COVID-19 VACCINE WILL BE ADDED TO THE CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE IN 2 DAYS IF WE DO NOT ACT

Where is the objectivity?  Anyone showing up who questions the efficacy or value of vaccines?  Or are they just going to sign off on murdering the souls of babies?

The entire medical industry is like tens of thousands of multi-headed hydra all self-congratulating and praising each other for fear that not enough tributes of "Hero" is being levelled to inflate egos, prices, and prop up a house of chemical cards.  I mean they are worse than what you might imagine a school teacher might do with a few students in her class.  The medical industry is a country club of overpriced whores.   

This is a meeting of a CDC army from around the country.  It'll be a well-paid conference with the finest coffee at a Continental breakfast and in 5-star hotels. Expect nothing less.  

🚨WHO IS ORGANIZING THE PROTEST?

WE MUST STOP THIS VOTE!

COVID-19 VACCINE WILL BE ADDED TO THE CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE IN 2 DAYS IF WE DO NOT ACT   https://t.co/wGegvgMzT7

— Brook Jackson 💜 (@IamBrookJackson) October 17, 2022

Oh, God.  They are working to devour our children.  Every time you hear them claim that they want to save or keep your children safe, it's a lie.  In fact, assume the opposite. 

🚩 CDC is trying to quietly include a vote to add the mRNA C•19 vaccine to the annual childhood immunization schedule. This vote takes place in 2 days on October 19th. Here’s why this matters:  pic.twitter.com/NyaO1p0mAi

— Kate (@KateTalksTruth) October 17, 2022

At 11:15, the topic of presentation turns to vaccines against mosquito-born viruses.  Well, how convenient is this, right?  I mean just the other day, Bill Gates was talking about the benefits of GMO mosquitos.  And the University of Washington at Seattle, a Bill Gates lab, was praising the efficiency of the using mosquitos like a flying needle.  Oh, I feel safe and effective now, don't you? 

Here's the agenda for the 19th: 

I.  Introduction                              Dr. Beth Bell (ACIP, WG Chair) from the University of Washington, Bill Gates' owned. 

II.  Overview of chikungunya and chikungunya vaccines.  Wow, isn't this convenient.  Chikungunya vaccines target arboviruses, viruses that are spread by insects, you know, things like mosquitos.  And hasn't Bill Gates been experimenting and bragging about how his GMO mosquitos are "safe and effective"?  

Dr. Susan Hills (CDC/NCEZID)

III. Vaccine immunogenicity and safety.  I mean given how long vaccine development has been in the real world, why is it that they've got to constantly harp on safety.  Haven't they figured it out?                                                      Dr. Katrin Dubischar (Valneva)

IV.  Work group interpretation of vaccine data & activities.                Dr. Susan Hills (CDC/NCEZID)  is out of Ft. Collins, CO.

. . . 

At 1:15 on Wednesday, October 19:  

COVID-19 VACCINES

I.  Introduction                              Dr. Matt Daley (ACIP, WG Chair), a pediatrician with the Colorado Permanente Medical Group, serves as a member of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.  Where is the objectivity?  Anyone showing up who questions the value of vaccines?  Or are they just going to sign off on murdering the souls of babies?

II. Pregnant people (pregnant people?  Do you mean expectant mothers?)                        Dr. Sascha Ellington (CDC/NCCDPHP) and is affiliated with the CDC.  

III.  COVID-19 in infants ages <6 months and effectiveness of maternal COVID19 vaccination in pregnant people and infants.        Dr. Katherine Fleming-Dutra (CDC/NCIRD)

IV.  Vaccine Safety in Children. Dr. Christine Olson (CDC/NCEZID)  

In 2016, Dr. Olson [was] a Medical Officer in the Preterm and Infant Health Team Lead- and Infant Health Team Lead at CDC. She completed her MD and MPH at the University of Minnesota and is boarded in Obstetrics Gynecology and Preventive Medicine. In the CDC Zika response she serves as part of the Pregnancy and Birth Defects Task Force.

V.  COVID-19 vaccines in children.                                            Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD) 

VI.  Vaccines for Children.               Dr. Jeanne Santoli (CDC/NCIRD)  

THOMAS RENZ: This is why the latest lawsuit and our fight is so important. These idiots are literally going to create an extinction level event if we do not stop them.

This is why the latest lawsuit and our fight is so important. These idiots are literally going to create an extinction level event if we do not stop them. This is literally worse than experimenting with a nuke. #Truth #Covfefe #COVID19 #Fauci #gof https://t.co/jTf8avPxs6

— Tom Renz (@RenzTom) October 17, 2022

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION: WHAT'S ITS REAL VALUE? Dr. Richard Ebright: "not a matter of value but a matter of incentives. GoF research . . . is fast and easy, much faster and much easier than vaccine or drug development."

Fauci funded most likely. https://t.co/vuJ3evObRs

— Salty Cracker (@SaltyCracker9) October 17, 2022

Here is how it starts

Boston University scientists were today condemned for 'playing with fire' after it emerged they had created a lethal new Covid strain in a laboratory. 

DailyMail.com revealed the team had made a hybrid virus — combining Omicron and the original Wuhan strain — that killed 80 per cent of mice in a study.

Okay, a little standard journalism would be nice.  For example, who condemned the Boston University Scientists?  Well, here is one condemnation from an academic, Professor Shmuel Shapira from the Israeli government.  Are we comforted given how the Israeli government captured such a high rate of vaccination? 

Professor Shmuel Shapira, a leading scientist in the Israeli Government, said: 'This should be totally forbidden, it's playing with fire.' 

Okay, this sent a chill down my spine, 

But the practice has been largely restricted in the US since 2017.   

So you mean to tell me that the U. S. government has allowed the genetic manipulation of virus, animals, bacteria, and all sorts of other critters?  To what end?  And given who we already know is in charge of the labs--like Fort Detrick [boy, do they have fancy names for bioweapons], and others--

Here is another condemnation.  Does this sound like a condemnation to you?  

Dr. Richard Ebright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, told DailyMail.com  that: 'The research is a clear example of gain of function research.' 

adding that

'If we are to avoid a next lab-generated pandemic, it is imperative that oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research be strengthened.'

Ooh, that is damning.  Honestly, do these guys look like they'd ever become whistleblowers?  A quick check shows that Rutgers chemist, Dr. Ebright, has been terrifically forthright about why the gain-of-function viruses were used in the first place.  In a Senate hearing via Zoom, he was forthcoming, saying that "it's not a matter of value but a matter of incentives."

During yesterday’s hearing, Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) asked Dr. Ebright and the other witnesses to explain why gain-of-function research is a popular choice among scientific researchers.

“Doctor Ebright, let me ask you about the merits of gain-of-function research because I was struck that something you said in your written testimony,” said Sen. Hawley.  You said, ‘gain-of-function research has no practical civilian application.’ From a research perspective, then what, why do it? I mean, what’s the, what’s the value, the real value of gain-of-function research?”

Doctor Ebright said, “Not a matter of value but incentives, particularly incentives within the academic research ecosystem. Gain-of-function research of concern is fast and easy, much faster and much easier than vaccine or drug development. And gain-of-function research is publishable, and gain-of-function research is fundable. With those four incentives in place: fast, easy, fundable, and publishable, the research will be performed.” 

So in his defense, it seems that Dr. Ebright has the interest of people everywhere.  This is refreshing.  

As to Shapira, he was critical of a Genesis award to Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla, 

The former head developer of Israel’s experimental coronavirus vaccine lashed out on Wednesday against the decision to award the prestigious Genesis Prize to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla.

Taking to Twitter, Prof. Shmuel Shapira, the former head of the Defense Ministry’s Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR), called the decision “pathetic.”

It shows he's got good instincts.  Plus, this, 

“There are other vaccines that are far more effective. There are countries with lower vaccination rates that bore [the pandemic] just fine,” he said. 

Yeah, why wasn't this evidence included in the science of evaluating vaccines?  To ask is to answer the question.  

Oh, this is rich.  As usual, they're changing the language.  The instance here is from bioweapons lab to a biosafety lab.  Cleaned the threat of mass murder right up.  

Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US. 

It adds that, 

In biosafety 4 labs, researchers do all experiments in a ‘biosafety cabinet’ — an enclosed, ventilated workspace for handling materials contaminated with pathogens.  

ELON MUSK: Saying the Quiet Parts Out Loud and Outing the NeoCon Playbook for All to See

Musk saying the quiet parts out loud. Neocons and Ukrainians (but I repeat myself) hate him for it. https://t.co/nlqJr7LRR1

— Tom Luongo (Give Deflation a Chance!) (@TFL1728) October 17, 2022

Tonight is the world premiere of RFK Jr.'s documentary film The Real Anthony Fauci, based on the book of the same name

Tonight is the world premiere of RFK Jr.'s documentary film The Real Anthony Fauci, based on the book of the same name. I had the opportunity to view it in advance, and you will love it. It's free to the world for ten days, starting tonight https://t.co/bzoV0fuKnR

— Tom Woods (@ThomasEWoods) October 17, 2022