Friday, November 1, 2024

OWEN BENJAMIN: Free will cannot be taken, it has to be given.

My prediction. Trump wins and they attempt to nullify it with the 14th Amendment [Section 3]. It disqualifies former officials if they took part in an insurrection.
It will hurt more if it’s after he wins. Especially if it’s a landslide.
It will appear that the people's choice is being rejected by an invisible cabal of baby-eating reptiles. This will be intended to create hopelessness and break apart families.
This will be fought about for years and will offer Americans an excuse to be unproductive miserable and resentful. This is an offer, it’s always an offer. If you accept it and people don’t want to hang around you anymore and you get fired it’s not the “deep state.”
I warned everyone not to take part in January 6th. I called that Biden may win and they would make it look like it was obviously stolen to create an animalistic blowback.
If you realize that the fact is this presentation is for social engineering you will see how it works better. Free will cannot be taken it has to be given.
People who crave power and who don’t possess the qualities that make people want to give them authority have to trick people into acting like miserable pigs so they can get it by default.
It’s why despair, sin, vulgarity, wrath, and greed are pushed. If you become animalistic you lose your authority.
Hope that helps. Not trying to sound like a “know it all” because I’m not, but I’m a “know a lot.”

NAOMI BROCKWELL: Surveillance has dangerous psychological consequences -- yet we're creating a world without privacy. We aren't passive enjoyers of tech, we have say in its direction. Let's write a better future.

People become defensive instead of open-minded.  Admitting to a change in our beliefs might seem like a weakness in the face of ever-present digital history.  And knowing that our actions are constantly monitored and recorded can make us refrain from exploring new ideas, or questioning the status quo because we fear the potential repercussions or judgment based on our digital trail with every digital action being scrutinized, there's a subtle push toward conformity.  It becomes safer to follow the herd than to stand out or challenge prevailing norms and this leads to a society that values uniformity of individual thought.  This new-found digital shadow haunts us.  Instead of spontaneous expressions or genuine searches for knowledge, we might lean toward actions that look better in our digital profile.  There is this subtle internalization that our digital self is in some way more important than our real self.  In a world like this, open authenticity becomes scarce, replaced by curated personalities for digital consumption.  These are profound shifts in the collective psyche of society that we need to be aware of . . . .  --Naomi Brockwell

Privacy is a vaunted goal to get after.  But surveillance is so far developed that it is hard to imagine privacy winning.  

In our communities, police forces in squad cars have receded in favor of crowd-sourced surveillance.

"Crowd-Sourced Suspicion Apps Are Out of Control," Matthew Guariglia, Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 21, 2021.

"Community Surveillance Apps,"

"Networked Self-Defense and Monetized Vigilantism: Private Surveillance Systems," Elizabeth E. Joh, SSRN, July 26, 2021.  

"The Rise of Fear-Based Social Media Like Nextdoor, Citizen, and Now Amazon's Neighbors," Rani Molla, May 7, 2019.

"Breaking the Limits in Urban Video Monitoring: Massive Crowd Source Surveillance Over Vehicles," Vitaly PetrovSergey AndreevMario GerlaYevgeni Koucheryavy, IEEE Wireless Communications, September 23, 2018.

Crowdsourced Surveillanced and Networked Data, Nick Lally, Security Dialogue, SAGE, February 2017.

"The Real Monster of Street Level Surveillance," Rory Mir, Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 25, 2024.

PETER ST ONGE: Trump Wants to Abolish the Income Tax But Will Congress Cooperate?

profstonge.com

"Trump Wants to Abolish the Income Tax."

It's official.  Donald Trump wants to abolish the income tax.  In a much anticipated interview with Joe Rogan, Trump said the country should return to the late 19th century when we had no income tax at all and funded the federal government with tariffs.  Now for months, Trump has been making it clear he really does not like the income tax.  He's promised to exempt tax on tips, Social Security, overtime pay, first responders, and even 18 million veterans.  I kept hoping he would come out and just break up with the income tax once and for all, and indeed he did.  So what if we end the income tax, laying off all 93,643 IRS agents?  So you can keep every dollar you earn while Washington will have to run on bake sales.  While the income tax currently costs American people $2.4 trillion dollars a year, Trump proposes to replace it with tariffs of 20% on everybody but China, who gets an extra special 60% tariff.  All together that might bring in about $900 billion dollars a year this would grow America's economy like rocket fuel I run through some numbers on the free sub stack but maybe near term we were talking a 20% increase in the economy so about a $15,000 raise for the typical American family note that's on top of the een thousand of income tax you would no longer have to pay knock off $3,000 for the tariffs and you get about $30,000 in additional income for the typical American family close to $3,000 per month.  Keeps getting better because going by low tax countries today or America before the income tax we might expect a doubling of annual economic growth.  So 5% growth would be the new normal.  Your kids would be three times richer than you as it used to work in America.   America would be by far the richest country in the world, also as it was before the income tax.  Of course, ditching the income tax would also mean the mother of federal budget holds after all replacing 2.4 trillion dollars with $900 billion dollars is a big hole even if you add say an extra $500 billion in payroll and excise tax from economic growth you still got about a trillion dollars to cover now we could just let it run a deficit letting the economy outgrow it I mean that's what they do with everything else that does not grow the economy but you could also cut a trillion dollars in federal spending out of the six and a half to seven trillion that we currently spend.  How would one do such a thing?  Well, the other day, Elon Musk estimated he could cut two trillion dollars in waste and fraudulent payments Ron Paul responded suggesting the military industrial complex and the Pharma industrial complex indeed going by countries like Britain perhaps $800 out of $900 billion dollars we spend on military is not for protecting Americans.  So border, Coast Guard, nukes, it's for invading other countries.  As for Pharma, really the medical industrial complex, if we simply copy countries like Singapore, we might save around about $2 trillion dollars or more and Americans would not go bankrupt getting knee surgery.  And then there is illegals, $150 billion a year minimum, plus the $1 trillion or more we spend on welfare, much of it to the able-bodied.  Sharpen some pencils, and you get $1 trillion easy, probably $2 trillion if you try.  So your country is rich, the IRS is gone, and you get a nice lean government.  

So what's next?  The Uniparty will fight this like a rabid dog.  But if a president can sell it to American voters, $30,000 is a chunk of change, Congress will go along out of sheer self-preservation; plus, the bake sales would be lit.

HRVOJE MORIC: "The whole theory for "two weeks to flatten the curve" comes from eugenicists," whistleblower and former medical coder Zowe Smith explains

It's critical to acknowledge the COVID scam/crime against humanity has been a major *EUGENICS PROGRAM*. "The whole theory for two weeks to flatten the curve comes from eugenicists," whistleblower and former medical coder Zowe Smith () explains for Hrvoje Morić () of Geopolitics and Empire (@Geopolitics_Emp). "The whole [ICD-10] code system comes out of a whole group of people that were in a club called the Eugenics Society, but they were also in a statistical society, and there was a revolving door between the two." (The ICD-10 code system is an international classification used for categorizing diagnoses, symptoms, and procedures in healthcare for statistical reporting, billing, and research.) "And the same families, the same names pop up from...the very beginning of the eugenics movement tied all the way back to sir Francis Galton, the guy who came up with it [eugenics], all the way to now," Smith says. "I was looking at it [COVID] through [how] the medical system is being exploited, and this genocide is being hidden through these [ICD-10] numbers. So why is it being hidden through these numbers? Come to find out, Bill Gates is a big player in this. He was a big player in IBM...[And] he's got some really nefarious ties with Planned Parenthood, his dad being in there, which goes straight back to eugenics. He's also tied in with Rockefeller." "I talk about how Rockefeller took over Western medicine in the book [The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult] and how he was involved in eugenics. Many people who have studied eugenics have realized that not only were a lot of people involved in it, and it was normal at one point, but these people had a revolving door between other organizations," the whistleblower adds. "It was almost a club where the same people show up doing the same things over time. And so...what happened during World War 2, the main conception is America came in and saved the day, and we stopped the holocaust of the Jews, and now it's bad to be racist, and eugenics is bad, and it's all over now. We stopped it. But that's not true. It went underground, and it came over to America. And the part that most people don't understand, it was funded by America to begin with." Smith notes, "It never stopped. It just morphed into something else, but it's still the same people. It's still Gates. It's still Rockefeller. It's still the Warburgs. It's still the Rothschilds. It's still those same families that are at the top of the WEF, the WHO, all of these regulatory agencies, all the governments that did this to us. So, yes, this is a democide." She adds, "The statistical coding system [the ICD-10 system] that they use to exploit this and enact COVID all across the world because the WHO, every member state has to use these codes. That's what they mandate. It's been their mission to make everybody comply to this generalization, standardization, centralization for the purposes of monitoring their eugenics programs." Partial transcription of clip: "Ultimately, I think COVID-1984 was a a multi-pronged attack. I don't think it was just the vaccines. I think that was a major linchpin in it obviously, but I don't think it was the only one. I think the PCR test was part of it. The lockdowns were part of it, and the psychological warfare was part of it. There's so many layers of it. "And once you understand a psychopath, you know they're not gonna use one thing. They're gonna use multiple things, and they could scare you about a lot of things. They might not do everything they're gonna say they're gonna do, but it's it doesn't mean that they have, you know, one thing and only one thing. And I think a lot of people who are trying to research this, you know, they find, oh, it's the PCR test. That was what did it. Or they find the Remdesivir and then, oh, that was what did it. Or they'll find the ventilator and say, that was it. But I think it was all of those things. And, ultimately, I think it was a eugenics project, and I did not expect to find that. When I decided they were using the codes to game the numbers. There's the COVID-19 code, which recategorized everything and incentivized everything, and I thought, okay. If this is a linchpin that they're using, the platform that they're using to exploit what's going on, there's a reason for that. The people who set this up did this intentionally. "So who did it and why? And the beginning of the ICD-10 code book, it has about, you know, I don't know how many, but a whole bunch of alphabet agencies, the WHO, the AMA, the CDC, all, you know, the alphabet agencies. Those are the ones that created the international code system. And it says these are the people responsible for the official coding guidelines, the rules for how to apply this statistical monitoring system. So I went all the way down to the bottom of the rabbit hole, and I found, wow. The whole theory for the "two weeks to flatten the curve" comes from eugenicists. The whole code system comes out of a whole group of people that were in a club called the Eugenics Society, but they were also in a statistical society, and there was a revolving door between the two. "And the same families, the same names pop up from then, which is the very beginning of the eugenics movement tied all the way back to sir Francis Galton, the guy who came up with it, all the way to now. And Etienne will tell you this too in his book Solving COVID because he found the same information from a different angle. I was looking at it through the medical system is being exploited, and this genocide is being hidden through these numbers. So why is it being hidden through these numbers? Come to find out, Bill Gates is a big player in this. He was a big player in IBM, at you know, going all the way back to World War 2. He's got some really nefarious ties with Planned Parenthood, his dad being in there, which goes straight back to eugenics. He's also tied in with Rockefeller. "I talk about how Rockefeller took over Western medicine in the book and how he was involved in eugenics. Many people who have studied eugenics have realized that, not only were a lot of people involved in it, and it was normal at one point, but these people had a revolving door between other organizations. And it was almost a club where the same people show up doing the same things over time. And so you're exactly right. What happened during World War 2, the main conception is America came in and saved the day, and we, you know, stopped the holocaust of the Jews, and now it's bad to be racist, and eugenics is bad, and it's all over now. We stopped it. But that's not true. It went underground, and it came over to America. And the part that most people don't understand, it was funded by America to begin with. "So it never stopped. It just morphed into something else, but it's still the same people. It's still Gates. It's still Rockefeller. It's still the Warburgs. It's still the Rothschilds. It's still those same families that are at the top of the WEF, the WHO, all of these regulatory agencies, all the governments that did this to us. So, yes, this is a democide. This is an intentional thing, and a lot of people will say, for various reasons, they write this down and they explain what they're gonna do to you. And when you look at some of the documents, there are programs, there are experiments, there are simulations that they've run. There are statements that put in writing, saying, basically, "We're trying to kill you." I mean, they don't put it in those words, but as you go through and you unpack each one and you read, you know, in between the lines, it's clear. "And then realizing, wow. Okay. So the statistical coding system that they use to exploit this and enact COVID all across the world because the WHO, every member state has to use these codes. That's what they mandate. It's been their mission to make everybody comply to this generalization, standardization, centralization for the purposes of monitoring their eugenics programs."

  ffggggg

Have you spoken to your local NSA rep lately?

NSA Unchained