Friday, September 16, 2022

BILL GATES' FINAL SOLUTION.

. . . If scientists are willing to put out a vaccine this corrupt, what makes you think that they wouldn't spend their time to put out data that would confuse you and make you not know what to believe about this vaccine.  What I'm saying is that we have to get to the point where we use our eyes, our ears, our brains, guys, to come to simple, deductive reasoning.  
They will come after you when you try to uncover the truth.  And also, it's very hard to speak out about the truth, and say, "Hey, maybe you should call a spade a spade here, and two plus two is four and the only thing that has changed in the past couple of months is the fact that everyone who took this vaccine.  You can't say that because there are no real studies for these correlations [and causations], and we suddenly have all of these extra deaths, and "we have no idea why, but we do know that it's not the vaccine," and that's the one thing they can tell you for sure.  


And we're waiting for people to print out data before we can come to conclusions.  . . . If scientists are willing to put out a vaccine this corrupt, what makes you think that they wouldn't spend their time to put out data that would confuse you and make you not know what to believe about this vaccine.  What I'm saying is that we have to get to the point where we use our eyes, our ears, our brains, guys, to come to simple, deductive reasoning.  We know that thousands have died already from the vaccines; we've seen that from the papers.  I'm convinced that millions have died . . . maybe a million to millions.  We know that some people died instantly from the vaccine.  We know that some cases are not reported when they happen.  I had a friend who died two weeks after taking the vaccine.  I know his case was not reported to VAERS.  And now you're talking about people who've died over a year after the vaccine.  I know these people are dying from the vaccine because don't tell me that 23-year-olds, who got the vaccine a year ago, are falling dead and it's due to "Sudden Death Syndrome." 

How the Religion of Social Justice Captured the Western World

Perhaps you've heard this argument before, but what I thought was striking was how all the different episodes of hysterics were relieved once a wealthy target sued these Social Justice Warriors.  Let that be a lesson to you.  The only way these folks can be stopped is via law suits.  That, and an accurate reporting of their crimes, pre-conviction, in the court of public opinion.  
 

Thank you to Steve Bartin.

" . . . you screw up supply lines by rerouting energy around the largest country by size in the world and then expect what to happen?"

MOTHER JONES: More or less an unpaid division of Pfizer?

By Tom Woods

It's hard to believe now, but not even one human lifetime ago the slogan "question authority" was associated with the left-liberal project.

That's long gone, having been replaced by "shut up and obey."

This more recent, more authoritarian approach is much more in line with historic progressivism, which began in the Progressive Era as an elitist movement that favored the management of society by a self-identified expert class, albeit concealed beneath a veneer of "democracy."

So it should not surprise us that Mother Jones, a progressive publication, isn't really so skeptical of authority or of big corporations after all. It's now more or less an unpaid division of Pfizer.

We've learned that senior editor Kiera Butler is preparing a hit piece on Dr. Vinay Prasad, himself a political liberal, for questioning the safety of the "boosters"; Prasad has correctly noted that the so-called safety data consists of results on eight mice.

Butler sought comment from Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya, whom I mention quite a bit in this newsletter. Jay has since reproduced her email, along with his answers.

So here's Kiera Butler:

I'm writing about the bivalent vaccines, and I saw that you had retweeted Dr. Prasad's video questioning their safety. I'm wondering if your past activism around opposing Covid protections -- with the Brownstone Institute, Hillsdale College, and the Great Barrington Declaration -- influenced your opinion on this at all? And I'm wondering if you think it's fair to characterize your takes on Covid as contrarian?

Jay's response:

(1) The FDA did not require any human clinical study before approving the bivalent ba4/5 booster, so I don't have any opinion at all about their safety profile. I simply don't know.

(2) The GBD was signed and supported by tens of thousands of scientists and doctors around the world. It is not a contrarian position, but represents the standard way of dealing with respiratory virus pandemics that the world has followed for a century until 2020.

(3) I am not paid by any of the organizations you mentioned and received $0 from them. My thoughts reflect my professional training in medicine, epidemiology, and health policy.

Let's see how much of that winds up in Kiera's Pfizer press release.

Sorry, article. 

For people who really do question authority, I recommend being part of the incredible and smart community I've built around the Tom Woods Show. I am extremely proud of it, and would love to have you join us:

 

Tom Woods 

JUST IN: FedEx stock plunges over 20% pre-market on "surprise" slowdown

Not too surprised.  Not only is there a recession, people are buying less, because prices on everything are through the roof.  So, production volume has to take a hit.  No production, less of a demand to ship things around town.