Showing posts with label Anna De Buisseret. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anna De Buisseret. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

ANNA DE BUISSERET: Article 4 of the International Covenant on civil and political rights specifically says that you can't set aside these rights even in a global Health threatening the life of the nation

00:00, ANNA DE BUISSERET. And there is confusion there because a lot of people seem to think that Collective rights outweigh individual rights and that's not the case certainly in this jurisdiction the individual rights are just as important as collective rights and it's always a balance of Rights and that's one thing . . . I want to mention actually while I think about it, a lot of people seem to misunderstand the fact that you can't set aside human rights in a global pandemic.  A lot of people are saying, "Well, you know they're allowed to do all of this because there was a global pandemic . . . ."  No.  I think it's Article 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights specifically says that you can't set aside these rights even in a global Health threatening the life of the nation; they're non-derogable.  [Article IV does not sound it is going to protect individual rights at all.]

00:45, DR. AHMAD MALIK. But that's the whole point of these laws and rules that actually in times of crises there's things there to protect the public I mean it doesn't make sense that oh when it's great you know that's when we apply it well no that's you don't actually need it then when you really need it is in time of War crisis to protect yourself from an overreaching government

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Friday, November 12, 2021

". . . we don't have the long-term safety data. What we do have is data already from around the world, confirming that thousands and thousands of people have died"

The speaker here is UK lawyer and military veteran, Anna De Buisseret. 

"Even in times of war, she explains, “you don’t get to experiment on Prisoners Of War.” And that is what our governments are currently doing by imposing experimental jabs and myriad “COVID measures” on domestic populations."

First, insist your employer gives you an individual risk assessment under the health and safety framework.  It's regulation III from Health and Safety Framework,1999.  Then onto that, it's a legal, statutory duty for the employer to the employee and individual risk assessment.  Now that has to be conducted with the Occupational Health Physician.  So not a line manager, it has to be a properly-qualified, occupational health physician.  And that occupational health physician has to see the individual privately and for that time they become their patient, which means they have a duty to take them through their whole medical history, including pre-existing conditions, and do a proper risk-benefit analysis for all the harms and risks for that person as an individual, because it's the individual's body that is going to be potentially harmed.  So the idea that there can be a blanket policy, to say "It's safe and effective," is nonsense.  We're all different.  It's not going to be safe and effective for some people.  It's going to kill them.  On the evidence, it has done.  So you know, the employer has no right to harm their employees.  So the idea that they can mandate and experimental, novel genetic-engineering in the case of Pfizer and Moderna, or a novel viral vector in the case of AstraZeneca [and J & J] is ridiculous because we don't have the long-term safety data.  What we do have is data already from around the world, confirming that thousands and thousands of people have died and millions have now been suffering serious adverse events, including long life-term disabilities.  Now, what employer has the right to play Russian roulette with their employees on this basis?  So as an individual, don't allow someone to threaten your right to life, your right not to be medically treated . . . .   

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)