FROM D.A.R.P.A. INTERNAL MEMO

Never forget who started all this mess. pic.twitter.com/gPn4xh2KOE

— DCGreenZone1 (@DCGreenZone) June 10, 2022

You can buy a readily available SARS-Cov-2 Spike protein antibody . . . . Why hasn’t it been done?”

By Jon Rappoport

I was going to recapitulate the evidence that the virus, SARS-CoV-2, doesn’t exist. But I decided to leave it out of this article. I’m just going to focus on the vaccine and what it’s supposed to be doing.

Let’s say you’re a vaccine researcher. You develop a new type of shot that deploys RNA.

The RNA, when injected, has one purpose. It induces cells of the body to produce something called the spike protein. That’s it.

According to your theory, the body’s immune system will spring into action and mount a neutralizing attack against this protein.

As result, when the “real thing” comes along—the virus, which contains the spike protein—the vaccinated person will be protected. His immune system will ward off the virus.

Since, again, the whole and only reason you’re injecting the RNA shot is to make the body produce the spike protein…

Aren’t you going to make sure the body is, in fact, producing that protein?

Of course you are.

How will you do that?

In the only way you can.

You’ll line up 10 or 20 thousand vaccinated people and test them.

You’ll test them to make sure you can find that spike protein in their bodies.

So show me the study.

Show me that vaccine researchers and vaccine makers and the FDA actually had that study done.

Where is it?

I’m not talking about looking at three patients in China or Berlin or New York. I’m talking about an extensive test to make sure the vaccine is doing the ONE thing it’s supposed to be doing. Across the population.

I don’t see that study anywhere.

A couple of people have told me, “Well, OF COURSE the vaccine causes the body to make the spike protein. That’s what the RNA technology is all about. We KNOW that. The technology is WELL ESTABLISHED.”

So is the safety of drugs, until the drugs start killing lots of people.

I want something simple. Verification. Across the population. Verification that the vaccine is doing the one thing it’s supposed to be doing.

And I want to know why this verification hasn’t been attempted.

One professor actually told me, “Perhaps you might be able to devise a test that would detect the spike protein directly in the body…but it might be very difficult to do that…”

Really? In other words, a vaccine was developed to do a thing it might be impossible to verify?

And this was understood up front?

A few months ago, someone sent me a study. She said the study showed the spike protein HAD been found in vaccinated people. I read the study. First of all, the authors were reporting on just a few people. No good. Not useful. Second, as far as I could tell, the method of finding the spike protein was suspect. It relied on detecting indirect and unreliable markers that supposedly proved (but didn’t prove) that the protein was present in these few people. No good. Not useful.

Where is the large correctly done study?

I don’t find it anywhere.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman, who has dismantled and exposed the non-scientific process by which virologists’ claimed to have discovered SARS-CoV-2, offers these important comments about the spike protein:

“You can buy a readily available SARS-Cov-2 Spike protein antibody which can be used in a standard western blot or ELISA to test recipients of the injections for the spike protein. This is cheap and easy to do. Why hasn’t it been done?”

I believe the answer is clear. The scientists and bureaucrats in charge don’t want to run the test. They want to avoid finding out whether the one thing the vaccine is supposed to achieve isn’t being achieved. They want to avoid finding out the vaccine, on their own terms, is a total failure. 

Keep calling them Nazis. It bothers them more than communist. Use Nazi, they hate being called what they are.

lol at these cry babies. Keep calling them Nazis. It bothers them more than communist. Use Nazi, they hate being called what they are. https://t.co/J4tVTwtGIH

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) June 9, 2022

Dr. Charles Morgan on Neuro-Biology and War

Just saw this tweet, check it out  https://t.co/fh0O7VbtMp

— Canute (@BabsjeanCanute) June 9, 2022

Who is Dr. Charles Morgan?  

Here is the full lecture. 

MELATONIN'S UNEXPECTED BENEFITS: slows aging, Prevents . . . Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, protects against ionizing radiation, macular degeneration, treats cancer . . .

This was interesting.  

It's a review by Dr. Gary Gonzalez of Dr. Russel [one L] Breiter's book on melatonin.  Most of us, including myself, think of melatonin as a sleep aid or more recently as a valuable antioxidant.  Reiter explains just how valuable it is for longevity and radical health.  

The first longevity product that I'd ever heard or read about was Resveratrol and IP6.  IP6 was a longevity compound because it managed the EXCESS iron floating around in our blood, out of the tissue, as what is called "Unbound iron."  The excess iron produces an inflammatory protein that, if left untreated, leads to chronic diseases like arthritis, 

FEMALE LONGEVITY

The end result is even more compelling. For example, Reiter explains that five separate studies have shown that older women produce more melatonin than older men-suggesting a possible explanation for the long-observed female longevity factor." He details findings showing a marked correlation between brain functioning in older age and melatonin levels.

Shielding DNA From Free Radicals

Reiter explains melatonin's effects on the immune system of aging animals and determines whether or not these actions also apply to humans. Most importantly, he shows how melatonin fits in with the free radical theory of aging.

He explains that melatonin is found in the greatest abundance in the nucleus of the cell, where it shields the DNA molecule itself from free radical damage better than any other known substance. Reiter describes his own studies in which melatonin has protected DNA from free radicals generated by radiation, carcinogens, bacterial toxins, and most important the process of using oxygen for fuel.

UNEXPECTED BENEFITS

Even if you have no sleeping issues, anyone over 40 should be taking melatonin.  19 Research papers reveal that melatonin promotes all of these unexpected effects [in no particular order, though numbered:

1.  Protects against viral and bacterial infections.

2.  Prevents cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure. 

3.  Reduces oxidant stress and inflammation and slows aging. 

4.  Prevents neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. 

5.  Improves menopause therapy. 

6.  Protects against ionizing radiation. 

7.  Prevents macular degeneration. 

8.  Prevents and treats cancer.

Okay, so with all of these benefits, the only thing to consider is how much does, or should, one take?  First, I would say do a trial run.  By that I mean start with smaller amounts, say, 3mgs, and see how you feel upon waking, whether or not you can tolerate melatonin to begin with, or tolerate that amount.  When I first tried melatonin, I woke up and could barely raise my arms, and my legs felt like bricks.  But when I was working a physically demanding job for a few years, I noticed that the only way to turn the pain off was excess melatonin, and excess was 5 to 10mgs back in 2018.  Since then, I've been taking upwards of 12 to 20mgs, but not every night.  For, at least in my case, melatonin doesn't deliver a deep sleep for me.  But I still take it for the other unexpected benefits listed above.  

So how much should you take?  The answer is contingent on several factors.  One, if you've got a serious disease, like cancer, then you want to take more.  Bill Sardi recommends 15-30mgs nightly for cancer treatment in conjunction with several other compounds.