Showing posts with label 1985. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1985. Show all posts

Sunday, November 10, 2024

DR. ROBERT MENDELSOHN, 1985: MS in later life connected to the early introduction of live virus vaccines, like measles and others

We were so much smarter then.  Or at least asked questions before letting Reagan's 1986 liability shield for vaccines take over the country and the world.  Guests are Pediatrician, Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, 1926-1988, Tony Morris, Ms. Wilma F. Gundy, Marge Grant, and the annoying, pro-vaccine doctor for whom I cannot find a name.  Thank you to Sasha Latypova for the video.

00:12.  He does make a point that we should also, Sabine is a live vaccine, and Salk's is, uh,  . . . inactive, as we say in the laboratory.  How many was it, they asked?

00:23ROBERT MENDELSOHN,  Well, how many people know that the European epidemic of polio, there were about 20 or 30 cases in this country.  Now, of course, the American doctors will argue that the reason why polio disappeared in this country was because of the vaccine.  But then why did it disappear in Europe in the 1940s and the 1950s without mass vaccination?  Why doesn't it occur in the third world where only 10% of the people have ever been immunized against polio or anything else? 

00:49.  DONAHUE, so in other words, we may be fighting a tiger that died.

00:52  That's quite correct.

00:54.  Ask the people in Great Britain.  Ask the people in Japan, who . . . 

01:00.  Gentlemen, if you, please. I've got probably the smartest audience we've ever had.

01:06. I have a question.  How long of a delayed action, if any, would you connect this with, like, MS?

01:14.  Is MS a possibility?  Would multiple sclerosis be one of the possible results?

01:19.  As a matter of fact, there's a new publication that just came out from John Hoffman, a close associate of Tony Morris's, 1919-2014, that gives references linking MS in later life to the early introduction of live virus vaccines, like measles and like some of the others, they were live viruses.  Now, at the present time, I would recommend that anybody who has MS or any amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS, or any of those degenerative neurological conditions of later life, carefully review their vaccine histories.  

01:54.  I would also like to comment on that because in connection with my case, I have been doing some research . . . 

02:00.  Let me tell them once again, Ms. [Wilma F.] Gundy, that you are a Guillain-Barre victim contracted following your receipt of the swine flu vaccination.  BTW, Ms. Gundy's doctor lied to her

Plaintiff, Wilma F. Gundy, received a swine flu vaccination by injection on November 26, 1976 during the implementation of the swine flu vaccination program. On December 5, 1976, plaintiff experienced sudden and acute exhaustion. Three days later other symptoms developed such as fever, aches and coughing. By December 18, 1976, these symptoms had subsided only to be replaced by a numbness of the face, legs and arms.

Upon referral by her personal physician, Stanley Sontag, M.D., plaintiff was examined on January 3, 1977, by Eric Hammerberg, M.D., a neurologist, who determined that plaintiff may have been experiencing some depression but was otherwise normal. On January 16, 1977, plaintiff admitted herself to a hospital for extensive testing. Plaintiff's treating physician, Dr. Sontag, stated in the hospital discharge summary that all of the tests results were within normal limits and plaintiff appeared healthy at all times. Dr. Sontag's diagnosis at this time favored depression as the source of plaintiff's complaints.

02:08.  Yeah, and I am in the process of writing a book about my experience, and in the process I've done considerable research, and from what I have learned it looks as if immunizations frequently cause autoimmune disease.  


Monday, January 24, 2022

WEALTH & WELLNESS INDEX: Only 9% of Americans Earn Over Six Figures

From Martin Armstrong:

Previous studies have indicated that Americans’ quality of life plateaus at an annual salary of $75,000, but that myth has been dispelled. A research article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America entitled, "Experienced well-being rises with income, even above $75,000 per year" examines 1,725,994 experience-sampling reports from 33,391 employed US adults. The study believes prior reports failed to accurately measure “well-being” and the actual emotional implications of income.

Numerous reports begin by analyzing the Satisfaction With Life Scale developed in 1985:

In most ways, my life is close to my ideal.

The conditions of my life are excellent.

I am satisfied with my life.

So far I have gotten the important things I want in life.

If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing.

The noted study incorporated these questions as well as others such as, “To what extent do you feel in control of your current situation?” The test also asked participants for their input on optimism for the future. The study found that the well-being plateau of $75,000 was no longer accurate. “There was also no evidence of an income threshold at which experienced and evaluative well-being diverged, suggesting that higher incomes are associated with both feeling better day-to-day and being more satisfied with life overall,” the abstract stated. “This suggests that higher incomes may still have potential to improve people’s day-to-day well-being, rather than having already reached a plateau for many people in wealthy countries.”

With inflation running at a nearly 40-year high and the prices of the most basic necessities such as food and shelter at unsustainable levels, people seeing money as a safety net is understandable. Personal Capital’s 2022 Wealth & Wellness Index found that Americans need an income of $122,000 to feel “financially healthy.” Only 9% of Americans and 31% of households earn over six figures, so this annual income is not feasible for the majority of the population. Only 67% of participants said they have enough money to pay bills in full and on time. Around 57% say they have some form of retirement savings that could manage an unforeseen expense of $500 without worry, and that figure only rises to 63% when asked if they could afford a $100 unforeseen expense. Despite previous notions, there is in fact a correlation between wealth and wellness.