Wednesday, February 14, 2024

20,000 people die of cancer every day this translates to 8 million people a year, half a million of which are Americans. 

At the beginning of last century, 1900, 1/20 person would get cancer; in the 1940s, it was one out of every 16 people; in the 1970s, it was one out of 10. Today, one person out of three gets cancer in the course of their lifetime.  

I liked this video when I first saw it, but reviewing it here this morning the fear-mongering is absolutely atrocious.  I like to tell people to pause, to stop and think, as does Chris Beat Cancer's, Chris Wark.  No wonder patients freak out and are shocked into an anxious state for which the doctor provides the only solution: chemotherapy. 

Over 1 million Americans are diagnosed with a new cancer every year.  All these people suddenly plunge into a dark tunnel that will radically change their life in the years to come.  

"They find themselves at the complete mercy of the disease," which is a trillion dollar industry.

While in that tunnel, each patient feeds an immense medical apparatus that employees hundreds of thousands of people and generates millions and millions of dollars for the medical and pharmaceutical industry from research laboratories to medical school prevention clinics to worldwide drug sales.  sales.  Today, the cancer medical apparatus is so large and expensive that it needs its patients in order to survive just as much as the patience need the apparatus to survive.  

01:48. Peter Barry Chowka,

The typical cancer patient spends $50,000 to treat his disease with 1 million new American cancer patients every year.  That translates to 50 billion dollars annually spent on cancer treatments in the United States . . . 

But you've got to love this gem of a follow-up comment,

but to modern oncology, cancer still remains a mystery.  

03:09. The official Theory maintains the cancer originates in the cell.  

 

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

REPOST: Reminder that when they pull out their hockey stick, you just point to the airport strip

"everything that is illegal for normal pharmaceuticals is now legal as long as Prep Act window remains open for them."

Completely different category of product which the federal government created called EUA, Emergency Use Authorization, and this category only exists under Public Health Emergency or Prep Act declaration by Health and Human Services Secretary.  So under this particular category they are regulated by a completely separate section of Food, Drugs, & Cosmetics Act, FDA, which says that "everything that is illegal for normal pharmaceuticals is now legal as long as Prep Act window remains open for them."  And as we know for COVID, the PREP Act window is open until December of 2024.  And now we also have a window open for Ebola, Marburg, and other things until the end of 2028.  And I assure you the federal government fully intends to keep these Prep Act declarations going in perpetuity because there is no way on this planet these products can comply with normal regulatory requirements.  They tried for 20 years and they failed every time.  So they decided to go on the market anyway by creating this new regulatory status for themselves.  

So under this regulatory status, there is no IRB (Institutional Review Boards) requirement. 

There is no informed consent requirement.

There is no requirement for any compliance with good manufacturing practices; rather, it says you can do it as a manufacturer voluntarily but there is no enforcement and clinical trial data is completely irrelevant.  

Also, these things can coexist with what's fully approved versions except, of course, these products have never been approved normally under investigational status and, therefore, there is no fully approved version.  There is only an EUA.  And only EUAs have always been shipped in the US with drug inserts arriving blank.  And they never complied with any rules or requirements.  

 On January 24th 2023 a press conference took place discussing the ongoing military deployment of bioweapons.  One of the attendees was Katherine Watt, a Pennsylvania paralegal and law researcher. Here are her findings in her own words.

00:19. The basic idea is that public health has been militarized where the military has been turned into a public health front or a Potemkin Village such that they're using public health law to carry out a military campaign.  I would not call them DOD vaccines.  I would call them DOD weapons.

They call it the kill box because the first lady that I had was Todd calendar January 30th 2020 to interview on Elizabeth leave leads podcast called Truth for health and he described it as a killbox I looked that up and it turns out that it's a military term for establishing a geographic space or three dimensional area for a military attack by air and by surface to kill the people who are in it and dismantle the kind of framework and move on to the next campaign and what the dod and the World Health Organization intend to do and have gotten quite far in doing but not completely accomplishing.  

Their goal is to set up the entire world as the geographic terrain.

Their target population: all the people in the world.

The duration of their campaigns: permanent.

The weapons they are using are informational: the propaganda piece and the censorship piece;

Psychological: that's the fear and terrorism piece, telling people that they need to be afraid all the time and they need to listen to the government;

The third piece is the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapon, which are called in their campaign "pharmaceuticals" and "vaccines" but are actually toxins and pathogens.  

After I heard that interview, I'd already been wondering what was going on but I started trying to track down some of the things Todd Callendar talked about in his interview and figure out what the legal frameworks were and how they were set up and what the financial coercion mechanisms were.  My finding, which many other people have found from various other angles, was that this project has been going on for centuries.  It's basically globalist Central bankers and lots of related organizations trying to get complete control of human beings through Banking and programs and Military programs and they kicked it into higher gear in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act and they and then they kicked the public health aspect of it into higher gear starting in the 1930s and 40s before the 1960s they mostly did it through orchestrated armed conflicts and financial depressions and Wars which are very loud messy and destructive to infrastructure and it makes it difficult for them to have probable deniability and legal impunity for what they are doing so in the mid 60s they got much better at inducing suicide homicide by fraudulently labeling poisons as medicines or as vaccines or as prophylactics and telling people that submitting to that poisoning process was their civic duty we saw that in covid with the shorthand for do this or you're going to kill your grandma or we're all in this together and the way that the pharmaceutical method primarily is primarily useful to them is plausible deniability as much easier and legal impunity is a lot easier to achieve the same goal like genocide is killing a lot of people without their fingerprints being all over it.

4:00  I looked into the coercion Cascades mostly Financial not going to go into a lot of detail with that but it starts at the top with the bank for international settlement and they can use their control of other Federal central banks access to financial systems and then all the way down through state governments National governments local municipal School District's hospitals everything.  If you comply with what they're telling you to do as far as masking, testing, isolating yourself, taking injections, then you will get the financial access you need to run your business or to have a job.  And if you don't comply, they can cut you off from those services.  That is one of the main mechanisms through which the whole thing was carried out.

4:52. And then on the legal side at my website I do trace it back farther but I'm going to start at 1969 just for the sake of starting somewhere.  The US Congress passed the law to set up the chemical and biological warfare program and in that log which is 50 USC chapter 32 there are very important key terms including protective prophylactic and defensive which is how they Justified doing it they were using those words because the international community of ordinary non-insane people were concerned about biological and chemical weapons and they were working on International treaties to prohibit them.  And so they needed to build in loopholes, and the loopholes they built in were not going to do biological and chemical research weapons development except for "protective" or "prophylactic" or "defensive" purposes.  And that's a false characterization because all biologically active products are intrinsically aggressive, toxic, and lethal, and that's where we get disciplines that's the thing that disciplines like to xicology pharmacokinetics genotoxicity drug drug interactions all related to that fact of the things that go into the human body has or any living body has some effects which can be toxic so that was the way they tried to get around that threat

 

When Democrats say we need migrants to pick our crops, show them this video