[RG911Team] If we had a choice, we think Trump should have considered Lt. Col Tony Shaffer for Sec. of Defense. Not only does he have extensive counterterror experience, he has blown the whistle on the 9/11 cover-up.
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) November 13, 2024
Who would you choose?pic.twitter.com/0kB8onF9x0
The host is Lieutenant Colonel Tony Shaffer.
00:00. Two of the hijackers were escorted by a guy named Anwar al-Awlaki. Anwar al-Awlaki, by the way for those paying attention, was assassinated in Yemen along with his son by Barack Obama in a hellfire strike in Yemen. So I said at the time that was not about . . . Anwar al-Awlaki was no existential threat. He was a priest who was on the run, and I think they killed him because he had direct knowledge about whatever we're talking about here. He was a US partner. No, I'm serious, Richard. This was an assassination of a US person. No doubt. Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated by Barack Obama. I've said a number of times that they did not want that man alive because of what he knew. Anwar al-Awlaki became an asset of the FBI in the late 90s while he was a holy man in California. He was found with prostitutes. I don't know about holy men and prostitutes, not my job, but he got caught and the FBI made him a deal he couldn't refuse and he became an asset.
01:02. Now, the Deep State I think is that permanent bureaucracy, a Leviathan if you will, which basically will build itself up and focus on what benefits it, not the American people, not the Constitution, and it will ally with whatever political party, or entity within a political party, that will benefit them and allow them to continue that march forward. So I would argue the military industrial complex, the military industrial Congressional complex, that Eisenhower warned us of has continued to grow.
01:32 The 9/11 Commission, and I was told by one of the commissioners in person, face to face, and I'll quote, "Everybody on that commission was covering for somebody."
01:44. You called it fiction, the 911 Commission Report. Can you tell us why?
01:47. Because it was based on a narrative that was designed before the investigation even started.
01:54. The more that we can get out legally and put sunlight on this issue, the more chances there are for a new investigation.
