automotive plastics, and surgical masks
  • polyethylene terephthalate (PET): present in clothing, beverage, and food containers
  • resin: a constituent of protective coating and paints
  • polyethylene (PE): a component of food wrappers, milk containers, toys, and detergent bottles

In 2020, the amount of disposable face masks littered into the environment increased by a staggering 9000 percent. Billions of people strapped polypropylene masks to their faces every day for two years and sucked their air through plastic fibers for 8 hours or more. To not have discovered plastic in lungs would have been surprising.

The confirmation of microplastics in the lungs also backs up a study conducted in 2020 which predicted a microplastic inhalation risk posed by wearing masks.

According to researchers in that study, the inhalation risk posed by spherical- and fiber-like microplastics was high while wearing a mask. Unfortunately, researchers in that study continued to recommend the use of plastic masks despite the risk of inhalation.

Read full article here…

Monday, October 10, 2022

". . . masks are also illegal in some communities precisely because they present the citizens in a town with a threat of robbery. Bandits love masks."

The "protective" masks that everybody is wearing have been an unmitigated disaster from the outset.  First, they are menacing which only helped to emphasize a threat.  But in this case, the treats were now multiplied by the thousands of mask wearers.  When I first spotted more than a few people wearing masks, it alarmed me because it's like they got orders from some cult or underground army.  Truly.  Not only do we know that masks don't prevent transmission or protect from infection.  We know they're unhealthy.  Worse yet, they ruin a young child's sense of communication and their ability to read cues from adults.  It's hard not to continually condemn these because no one has been brought to account regarding the masks.  You still see people wearing them, and I am sure that as the late fall and winter months approach, more people will be wearing them.  But I said early on that the masks are also illegal in some communities precisely because they present the citizens in a town with a threat of robbery.  Bandits love masks.   

Thursday, December 3, 2020

"When you exhale the carbon dioxide you're not able to get it out or past the mask. This condition created by the masks is giving people heart attacks."

Not only is it not effective in disease transmission, [the mask] is hurting you because no one has done a risk analysis or risk assessment on you.  We don't know your airflow, your air intake, your CO2 output, yet I am telling you to cover your mouth and nose all day and then go do your work.  Think about kids who are running around, and their hearts are beating hard, and then we cover their mouth and their nose.  That is very dangerous.  In fact, this is the reason why OSHA instituted the respirator standard in the first place because we have killed people by putting them in face coverings--covering the mouth and nose--and telling them to work all day.  We've killed people because of that.  We've given them heart attacks.  OSHA actually created a respirator standard, that if you're going to cover somebody's mouth and nose and require them to work all day that way, then you have to do a medical evaluation first.  You have to do a fit test.  You have to make sure there is no breakthrough.  So this is an actual OSHA standard.  The intent of the law, the intent behind the law is that we don't cover the mouth and the nose.  It's not healthy: one, you're not able to get in enough oxygen, and when you exhale the carbon dioxide you're not able to get it out or past the mask.  So you're just breathing in and you're keeping too much CO2 in the body, which causes hypercapnia, which is the build-up of CO2 in the blood.  And that causes other issues.  So, hypercapnia, when you have a toxic build-up of CO2 in your blood, it actually causes your blood to become very toxic and acidic, and that causes your immune system to be suppressed.  So it's important that we have good oxygen intake and CO2 expelled.  Those two things are very important for us.  If God wanted our mouth and nose to be covered, we wouldn't have been born with a nose that can breathe air in and a mouth that can exhale air out, right?  OSHA has cited clients of hers for putting people in an N95 respirator

 

OSHA has cited clients of hers for putting people in an N95 respirator

Why is OSHA turning a blind eye to the mask-wearing?  Finally, a good question.  OSHA used to cite people for violating the respiratory standard for putting people in an N95 mask without doing the whole respirator program requirements and meeting all the elements of a respirator program: 1) medical evaluation; 2) the fit test; 3) the documentation, and 4) the annual evaluation.  It's a lot to follow a respirator program and people have a tough time meeting all of those requirements. 

OSHA, at least in Michigan, is adopting the government's policy and violating its own standards.  She simply calls it crazy, but tell us something we don't already know.  Tell us how to stop the enforcement and stop the law. 

Finally, at the 19:15 mark, she makes a good point.  When people argue that doctors who work in an operating room all day with the masks on, the reason they don't get the same symptoms from someone working with one on for 15 to 30 minutes is that the doctors work in operating rooms that have additional airflow to make up for the fact that they're wearing masks, and most doctors don't even know it or realize it.  

Air change rates, ventilation rates for infectious disease control, room pressure control [the room has to be either positive or negative pressure depending on whether she's trying to keep the pathogen in or out].  This is what she deals with on construction projects.  She has to have a very precise temperature and humidity controlled room.  To keep that microenvironment precisely controlled.  So she keeps the oxygen rates up for the doctors and nurses who are wearing surgical masks; they need additional oxygen in that room.  She keeps the pathogen and diseases at bay, so it's a sterile environment.  So the surgical masks that doctors and nurses are wearing prevent transmission if somebody coughs or sneezes--those large droplets of water or mucous that could be carrying a pathogen, right?  But the operating room already is a sterile environment and they're being given additional oxygen so that they're safe.  The mask that they're wearing just protects the patients from coughing or sputtering, whatever, sneezing, anything like that.  So when nurses get online and say that it is BS that masks are harmful, citing how they wear masks all day, and how they do their own oxygen testing, and it's perfect and that they have "no oxygen decrease level," that's because they're working in a room of very precisely controlled O2 level, additional O2, and higher airflow levels to make up for the fact that they're working in a mask.  

Sunday, November 6, 2022

When the government takes an inch, do they ever stop with just the inch?

A point about being safe.  This point was raised at the 1:48  mark in the context of wearing a mask.  "We were all scared and we just wanted to stay safe.  We didn't really know some of that stuff wasn't going to do anything.  Live and learn, live and learn."  One, safety is a measurement of risks.  No one is permanently safe, so no one can stay safe.  We can make vigilance a habit but that effort isn't really captured by the "stay safe" mantra.  "Stay safe" is an instruction to be afraid.  Afraid of what?  Transmission initially.  But health is an inside out phenomenon.  If your immunity is strong internally because you do everything right, your immunity will knock at varying speed the any pathogen that invades your body.  And given the dearth of information about how and why COVID was so dangerous, it was easy for too many to be afraid.  The fear was designed to reduce your thinking from an adult with decades of survival skills to rely on the mass propaganda and health instruction from the singular authority, the televised Fauci, while divesting you of the wisdom you've practiced most of your life and learned from family, neighbors, and community.   For most of our lives we've known to cover our mouths with our hands.  We know to wash our hands.  The goal was to strip you of knowledge and history and to funnel you into the shute of mass formation toward the vaccine.  Masks are psychological instruments of torture and symbols of being gagged.  Who can so readily and easily forget the waterboarding torture thar uses a mask placed over the face and water poured over it?  The masks reduced adults to acquiescent, obedient children.  The instruction was to shut up.  Shut up about any detrimental effects of the masks.  Shut up about any received information about COVID or about SARS-CoV-2.  Just shut up.  Shut up about the ridiculousness of the 6' social distancing.  The wisdom of your elders in the County Health offices, your governor, the White House COVID Task Force, the CDC, the W.H.O., and the FDA know better than you.  And recently, Emily Oster says we didn't know.  Those agencies sure claimed to have known everything including the medicines to prescribe anybody hospitalized. 

Grocery stores refused entry without one.  Ditto for restaurants.  They did this without themselves knowing the science behind mask-wearing.  Businesses that were allowed to stay open simply and obediently deferred to the local County Health office.  They'd been threatened or bribed.  None of the businesses, which were and are all essential to people's lives and to a sense of enjoying a certain or high standard of living.  But the unscientific refrain that got drummed into our heads from the grocery store speakers was to wear a mask to keep yourself and others safe.  Not a peep about how unhealthy the masks were.  People dutifully wore the masks to buy food and endured the lowering of oxygen saturation in our blood and lungs by breathing in one's own CO2.  From a rational standpoint, the idea to wear masks to keep other people safe was an epic fail.  Okay, if the message wasn't rational or practical and, in fact, designed to reduce oxygen saturation in our lungs and blood, what then was the intention of the message?  Solely to get people sick while we're being gaslit to believe we're making a small sacrifice to protect others or the community?  How do we know?  Is infectivity the same the world over?  Is it the same in Riverside as it is in Los Angeles, or the same in Denver as it is in Boulder?  

When the government takes an inch, do they ever stop with just the inch?  They commanded us to make a small sacrifice with the mask.  And look at all of what we gave up.  

Tuesday, April 6, 2021

Track Coach Fired Because He Didn't Force Athletes to Wear Masks During Races

An Update:

A New Hampshire high school track and field coach was fired after refusing to tell his team they had to wear masks when they competed.

Pembroke Academy track and field coach Bradley Keyes, who coached at Pembroke for four years but was not a teacher there, asked the school if the New Hampshire Interscholastic Athletic Association’s guidelines requiring masks were guidance or a mandate. Informed that Pembroke and fellow competing schools agreed with the policy, on Saturday Keyes issued a blog post encouraging others to tell the school they opposed the policy, while adding an email he sent to the school’s athletic director that stated:

I’ll come straight to the point. I will not put kids on the track and tell them to run any races while wearing masks. I will not stand up in front of the kids and lie to them and tell them that these masks are doing anything worthwhile out in an open field with wind blowing and the sun shining. These insane policies are robbing kids of once-in-a-lifetime opportunities for no valid reason other than irrational fears and going along with the sheep.  … Fire me if you must

Sunday, May 23, 2021

Masks: "they do more harm than good and the decision to mandate them for healthy people in the community was introduced as a psychological control method"

In addition to their recognition of the ethically dubious nature of covert ‘nudges’, a SAGE insider, Dr. Gavin Morgan, also offered support to HART’s view on masks: that is, that they do more harm than good and the decision to mandate them for healthy people in the community was introduced as a psychological control method rather than a means of reducing viral transmission. The UCL educational psychologist was energetically opposed to masks from the outset of the crisis, describing them as ‘dehumanizing,’ but ultimately his view didn’t count as some SPI-B members liked masks because they conveyed a message of ‘solidarity.' 

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Ben Swann reviews the data on wearing masks. These masks put the wearer at greater risk and pose no protection for the population.

Ben Swann reviews the data on wearing masks. 
Improper use of face mask might increase the risk of transmission.  Not only does wearing a cloth mask not prevent the spread of a virus, it actually can put you at greater risk for catching the virus.  The studies show that masks retain moisture and put the wearer at greater risk of infection.  So these masks do not protect the population but only put you, the wearer, at risk. 

Friday, July 24, 2020

"The reason for [the compulsory masks] is they need visible evidence of terror"


Thanks to Bill Sardi for the link to this tweet

The speaker's name is John Waters, an Irish columnist.  His insights are compelling but can they persuade individuals to recapture their souls from this government takeover? 

At the very height of this alleged pandemic back in April there was no talk of compulsory masks.  In all of May, when figures were dying away to nothing, there was no talk of compulsory masks.  In June, when there were no cases virtually at all, there was no talk of compulsory masks.  Now, when it has all but disappeared . . . it’s gone . . . it’s gone, they’re now bringing in compulsory masks.  And the reason for that is they need visible evidence of terror.  They need visibility of terror that they want to inculcate in the people, and that’s why this is so important to them.  These are really sinister people that we’re dealing with now.  These are people that we’ve previously talked about who are our own kind.  What we have to start thinking of them now as alien beings, as hostile beings to the Irish people.  They are the enemies of the Irish people.  Because clearly, their intent is to the mask is a way of denying the very human face of the person.  It’s a way of taking away the very unique humanity of each person and turning yourself into zombies and restoring us into a kind of animal state.  So that we no longer look at each other coming down the street as Tom or Mick or Mary, my sister, my friend, my brother, but instead as a festering mess of bacteria and viruses which is a danger to my health, Ooh!  Ooh! You know, I have to get out of the way.  This is what they’re turning persons into.  I’m not saying that our people are responsible for thinking this up . . . they don’t have the brains for that or anything.  But this is what they’re implementing.  This is the thinking behind it—to destroy the spirit of the human person, the individuality, the personality, the conscience, the character of the human person.  That is what this project is about.   

Monday, January 24, 2022

"As for me, I've had it with masks. I feel like a fool, and I am not going to play anymore."

The question was, "In general, do you trust [what] Dr. Fauci has said about the coronavirus or not?" The results were 43% no, and 40% yes.

Compare those results to 60% yes and 8% no in April 2020.

From Tom Woods

These days it seems as if everywhere I turn, a new person is saying the whole thing is stupid and I'm not doing it anymore.

This time it's an editorial writer for USA Today.

Headline: "I am done with masks. We've been idiotic about them since the beginning."

He begins with this: "Who knew that little pieces of plastic or cloth worn over the nose and mouth could turn people into complete idiots?"

In response to Dr. Leana Wen's [the Chinese-American, flip-flopping, goalpost-shifting version of Anthony Fauci] recent observation that cloth masks are nothing more than "facial decoration," he responds, "Well, I feel like an idiot for all the times I donned a facial decoration and forced my kids to do the same."

He dismisses the drive for N95 masks as unreasonable and concludes: "As for me, I've had it with masks. I feel like a fool, and I am not going to play anymore."


Then, too, Bari Weiss, formerly of the New York Times opinion section, made waves on Bill Maher's program recently when she declared herself "done with COVID," and swatted down the standard arguments with data.

The only thing missing was: I'm sorry for going along with it all this time and demonizing people who said then what I'm saying now.

The whole "we now have new information" thing from Weiss and others is disingenuous. We knew very early on that the crazies were wrong and that nothing they recommended did any good. A simple "stay home when you're sick" would have been better than their entire mitigation program.

Having said that, I by no means decline Bari Weiss's membership in Team Reality, and I'm happy to see our ranks continue to grow.

Before I reveal the happiest of the three items I have to report to you today, in terms of the evolution of opinion, I want to make sure you know a term.

Surely you know "red pill" and "blue pill," from The Matrix. You and I are red-pilled. We understand the nature of the regime that rules over us. We don't accept the establishment version of events.

The blue-pilled are those who even now still think the public health establishment just has the best interests of Americans at heart and should be trusted to do sensible things.

A white pill, meanwhile, is a source of optimism for us.

And now for a white pill:

A recent NBC News poll--so not exactly biased in our favor--finds more Americans distrust Fauci than trust him.

The question was, "In general, do you trust [what] Dr. Fauci has said about the coronavirus or not?" The results were 43% no, and 40% yes.

Compare those results to 60% yes and 8% no in April 2020.

Meanwhile, Ireland just announced it's dropping most COVID restrictions, and England (not the UK as I mistakenly said the other day) is dropping its mask mandate and vaccine passport system.

Austria keeps putting off its mandatory vaccination program, and there are murmurs in England about pushing the vaccine mandates for NHS workers back six months.

We're almost there.

With next to no high-profile support, and with every major opinion-molding institution against us, we've begun to turn the tide.

What you and I say and do is not in vain.

And speaking of that, here's how I can help amplify your voice:


If you've ever considered starting a website or blog, you know the main problem facing you: nobody visits.

Well, remember my publicity offer: get your hosting through my link and you'll not only get a good price, but I'll also publicize your site to get you that critical burst of initial traffic. Not to mention membership in my mutual-help bloggers' group (this will help you out of many a jam), free tutorials to help you get started, and more. Get the details:  http://www.tomwoods.com/publicity

Find Tom's podcasts here.

Saturday, February 12, 2022

DENTISTS on MASKS: "masks are awful for oral health. I am seeing much more decay and gum disease in my patients."

Wednesday, April 26, 2023

STOP THE PRESS: FAUCI ADMITS HE WAS WRONG ON MASKS

Monday, January 3, 2022

"Even in the hospitals, when you remove masks infection rates go down"

Friday, August 25, 2023

Oh, Come on! You can't compare mask wearing in public to . . . Oh, my God!

Sunday, August 9, 2020

"[These two women] have more cajones than most men in America"

I want to start with this quote first: 
One speaker during Tuesday's board meeting, Nicole Monteilh Brown of Costa Mesa, said, "You have seen how the people have been forced to exercise their First Amendment.  Be wise and do not force the residents of this county into feeling they have no other choice but to exercise their Second Amendment. [see her speak these remarks at the :57 to 1:13 segment in the first video on this page]
Nicole Monteilh Brown [check out her very informative site] invoked the 2nd Amendment and her friend, attorney Leigh Dundas [see her videos below] listed Dr. Quick's home address & her boyfriend's name, and then a bunch of them went directly to her house after the meeting. They have more cajones than most men in America, and these 2 women deserve the real credit for getting the OC mask order repealed. 
Reference to the 2nd Amendment did not go unnoticed.  "The comment concerned county officials as the reference to the Second Amendment right to bear arms was viewed as a threat."  Oh, I see, so the law of the land is viewed as a threat to corrupt officials? Yes, it is.  It's why they and their media Quislings twist the intentions and language of their opponents. It shows how much these county officials loath the Constitution and the law of the land.

At first, I thought that it was the great work by a single woman, Peggy Hall, who was responsible for the Orange County Board of Supervisors' decision to repeal the mask mandate there.  Turns out that it wasn't just the work of a single woman but of many people.  It turns out that it wasn't Hall specifically; in fact, she objects to protestors showing up at the residents of officials' homes.  So the real women who put the fear of God into these OC Board of Supervisors were the two women Nicole Monteilh Brown and attorney, Leigh Dundas.  Be sure to watch Dundas' presentation to the OC Board of Supervisors.  It was superb. 
Bob, regarding your post "This is Why The Mask Mandate Was Repealed in Orange County."  The author writes,
I hate to break it to you but here's what really happened in Orange County. I know that Peggy Hall says a lot of good stuff & that she likes to take credit for the OC mask repeal, but it's not the case. If you watch the following you'll understand. On her Facebook group, Hall recently posted that she DOES NOT CONDONE protesting outside of anyone's house. Yet that is 100% legal and its actually what got the OC order repealed. 
And it looks like the protest outside Orange County Supervisor Nicole Quick's home residence is what got the mandate overturned.  Is this the way that that government forces its citizens to act?  Apparently, so.  So just as politicians use rhetoric to lie and obfuscate, that rhetoric is their bread and butter.  When Americans use rhetoric, the politicos crawl in a hole. 


Pay attention:

Over 100 anti-mask citizens spoke at this very contentious board of supervisors meeting in Orange County, California on May 26. Nicole Monteilh Brown said, "You have seen how the people have been forced to exercise their First Amendment. Be wise, and do not force the residents of this county into feeling they have no other choice but to exercise their Second Amendment."
Brown's friend, attorney 
Leigh Dundas Esq, then READ NICHOLE QUICK'S HOME ADDRESS ON THE RECORD AT THE BOARD MEETING and then a group of them protested outside Quick's house. The OC sheriff then claimed that Quick was scared for her life & they offered her 24/7 protection. Quick resigned the next morning and her replacement, even though he was pro-mask, rescinded the order. So, literally invoking the 2nd Amendment  and listing Quick's home address is exactly why the OC order was revoked. 
After the meeting, many people went to protest at County Health Officer Dr. Nichole Quick's home. She resigned the next day in shame, and her replacement rescinded the face mask order. This is a blueprint.  https://nofacemask.blogspot.com/2020/06/footage-of-anti-maskers-at-oc-board.html
Want to know a little about Attorney, Leigh Dundas?  Check out her May 26, 2020 appeal to the OC Board of Supervisors . . . 


And here she is on the hypoxic dangers of wearing masks. 


Here is her advice on reporting the hypoxic dangers of wearing masks: 
Report it to my boss.
Report it to corporate. 
Report it to the store manager, if you're not an employee there and you don't like the mandate.
Report it to OSHA.
Report it to the media.

And report it to 911 if I were feeling really badly. 
A few more details about this, the Orange County Board of Supervisors even to this day have edited the public footage of that meeting where the attorney listed doctor Quick's home address, yet it was reported in numerous outlets including the L. A. Times. The lawyer also revealed Dr. Quick's boyfriend's name. 😅Hilarious! and furthermore, the claim that that one-minute clip by Peggy Hall where she threatens to sue Chau, (who is now the Orange County medical officer, the one who rescinded order,) Chau and other government bureaucrats are not afraid in the least of being sued by anybody. Many many lawsuits have been dismissed nationwide in the past few months by people who are suing counties over the mask mandates. 
Bureaucrats are never held personally liable anyway, so Chau did not in any way rescind the order because of a threat of a silly lawsuit in which that the judge is going to side with the county anyway. 
Nicole Monteilh Brown invoked the 2nd Amendment and her friend, attorney Leigh Dundas listed Dr. Quick's home address & her boyfriend's name, and then a bunch of them went directly to her house after the meeting. They have more cajones than most men in America, and these 2 women deserve the real credit for getting the OC mask order repealed. 
It's very clear what happened here to anyone who's actually following it. Thank you.  https://nofacemask.blogspot.com/2020/07/wearing-masks-scientific-legal.html
This story just gets too delicious.  The SpectrumNews1 reporter, The City News Service, wrote that 
Some protesters unfurled a banner with a picture of Quick, who is Jewish, with a Hitler mustache and a swastika on it.  Brown called Gov. Gavin Newsom "Adolph Newsom" in her statement to the board. 

You'll want some protection against hypoxia if you wear a mask with any regularity.  It's called Benfotiamine.  It's a B vitamin that carries more oxygen in your blood to the different tissues in your body.  

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

Hoisted by her own petard

Thank you to Robert Barnes and the Justice Centre.

Dr. Hinshaw knowingly withheld evidence from the court regarding her knowledge of the dangers and harms of forced masking on children

CALGARY: The Justice Centre today announces a court application has been filed to compel Dr. Deena Hinshaw to re-attend court for further cross-examination in the constitutional challenge to her lockdown orders. The application alleges that Dr. Hinshaw knowingly withheld evidence from the court regarding her knowledge of the dangers and harms of forced masking on children. The Application is brought jointly by Leighton Grey, Q.C. – on behalf of the Justice Centre for Heights Baptist Church, Northside Baptist Church, Erin Blacklaws, and Tory Tanner – and Jeffrey Rath, counsel for Rebecca Ingram. A court hearing is scheduled for Friday, August 26, 2022, to reopen the case based on new evidence.

The application also requests that the Court require Dr. Hinshaw to produce all of her recommendations to the Kenney government related to her own Covid lockdown orders, as well as to require Dr. Hinshaw to answer all questions which were previously objected to by counsel for the government of Alberta on the basis of Cabinet Confidentiality.

According to the Application, the Alberta government-generated memo states that:

  • There is insufficient direct evidence of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing transmission of Covid in educational settings;

  • That there are harmful effects of mask wearing on children; and

That masks can:

  • Disrupt learning;
  • Interfere with children’s social development;
  • Interfere with children’s emotional development;
  • Interfere with children’s speech development;
  • Impair verbal and non-verbal communication;
  • Impair emotional signalling; and
  • Impair facial recognition.

During her cross-examination in April, Dr. Hinshaw was specifically asked whether she was aware of any evidence of harms to elementary school children from being compelled to wear masks. Dr. Hinshaw answered this question before the court in April in the negative. The Application contends Dr. Hinshaw’s answers to this line of questions were false, and that she failed to disclose her knowledge of the harms to children from forced masking.

The application asserts that it is clear that there were a significant number of studies in Dr. Hinshaw’s possession or control which in fact did show evidence of harm to children from forced masking. Dr. Hinshaw’s health orders required forced public masking, including masking of elementary-aged children in all schools.

Thursday, February 10, 2022

Tell me again the therapeutic value of masks . . .

I do feel empathy for those who complied hard and were terrified by the coronavirus.  Doesn't mean I agree with you.  I think that you've found safety and comfort in a cult built around fear and a persistent leader whose message is repeated too often, namely your BFF, Anthony Fauci.


Who knows?  This might bring enough self awareness, enough of an independent buffer from the madness of crowds that you'll begin to understand the insanity of it all, and value your convictions and excellent survival skills again.







Saturday, March 28, 2020

N95 RESPIRATOR MASKS DO WORK TO DETER AIRBORNE RESPIRATORY VIRUSES

Turns out that masks that cover the mouth and nose actually are effective at deterring airborne respiratory diseases. The mask they recommend? The mask in question is the N95 Respirator Mask.

You'll be hard-pressed to find any N95 Respirator Masks on Amazon, but you can and will find them at eBay.

Saturday, December 26, 2020

Japan, like Sweden, is a crucial control country with no lockdown. Japan got almost no impact.

Ivor Cummins.  Who is he?  

Find him on Twitter at @FatEmperor

Japan and other Asian countries had incredible low death rates.  And they matched New Zealand, but nobody wants to talk about them.  

Tom reviewed some of the headlines in April at the time that the death rates were falling off in Asia, explaining that all of the mainstream media had grim predictions for Japan and absolutely none of them occurred.  

Did we get an apology, a re-think of this?  No, they're onto the next country.  Or if they have to talk about Japan, they'll stumble around and say they wore masks or something.  They don't even know what happened.  

"Japan's Coronavirus Is Too Little, Too Late," William Pesek, WaPo, April 10, 2020.

"Did Japan Miss Its Chance to Keep the Coronavirus In Check?" Dennis Normile, Science Magazine, April 22, 2020.  

Japan, like Sweden, is a crucial control country with no lockdown.  So Japan, in a brief summary, Japan got almost no impact.  Wow!  So if you look at the graphs in Europe for the deaths per million, the big curves, and you plot Japan, you can't see it.  It's that low.  And even the most dedicated mask-o-path, whose pushing the mask, will acknowledge that it will reduce some forms of transmission . . . maybe.  So it's not masks in Japan, because look at the mortality curves.  It's basically huge humps (in Europe) versus nothing (in Japan).  So it's not masks.  

I really liked this quote of his: 

Then there was this on December 7th, 2020.