PAUL SALADINO, MD: Replace your regular deodorant with this, and your body will thank you

Replace your regular deodorant with this, and your body will thank you… pic.twitter.com/Gy6kNZyi6E

— Paul Saladino, MD (@paulsaladinomd) May 12, 2025

Clogged arteries in a 50-year-old vegan

Clogged arteries in a 50 year old carnivore!!

Source: mindfullygrounded pic.twitter.com/EnwzloYO8h

— Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 (@SBakerMD) May 12, 2025

DR. RAMANI DURVASULA: Everyone is attracted to narcissistic people

Everyone is attracted to narcissistic people.  They're charming.  They're charismatic.  They're confident.  Research has shown they're often rated as more attractive than other people.  They take good care of their bodies.  They know lots of interesting things. They're so concerned about hip cred that they are like they know the cool restaurant.  Oh, all of us have been indoctrinated to think that these are the people were supposed to be dating, right.  Who says no to charm, charisma, and attractiveness?  Me maybe, but just nobody else would do that.  So we're all attracted to them, right, until, and even with the vulnerable narcissistic folks, you'll say, "Really?  Someone's going to be attracted to sullen and resentful?"  That's not how they come off when you first meet them.  Many times a vulnerable narcissistic person looks like a vulnerable child who needs to be rescued.  So if you like rescuing people or puppies or any small vulnerable creature, that's going to seem actually very attractive to you.  So we're all attracted to them.

What about what are they attracted to in us?  What they are attracted to in us is our supply.  Now supply can mean different things to different narcissistic folks.  Classical sorts of supplier.  Are we attractive?  If we are attractive, if we have some form of social status, if we have resource, if we have connections, the things that would get them supply.  Here's where it gets wonky. Because the question of attractiveness is what attracts people?  It's almost the wrong question.  The more deep questions is what gets people stuck in narcissistic relationships?  Because narcissistic relationships start strong.  These are people who are running their fastest miles in the beginning of the marathon.  Like they're just like go!  And this is, these can often feel like a fairy tale.  It's glamorous and it's exciting and the dates are really interesting, and they're very attuned.  May be very attentive.  They focus on you and a figure what's going to work for you?  If they really want to keep you close they want to get you and they want to get you quick because then you're like a butterfly under glass.  Then they've got you captured because after all this good stuff happens, you've bought in.  You might even be dubious for a while, saying, "Seems too good to be true," or "I don't know," but then people after about, I always say somewhere between 6 weeks and 6 months, the devaluing stage starts and then it's . . . they've got you, right.  And then you might get the passive aggressive digs, the minimization, the lack of empathy, the withdrawing, the withholding, and people say where did that first six weeks go?  Did you like, we had such a good time and as the devaluing begins, people start to blame themselves.  So people who are more empathic, more forgiving, more optimistic, these are the kinds of people who get stuck because they're making allowances for this.  They're saying, "I mean, I can't, they were lovely and they did say they're having a really stressful time at work."  But their behavior is consistently dismissive and rude, and so you keep making excuses, excuses, excuses, but then there's a few good days sprinkled in there.

CHASE HUGHES: Cool thing about mitochondria is that mitochondria is not human

SIR JAMES GOLDSMITH: The result is, we are destroying the stability of our societies because we are worshiping the wrong god, economic index

from The Mises Institute, 

In 1994, Charlie Rose interviewed the British businessman James Goldsmith. Sir Goldsmith was campaigning in the European Union against the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), a component of the WTO agreement. In 1995, 125 countries had signed onto the agreement, which included agricultural subsidies. Goldsmith warned in the interview that this would lead to massive emigration from third-world countries and that people in western society had come to serve an economic index that harms them. He claimed that, if the GATT were adopted, we would be:

Creating mass immigration, which none of us could control. We would be destroying the towns, which are already largely destroyed. Look at Mexico; look at our own towns, and we’re doing this for economic dogma because we’ve got to get it done by the end of December. We can’t wait another year or two to see the results. Otherwise some political gimmick like Fast Track will go out of the way. What is this nonsense? Everything is based in our modern society on improving an economic index. How do we get greater economic growth? How do we grow the GNP? The result is, we are destroying the stability of our societies because we are worshiping the wrong god, economic index

From her interview on Tucker Carlson on April 28, 2025.

"One of the greatest explanations of globalization ever given Sir James Goldsmith came to United States in 1994 and he did an interview with Charlie Rose and he described why we should never approve the Uruguay Round, 1986-1993, of gas and Institute the WTO to this day he nailed it perfectly." . . . He said we are going to hollow out the middle class in the West and we are going to devastate our culture and we are going to devastate the quality of the food supply.  To this day, I think it's the best description [of globalization] and if you read my online book and listen to Sir James Goldsmith, what they both describe is the fact that we knew, we knew what we were . . . in other words, the leadership knew that this would destroy or devastate the West.   --Catherine Austin Fitts.  

16:25.  So why did they do it?

16:29.  That's the 64,000 question.  I think one of the reasons they did it is I think they wanted to create the capacity and centralize the capital they needed to go into space, and I think they knew that they would need . . . every hundred or so years, the central Bankers do a reset.  And I think they knew they were coming into a reset and they felt with this technology that if they didn't globalize someone else would and they wanted to control the process.

17:06.  So they needed the money to go into space

The Uruguay agreement was part of the GATT., 1947-1995, when it gave way to the WTO in 1995 that replaced GATT.