DR. NAOMI WOLF: The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce

"The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." (1/12)

DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf… pic.twitter.com/5oHRzHFXmZ

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) October 14, 2024

"The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." (1/12) DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (

@naomirwolf

) describes for Del Bigtree (

@delbigtree

) on a recent episode of The HighWire (

@HighWireTalk

) how the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) cause immense, all-encompassing damage to the human reproductive system—specifically the female reproductive system. In fact, Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction... [i.e.] the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." "All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And [that's why] I say 360-degree damage, it's [because] they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse every membrane in the human body [and] that includes the placenta." Wolf goes on to note that "not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and... creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get nutrients and oxygen." "I've called this Mengele science and I say that advisedly," The Pfizer Papers editor adds. "[There are] charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. Twelve thousand (12,000) women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. Eighty-five-hundred (8,500) are passing tissue. Ten-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. Eighty-five-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, [these are charts] showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale." Partial transcription of clip: "In the documents. But what really jumps out is that you'd expect that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents would be concerned about respiratory reactions because this is ostensibly a respiratory infection, COVID. But there's very little about that. And the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction. Completely centered on that. And the 360-degree ways in which this injection damages the human ability to reproduce. "All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And it's when I say 360-degree damage, it's they knew because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse every membrane in the human body. So that includes the placenta. So not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and making it more creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get nutrients and oxygen. "And so, some of the midwives that we've interviewed and Dr. James Thorp (

@jathorpmfm

), a fetal maternal medicine specialist, who's one of the few who's spoken out, they are independently confirming that there are nettings of calcifications now in vaccinated women's placentas that keep the baby from growing to term. And also they have to deliver babies early, as a result. "A midwife named Ellen Jasmer sent me photographs and independently confirmed by another midwife showing that placentas now vaccinated women are flat and not well provided with blood vessels as opposed to the I mean not to get graphic but a baby needs like a cushy well provided with blood vessels placenta to grow and come to term. And so the placentas are in such terrible shape that, maternal deaths are up 40% because women are hemorrhaging. the placentas are falling apart. Let alone the babies, are suffering as well. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles go into the babies in utero and degrade the membranes around the testes of baby boys in utero if their moms are vaccinated. And that degrades the Sertoli cells, and Leydig cells, which are the factories of masculine development, masculine hormones. So we don't know when those babies turn, you know, become adolescents and grow up into men. Those are the hormones that turn on like deep voices, broad shoulders, facial hair, and the ability to father a child. "So we don't know if those baby boys will even be able to grow up into normal men who can be fertile. Pfizer knew that they were destroying women's menstrual cycles. You remember that's how the price story started. Just people's accounts of women's own bodies. Well, it turns out they didn't want women to know that that was true. There's now a 13–20% drop in live births according to government databases in Western Europe and North America. And, in the Pfizer documents, there's something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report. It's 8 pages long. And it has charts of that Pfizer was keeping. And I've called this Mengele a science and I say that advisedly. Charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. 12,000 women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. 8,500 are passing tissue. 10-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. 85-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, this complete chart showing complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale. And I was mocked and mocked and mocked and deplatformed, but now multiple peer-reviewed studies have come out conceding that, yes, on average women's menses have changed if they've been vaccinated."

"And so you don't have to be a scientist. All you need is eighth-grade biology to know that if women's menstrual cycles are being damaged, their fertility is being damaged. And that's what we're seeing." 

JAMES OSTROWSKI SHOWS YOU HOW TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST OFFICIALS WHO ENFORCED MANDATES

Thank you to Dr. Naomi Wolf at Daily Clout.  

Identify the perpetrators.  Identify the crimes, their crimes, not just so that they can be punished but

Criminal law is one of the areas where citizens can actually get involved in the investigative process and have a little more control over finding out what happened and what to do about it  

advantages of using criminal law versus civil law

How to file a request to investigate.  

The potential risks of filing a request to investigate, are because there are some risks and downsides and we've worked those into our forms to minimize that risk, and we'll get into that very quickly.   

An overview of some of the main criminal statutes.  And an overview of potential remedies in international law.  and then finally a proposal for how citizens can take charge of the whole process in investigating these crimes.  

TABLE OF CRIMES

1.   Threatening of medical personnel and doctors.

2.  Threatening medical professionals with disciplinary action for making reasonable treatment decisions.  That may be coercion under state law.  

3.  Many doctors were threatened for just speaking out, which could be a violation of their 1st Amendment rights.  That's actually a crime. 

4.  The stay-at-home orders and the lockdowns that caused enormous suffering around the planet may be a crime under international law and U.S. federal law.

5.  Applying treatments that are likely to cause death or serious injuries, such as Remdesivir, over-use of ventilators, and vaccines themselves, could be, if the facts showed it, a criminally negligent homicide.  Deliberately withholding treatments may also be a criminally negligent homicide.

6.  Mask mandates--endangering the welfare of children.

7.  Vaccine mandates, again, with respect to children

Bill Gates is not about public health. He has "investments . . . in tobacco companies, processed foods, in Coca Cola, in Cargill and Monsanto, Phillip Morris, Kraft"

More about the arch-villain. Shocking stuff. https://t.co/82syavPgkg

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) December 12, 2022

Bill Gates is not a guy who cares about public health.  His other investments are in tobacco companies, processed foods, in Coca Cola, in Cargill and Monsanto, Phillip Morris, Kraft cheese, and all the oil companies in which he owns stakes in virtually all of them.  So he's not a guy who cares about climate or who cares about public health.  He's a guy who cares about control.  You saw him everyday as Dr. Gates as a public health as a public health expert.  What was his message?  "You got to shut down, you got to lock down, you got to wear a mask, and it will never end until you take your vaccine which I am making for you."

“The CDC Director was working with the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Liberation Army…the whole time…” says the questionable, Dr. Naomi Wolf

Alex (Sasha) Krainer's warning,  

This woman is perpetually misdirecting. Caveat emptor! https://t.co/MJ5FFt9jzM

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) November 26, 2022

Please heed Krainer's warning.  She is not a serious researcher or historian or the Joan of Arc of the third wave of feminism.  But I have to say that I got caught up in this presentation of hers about China's involvement in the production of LNPs for the vaccines.  And because she offers no docuementation, no reference to any journals or authors, it leaves me mainly with questions.  

Alex added that 

Run up to 2020 elections, produced alarmist videos about the threat of totalitarianism in the US - identifying Trump and MAGA republicans as source of that threat.

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) November 26, 2022

So I checked further, and Wikipedia delivered.  On the accuracy of facts and details in her 1991 book, The Beauty Myth, Wikipedia states that 

Christina Hoff Sommers [who does good work as an anti-feminist but has gone off the rails at times] criticized Wolf for publishing the estimate that 150,000 women were dying every year from anorexia. Sommers said she traced the source to the American Anorexia and Bulimia Association, who stated that they were misquoted; the figure refers to sufferers, not fatalities. Wolf's citation came from a book by Brumberg, who referred to an American Anorexia and Bulimia Association newsletter and misquoted the newsletter. Wolf accepted the error and changed it in future editions. Sommers gave an estimate for the number of fatalities in 1990 as 100–400.^[39][40] The annual anorexia casualties in the US were estimated to be around 50 to 60 per year in the mid-1990s.^[41] In 1995, for an article in The Independent on Sunday, British journalist Joan Smith recalled asking Wolf to explain her unsourced assertion in The Beauty Myth that the UK "has 3.5 million anorexics or bulimics (95 per cent of them female), with 6,000 new cases yearly". Wolf replied, according to Smith, that she had calculated the statistics from patients with eating disorders at one clinic.^[32]

Caspar Schoemaker of the Netherlands Trimbos Institute published a paper in the academic journal Eating Disorders demonstrating that of the 23 statistics cited by Wolf in Beauty Myth, 18 were incorrect, with Wolf citing numbers that average out to 8 times the number in the source she was citing.^[42]

This is not the work of a serious journalist or researchers.  But it doesn't end there.  While the accuracy of her book and arguments were found questionable, the reception of her book as an argument to advance women's strength failed too. Wikipedia again,

However, Camille Paglia, whose Sexual Personae was published in the same year as The Beauty Myth, derided Wolf as unable to perform "historical analysis", and called her education "completely removed from reality."^[45] Her comments touched off a series of debates between Wolf and Paglia in the pages of The New Republic.^[46][47][48]  

Caryn James in The New York Times stated:

"No other work has so forcefully confronted the anti-feminism that emerged during the conservative, yuppified 1980's, or so honestly depicted the confusion of accomplished women who feel emotionally and physically tortured by the need to look like movie stars. Even by the standards of pop-cultural feminist studies, The Beauty Myth is a mess, but that doesn't mean it's wrong."^[49]

James also wrote that the book's "claims of an intensified anti-feminism are plausible, but Ms. Wolf doesn't begin to prove them because her logic is so lame, her evidence so easily knocked down."^[49] Marilyn Yalom in The Washington Post called the book "persuasive" and praised its "accumulated evidence".^[50]

Revisiting Beauty Myth in 2019 for The New Republic, literary critic Maris Kreizman recalls that reading it as an undergraduate made her "world burst open". However, as she matured, Kreizman saw Wolf's books as "poorly argued tracts" with Wolf making "wilder and wilder assertions" over time. Kreizman "began to write (Wolf) off as a fringe character" despite the fact that she had "once informed my own feminism so deeply."^[11]

So by her very work, she discredits herself.  Which begs the question: is Naomi Wolf a serious researcher and can her work be credible?  What I have not liked about her presentations is that she is all over the map, offers little to no documentation, reference to journals or articles, but leaves it up to the viewer to do the research to confirm what she's saying.  Not good.  But I liked what she said here on Bannon's War Room, but it only left me with questions.

Well guess what? It's China and not only is China a company called WuXi pharmaceuticals in Shanghai producing the Wuxi Biologics (thank you) producing the lipid nanoparticles, but Karen Kingston pointed out that the CDC had their trials for the vaccines. Nine of the trial locations and trial oversights in 2020 were in China and one of them was believe it or not overseen by the People's Liberation Army of China.

I'm going to say that again, our CDC, our Rachel Walensky, when they were running the trials for this mRNA injection that everyone was forced to get mandated to get, nine of the sites, nine of the oversight of what was happening, were in China.  One was overseen by the military of China.  I'm going to remind you that I keep saying this is a bioweapon.

This is a bioweapon.  I'm going to move on.  WuXi Biologics of Shanghai doesn't just manufacture the lipid nanoparticles that are in all of these mRNA injections, they actually bought a chunk of Pfizer.  They bought a Pfizer production plant in China, so they bought a part of the company of Pfizer.  Remember I reported that there was a memorandum of understanding.

Well, they are actually now a Chinese company meaning a CCP managed company as everything is in China owns a chunk of Pfizer.  Not only that, in this past month, September of 2022 our FDA, that complicit FDA that signed off on all of the atrocities and mass murders and disabilities and horrors and poisoning of women and babies in the Pfizer documents, our FDA and European Medicines Association which is their FDA signed off on an agreement, they okayed WuXi to produce drugs and injections for Europe and America.  And then WuXi opened plants in Germany, Switzerland and now in Worcester, Mass (Massachusetts) to manufacture Pfizer injections and other drugs.  That’s the third plant owned by China. 

But the Chinese never approved the Biontech or Moderna mRNA LNP for their own peope. Have a look at this thread. https://t.co/zvQ1Dp9qzY

— RefugeOfSinners (ROS) (@RefugeOfSinner5) November 25, 2022