For their clinical trials, pharmaceutical companies . . . subjects suffering an underlying "disorder." If the trial is a success, they can then claim that their product can treat that disorder. Any suicides or attempts can be blamed on the "illness" rather than their treatment.

Just so you know, re antidepressant clinical trials.

Pharmaceutical companies much prefer clinical trials where the subjects are suffering an underlying "disorder." They can then claim, if the trial is a success, their product can treat that disorder and any suicides or attempts… pic.twitter.com/7cUcdWctaE

— BOB FIDDAMAN💜 (@Fiddaman) October 30, 2023

January 6th was a lawful protest, which devolved into a riot. That’s why Jack Smith couldn’t charge insurrection. No evidence.

How many “insurrectionists” go unarmed into a capitol, get to the Senate floor, walk through velvet ropes, take selfies, and follow police direction?

January 6th was a lawful protest, which devolved into a riot.

That’s why Jack Smith couldn’t charge insurrection.

No evidence.

— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) October 30, 2023

How the Chutkan gag order [against Trump permits] Jack Smith to continue his information warfare on the American people and prosecute Trump in the court of public opinion

The Chutkan gag order is actively encouraging Jack Smith to continue his information warfare on the American people. Here's the playbook:
- Smith leaks to media that Mark Meadows takes an immunity deal to testify against Trump
- Meadows' team denies the claim
- Trump, and his…

— Daniel Baldwin (@baldwin_daniel_) October 30, 2023

D.C. Judge Tanya Chutkan.

- Smith leaks to media that Mark Meadows takes an immunity deal to testify against Trump - Meadows' team denies the claim - Trump, and his team, cannot respond in public - If Trump responds, Chutkan can fine him or throw him in jail - Smith, his prosecutors, and the liberal media that hates Trump can now try the case in public by setting a narrative that Trump cannot challenge - They've been doing this from the jump - They can do the exact thing they claim Trump wants to do - Yet, Chutkan had the audacity to claim the gov't has a right to a fair trial - Pres. Trump, or any of his supporters, cannot get a fair trial in DC (the most anti-Trump district in the country) 

- This isn't fair; this spits in the eye of the American judicial system...and should chill every American to their core 

It's not in the Constitution for Americans to finance or go to war for any other nation. America isn't a theocracy.

You swore to obey the U.S. Constitution.

It's not in the Constitution for Americans to finance or go to war for any other nation.

America isn't a theocracy.

Congress doesn't have its hand in our pockets, ready to pull out cash for any particular religion or nation. https://t.co/lLla4x7LHO

— Chris Rossini (@ChrisRossini) October 30, 2023

By 2043, . . . interest expense as a percentage of GDP will be 7%. That is 144% of all current discretionary spending.

MUST WATCH:

Stan Druckenmiller destroys Janet Yellen.

“I literally think if you go back to Alexander Hamilton, it was the biggest blunder in the history of the Treasury. I have no idea why she has not been called out on this. She has no right to still be in that job.” pic.twitter.com/aHp2iz7x1A

— Stephen Geiger (@Stephen_Geiger) October 30, 2023

Janet Yellen: 2 years @ 15 basis points. 

When the debt rolls over by 2033, interest expense is going to be 4.5% of GDP if rates are where they are now.  By 2043, sounds like it's a lot of time, but it's really not, it's 20 years, and interest expense as a percentage of GDP will be 7%.  That is 144% of all current discretionary spending.  Let me repeat that: interest expense alone will be 144% at today's rate of all discretionary spending.  So the politicians that are telling you and think that they're not going to cut entitlements, it's just an outright lie.  The numbers absolutely don't work.  It's a fantasy.