John Moody is back on the
Tom Woods Podcast, where he talks about the "Wholesome
Meat Act of 1967." Government destroys both the means and the
end.
What follows are my notes from the show, from John Moody and Tom Woods. Enjoy.
3:15 Just last week 2.5 million
pounds of poultry were recalled because of what the FDA called "extraneous contamination," meaning
that when you bite your chicken nuggets [or some other chicken product], you get bits of plastic or rock.
Statistics show that it
has made our food supply less safe.
Why would the food be not
safe? Food system used to work and look, and legislation distorted the
food system and how it works. Cows used to be butchered at 10,000
locations and be fed a lot less grain. Meat in America used to be a
highly diversified and competitive industry. When you see all these
different labels and different products
Now we have it where 80%
of all meat in the US is controlled by 3 to 5 companies. With this
consolidation of control, you have consolidation of processing.
The meat you have in the
hamburger you ordered at a local restaurant comes from the beef of tens of
thousands of cows that have been all ground together, whereas in the old days
we had 10,000 different locations that used to butcher the beef. Today we
have only a few.
If there was one sick cow
or one sick employee or one improperly sanitized step in that process, with all
of these commingled cows, you now get the multi-million-pound food meat
recalls. Only way people could keep up with meat regulations and
additional costs they created was by consolidating to keep
up. And the consolidation made the meat supply less and less
safe. It's astoundingly sad to see an action how badly this legislation
turned out for the American people and the American farmer.
Meat wasn't unsafe before
the wholesome meat act. It was driven by the fictional writing by Upton
Sinclair. He had in his sites labor and not so much the meat
industry. If these foods meat and raw milk were so unsafe, none of
us would have ever gotten here. We're indoctrinated into believing that
before the government got involved in these industries, these industries were
killing people left and right.
If we want a safe meat
industry . . . , no such thing in a no-risk option, it would be a decentralized
meat system, where animals are not being commingled, where you're not putting
3000 chickens an hour through a multi-step chlorine bath from chickens that have
been raised in their own fecal matter.
A few years ago, ConsumerReports did a study where they sampled poultry right off the shelf for its safety. USDA Inspected, FDA Approved. The CR results were
terrifying. 3/4 of the chickens tested positive for pathogenic bacteria
and over half tested positive for strains that are antibiotic resistant.
Woods,
"this helps to account for the increasing interest of getting all
foods from local farms." It is illegal for farmers to choose where they have their animals butchered because of the Wholesome Meat Act, 1967. Some states for instance, one farmer lives right along the state line, he has to take his animals all the way to the
Custom slaughterhouse. He took two cows to be butchered. Took two weeks to pick them up when they're all done--they need to be hung and aged. the packaging said "Not for Sale." Because the meat was butchered at a custom slaughterhouse. It magically becomes unsafe when
Who is the beneficiary in all of this?
The processing cartels and the larger players in the meat industry. 80% of beef in America is controlled by only 4 companies. They enjoy cost advantages and economies of scale over small farmers that would not exist if local farmers were allowed to sell directly to the consumer. He can give the meat away, have friends over to eat that meat at this house, eat himself, but once he tries to sell it it becomes unsafe and he would be a criminal. Enjoy massive subsidization because of the Farm Bill.
Cans of Coca Cola are cheaper than carrots.
The Federal Government recently approved American raised chicken can be killed in America and frozen, then shipped to China, unfrozen there and processed, then refrozen and shipped back to the United States, and allowed to be labeled "Raised in America." You as a consumer will not know it is Chinese processed chicken. The feds will allow the chicken to be labeled "Grown in America" or "Raised in America."
You as a consumer will not know. Cheaper for a chicken to cross the road to China and back than it is for a chicken to come from a local farm.
WHAT COULD THE MOTIVATION BE BEHIND THIS FEDERAL ACT?
To create trouble for small business owners. Temporary inspector was so bad, that a few employees quit in tears. How does this affect the big players? They're having 3,000 chickens an hour going through the process line. How much control is the inspector exerting on the large farms?
Only when undercover whistle blowers have recorded abuses by the Federal food inspectors. If the animal is 30 months or older, that animal must be condemned. This is for animals with the best cuts of meats. Smaller and local farmers don't use grain. It takes longer. Here's a regulation that tilts in favor companies he's competing against. If the inspector decides that the animal is older than 30 months, the small farmer can lose all those good cuts of lucrative meat. Those Chinese chickens receive literally billions of dollars per year in government subsidization before they go to China through the perverse incentives of grain subsidization. See Denis Minger's, Death by Food Pyramid. No section of the economy that has been as tampered with as food and farming. So you have these massive grain subsidies that prop up the feeding of animals who aren't designed to eat grain feeding them grain. Then you have these regulatory frameworks that favor massive consolidation as the only way to comply with these huge costs of these regulatory structures for the butchers. And every step of the way, small farmer can't externalize his cost onto others. As a small farmer, manure is an economic benefit, not an economic liability. CAFO's, Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, have manure lagoons that contaminate ground water, causing the collapse of aquifers all over the country and externalizing all of these environmental costs onto their communities in terms of gobbling up all of the groundwater, contaminating ground water supplies, odor issues, other noxious issues. His friends in Indiana where the farmers can't go outside their homes because the smell of the manure is so bad and the government protects this pollution. Property rights are being denied to them because of big agra businesses. Subsidization to the Agricultural giants. "Beef: it's what's for dinner." Industry trade groups? No. Quasi governmental trade group that the supreme court ruled can force all farmers to contribute to them. They're called "Check-offs." The Supreme Court said these check-off programs can force all farmers in the nation to contribute money to them even if you don't agree with them, even if you don't want to support them. They're basically a government mandated cartel. The Supreme Court treats it as a tax. These programs are shielded from FOIA requests. Because the check-off programs are using the money they're extracting from all farmers to basically lobby against and hurt others who are forced to contribute to them.
WHAT IS THE PRIME ACT? WHAT WOULD THIS DO AND WHAT'S DESIRABLE ABOUT IT?
The Prime Act would be the first rollback to federal meat inspection in history. Called the Prime Act. Would allow individual states to opt out of the requirement for USDA Inspection for by-the-cut meat butchering sales. If he were trying to sell ground beef from a cow he butchered, he would become a criminal. So his meat would have to go to a USDA meat-inspected facility. If that were to pass, it would allow farmers to sell meat from custom slaughterhouses. It's a bill. Not law yet. Done fairly well in the house. Thomas Massie introduced the bill. Found sponsors and co-sponsors in the Senate. It would have traction because people on both sides see this bill as being a win. For Republicans, it's a limited-government bill. On democrat side, it's local government.
His site is a 501C4, Not for Profit. It advocates for a truly free food system to protect consumers and producers and access to food with no government regulation and regulations. Taking away the ability of government to be taken away from corporations. Wants people to have the ability to opt out of the regulated food system. Engage in lobbying, litigation, and education. 1960, 10,000 to 20,000 of butchering options to now less than 3,000. Went from a beef industry with thousands of players and businesses to a beef industry of four. None of this would have ever happened had the government not stacked the deck to eliminate competition to encourage and create consolidation. Woods shows how government inhibits competition.
