When OWS turned over the organizational charts, they shocked everybody because the top organization that had managed OWS was not HHS, which is a public health agency. It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, a spy agency.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. details how the NSA was in charge of Operation Warspeed's COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the history of the United States bioweapons program, and why Anthony Fauci is the highest-paid government official in history:

"The weird thing about the pandemic was this… pic.twitter.com/zEHn5jlPXT

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) May 13, 2023

It was a pretense for clamp down totalitarian control.

The weird thing about the pandemic was this constant involvement by the CIA and the intelligence agencies, and by the military.  When Operation Warspeed made its presentation to FDA, to the committee they call the (VRBPAC) Committee, Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, (VRBPAC) asked for the organizational charts which were classified up to that time.  When OWS turned over the organizational charts, they shocked everybody because the top organization that had managed OWS was not HHS, which is a public health agency.  It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA.  It was the NSA, a spy agency.  That was the top agency, the lead agency on Operation Warp Speed on the pandemic. And the second agency was the Pentagon.  The vaccines weren't developed by Pfizer or Moderna.  They were developed by NIH.  The patents were owned 50% by NIH.  Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna.  They were manufactured by military contractors.  And basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their labels on the vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry.  This was a military project from the beginning.

And then you have 20 different simulations that I uncovered, virus and pandemic simulations, that started in 2001 right before the Anthrax attacks.  And the CIA was sponsoring them all.  The last one was Event 201 in October 2019.  And the participants in there are Avril Haines, the former Deputy Director of the CIA, who's been managing cover-ups her entire life.  She managed Guantánamo Bay, lying on the Senate.  She is now the Director of DNI, Director of National Intelligence, which makes her the highest-ranking officer at the NSA that managed the pandemic.  So you have a spy who is convening these pandemic simulations and each of these simulations going back 20 years, they're not simulating a public health response  They're not doing things like,

"How do we stockpile vitamin D?" 

"How do we get people outdoors, get them to lose weight, get them doing exercise?"  

"How do we develop an information grid with all of the 15 million doctors, frontline physicians, all over the world?" 

Who are going to be encountering their situation so that we can get what they're doing that works, what doesn't work, and put together a model, here are the repurposed drugs that worked, here are the treatments that worked.  None of that happened.  It was an incredible opportunity to manage a pandemic in a way that was intelligent and sensitive and devastating to the disease but we didn't do any of those things.  It was all about how you use the pandemic to clamp down on censorship.  How do you use it to force lockdowns?  

Did you know that Janssen, a J & J division, was from Belgium? Had you known that, would you have taken that, er their, vaccine or any other from a foreign government?

Thank you to Dr. Meryl Nass, dated February 27, 2021.

Yesterday, Feb 26, the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee (VRBPAC), an FDA committee called Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, met to give its assent to the third Covid vaccine candidate applying for an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). And I spent another day listening in. FDA is expected to authorize use of the vaccine today.

This one requires only one dose.  For now.  The company is doing a clinical trial of two doses and they could be recommended in future. The VRBPAC committee comments were lackluster.  The members had little to go on.  There is no adenovirus vaccine in civilian use in the US, just as there were no mRNA vaccines.  The committee members simply don’t know what they have to watch out for.  One admitted it, and asked if FDA would assist and suggest what types of issues the newly licensed Ebola adenovirus vaccine or the military adenovirus vaccine had faced.  FDA responded with stony silence. Clearly this “advisory” meeting was only needed for its rubber stamp.

Most of the sponsor’s (Johnson and Johnson) presenters were from the Janssen division, based in Belgium. Many of the FDA’s presenters were non-native English speakers. The combination of an audio transmission that kept dropping out, and inability to catch many of the words made it a challenge to fully grasp the presentations. Was this intended? 

This here, is it by will or an omission?  Yeah, that's what I thought . . . .  

FDA has refused to inspect the Covid vaccine manufacturing plants before they are “authorized” under EUA.  I suspect FDA administrators were directed not to slow the warp speed down. 

FDA will have to inspect the factories by law before Covid vaccines are fully licensed, but it seems that the game plan is to get the country vaccinated before adequate data become available and licensure can take place. 

Wait, is she saying that the lack of data is precisely the thing that allows the vax manufacturers to have an emergency permission?

Okay, here is the motherload 

While Johnson and Johnson’s Janssen division designed and tested this new adenovirus vectored spike protein vaccine, the vaccine is actually being produced in a factory newly taken out of mothballs, with hundreds of new employees, that has never before produced a vaccine for mass use.  It is owned by Emergent BioSolutions, a company notorious for poisoning soldiers with its anthrax vaccine, which has failed multiple anthrax vaccine inspections.  On Emergent BioSolutions’ board is Kathryn Zoon, a former head of FDA’s Center for Biologics, which regulates vaccines. 

Here is a vague report.  This was interesting.  Turns out that the vaccine that a company will run in a trial may not be the same vaccine that gets made and distributed to the public.  Wow, we all are making way too many assumptions when it comes to how vaccines are made, their testing, distribution, and so forth.  We're all focused on their efficacy only to find ourselves in a 

This factory’s vaccine may not be exactly the same vaccine that about 20,000 subjects in the clinical trial have received. Usually vaccines for clinical trials are made in a pilot plant under stringent conditions. 

So many questions about the vaccines, where it was made, is the company reputable, do they have major lawsuits against previously deadly vaccines, etc.?  So none of these questions are asked let alone addressed.

Does the vaccine work?  The vaccine is said to be 66% effective against moderate to severe disease in the trials, and 100% protective against death. 

Okay, well, according to Fauci, where most of America got its reports on the vaccines, the vaccines started out at 95% effective and went downhill from there.  

In the clinical trials, having a headache and a cough was enough to put subjects in the “moderate to severe” category.  Like the two mRNA vaccines, the vaccine sponsors apparently did not see fit to test whether their vaccines block infection and transmission in humans. This is the fault of the FDA, which sets the standard for the data needed to obtain an EUA.  

Whoever did this deserves an award.
pic.twitter.com/cJFcgpB9Y3

— Rising serpent 🇺🇸 (@rising_serpent) October 17, 2021

You can find the below video here along with a few remarks by Deborah Birx, who admitted that the vaccines were not going to work.  Imagine that.  While Birx is telling the truth in a rare moment, Dr. Fauci doubled down on his "effective" narrative.  Even recently on the Stephen Colbert Show he praised the vaccines again, while giving a thumbs down to Hydroxychloroquine and warning people that Ivermectin was dangerous.  Ha!  

Apparently in the J&J trials, only a subset of participants were evaluated for side effects, "Only a subset of the subjects in the trials were evaluated for side effects.  Why was that?"  See what Dr. Meryl Nass said about the vaccines in general, 

I can’t tell if this vaccine is safe and I doubt anyone else can, either. Nor do I want to be injected with something manufactured by the anthrax vaccine manufacturer, famed for injuring thousands of soldiers twenty years ago, while making 300% profit margins. 

Read Dr. Meryl Nass's background here.  She's amazing.

Meryl Nass, M.D., ABIM, is an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, chronic fatigue syndrome, Gulf War illness, fibromyalgia and toxicology. As a biological warfare epidemiologist, she investigated world's largest anthrax epizootic in Zimbabwe, and developed a model for analyzing epidemics to assess whether they are natural or man-made.  Continue reading . . .