Fauci, Gotlieb and other scientists knew

Fauci, Gotlieb and other scientists knew https://t.co/dv6UCU7TjQ

— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) January 10, 2023

This is a longer version of this interview back in August 2022. 

As of today, Notre Dame will require yet ANOTHER round of the vaccine for students. The pandemic ended, but the COVID Regime remains fully intact and detached from reality.

Sacrilege on display. 

Where are the fighting Irish?  Where are the priests?  Where is the application of Biblical law?  Where is the Catholic doctrine to help protect the bodies and spirits of the students?  

Could you imagine Knute Rockne or the Gipper signing off on this?

Absurd. No other country is doing this.

Students need to stop being puppets. https://t.co/cwpWT5aDfb

— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) November 15, 2022

And we know that the vaccine CANNOT PREVENT TRANSMISSION.  No clinical proof it further reduces severe disease in young, healthy college students. We know the 💉 has RISKS for this age.

:: UPDATE ⚠️ College Bivalent Mandate ::

We know it can’t prevent transmission. No clinical proof it further reduces severe disease in young, healthy college students. We know the 💉 has RISKS for this age.

WHY are these schools STILL coercing students to get this shot? Enough! pic.twitter.com/s6FljOEqCU

— Kristen Mag (@kristenmag) November 14, 2022

"the scientists don’t intend to release swarms of genetically modified mosquitos, either"

Well, that headline is truly odd, ". . . the scientists don't intend to release swarms of genetically modified mosquitos, either."  Odd indeed, given the fact that Bill Gates has already done this, in two states within in the United States, no less, California and Florida.  What could go wrong?

You would think that some retired folks would chase this down, learn the threat of it, find out who runs it, discover the legality of it, so as to bring lawsuits to get this stopped.   

Scientists used mosquitoes to delivering vaccines to humans?? https://t.co/FEaunuJjYM

— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) October 2, 2022

The number one problem with these mosquitos is their size: they're very tiny and almost transparent, and so light you can't really feel them landing on your skin.  And the breeding grounds pf the current crop of mosquitos is no longer pools of stagnant water.  They can breed, and do breed, in dark settings like stacked or piled high clothing, the underside of your dash in your car.  

These attempts to vaccinate via alternative methods, or any vaccine through standard methods, has always posed the risk of poor effectiveness.  All vaccines, bar none.  Even Dr. Judy Mikovits, a scientist who worked quality control on several vaccines, said that all vaccines are contaminated.  Oh, what joy.  Because effectiveness has always, always been a problem, manufacturers have always, always had to run "safe and effective" campaigns ad infinitum to bury vaccine hesitancy, hesitant because the vaccines are ineffective, non-effective, lack effectiveness, don't work, are bad for you, poisonous, they'll down right kill you. 

The biggest problem with using mosquitos to deliver vaccines for malaria, though, is the effectiveness. 

There is nothing reassuring in this article.  It goes in to say that

It’s also important to realize that the scientists don’t intend to release swarms of genetically modified mosquitos, either. 

When you think of scientists, think of Anthony Fauci, who with each interview revised his previous statement while calling the revisions "science."  Science is not a the changing of mind without evidence, meaning showing and citing the evidence so that it can be checked, rechecked, and verified by a group or community of OTHER scientists.  Fauci himself is not SCIENCE.  I'd be hard pressed to even call the man a scientist.  No, he is a government bureaucrat serving the longtail interests of different branches of the pharmaceutical industry.  So when the article states that "scientists don't intend to release swarms of . . . mosquitos," know that that is simple a legal statement up front to protect the lab and company conducting the experiment.  And it doesn't mean that other folks working on the project won't "accidentally release swarms."  Given the ubiquitous presence of bioweapons labs across the world, we are all in peril.  So for this writer to diminish the threat of a swarm being released means that he's running cover for the bioweapons and vaccine manufacturers.  Nor do I think that it is just England where they're running these experiments.  

I wonder: do more people die from malaria or from mosquito bites each year?

It wasn't until the very end of his article that Hawkins finally raises the tiny little issue of consent, but he presents it as an inconvenient barrier to mass vaccination as though vaccination, mass or otherwise, is such a good for society that he prefers vaccination to human beings having rights or, for that matter, much of anything else. 

Instead, they want to use the mosquitos to deliver vaccines in a more controlled fashion.  The researchers told NPR that releasing a massive number of these mosquitos is an intriguing proposition.  But, doing so would raise very deep questions about medical consent and bioethics as they couldn't control who was inoculated and exposed. 

To Hawkins, consent is the not the biggest problem, no.  To Hawkins, effectiveness is the biggest problem. 

Fake Meat Can Cause Inflamed Kidney (Ouch!) Do What Chickens Do . . . Skip It

Rat-feeding study commissioned by Impossible Foods suggested its burger's key ingredient—genetically engineered SLH—caused rats to develop unexplained changes in weight gain + blood that can indicate onset of inflammation or kidney disease.  https://t.co/cpI6PXDgaO

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 25, 2022

Chickens seem to know what's best for their biology.  People can figure this out . . . right?

Chickens give their opinion of fake meat!!

It’s not food. https://t.co/sz83QoqUpC

— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) September 25, 2022

P53 IS THE ESSENTIAL TUMOR SUPPRESSOR

P53 is the guardian of the genome, is that important?? https://t.co/ZNw5CYAbY0

— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) January 27, 2022

The spike protein binds to the P53 and inactivates it?  The spike impairs DNA damage repair.  Translation?  Cancer, perhaps metastatic cancers.  Nature magazine explains that 

p53 is an important tumour-suppressor protein that is altered in most cancers. p53 activates various responses, including cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Each of these appears to contribute to tumour suppression. 

P53 upregulates skin pigmentation.  So vitamin D plays a coordinating role with p53 to suppress tumors.  

This was good.  

The word mutation just doesn’t sound like something good. By definition, a mutation is a permanent change in DNA. Mutations, for the most part, are harmless except when they lead to tumor formation. 

Likely you have heard about BRCA mutations. BRCA genes are tumor suppressor genes. BRCA mutations can increase one’s risk for cancers of the breast and ovaries. However, these mutations are only responsible for about 5-10% of all breast cancers and about 15% of ovarian cancers. But, the little-known p53 mutation affects far more people. About 50% of all cancers have a mutated p53 gene.

What is P53?
The p53 protein is located in the nucleus of cells throughout the body, where it attaches (binds) directly to DNA. (It is actually the TP53 gene that provides instructions for making the tumor protein p53 but for simplicity, I will say p53.) P53 regulates cell division by keeping cells from growing and dividing too fast or in an uncontrolled way.

P53 plays a critical role in determining whether damaged DNA will be repaired or a damaged cell will self-destruct (undergo apoptosis). If the DNA can be repaired, p53 activates other genes to fix the damage. If the DNA cannot be repaired, this protein prevents the cell from dividing and signals it to undergo apoptosis. By stopping cells with mutated or damaged DNA from dividing, p53 helps prevent the development of tumors.

Mutated P53
P53 mutations lead to a version of p53 that cannot regulate cell growth and division effectively. Specifically, the altered protein is unable to trigger apoptosis in cells with mutated or damaged DNA.

DNA can be damaged by agents such as toxic chemicals, radiation such as gamma rays, X-rays — even UV light can interact with compounds in the cell generating free radicals which cause chemical damage to DNA.

Since all cells in our body contain DNA, there are lots of places for mutations such as p53 to occur. When p53 does not operate properly, damaged DNA can replicate, producing mutations and DNA rearrangements that contribute to the development of a highly transformed, metastatic cell. Many cancer cells inactivate p53, allowing the cells to evade death and continue proliferating up to becoming a tumor.

Mutant p53 proteins not only lose their tumor-suppressive activities but often escalate the development of cancerous tumors by providing them with growth and survival mechanisms. Interestingly, mutations in the p53 gene have been shown to occur at different phases of the cancer process, contributing to tumor initiation, promotion, aggressiveness, and metastasis.

 Here is a list of nutritional compounds that protect and rebuild your p53 proteins.  

• Cruciferous vegetables, especially watercress
• IP6
• Resveratrol
• Herbs such as sage, rosemary, ginger, curcumin, and ashwaganda
• EFA’s from omega 3 fatty acids (please use caution with fish oil supplements as they can be toxic). For a plant-based formula, you could take BodyBio Balance Oil.
• Licorice
• Mistletoe
• Vitamin D
• Selenium
• Vitamin C
• Zinc
• Black Seed
• Clinoptilolite (a special form of Zeolite)

Regarding the benefits of Resveratrol, this information was compelling.   On pages 9-10, check this out: 

No single molecule, natural or man-made, has been proven to cure cancer. Most cancer chemotherapy consists of multiple drugs. But then again, there is resveratrol.

It was a breathtaking moment in the history of medicine. It is nearly forgotten now, but momentarily relived for readers here. A researcher had been dispatched across the globe to test and examine over 30,000 natural molecules for their ability to quell cancer. Unexpectedly, one molecule stood out from the rest.

John Pezzuto PhD, the researcher who traveled thousands of miles for the National Cancer Institute to put these natural molecules to the test, said: “Of all the plants we’ve tested for cancer chemo-preventive activity and all the compounds we’ve seen, this one has the greatest promise.”

Resveratrol blocks all three stages of cancer genesis:  initiation, promotion and progression.  No anti-cancer drug comes even close to doing this.  Resveratrol may be as close as biologists will ever come to a singular cure for cancer. Oddly, even though resveratrol has been demonstrated in numerous studies to help overcome cancer drug resistance and to quell cancer itself, it is not even used as a secondary medication in cancer therapy today.

According to Dr. Pezzuto, a recent research study involving resveratrol showed that it switched hundreds of genes at one time. Commenting on that study, Dr. Pezutto likened resveratrol to a “whiff that induces a biologically specific tsunami.” Those are strong words from a usually reserved investigator