Sunday, June 22, 2025

Iran is one of two or three countries left in the world without a Rothschild, central banking cartel in its country.

AMERICAN AF: Mexican citizens in multiple cities have blocked roads, destroyed migrant shelters and physically confronted Central and South American immigrants passing through their country….

00:00  Thank you so much to everybody who's giving me such a warm welcome here.  I'm privileged and grateful to be here to join this great conference.  So far we've had so many great ideas, and I want to thank you for including me in this as our topic today is about inclusion.  As you've just heard, I'm the author of a couple of books which I brought to show.  The first is Economic Freedom and Social Justice: The Classical Idea of Equality in context of racial diversity so I'm actually going to be talking about the classical ideal Bobby quality but I'm going to be explaining how that has been corrupted as it were by the Socialists who are in charge of implementing equality I also have another book which extends those ideas to the debates about historical Injustice it's called redressing historical injustices because you often hear people saying what about my historical grievances so that's what I address in this book together with my Mises colleague, David Gordon. 

01:17.  So we heard earlier about the long walk through the institutions, the long march through the institutions of the Marxist scholars, and what I want to talk about this morning is about how that long march has walked through the legal institutions by small steps, twisting and turning the legal concepts so the concepts are the same.  So if you look at the legal framework, you think, "Oh this is nice.  This is equality. This is fairness."  But the meaning of those concepts has been changed by this long march through the system, and some of you may be aware that critical race theory, critical theories, critical social justice, started in the law schools as critical legal theory so by now we have judges on the bench who are schooled in critical legal theory.  So when you say to them "equality," you may think that you're only talking about equal opportunities or fairness.  But what the judge is hearing is DEI.  So that's really the message that I want to put forward today, and I'm going to draw upon Murray Rothbard to suggest that we must reject egalitarianism altogether.  There is no such thing as the good form of egalitarianism and the wicked form of egalitarianism.  Egalitarianism is to be rejected altogether from the legal system, and again this links to what we've heard from some papers earlier. This is not about private morality.  You may think to yourself that you want to be an egalitarian because this is your preferred worldview. That's not what we're talking about here today.  We are talking about the policy framework, the legal framework, which is enforced by coercion and that is the system we are saying ought to reject egalitarianism altogether.  As many of you will know, Murray Rothbard's view of Liberty was different from Hayek's view of Liberty so Hayek conceptualized Liberty as an absence of coercion so what Hayek would say is you can have your ideals if you want to but you don't coerce people into following your moral ideas and Murray Rothbard conceptualized this as a defense of private property self ownership and private property you infringe upon people's rights of self ownership when you try and force them to promote whatever egalitarian ideals you may think are good ideals.  So that's essentially the message of my paper today.  In the preface to his book, Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, 1951, Ludwig von Mises warns us of the threat posed by socialism to individual freedom.  In particular, he says, "We must be concerned with the desperate struggle of lovers of freedom, prosperity, and civilization against the rising tide of totalitarianism.  So we are the lovers of freedom prosperity and civilization, and our concern is to see the threat posed by the rising tide of totalitarian barbarism."  And here's the thing about barbarians.  If they marched saying, "I am a barbarian and I'm here to take over all of your institutions," we would not have a problem.  Everybody would say no.  The problem we have is that they march under the banner of social justice.  Some people were asking earlier why is Marxism so successful it's successful because it marches under the banner of ideals that people love. When you say social justice, ordinary people they're not Marxist or socialists, but they want to promote Justice.  They think this is nice.  This is why they are beguiled by this idea and this is something that Frederick Hayek was trying to argue against in his book, Law, Legislation, and Liberty, 1973.  In his second volume where he talks about the Mirage of Social Justice, 1976.  He says social justice is an empty slogan. When people say social justice, you assume that you know what they mean.  You assume that they're just talking about good things that we should do to be fair, be inclusive, be diverse, but it's an empty slogan.  And Hayek says that it is used as a pretext to justify socialist policies.  They call it social justice but it's really socialism, and Hayek says that the reason they do this is so that they don't have to justify what they're proposing.  And so they don't have to give reasons because when you say this is for justice, this is for social justice, people don't ask you, why, why should we have social justice?  It's a self-evidently good ideal, and Hayek says this is the reason why they call it social justice. But the idea of social justice is still viewed as morally compelling to most people.  They think it means moral fairness.  Everybody wants to be fair.  I've never heard anybody saying I'm against fairness.  So this is the problem and one message that I have tried to put forward is that fairness is not synonymous with equality.  So in the book that I was just showing you, I'm talking about the English common law framework and the English common law framework is based on Notions of reasonableness.  So many legal concepts are based on a test of reasonableness.  To give an example of the duty of care, have you shown the care that we would expect you to show in the circumstances? The test would be "What would the reasonable person do in the circumstances?"  So that's a test of reasonableness, and we may think of that as a test of fairness, treat everybody fairly.  This is not the same thing as equality. Equality in the legal system is based on comparison. You're not asking if people have been fair, you are comparing different groups and asking if the two groups have been treated the same. So, if you treat your employees equally badly, you haven't violated the law because you haven't discriminated.  To give you an example, when the Equal Pay claims were brought in England, as some of you have been following the news about how equal pay bankrupted the city of Birmingham, but before that there was a great equal pay claim in the BBC where the women broadcasters asked, "Why are we paid less than the male broadcasters?" And the BBC said, "Well, it's because the male broadcasters bring in a bigger audience.  That's why we pay them more," and the women said that's not allowed as an excuse under the Equal Pay legislation.  So they sued the BBC for violation of the equal pay rules.  And how did the BBC resolve this?  By cutting the pay of their male broadcasters.

NEW YORK CITY: 300 new babies born to migrant moms. Illegals flooded into America for free “cancer treatments." Hospitals overwhelmed by migrants needs.

Just ask Peter Weelmaa.

This should make you furious New York City “300 new babies born to migrant moms” Illegals flooded into America for free “cancer treatments” I have literally watched video after video of Americans not being able to afford their cancer treatments and new baby delivery costs “Hospitals overwhelmed by migrants needs” It really does blow my mind that illegals are having their cancer treatments, their ASTRONOMICAL cancer treatments paid for be us but actual Americans can’t afford it

We have a problem where Americans can’t have babies because no one can afford them yet illegals are breeding like rabbits for free and we’re paying for it.

TRANSCRIPT

Across public hospitals in New York City, nearly 30,000 visits by migrants and 300 new babies born to migrant moms.  

We met Orlando who fled violence in Venezuela.  He didn't want to appear on camera, telling us he slept on the street before coming to Bellevue for cancer treatment.  Orlando tells us he came to New York because he heard about the social services the city would offer to migrants like himself.  

So States across the country are forced to make a choice: continue providing Healthcare for undocumented migrants or cut off those programs to save on rising costs.

The Newsome Admin projected Medical funding for undocumented Californians would cost $6 billion dollars.  New projections say it could cost $9.5 billion dollars.  Newsome now wants to freeze new enrollments in Medical for undocumented adults.  Existing patients can say even they can see benefits cut.  A new poll says 58% of Californians oppose providing coverage to undocumented immigrants, which is a big change from years prior when a majority of people supported the idea.  Republicans say there is just not enough money in the state budget.

We simply cannot afford it, and it's certainly not just to put the health coverage of poor California's, elderly, disabled, young children at risk because California politicians want to give free handouts to people who are not even citizens.

Here in Illinois, Governor J.B. Pritzker is taking it even further, ending the Immigrant Adult Health Program entirely on July 1st.  It launched in 2021 and currently covers over 30,000 people.

Minnesota is also pulling back, taking undocumented adults off of Minnesota Care by the end of the year.  Pundits say it's not the governor's values that have changed, but cash flow.  

All three states are facing budget shortfalls, and there's new pressure from Washington, including a federal bill that would cut funding to States covering undocumented immigrants.  The cutbacks have sparked outrage from immigrant rights groups.  They say that it's a step backwards for Public Health and for states that claim to be inclusive.  More States could follow because we know that enrollment rules are being reviewed in states such as Colorado, Washington, and New York.

In Chicago, Mills Hays. 

lls Hays.

END OF TRANSCRIPT

Americans prefer to cover illegals who have no stake in the country other than it is an economic zone for them, and a place to escape to from violence that they're caught up in. Democrats are just fine with this.

PAT BUCHANAN: “Wherever the west builds and creates and improves, the third world demands a piece. They arrive in vast caravans that stretch for miles. They arrive in boats on beaches in the night. They slip across borders and enter illegally like invaders because they see the west as . . .

SUSAN KOKINDA: Trump is systematically dismantling the post-war British imperial system, and he's doing it while delivering the largest blue-collar wage increases in 60 years

Trump is systematically dismantling the post-war British imperial system, and he's doing it while delivering the largest blue-collar wage increases in 60 years.  The empire's puppets can see their game is up.  I'm Susan Kokinda, and I've been fighting 

Saturday, June 21, 2025

President Donald J. Trump Delivers Address to the Nation, June 21, 2025

Ritter might be onto something.
June 17, 2011. The Center for Security Policy honored John Lehman, former Secretary of the Navy during the Reagan administration, at its annual Freedom Flame award dinner in New York City. Dr. Lehman was a central architect of the 600-ship Navy, one of the central parts of the Reagan 'Peace Through Strength' strategy.

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., Executive Chairman of the Center for Security Policy, introduces Admiral James "Ace" Lyons.

He's known John Lehman for many years.  He's had more influence on the United States Navy than anybody since Teddy Roosevelt and the Great White Fleet.  John learned early on about the Navy from his dad who was Captain of an LCS as a lieutenant Junior grade and fought in the early battles for Okinawa in his early college and graduate days is inquisitive mind was put to full use while he was at Cambridge.  He spent many hours at at the Tickell Arms over a pint discussing the issues of the day.  It was there that he learned to hone his debating skills.  Sometimes he was asked, "Why didn't you go to Oxford?"  And he would reply, "I was rejected when they found out my mother and father were married."  It was at graduate school at the University of Pennsylvania where John met one of his mentors Dr Robert Strauss Houpee?, and it was through that relationship that brought John to Washington and where he joined the Nixon Administration and worked directly for Henry Kissinger and Richard Allen.  It was under the master Henry Kissinger that he learned to consolidate power, which he would put to good use later on.  John was the Congressional liaison appointment for the administration.  This let him establish close working relationships with the defense Titans on Capitol Hill

KARMA?

 

1983 Beirut Barracks Bombing


Admiral James "Ace" Lyons, 1927-2018, 'Hillary & Obama abet Muslim Brotherhood' at AFA's, American Family Association, "Islam & the West"  

RAYMOND IBRAHIM: [Trump] also called the treatment of Christians in the region “beyond disgraceful,” saying Christianity was being “treated horribly and very unfairly — it’s criminal.”

On June 1, President Donald Trump issued a statement to commemorate Global Coptic Day. Among other things, he said:

“Today, I join the Coptic Orthodox Christian community in observing Global Coptic Day… Tracing its roots to Saint Mark, the apostle of Jesus Christ and the evangelist who brought the Christian faith to Egypt in the first century, the Coptic Church has been a beacon of Christendom in Africa for nearly 2,000 years. The Coptic community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of millions of Christians — most evidently seen in their timeless contributions to Christian theology and culture. This Global Coptic Day, we also pause to reflect upon the vicious and ongoing persecution of Coptic Orthodox Christians in Africa and across the Middle East. In 2015, 21 Coptic construction workers were brutally executed by ISIS terrorists in Libya. Like persecuted Christians all around the world, these heroic martyrs refused to renounce their faith. They exemplified sacrificial love and steadfast devotion to God, even in the face of certain death. The Copts’ persistence amid relentless persecution is a living testament to their unbreakable resolve and fearless dedication to spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

Trump’s statement is obviously powerful, but it’s more than that — it is rare. Unlike his predecessors, Trump has consistently acknowledged the brutal and ongoing persecution of Christians in the Muslim world, especially in Egypt, where Copts have long endured systemic violence, discrimination, and neglect.

And that persecution continues till this day. One week after Trump’s statement, the Virgin Mary Church in Luxor, Egypt, became the latest to go up in flames. So-called “accidental” church fires have become disturbingly commonplace in Egypt, with authorities reflexively ruling out arson often before an investigation even begins.  

. . . 

Nor is this a new position for Trump. During his first term, he addressed the issue bluntly. In 2020, he remarked on the “ongoing challenges facing the largest Christian group [Copts] in the Middle East,” emphasizing the need to “acknowledge the importance of religious freedom” and to “reaffirm our commitment to promoting and defending this core tenet of a free society.”

That year, he also called the treatment of Christians in the region “beyond disgraceful,” saying Christianity was being “treated horribly and very unfairly — it’s criminal.”

Perhaps most memorably, following the 2017 massacre of 28 Copts — including 10 children — by Islamic gunmen in Egypt, Trump stated:

“This merciless slaughter of Christians in Egypt tears at our hearts and grieves our souls… America makes clear to its friends, allies, and partners that the treasured and historic Christian communities of the Middle East must be defended and protected. The bloodletting of Christians must end, and all who aid their killers must be punished.”

More from Raymond Ibrahim.

PAT BUCHANAN: Every true nation is the creation of a unique people, separate from all others. Indeed, if America is an ideological nation grounded no deeper than in the sandy soil of abstract ideas, she will not survive

State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, Pat Buchanan, 2006. 

from Amazon

In this important book, Pat Buchanan reveals that, slowly but surely, the great American Southwest is being reconquered by Mexico. These lands---which many Mexicans believe are their birthright---are being detached ethnically, linguistically, and culturally from the United States by a deliberate policy of the Mexican regime. This is the "Aztlan Plot" for "La Reconquista," the recapture of the lands lost by Mexico in the Texas War of Independence and Mexican-American War.

Comparing the immigrant invasion of America from across the Mexican border---and of Europe from across the Mediterranean---to the barbarian invasions that ended the Roman Empire, the author writes with passion and conviction that we have begun the final chapter of the Death of the West. Unless the invasion is halted now, Buchanan argues, by midcentury America will be a country unrecognizable to our parents, the Third World dystopia that Theodore Roosevelt warned against when he said we must never let America become a "polyglot boardinghouse" for the world. 

DRIES VAN LANGENHOVE: [I'll be able to look them] in the eye and tell them that I did everything within my power to make sure that this chain of generations is not stopping with my generation. That the lands of our ancestors remained the lands of our descendants. This is the most important fight

That the lands of our ancestors remained the lands of our descendants.  --Dries Van Langenhove

Dries Van Langenhove. And I am a nationalist activist I also used to be the youngest member of Belgian Parliament.

ROGAN.  Did you see about that Flemish guy who is a part of the government who just got sentenced to one year in jail for sharing racist means in a private chat.

There's been many different legal cases against me now.  As I said, they have been trying to find something to use against me for years, and now they found these memes, memes that I didn't even post myself.  The police they broke into my home, into my bedroom, they stole everything that I own, years worth of all of my life.  They leaked everything deliberately to the leftist media who were very hostile to me.  This judicial terror has been going on for 7 years now.  It's cost me all of my time, my energy, I haven't been able to spend much time with my children.  And now of course, I have also had to spend E230,000 already; it's going up even more.  Don't feel sorry for me, don't hate me, and don't misunderstand me.  I may be in prison in two weeks but still I'm very happy at the thought that when I am older, I will be able to look my children and my grandchildren in the eye and tell them that I did everything within my power to make sure that this chain of generations is not stopping with my generation.  That the lands of our ancestors remained the lands of our descendants.  This is the most important fight, saving Western Civilization, of saving European culture, of saving our people.  There is nothing more important than that.  And if you can say at the end of your life that you did everything to help in this struggle, then I think you will have lived a good and meaningful life. 

Friday, June 20, 2025

PAUL SALADINO, MD.: Favorite Protein Bar: Parmigiano Reggiano Cheese

DOUG CASEY: Gold went away in 1933, silver in 1964, copper in 1982. Soon, all coins will be gone, then the paper currency.

Thursday, June 19, 2025

MARY TALLEY BOWDEN: This decision sets a dangerous precedent, that a doctor can put a DNR on your chart without your permission or knowledge.

DR. RHONDA PATRICK: Coffee’s health impact depends on how you brew it.

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

DR. MARY TALLEY BOWDEN: I am self-conscious in public. I go to the grocery store. I don't make eye contact with people. I worry. When I go to a social situation, I worry who's going to be there, if anybody's going to say anything bad to me.

Thanks to Eric Starkman for the video.  I liked Starkman's indictment of Neil Young and Joni Mitchell, 

Rogan—who became a lightning rod during the pandemic for saying he recovered from COVID using a protocol that included ivermectin—was relentlessly attacked by the corporate media. Spotify faced boycotts from Neil Young and Joni Mitchell, Canadian-born musicians who, true to their birthplace roots, preferred to support government orthodoxy and deference than advocate for artistic freedom. 

And then this, where two former presidents called Spotify directly "urging them" to remove his podcast.  Wow.

During his conversation with Bowden, Rogan dropped a bombshell: he said two former U.S. presidents personally called Spotify urging them to remove his podcast. While he didn’t name names, only a few former presidents were alive at the time—Trump, Bush, Clinton, Obama, and the ailing Jimmy Carter. One doesn’t need a Ph.D. in political science to guess who likely made those calls. Rogan added that censorship efforts backfired, netting him two million new subscribers.

2:46  I have gone above and beyond when their primary care doctors are telling them "there's nothing you can do."  I have put my own life in danger and all that I've tried to do is help people, and for this, Houston Methodist goes to the sewer of social media and just viciously attacks me, smears my name, not sure my life will ever be the same.  I am self-conscious in public.  I go to the grocery store.  I don't make eye contact with people.  I worry.  When I go to a social situation, I worry who's going to be there, if anybody's going to say anything bad to me.  I've been called "a quack," "crazy," a slew of other epitaphs not suitable for television.  I worry about the safety of my children.  I worry that if I needed to see a physician or if my children need to see a physician that they're going to get treated differently because of everything that has happened.  

So I am doing this to hold Methodist accountable.  Like this should not be happening.  I'm being punished for speaking about what I'm seeing firsthand.  I am seeing all of this firsthand. And I have treated now over 4,000 COVID patients.  And every single one of them that has received early treatment has stayed out of the hospital and survived.  No one has had any adverse repercussions from my treatment.  But Methodist has made it appear that I am potentially dangerous and need to be silenced. 

QPOL: All of this is just the byproduct of chum that’s caused by the major issue: the bond market (as @TFL1728 has taught us all) and America taking back its monetary sovereignty from the City of London. Bankrupt these demons with SOFR and sound domestic policy in the US, and you’ve got yourself a better looking world.

Basically, Trump let Israel beat Iran. Why? To make sure Iran doesn’t get nukes. Is that a major threat? Maybe, but Israel is happy. Why make sure Israel is happy? So we can actually start to make peace deals disguised as real estate development projects (or whatever Trump wants to do in the region) to make everyone tolerable. Iran winning would actually empower Davos (Europe), the real enemy of America. Throwing Bibi a bone is smarter for Trump to do in the long run if it gets us a deal of some kind and makes his legacy look good. The JCPOA was a benefit to the EU/Davos/WEF/the ECB/ America’s and the world’s greatest threat. Israel winning this battle is simply a part of the plan/grand strategy of separating from them and their influence, and our influence in the Middle East. All of this is just the byproduct of chum that’s caused by the major issue: the bond market (as has taught us all) and America taking back its monetary sovereignty from the City of London. Bankrupt these demons with SOFR and sound domestic policy in the US, and you’ve got yourself a better looking world.