. . . why do we have to take the tetanus vaccine every 10 years? And just to shorten this for time's sake, I ended up finding out, asking all of my attending physicians, infectious disease experts, we found out that the reason they told us back then to take it was that when you are walking out in the yard, you have a rusty nail in your foot, the bacteria called tetanus gets in there and within minutes to hours, not days or weeks, you could spasm so terribly that you would suffocate to death, fall on the floor, and die, like within minutes to hours, which I've never heard of anyone dying that way. So come to find out that is a lie. No one has died that way. Nobody in the entire world, in recorded history, right, has died that way. So why are they giving it out if that's a lie, right? So I was doing an observation on my rotations in Detroit, Michigan when I was training and I saw that they gave some people the tetanus vaccine, and some not, as a protocol. And the ones that were on welfare did not get it, but the ones on private pay did, which didn't make sense. But I saw there's a huge difference in fertility. Huge. The people who didn't get it were extremely fertile. The people who did had a lot of problems with fertility. I Googled it then, and sure enough you can still find this if you Google it . . . that the World Health Organization and NIH have since 1972 been developing the tetanus vaccine as an abortion or sterilization vaccine. They've been putting the pregnancy hormone inside the tetanus vaccine in that vial. And so every time you get it, it's an accumulative response. Your body will then see, if you're female, you'll see . . . or when you're getting pregnant, you'll have a higher and higher hCG level, right? Well, then your body will learn to attack that. It's going to attack an early pregnancy. So then you wouldn't even know if, if you got pregnant in the first place. So they have absolutely used this in Latino countries, Africa, and India. I absolutely believe they were using it here in the US, although they deny it. Although you look on the World Health Organization website, oh, they've had tons of vaccines they've been developing, they've been testing out, they've been utilizing on us for decades and lying to the doctors, lying to the other people. So my point is that these are the organizations standing behind the COVID-19 shot . . .
If you have any doubts about Israel's concern for Jewish safety and the lives of Jews, which is their whole schtick, just look at the way they treat the hostages. They shot their own hostages. They killed their own on October 7th. They used the Hannibal Directive, and they shot their own hostages, who were holding White flags, speaking in Hebrew, and they bombed places that they knew the hostages were in. If they wanted to free hostages and save Jewish lives, they would negotiate. That's what you always do when you want to save the lives of hostages, you negotiate, you do a prisoner exchange. And we know that they know that because they've done that in the past. But they care more about killing Palestinians than saving Jews.
00:41. Yeah, and so the ceasefire has ended and the killing ensues . . .
And also, how dare they live- stream a genocide! First of all, that's unforgivable in itself, right, but then on top of that they're saying that they're doing it in the name of Jews and they're weaponizing the attempted extermination of Jews to justify an attempted extermination of Palestinians. It's just disgusting. And I'm also kind of tired of people saying, "Well, you know, they're not doing exactly what the Nazis did, so it's okay." No, that's not the point of the Genocide Convention. The Genocide Convention wasn't "as long as you don't do exactly what the Nazis did, you're A-okay." And it's interesting, you know, a Jew developed the genocide definition, Lemkin. That's not the point of it to say "as long as you kill not quite as many people as Nazis, as long as you don't use gas chambers." I mean when are people going to realize that Israel is a menace. It's a terrorist state. It really is a terrorist State. Now to be fair, so is the United States but I say their ratio of terrorism to non-terrorism, in the case of Israel, [Israel] is greater than it is for the United States. And then they live-stream a genocide, they say it's in the name of Jews, and then also claim to be combating anti-semitism. I mean how, what's a better way to create anti-Semitism than to kill people, maim them, children, women, civilians, men, too. It's kind of messed up that men get, you know, that their lives don't matter. All Palestinian lives matter. But it's pretty messed up to, to do that and then say that people are upset about it because they're anti-Semites as opposed to being upset about it because they don't like to see kids literally into pieces.
Dr. Sabine Hazan: "When we started looking at Bifidobacteria, we realized that Bifidobacteria was absent in kids with autism. That Bifidobacteria was absent in Alzheimer's. Bifidobacteria was absent in long haulers, vaccine injured, Lyme patients, Crohn's patients, invasive… pic.twitter.com/qmHmurdFqU
When we started looking at bifidobacteria, we realized that bifidobacteria was absent in kids with autism. That bifidobacteria was absent in Alzheimer's patients. Bifidobacteria was absent in long-haulers, vaccine injured, lime patients, Crohn's patients, invasive cancers. Then when you look at who has bifidobacteria, the newborns have a lot of bifidobacteria. Old people have zero bifidobacteria, nursing home, the dying, zero bifidobacteria. The process of aging is really this loss of bifidobacteria. And I think we have expanded. I think, if you believe the Bible, you know, people lived a long lot longer in the olden days during Biblical times than we are right now. We are barely making it to 70, 80 years old, and not really healthy 70, 80 years old. The mind starts going so . . . is the mind starting to go because of the loss of bifidobacteria?
WHAT INCREASES BIFIDOBACTERIA?
And when you start looking at what improves bifidobacteria? So our lab discovered vitamin C improves bifidobiacteria. Our lab discovered bovine immunoglobulins, the blood of the cow spun around, that clear stuff, provided that the cow is not is not on a lot of antibiotics, it's not given a lot of hormones, it's not given like thousands of vaccines. So when you start looking at all that, you start seeing the importance of bifidobacteria and you start seeing, even me, you know, with progenobiome, looking at the stool samples before the pandemic. During the pandemic and after the pandemic there is a lot of disappearance of bifidobacteria. Is that why we are having an increase in Alzheimer's, an increase in cancers, have we demolished this bifidobacteria? So to me that's a very important microbe that I believe is our longevity. If we can retain it, and it's not easy to retain in a world that's toxic and in a world where we are given media full of stress, where we are divided, we are constantly nervous of the next pandemic or the next virus. It's almost like this bottle that you're shaking and it's full of gas and you just need to put it on the counter and let it just calm down, right? So, yes, I think it's a very important microbe.
Johnson & Johnson has been around for 139 years and never cured anything.
Merck has been around for 134 years and never cured anything.
Pfizer has been around for 175 years and never cured anything.
These companies ONLY make deadly drugs and vaccines.
Shut them down!
Anti fertility vaccines are/were real. I've also got the proof of what Dr Wakefield says here. Some types of tetanus vaccines were designed to control certain populations. https://t.co/BYr2W1CtCI
KABOOM: Toxic elements / heavy metals results from Florida, showing insane levels of Aluminum, Cadmium and Lead, with also red-alert findings of lower levels of Mercury. None of this should be seen anywhere near these levels in a sample just collected from the open air. This… pic.twitter.com/9Md1cr4DFE
I have said on various podcasts that a 10% tariff is really a tariff. Beyond that, it is political to force free trade. Most countries are dropping tariffs on US goods, creating what Trump actually was trying to create – FREE TRADE. The belligerent one is, of course, France. Macron has a Napoleon Complex, which is why he has been pushing for war, offering nukes to Germany, and trying to supplant the United States as the savior of Europe, being the 3rd largest nuclear power.
“The tariffs give us great power to negotiate. They always have,” Trump told reporters Thursday aboard Air Force One a day after his Rose Garden “Liberation Day” tariff announcement sunk the market to its lowest point since the COVID-19 pandemic.
I have received many inquiries about the US Reciprocal Tariffs announced on April 2, 2025. The justification for these tariffs can be found in President Trump’s Executive Order, which may be found here. I am not an expert in tariff law. Nonetheless, parts of the Executive Order are open to interpretation by experts, and the end result remains fluid from one day to the next right now. Therefore, it is important to consult with a customs broker before importing or exporting to the US. It is always a matter of interpretation.
Macron is belligerent and, like Carney in Canada and Democrats in the USA, whatever Trump does, he must do the opposite. Macron, according to sources, is urging full retaliation against Trump that the EU should block all US goods and push for capital controls to prevent money from flowing to the US. He already uses non-tariffs pretending it to be “quality” control outright blocking some products.
However, Macron is also pushing for war with Russia, offering Germany nukes to replace the US as the savior of Europe. He thinks war will elevate France to the leadership of Europe because of its nukes. Macron has always had a problem with sparkling wines in California being labeled Champagne. The French reinterpreted the label “Champagne” to be the origin rather than how it is produced. Champagne, made in France, is produced using the méthode champenoise. If that bottle is produced using the exact same method, anywhere else, it must carry a different name, but that was part of the Treaty after World War II, and it was meant to punish Germany. But the US never ratified that treaty, so it never applied to the United States.
Sparkling wines have been produced in California since about 1860, and they were introduced by European immigrants, including those from France. Since then, the term Champagne has been used to refer to the type of wine, not where it was made. Here is an advertisement from 1866 offering North American-produced Champagne. Macron does not care how it is made; he wants to redefine the word “Champagne” to mean France as the area where it is produced rather than the type. This is just an example of dealing with the EU.
First, keep in mind that these tariffs, broad as they are, are being levied under the President’s “Emergency Powers.” This means that the usual statutory exemptions for antiques and other collectibles, which are referenced in the HTS Codes, may not seem to apply, depending on who does the interpretation. Does this executive order overrule the statutory exemptions covering antiquities when, in fact, the purpose of the tariffs focuses on currently manufactured goods, not antiquities of more than 100 years old?
While executive orders are powerful tools for presidential action, they cannot override statutes. In cases of conflict, statutes prevail unless the executive order operates within constitutional or delegated authority. Courts serve as the ultimate arbiter, ensuring adherence to the separation of powers.
So what does it mean for antiquities? According to Section 2 of the Executive Order,
The additional ad valorem duty on all imports from all trading partners shall start at 10 percent, and shortly thereafter, the additional ad valorem duty shall increase for trading partners enumerated in Annex I to this order at the rates set forth in Annex I to this order. These additional ad valorem duties shall apply until I determine that the underlying conditions described above are satisfied, resolved, or mitigated. However, since an executive order cannot act unconstitutionally, it should not be interpreted as overruling a valid statute defining the exemption.
Moreover, according to Section 3,
a) Except as otherwise provided in this order, all articles imported into the customs territory of the United States shall be, consistent with law, subject to an additional ad valorem rate of duty of 10 percent. Such rates of duty shall apply with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. Eastern daylight time on April 5, 2025, except that goods loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading and in transit on the final mode of transit before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on April 5, 2025, and entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on April 5, 2025, shall not be subject to such additional duty.
Furthermore, except as otherwise provided in this order, at 12:01 a.m. Eastern daylight time on April 9, 2025, all articles from trading partners enumerated in Annex I to this order imported into the customs territory of the United States shall be, consistent with law, subject to the country-specific ad valorem rates of duty specified in Annex I to this order. Such rates of duty shall apply with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. Eastern daylight time on April 9, 2025, except that goods loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading and in transit on the final mode of transit before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on April 9, 2025, and entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on April 9, 2025, shall not be subject to these country-specific ad valorem rates of duty set forth in Annex I to this order. These country-specific ad valorem rates of duty shall apply to all articles imported pursuant to the terms of all existing U.S. trade agreements, except as provided below.
Therefore, under Section 3 (b) (v) of the Executive Order, it is suggested that things like antiquities should be exempt under the Executive Order because they are generally exempt from tariffs under the Harmonized Tariff schedule. Furthermore, there is a statutory exemption for “informational” materials under 15 USC 1702(b). While this certainly applies to artwork and our reports, informational materials are exempt. Additionally, I should note that, for the time being at least, there is a separate exemption for low-value shipments under $800 under 19 USC 1321, which an executive order cannot nullify.
9million shots.
It’s not the fruit loops.
It’s not the cannabis
(but definitely avoid gas station hemp legal in FL and other red states) https://t.co/voiTEezu3I
Most American manufacturers rely on foreign goods to operate or finalize their “Made in America” products. Hiking up tariffs will cause the cost of production to soar. The workforce will shrink as profits decrease. Consumers bear the brunt of these policies through higher prices. --Martin Armstrong
How did the Trump Administration come up with these tariff rates? Why would a nation like Madagascar, for example, with a small economy, be hit with a 47% tariff? Reciprocal tariffs were determined based on America’s trade deficit with other nations. They took each nation’s trade surplus with the US by total exports and divided that number by two, proclaiming we are asking them for half of what they have been charging the United States.
The assumption behind this method is that a trade surplus means one country is “taking advantage” of the other. However, trade imbalances do not function in such a cut-and-dry manner. The US runs trade deficits with some countries while running surpluses with others. The global economy is interconnected, and imposing arbitrary tariffs based on a deficit does not reflect the broader picture.
For example, China may have a surplus with the US, but it also imports raw materials from other nations to manufacture goods. If the US places a retaliatory tariff, it does not necessarily mean that China has been unfairly charging the US. China’s advantages of natural resources and lower production costs are part of the trade deal. There is a reason the US and China were once the largest trading partners, as China relied on American consumers the same way that America relied on cheaper Chinese goods. China was then investing in US debt, which it once viewed as a safe trade, but that is no longer the case, and America will suffer as a result. All of these measures are causing America’s trading partners to flee.
Look at Canada, where the population is far smaller than America’s, which is one of many variables. There is less demand overall and while Canada relied on the US for numerous imports, America was not subsidizing Canada. A trade deficit is not a subsidy! The US pays for Canadian goods and services with USD, which Canada then reinvests in the US economy. This is how global trade works; it is not a one-way street where Canada simply takes advantage of the US.
We cannot expect a complete balance in trading. Look at poorer nations—they simply could never purchase the same volume from America. Wages in these nations are far less than the US minimum wage, and thus, production is cheaper from a labor standpoint alone. For example, no one from Cambodia will be seeking an American-made car. A Cambodian factory will not move operations to the US to avoid the 49% tariff. They will look for alternative buyers outside of the US. Imbalances are a natural part of trade. Treasury Secretary Bessent said, “Let them eat flat screens,” but that is not the core of the issue. Americans did enjoy cheaper goods, but the bigger issue is that these tariffs make American investments LESS attractive as major companies cannot operate from a purely domestic standpoint.
The calculations do not factor in currency exchanges. Capital flows and currency values often influence trade deficits. If foreign capital flows into the US to buy Treasury bonds, real estate, or equities, it strengthens the USD, making US exports more expensive and imports cheaper. This is not a function of unfair trade practices but of the global demand for US assets.
By imposing tariffs arbitrarily, the cost of imported goods rises, which can negatively impact domestic industries that rely on those goods. Most American manufacturers rely on foreign goods to operate or finalize their “Made in America” products. Hiking up tariffs will cause the cost of production to soar. The workforce will shrink as profits decrease. Consumers bear the brunt of these policies through higher prices.
The assumption that tariffs should be determined by “half of the surplus” rule ignores the reality that trade wars are not linear. These tariffs are NOT “reciprocal” as the Trump Administration insists. They are not looking at the actual tariffs set by other nations. Those advising Trump believe that other countries will want to negotiate “tariffs” to permit free trade, but instead they are simply hoping to close trade deficits, and that simply cannot occur. Thursday’s sell-off is indicative of capital flowing out of the US. The Trump Administration basically told the world that America is closed for international business, and capital is responding to the threat. The real impact of these tariffs will soon come as we move deeper into a period of stagflation.
Many people think dementia is genetic. "My Mom or Dad (or both) had it, so that's my fate".
Not really. There are lots of things you can do to lower your risk or avoid cognitive decline entirely. We're doing a lot of these in my assisted living homes. I made a short video of… pic.twitter.com/ra0u16CShe
— A Paradise for Parents (@HalCranmer) April 4, 2025
Ignore your body's clues about health, and you could be setting yourself up for Alzheimer's or dementia later in life.
CLUE #1: Muscle loss equals memory loss.
Scientists have found that frail people with low muscle mass have significantly worse brain function as they age.
[THE FIX?] Strength training. Building muscle equals building brain power.
CLUE #2: High blood sugar. Type 2 diabetics have a 60% higher risk of developing dementia. Alzheimer's is being called type 3 diabetes because high blood sugar wreaks havoc on brain cells.
[THE FIX?] Cut sugar. Go low carb. You control glucose and you control your future brain function.
CLUE #3: Vision loss. Vision loss is a massive red flag for cognitive decline. Your retina is part of your brain coming out of your skull. Don't ignore poor vision. Start improving your retina and your brain with diet and exercise.
CLUE #4: Hearing loss. People with sustained hearing loss have a 37% higher risk of dementia. Hearing loss equals brain shrinkage.
[THE FIX?] If you're suffering hearing loss, look into hearing aids early.
CLUE #5: Bad teeth. Keep that bacteria out of your mouth and out of your brain through good dental hygiene.
Take care of your body, and you'll take care of your brain.
WARNING
70–80% of Lion’s Mane on the market is fake.
You only get the real benefits if you’re using fruiting body extract — not the cheap mycelium-on-grain filler most companies sell...
Forms of Lion’s Mane ( ranked by quality ):
1. Dual-extract powder → Best for daily brain fuel 2. Tincture (alcohol + water extract) → Fast absorption 3. Capsules → Only if they contain fruiting body 4. Coffee blends → Convenient, but often underdosed
What Big Pharma Doesn’t Want You to Know About Vitamin C
“Mortality rates would plummet.”
We are told you can’t treat measles, so it must be “prevented” with a vaccine, a convenient story that generates billions for the medical-industrial complex. However, Dr. Suzanne… pic.twitter.com/rQySb3zjwy
— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) March 31, 2025
What Big Pharma Doesn’t Want You to Know About Vitamin C“Mortality rates would plummet.”
We are told you can’t treat measles, so it must be “prevented” with a vaccine, a convenient story that generates billions for the medical-industrial complex. However, Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ [
Regarding hospital patients and vitamin C, here is one of several studies that looked at the issue. They consider anything less than 28 µmol per liter to be deficient and less than 11 to be in the scurvy range. Let me tell you that studies show that an adult man can eat two kiwi… pic.twitter.com/cJXSztutvj
Regarding hospital patients and vitamin C, here is one of several studies that looked at the issue. They consider anything less than 28 µmol per liter to be deficient and less than 11 to be in the scurvy range. Let me tell you that studies show that an adult man can eat two kiwi fruits per day and get their level up to 70. So in my opinion, that 28 is quite low. But even so, have a look. on admission, 60% were what they call subnormal, 19% were in scurvy range. The majority of people going into the hospital have dangerously low vitamin C levels obviously because they are sick. And we know that with all the stress going on in the hospital, the drugs and poisons that are given to people to try to help them, vitamin C levels will drop further during hospitalization. Doctors stop the outpatient vitamin C supplements according to the study and according to what I have seen in my lifetime as well. Strange that they call what happens in hospitals medical "Care" . With regard to this, it's absolute medical neglect.
Oh look! Polio definition changes made polio go down. Straight from our free website content. Are we going to keep talking about thimerosal being a biohazard or do we want to address this foundational issue? And by the way, there were several adjustments. They just couldn't make… pic.twitter.com/TikNW48nIk
