Eric R. Weinstein’s “Great Replacement” https://t.co/eTU0L1U0uC via @JohnnyVedmore
— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) October 5, 2024
"The Great Replacement" concept is not just used to intimidate or scare domestic populations, it is real and it is really being implemented. So don't dismiss the obvious fallout from this. It's designed to lower the standard of living wherever it is implemented. You're doubling the population in many cases so as to reduce the amount of goods once available to just the native population.
Vedmore explains,
Essentially the UN decided that the democratic voters of a nation-state would oppose unfettered economic migration, as we are experiencing today, and the folks at this globalist entity believed they knew better. To achieve their goals, the United Nations needed to subversively introduce this agenda in an undemocratic manner without gaining the consent of the native citizens of the democracies that they were to target. The man they chose to analyse and map out this scheme, which many refer to now as “The Great Replacement” was Eric R. Weinstein, who has since become a central figure in the “Intellectual Dark Web” whose members include Ben Shapiro, David Rubin, Jordan B. Peterson, Sam Harris, Douglas Murray, Joe Rogan, and Eric’s brother Bret Weinstein.
Vedmore's revelation is so valuable here. It's important to keep regular notes as to who the "Intellectual Dark Web" is. When I first heard Jordan Peterson, I thought he was fantastic and was really pursuing truths in service of working kids.
Ben Shapiro.
David Rubin.
Jordan B. Peterson.
Sam Harris [in my opinion, one of the more disgusting guys anywhere].
Douglas Murray.
Joe Rogan, and
Bret Weinstein.
In the context of "The Great Replacement," however, Eric Weinstein stands out as the prime culprit. He was employed by the UN, an exclusive hotbed of communist intellectuals.
Eric Weinstein was employed by the UN to produce a document entitled: "Migration for the Benefit of All: Towards a New Paradigm of Economic Immigration," Weinstein was aware of the damage which economic migration was to do to the native populations in places such as the United States and the United Kingdom. In one part of the document he produced for this nefarious United Nations agenda entitled, “Preference for migrants, undercutting of natives”, Weinstein wrote:
“When migrant and native workers of comparable value to an employer are asked to compete, it is to be expected that the employer will take the applicant who costs him/her less. If, however, the respective terms of employment of the native and the migrant workers differ considerably, the employer may develop a preference between otherwise equal candidates. If migrant workers are not permitted to seek alternative work in the host country, then their “company loyalty” is reduced to a matter of law and regulation. In such circumstances, employers know that they will not have to earn migrant worker loyalty with the expenditure of resources that would be needed in the case of native workers. Thus it is to be expected that in systems tethering migrant workers to their employer-sponsors, some migrants will out-compete natives of comparable or greater value simply by virtue of the terms of employment set by the MWP. Since this is precipitated by a rational market response on the part of native employers, this consequence must be seen as a natural, if unfortunate, by-product of direct migrant sponsorship.”
