Thursday, March 6, 2025

25% of Harvard graduates from last spring are still job hunting — up from 20% a year earlier and 10% in 2022, per WSJ.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

AUSTIN FITTS on ZELENSKYY: "My name is on the bank accounts, and I still got pots of money and I got all the intel about where the money came in and where it went out. So he does hold cards, is what it looks like to me."

Has Biden's hundreds of billions of dollars sent to Ukraine given Zelenskyy blackmail power over Trump and the United States? 

Trump says to Zelenskyy, 'You don't hold the cards,' Zelenskyy's thinking, 'No? My name is on the bank accounts, and I still got pots of money and I got all the intel about where the money came in and where it went out. So he does hold cards, is what it looks like to me." 

Red Mafia: How the Russian Mob Invaded America, Robert I. Friedman, 2000.

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Epstein was not [just] a sex network...[his] operation supported a massive money-laundering [operation]....[and] Ukraine...I think of it as a huge money-laundering operation...And the Epstein operation is right in the middle of that."

"In other words, Zelenskyy at the White House and the Epstein Files, everybody thinks are two different stories, [but] to me, they're one story...And when Trump says to Zelenskyy, 'You don't hold the cards,' Zelenskyy's thinking, 'No? My name is on the bank accounts, and I still got pots of money, and I got all the intel about where the money came in and where it went out. So he does hold cards, is what it looks like to me." 

This clip is from a recent interview with Fitts—a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the)—on The David Knight Show (@libertytarian).

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Whole Foods Using Fake Organic Foods from China?

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

CONGRESSMAN CURT WELDON: assemble his best evidence for the destruction of all three World Trade Center towers on 9/11. “Get it to me. I’m going to take it straight to Pete Hegseth

It’s nothing short of a miracle. Our rather fractured 9/11 Truth Movement has been somewhat reassembled, if not healed, by relative newcomers to the 9/11 evidence! Today, the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers has not only been compiled (by key authors from RichardGage911, AE911Truth, The Lawyers’ Committee, 9/11 Speakout, Protecting All Protectors, and Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth), but it is now heading straight to the Trump Team who is expecting it. And now you can help spread it widely!

Last month, we brought you the big interview that Gail and I did with firebrand-former-Congressman Curt Weldon on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! in which he disclosed his passion for exposing the truth about 9/11. Though temporarily captured by the limited hangout of CIA “interference” and FBI “incompetence,” the Congressman has been mingling with us long enough to know now that the Towers were indeed demolished and that this was indeed an inside job.

But it started before that. Three years ago, Ret. Seattle Fire Capt. Raul Angulo was invited to join architect Richard Gage, firefighter Erik Lawyer, and the Boston 9/11 group, which funded our first of three annual events at the National Fire Protection Association as Protecting All Protectors Alliance(PAPA), to man our WTC evidence booth at this major conference of fire protection professionals. We made quite a scene. 

At our third convention, in Orlando, FL, we not only hosted our booth but spoke all about WTC Building 7 in the theater on the Expo Floor, which was their largest such presentation of the convention — with standing room only. This all caught the attention of a neighboring booth vendor, the International Fire & Safety Journal, who invited Captain Angulo to write an 8,000-word article in the Journal.

Well, that article intrigued former fire chief and longtime critic of the CIA’s “mishandling” of 9/11, Fmr. Congressman Curt Weldon, who then inspired the Captain to assemble his best evidence for the destruction of all three World Trade Center towers on 9/11. “Get it to me. I’m going to take it straight to Pete Hegseth, who I know personally, and to Tulsi Gabbard and JD Vance on the Trump Team.”

And that’s how all of this excitement went down. But that’s not all. Last week, Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna was named Chair of the Congressional House Oversight Committee on the Declassification of Federal Secrets. She gave a stunning press conference with Oversight Committee Chair James Comer on the subject. She called not only for an investigation into JFK/MLK/RFK, but also the Epstein files, the COVID origin, AND 9/11! It’s the first time in the history of our 9/11 Truth Movement that a representative in Congress has stood up and called for a new 9/11 investigation. Foreign nationals may indeed influence her, but the 9/11 Genie cannot be put back into the bottle!

So we intend to hold her feet to the fire. To begin with, we at RichardGage911 have also now produced our own 3-page Executive Summary (a condensation of our new 120-page 9/11 WTC White Paper), which will be hand-delivered to each of the Republican and Democratic Committee Members.

Needless to say, we are as busy in the 9/11 Truth Movement as we have ever been before. These are historic happenings for us. We have been launched. And we need your help more than ever. Will you be a part of history in the making and help us raise the necessary funds to support RichardGage911 at this crucial time? We need you right now! 

[see the link below to view the videos and see the entire article] 


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

DOCUMENTARY: The Universal Antidote of Chlorine Dioxide


Chlorine Dioxide from Amazon.  I've not tried this product, so I have nothing to recommend. 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: "Somebody's been putting the squeeze to [him]. They put the squeeze to him on measles...now they put him in a squeeze with an antisemitism tweet..." "He's being put through...ritual humiliation...This looks terrible; it looks ridiculous."…

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

The meeting was supposed to be in Ukraine just to sign the papers.  At Zelensky's request, they moved it to the White House.  This can be confirmed by Marco Rubio.  

04:34.  Whenever government is in trouble, they just point to an external enemy, and Putin is that enemy.  Honestly, the solution for Ukraine was the same solution for Yugoslavia: it broke up according to ethnic lines.  The Minsk agreement was supposed to be allowing the Don boss to vote for separation.  Zelensky has outlawed their language, their religion, . . . if you did that in Canada, if you said you can no longer speak French, I think you're going to see a civil war there too.  You don't do this kind of stuff I think this is all theater and was part of the agenda that they just need War.  The economy is falling; the German economy has shrunk by at least 3%, maybe as high as 5%.  You put people out of business first with the COVID-19, and then the climate change, and then the sanctions on Russia.  Just look at a chart of the GDP of Germany; it's appalling, and that is supposed to be the economic cornerstone of Europe. Economically, it's not doing very well.

06:10.  The entire meeting was an hour long. It didn't really devolve into a flame war until the last 20 minutes. It seemed to have been kicked off by JD Vance. Was JD in on it?  Was he in on it with Zelensky, or was that a tinder box waiting to explode regardless?

06:26.  They knew what this was about.  It wasn't necessary for him to come to the White House; it was all supposed to be done in Kiev.  So they knew this was a setup, and that's why usually if there's going to be some sort of a meeting.  They don't always let the cameras in; maybe afterwards for a photo.  They set up the cameras for the whole thing.  They wanted this, okay.  Fine, this is what you want to do, and that's why Vance said, "You're trying to argue in front of the American people."  They knew what this was about.  We had two employees in Ukraine, one in Kiev and one in Donas.  They're both in Berlin now.  Over 8 million people have fled the country, and none of the Ukrainians that I know even want to go back.  It's a real disaster.  Zelensky won't have an election largely because he knows he would lose if there was actually a free election.  He ran on peace.  Just look it up.  He promised peace.  The death toll when he went in was only 13,000; now, it's over 1.1 million, and he has the audacity to say he doesn't want a ceasefire?  He doesn't give two s**** about the people that are there; it's as simple as that, really.  The first obligation of any government is to avoid war.  You don't want to see your people slaughtered.  Something's just not right with him.

17:44.  The week before this, all I had was phone calls constantly.  Most of our institutions in Europe now see this coming.  They are moving capital out.  This is why all the gold is leaving London and Switzerland.  Get it the hell out, because once the capital, as Tom has said, . . . I've learned over the years, back in the 80s was the first time I came in contact with it, when a bank in Lebanon found a ledger and they wrote down the Lebanese pound every day, asked me if I could create a model.  I did, and what came out said the country was going to fall apart in eight days.  I thought there was something wrong with the data.  I told him I said I don't know if something's wrong, got to be wrong, and very calmly he asked, "Well, what currency would you recommend?"  I said, "Well, it says the Swiss franc," and 8 days later, the Civil War began.  And so then I realized, with other people as well, he didn't come to me for the forecast; he came to me for the timing.  
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

And they told two friends, and they told two friends . . .

Don't expect apologies.  Don't expect, "Oh, you caught us," followed by explanations, er, uh, lies.  Don't expect "Oh, that was a Republican AI trick." Just know the Party by its works.  Here's another of its works.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

U.S. CITIZENSHIP, WOULD YOU SELL YOURS . . . FOR $5 MILLION?

Shahid King Bolsen recommends that Americans be offered $5 million for their U.S. citizenship.  But who, outside of the U.S. government, would buy your citizenship?  Is it that valuable to foreigners?  Many realize that they can come to the U.S. without U.S. citizenship and get benefits; in fact, given all the promises that Democrats make to foreigners, foreigners think that they're king or queen and hold Americans in contempt for supporting a government that sells their country out to strangers.  So the U.S. is less of a country and more of an economic district where everything is for sale at the right price.  Even citizenship.  Why not?  It's not like there's civic pride in any of our cities.  Our cities are sanctuary cities that protect foreigners.  Brion McClanahan recently stated @ the 6:00 mark that "We are enforcing the charter of the United Nations, not the U.S. Constitution."  Seems that way.  American citizens have been disenfranchised by the policies of our own government.  Truthfully, what would you expect?


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

TOM LUONGO: the US doesn’t need anything from Canada including the oil, since you can’t refine your own crude without using our pipelines

Posted by at No comments:

MARTIN ARMSTRONG: The United States is deliberately funding its own demise under the guise of humanitarian aid. DOGE is still uncovering the magnitude of this injustice that was hidden from public view.

Revoking free housing, shelter, food stamps, debit cards, phones, and whatever else the Democrats threw in the care package should discourage newcomers.  --Martin Armstrong
Thank you to Martin Armstrong's article, "Ending Incentives for Migrants," Armstrong Economics, February 28, 2025.


Executive Order “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders” was signed into law by Donald Trump on February 19, 2025. Homeland Security arrested around 20,000 illegal migrants during Trump’s first month in office, but that is a drop in the bucket. Agencies must now act swiftly to ensure that we are not incentivizing people to stay in the US illegally, which is a complete reversal from the actions of the last administration. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has directed the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) under the US Department of Agriculture to prevent illegal migrants from accessing food stamps. “The days in which taxpayer dollars are used to subsidize illegal immigration are over,” said Secretary Rollins. “Today’s directive affirms that the U.S. Department of Agriculture will follow the law—full stop,” Rollins noted. 

Rollins also noted that there have been restrictions in place since Bill Clinton was in office to prevent incentivizing illegal migration. Congress passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA, P.L. 104-193) in 1996, stating that illegal aliens may not receive federal benefits. Former President Bill Clinton signed this measure into law, and it received bipartisan support at the time. “Qualified aliens” were permitted to receive benefits after residing in the US for five years. The Biden Administration completely ignored this law by opening the borders and announcing to the world that anyone who bypassed border patrol would receive a US taxpayer-subsidized easy life. 

The United States is deliberately funding its own demise under the guise of humanitarian aid. DOGE is still uncovering the magnitude of this injustice that was hidden from public view. This migrant crisis is not some organic event where people decided to rush en masse to the US. Our politicians not only told them to come here to seek sanctuary, but they passed measures to incentivize everyone and anyone to enter America.

Rome fell when it stretched itself too thin, bringing in foreigners who had no loyalty to the state, all while its bureaucrats bled the treasury dry. The same pattern is unfolding today. The government is using taxpayer dollars to house, feed, and subsidize migrants, all while American cities rot from decades of economic mismanagement. This is not about compassion—it’s about control. 

What people fail to understand is that this is a deliberate policy decision, not an accident. The Democrats were importing voters to ensure political dominance, creating an economic burden that will justify higher taxation and more draconian measures on the average American. We are witnessing the same strategy that has been used time and again throughout history—when governments lose control, they seek to divide and conquer their own people. 

Revoking free housing, shelter, food stamps, debit cards, phones, and whatever else the Democrats threw in the care package should discourage newcomers. The ongoing arrests and deportation measures are costly while necessary. We do not know how many people are here illegally, and it is unrealistic to believe everyone will willingly leave. There are valid concerns that we will witness an uptick in crime as people lose their only way to access money and necessities. What will happen to those who have already made a life here and abandoned their prior lives? Countless individuals paid smugglers to grant them entry into America. Others sold off everything they had to make it to America. Most were relying entirely on US welfare and will need to rebuild their lives entirely. Opening the border was a complete violation of human rights for not only the American people but for the migrants as well.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

MARTIN ARMSTRONG: They needed to nullify the election in Romania because they were building the largest NATO airbase in Europe. They intend to attack Russia and take back Crimea and the entire region.

The EU looks at you as irrelevant in their quest to take Russia’s $75 trillion worth of natural resources, which is twice the US National Debt. Then Europe will rise to reestablish what was the old Roman Empire, and the upstart USA will be reduced to a subservient position.  --Martin Armstrong
Thank you to Martin Armstrong's article, "The Truth Behind Romania," Armstrong Economics, March 4, 2025.

QUESTION: I read your post on Romania. Why have the EU and US interfered in the Romanian election? Is it just because they would be anti-EU? But then why was the US involved? What am I missing? 

Map of Romania.  Note the proximity to Ukraine. 

ANSWER: It’s all about Russia, Russia, Russia. They needed to nullify the election in Romania because they were building the largest NATO airbase in Europe. They intend to attack Russia and take back Crimea and the entire region. They want to take all the warm water ports, shut down Russia, and drive it into bankruptcy.

from the Defense Post, "Construction on Europe’s largest NATO military base has begun in southeast Romania, expanding the 57th Air Base at the Mihail Kogălniceanu Airport."

Everything they do is to create World War III. They are no different than Zelensky, who is not interested in peace. He is a NeoNazi who pretended to be Christian, just like George Soros, and only said he was Jewish after he became President so nobody would look at his background, making jokes about confiscating assets from Jews and Russians. 


Robert MacNamara was the Neocon who took us into Vietnam. He said they thought Russia was involved. He apologized and said it was just a civil war. It has been nothing by Russia, Russia, Russia for decades. They did not care that communism collapsed, and the Russian people did not want to conquer Europe. NATO has no purpose if there is peace with Russia. They need to promote war constantly, and they instruct the leaders not to dare speak with Putin. That ensures there will never be peace.

Thus, Romania is a strategic pawn in this chess game with Russia. They do not care about the Romanian people whatsoever. How dare they select someone who wants to take Romania out of NATO and the EU! 

Here is the forecast from 2022 for the Romanian share market. Note that the turning point was 2025. I feel very bad for the Romanian people. The EU looks at you as irrelevant in their quest to take Russia’s $75 trillion worth of natural resources, which is twice the US National Debt. Then Europe will rise to reestablish what was the old Roman Empire, and the upstart USA will be reduced to a subservient position.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

OMEGA6: taking her to sea level, we've SIGNIFICANTLY improved her lung and heart function

Single ventricle physiology refers to a condition where a person has only one functional ventricle in the heart, which can lead to mixed blood flow and lower oxygen levels in the body. This condition often requires a series of surgeries to improve blood circulation and oxygenation.

This was interesting.  Being at sea level, you can increase the oxygen levels in your blood, effectively lowering any risks associated with hypoxia.   

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

DR. AHMAD AMMOUS: Do cholesterol medications lead to memory loss?

Lipitor: Thief of Memory, Dave Graveline, Kilmer S. McCully, Jay S. Cohen, 2006.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

BRETT PIKE: homeschool socialization is by far superior to public school

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, March 3, 2025

 

3:00. Interesting constitutional question so I have to go back to 1883 and the Pendleton Act and talk about 

3:12.  In 1883, we have some discussion about civil service reform.  Why?  In 1881, we have the assassination of President James Garfield.  So he's walking in a train station, and a disgruntled office figure named Charles Guiteau shoots him in the back.  He doesn't die right then; he'll die later on horribly from infection because they're trying to find the bullet, and they kept digging around in his back.  When Guiteau  shoots Garfield, he says, "I am a stalwart of the stalwarts."  Arthur is president now, and what did that mean?  In the 1880s in New York, you had political factions vying for the spoils of the presidency.  Now at that time there were a shade over 100,000 federal jobs in the United States, and the party in charge of the executive Branch appointed all of these people the president actually made $100,000 appointments or at least he delegated that out to subordinates who appointed people it wasn't any civil service the executive branch turned over every time a new president came in all of them including things like postmasters all of that turned over you could have a new postmaster every 4 years because the postmasters were appointed by the president and this was very effective for the Republican Party during the war by the way because they would put Republican postmasters so they could control the Postal Service, they could search the mail and other things.  We had all of these appointed people.  Well, Guiteau didn't get a job, and so he thought he was going to take it out on the president.  He shot the president and killed him.  At that point, Chester Arthur becomes president.  Chester Arthur was a stalwart.  There were two factions.  One were the stalwarts, one where the half breeds.  The stalwarts were purely party men.  If you were not a Republican, if you were not someone who toed the line, the Republican Party line, you were not going to get a job.  The Half-Breeds, like James Garfield, believed in hiring Democrats at times.  They didn't really have to be a Republican; he wanted the best man for the job.  These were the reconciliationists.  You saw this when you got to a period after the war where there was some insistence that some Democrats were brought into the fold, or at least some Southerners.  These were people that were thinking, "Well, we need to reunify the United States.  Let's put some things back together." So, after Garfield was killed, there was an outcry for civil service reform.  "We've got to get rid of the spoils system.  It's a problem."  So that led to the Pendleton Act of 1883 Chester Arthur was behind it so was most of the American population but even at that point with well over 100,000 workers only about 10% were covered by the Pendleton Act still there were a lot of people that worked as civil service employees that we're going to be hired instead of political appointees only about 10%, so you're looking at what 13,000 people.  the rest were still Federal appointees.  You could see how small the federal government was at that point if only 10% were covered by civil service.  Most of the people were not.  That means the president still appointed all these people.  Now, today we have a federal workforce of around 3 million people, 3 million people.  Unprecedented.  3 million people.  What D.O.G.E. is finding out is that most people don't do any work. They simply get a salary, and it's corrupt and fraudulent, and everything else is graft.  All of it.  But all of those people are covered by the Civil Service law except for the President [who] appoints such a small percentage of the federal workforce now.  That is almost all of the 2.9 million people.  I can't remember if that number includes military people or not.  I don't think it includes that.  To cover the soldiers, there is a million of those.  So now you've got almost 4 million people who are on federal service, and when you're broaden it out further when you look at people who are on the door who get money from federal contracts Federal money it's a huge number millions and millions of people are getting federal dollars in one way or another.  So we have this interesting situation that has developed since 1883 where the president has become completely hamstrung to control the executive branch.  In 1883, the president controlled all of it.  In 1882 the president controlled every higher in the executive branch there were 130,000 of them.  Today, the president controls very few.  So we've gotten 180° in the other direction.  People complained in 1883 that the President had too much control.  But it only covered 10% of the federal workforce, so they were still fine with the president getting everything else.  So what happened?  Over time it was that people decided that who wanted bigger and more bureaucracy, and that the president didn't need to have control over these people however in the 1880s when you go back and look at how some of what the president said about this.  The Pendleton Act itself actually had all kinds of rules and regulations.  One of the things was that you couldn't be overly political.  You couldn't be forced to do something for political reasons but you couldn't take money you couldn't do anything political but now we know the federal workers do this all the time. And when Grover Cleveland became president, he actually set out some rules.  You had to be a US citizen to be in the Civil Service, all these things.  The Civil Service Commission made recommendations.  One of the things was that you couldn't show up intoxicated.  Regardless we had a civil service that covered very few people and even as it expanded out the president had a lot of power over who could be hired and fired even there under civil service.  So this is the vesting clause, the vesting clause.  The president is the head of the executive Department and because of the vesting clause if you want to read it broadly it just means that he has the powers vested and him through the Constitution of only the things listed there but these people that are in favor of extensive executive power they said the vesting Clause means that anything that would be executive is invested in the president, not the Congress, not the Supreme Court.  They have no control over it.  Separation of powers, and the president has the authority to do these things.  He has the authority to appoint, for example, Elon Musk, and create this DOGE committee to go and review the waste in government and make recommendations, which the president can then implement.  He has the power in the vesting clause to fire people who are not doing their job.  He's the president of the United States.  Or his secretaries have the power to fire people because they're not doing their job.  This was a big issue during Reconstruction.  Could the president of the United States fire the commander, the General in Chief of the US Army?  The Congress said no, the president said yes.  This has now been litigated out and this is under the administration of Andrew Johnson and the courts have decided that, yeah, the President can fire the General in Chief ;we call him the Joint Chiefs of Staff now, but they can do it.  The president can fire these people he can also hire these people even if Congress has a role in hiring them the president can still fire them because they're not doing their job Congress doesn't have to have any role in that so that vesting Clause actually allowed a broad interpretation of it for Franklin Roosevelt to use the executive branch to transform the government in the 1930s.  Also Woodrow Wilson has set the stage for that in the 19-teens, but really Franklin Roosevelt did it more than anyone else.  And essentially what has happened since the 1930s is that we've seen a massive expansion of federal power through the bureaucracy, because that's what Roosevelt did.  He created a fifth column.  He created a bureaucracy that was unmovable.  He knew exactly what he was doing and he talks about it we have all these people people working in government and really when this is over when World War II was over the United States just rearranged the deck chairs and they just kept all of the stuff in place.  So we kept the massive bureaucracy in place.  We kept all the things in place that he was doing, supposedly to win the war, win the war on poverty, the war on depression, win the war in Europe.  Truman just came in and rearranged the deck chairs, and we kept this in place so really no one alive today remembers what it was like before this even if you were old enough to remember World War II there are still some people alive and their 90s that could remember that you really don't remember what it was like before that if you were 18 in World War II at the end of World War II you're in your mid 90s now so you might somewhat remember a time but you really don't remember anything before the 1930s when Roosevelt became president so you don't really remember anything about this we've had three generations of people now essentially who have been brought up under a system, a Roosevelt-type system, an American fascist system, that's what it is.  And so all Trump is doing is going in and doing something with this stuff but using the same powers that Roosevelt claim he had in the 1930s.  
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

EUROPEAN OWNED SENATOR FROM MAINE, ANGUS KING: ending the war in Ukraine to preserve millions of lives would be the “greatest geopolitical mistake that this country has made since World War 2.”

U.S. politicians owned by Europe?  Exhibit A: Senator Angus King. 

Sen. Angus King tells 60 Minutes that ending the war in Ukraine to preserve millions of lives would be the “greatest geopolitical mistake that this country has made since World War 2.”

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

SENSE RECEPTOR: Debbie Lerman describes how Calley/Casey Means are the new Deborah Birx—they're here to corral us into the idea COVID was a public health response & mRNA jabs aren't the problem, the "chronic disease epidemic" is.

Here is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s speech where he declares his intention to join the Trump campaign in August 2024.

And the same way that I had a jaw-dropping moment with Deborah Birx when I started reading her book, and I realized that she was covering all this stuff up, I had a jaw-dropping moment when I listened to RFK, Jr.'s speech which I had never heard before that he had given, because in that speech he spends half of the speech, it's a 50-minute speech, he spends literally exactly 25 minutes talking about what he really cares about, about the Ukraine, about his uncle and his father, the state of democracy, censorship, all the things that he wants to change in this country.  Minute 25, all of a sudden, he says, "On the night of July 13th when Trump was almost assassinated, I got a call from Calley Means.  He mentions him by name.  Very strange.  This guy never, nobody ever heard about.  He's nobody.  Why would he be mentioned in this historic speech?  Then he says, "Calley Means is the, probably the most prominent advocate for food safety, soil regeneration, and ending the chronic disease epidemic that is devastating this country, and I thought, "THE leading advocate" for these things, the leading . . . ? I've never heard of him.  No, how is he the leading activist for these things?  That was jaw-dropping.  So, RFK, in this major speech, is saying something that is false, right?  Why would he do that?  Then he proceeds to say I highly recommend that you watch the Tucker Carlson interview with Kelly and where's Kelly and Casey Means.  Again, this is a huge speech, probably the most important speech of his life because he like put everything he had into running for president; that's probably the biggest effort he made in his life.  Now he's dropping out of that effort, and in the speech, he says, "Listen to a Tucker Carlson podcast"?!  Like, are you kidding me?  That, that's just mind-boggling weird. I've never heard a big political speech where somebody all of a sudden like recommends a particular podcast with particular names of people that nobody's ever even heard of.  So that was a fall-off-my-chair moment. Then he says, "And Casey Means was the top graduate of her medical school class from Stanford."  Also false.  I don't have definitive proof because I asked Stanford to fact-check, and they never got back to me.  But nothing on her, even on her LinkedIn, on her resume, like she never mentions that she was a top graduate.  She wasn't the top graduate.  She, she doesn't even have any awards from her medical school year.  She had a few awards from when she was an undergraduate at Stanford, that's it.  So two things he said that were, you know, at best inaccurate about these two individuals; at, at worst they were, you know, intentional falsehoods.  Two people we've never heard of, major speech, listen to the Tucker Carlson podcast.  I was like, okay, well, something's obviously going on with these people.  It's another Debra Birx moment.  

03:14.  Now, what's important about Debra Birx is that she was put in to change the narrative or to control the narrative, to say that the COVID-19 response was a public health response.  So her job was to come for the National Security side of things that was running the pandemic and to represent it to the public as if it was a public health event that was her job so to turn it from bio defense, you know, intelligence military into public health.

What Calley and Casey's job is is to take people like me and people in the medical freedom movement who now realize that it was a military intelligence operation and that the vaccines were the unregulated countermeasures that have killed and injured lots of people all over the world right that's what we've been fighting about, one of the things.  And to take us and turn us back from that realization into channel us back into the channel of Public Health.  So she tried to divert us and so Debra Birx . . .  I see them as two sides of the same operation.  So the operation starts with the military-industrial complex saying, okay, we need to convince everybody that this is Public Health.  They try to convince us it is Public Health.  Most people are convinced.  Some, there's a little bit of a resistance, and we aren't convinced.  Now, Calley and Casey have to take those of us who weren't convinced and shove us into the public health bubble that everybody else has already been shoved into.  So that's what I mean when I say both sides.  So once I was already in the bubble that said, "Oh, this is Public Health, and it was just Public Health measures," we said, "No, it's not Public Health.  We don't believe that."  We know it's military.  We know it's intelligence.  We know it's biodefense.  We know it's unregulated, and we know that it's killing and injuring lots of people, and so now we need other handlers, Casey and Calley Means, for example, to take us and handle us and put us into the public health bubble that we refused to get into.  We refused to be shoved into the public health bubble because we understood that it wasn't public health during COVID-19, and now they're shoving us into the public health bubble and saying, "Oh, it's the 'chronic disease epidemic.'"

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

BEN@USMORTALITY: Since 2000, measles vaccines may have caused 16 times more deaths than measles itself!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

GROK: An Indian immigrant buying a rural gas station can access roughly $50,000 to $200,000 more in government-backed financing than a white American man

An Indian immigrant buying a rural gas station can access roughly $50,000 to $200,000 more in government-backed financing than a white American man, assuming both have similar credit and income.  The Indian qualifies as a minority for MBDA-facilitated [Minority Business Development Agency] loans, like SBA (7a) with minority priority or CDFI Fund [Community Development Financial Institutions Fund] targeting underserved groups, while the white man doesn't get that edge unless he's in a rare distressed-area exception.  Add in informal Indian Community loans (say $20,000-$100,000), and the gap widens.  Total extra?  Potentially $70,000 to 300,000, depending on the deal.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)