Saturday, December 26, 2020

"Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE"

Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE?!?!?!?

If a company is private and is entitled to creating any policy it wants, then why are companies complying with CDC recommendations?  By deferring to a pseudo-government/private entity, the CDC, companies put more muscle behind their policies whether it’s a mask mandate, six-feet apart, or taking 2 Tylenol as a condition for entering their store.

Is this a way to give any policy they create more weight

33 mins. 

Why are they citing the CDC and the public health orders, that are not even laws, that they have to comply with?  You guys got to think this through, and I hope that the sheriff is listening and I hope the police are listening: you guys are part of the problem.  Think!  And I know you know what the truth is anyway.  I know you do, and you’re just afraid to lose your job and that is pathetic.  You should be fired!

You are practicing medicine without a license.

35 mins.

Is it fancy pants and lollipops?  Is it a bribe that you’ve received?  Is it a promise for a promotion?  Do they have something on you?  Have you compromised yourself?  Whether it’s sexual, whether it’s theft, I just don’t know.  What I do know is that each of you is . . . what I can’t reconcile in my mind is how you can sell out your own children and grandchildren, throw them right under the bus. 

38 mins.

How much money do you think they got in April from the disaster funds?  Palm Beach County with a 2020 population of 1,510,660 received $261 million.  Over a quarter of a billion dollars.  That’s just to start in April.  I don’t know what else they received.  Chapter 252: Disaster funds.  In Florida statutes.  You’ve got the Florida mutual aid plan.  You’ve got FEMA.  Emergency Management Systems Compact.  Emergency Use Authorization.  The CARES Act.  Other things, including insurance monies.  That’s what they’re doing.  They’re bailing themselves out. 

If these counties rescind any of the mandates, they need to return the federal relief funds. 

40  just file a complaint.  And submit it to whom?  They will try to head you off by sending you on a fool’s errand. 

49  The department heads are lying.  The judges are lying.  They’re all lying.  They’re overtly lying and they know it.  They know the law.  It’s no mystery. 

Start with an administrative agency, the Human Rights Commission.  You have something like this in every state.  The state agency is not going to help you at all.  They’re part of the problem; they’re perpetuating the problem.  But you still have to do that, because the court can’t hear it.  Because the court’s gonna say, “you still have to do something with the state agency; otherwise, I don’t have jurisdiction.

Don’t listen to these people; go ahead and make your complaint.

If your gov’t agency is acting outside of its mandate, that means that they’re not immune. 

52  The Uncle Odd Show’s “Notice of Liability.”  Notice of liability is conditional acceptance of their offer.  A mandate is an offer.  They have to prove, 1) that the virus exists, 2) that social distancing is medically effective, and 3) that masks work.  And they have 21 days to be able to do that.  When they don’t, which they won’t, then you send out a second notice, because that’s the honorable thing to do.  You give them another 14 days to comply.  The 14 days will pass and they will not have responded.  At that point, at the end of the 14 days, they will be in default.  So I’ll send a notice of default.  There are 8 or 9 steps to this process, but the end of that it will be their conditional acceptance of my notice of Liability.  Now they are liable.  Their office is liable.  And they are liable as a man or a woman, where I understand it, I can file liens against their office and against them personally.  

SOURCES

Fakeologist.  

Fakeologist Home Page


"Vaccination does not confer a true, genuine immunity. . . . It only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead . . . "

The positive benefits of vaccines are always presented as a slam dunk.  Vaccine expert, Dr. Richard Moskowitz, MD and Homeopath, points out that 

the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.


A brilliant analysis of vaccination, by Richard Moskowitz, MD, and homeopath

Dec 24 by Jon Rappoport

by Jon Rappoport

December 24, 2020

(To join Jon Rappoport's email list, click here.)

BACKGROUND ON VACCINES

In the age of COVID, vaccination looms large. As in mandatory. And of course, toxic.

I’ve already covered two new vaccine technologies, one of which has already been pushed forward, to “protect” people from a virus that has never been properly proven to exist.

DNA vaccines, aka gene therapy, permanently alter recipients’ genetic makeup in unknown ways. RNA vaccines (Pfizer’s and Moderna’s, just approved for COVID) can cause auto-immune reactions—which means the body attacks itself. [1] [2]

In this piece, I want to take a look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.

WHO IS DR. RICHARD MOSKOWITZ?

From his bio [3]: “Richard Moskowitz was born in 1938 and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York University (M.D.). After medical school, he did 3 years of graduate study in Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel Fellowship.”

“He took his internship at St. Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967, as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”

In 1987, while writing my first book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation on the phone with Richard about vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system suppression.

I had already seen that AIDS was actually a lumping together of various immune-system problems, none of which needed HIV as an explanation.

I still recall that phone conversation with Richard Moskowitz. I came away from it with an idea about how vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a very different thing.

If vaccines were lowering immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).

Vaccination equals no cases of measles, the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is going on in the body.

I’m printing here an excerpt from Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter, about which I’ve spoken and written in other places. [4] [5]

Note: Although the RNA COVID vaccines deploy a technology different from classical vaccines, they still rely on antibody response as the key to “producing immunity.” But that response is only one of many natural reactions in the body which maintain health and ward off disease.

From Dr. Richard Moskowitz’s brilliantly articulated article, The Case Against Immunizations: [6]

“It is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’ to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker, but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following administration of the measles vaccine.”

“…Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’ organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.”

“By the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.”

“Such splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.”

“By contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, bypassing the normal port of entry and set[ting] up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no ‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring. By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.”

“The result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient. Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”

“Far from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.”

This is an explanation of vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they eliminate cases of disease.

With experimental RNA COVID vaccines, who knows how long the injected RNA lingers in the body, and what effects it produces over time? The relatively short clinical trials certainly don’t offer useful conclusions. [7] [8] The CDC blithely assures us that once the injected RNA offers “instructions to cells of the body,” the cells destroy the RNA. Sounds magical. The cells wait, receive instructions, THEN destroy the messenger.

And again, as I stated above, RNA technology has, in the past, caused auto-immune reactions, in which the body basically attacks itself.


SOURCES:

[1] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/

[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/26/vaccine-for-the-china-virus-the-planet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/

[3] https://healthy.net/author/richard-moskowitz-md/

[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/08/08/what-youll-never-read-about-virus-research-fraud/

[5] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/08/01/remember-the-pandemic-that-was-going-to-wipe-out-humanity-were-still-here/

[6] https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/richard-moskowitz-m-d-the-case-against-immunizations/

[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/21/why-you-shouldnt-believe-the-covid-vaccine-is-effective/

[8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/24/covid-vaccine-clinical-trials-doomed-to-fail-fatal-design-flaw/


Japan, like Sweden, is a crucial control country with no lockdown. Japan got almost no impact.

Ivor Cummins.  Who is he?  

Find him on Twitter at @FatEmperor

Japan and other Asian countries had incredible low death rates.  And they matched New Zealand, but nobody wants to talk about them.  

Tom reviewed some of the headlines in April at the time that the death rates were falling off in Asia, explaining that all of the mainstream media had grim predictions for Japan and absolutely none of them occurred.  

Did we get an apology, a re-think of this?  No, they're onto the next country.  Or if they have to talk about Japan, they'll stumble around and say they wore masks or something.  They don't even know what happened.  

"Japan's Coronavirus Is Too Little, Too Late," William Pesek, WaPo, April 10, 2020.

"Did Japan Miss Its Chance to Keep the Coronavirus In Check?" Dennis Normile, Science Magazine, April 22, 2020.  

Japan, like Sweden, is a crucial control country with no lockdown.  So Japan, in a brief summary, Japan got almost no impact.  Wow!  So if you look at the graphs in Europe for the deaths per million, the big curves, and you plot Japan, you can't see it.  It's that low.  And even the most dedicated mask-o-path, whose pushing the mask, will acknowledge that it will reduce some forms of transmission . . . maybe.  So it's not masks in Japan, because look at the mortality curves.  It's basically huge humps (in Europe) versus nothing (in Japan).  So it's not masks.  

I really liked this quote of his: 

Then there was this on December 7th, 2020.  

Friday, December 25, 2020

"Dr. Anthony Fauci doesn't mind going on television . . . and lying directly into the camera"

Thanks to Robert Wenzel's "The Inventor of the PCR Test on the Lying Fauci," @ TargetLiberty. 

Commenters to this thread point out that Mullis was talking about the HIV virus and not COVID as though that were some meaningful difference to point the severity of COVID over HIV.  In Chapter 5, "AIDS: The Virus Hunters Converge," of Peter H. Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, he points out that "Now came the big question: Which virus to blame?  Finding one would be the easy part; since AIDS patients were inherently full of infections, virus hunters would almost have too many choices."  Duesberg's conclusion was that AIDS is not the result of a specific virus but rather the destruction of different immune functions from lifestyle and diet.  For the cancers associated with AIDS, nitrite inhalants were cited as the primary culprit.  

Interestingly, the areas where absorbed concentrations of volatile nitrites would be expected to be highest--the skin surrounding the nose and in the nasal/pulmonary mucosa-are also reported to be the areas in which KS occurs in persons with AIDS. 


Monday, December 21, 2020

Dr. Carrie Madej on C-19 Vaccines Under Development: "One tiny little change can make a disastrous result."

Who is Dr. Carrie Madej? 
Dr. Madej is a DO, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, and Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA who has over 19 years of experience in the medical field.  She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001.
Her Twitter page is @DrMadej.  

Here is my transcript of the first 6 minutes of this 29-minute interview.  She is excellent; the interview is excellent and time well spent if you're at all concerned about the short, but more importantly, the long-term effects of the C19 vaccines.  
We are skipping safety trials.  We are skipping animal trials.  And people need to know that this is not a safe vaccine; this has not been proven to be safe.  The reason why they're skipping the animal trials is that the previous attempts in the last 20 years, to try a very similar vaccine because this is a very different one, has been a failure to the animal studies.  For instance, with the animal studies in the past when they gave this kind of modified mRNA or modified mDNA, the animals looked very robust with their immune systems at first.  Wow!  It looked like a success.  Antibody levels went up in the blood cells as well as the T-Cells response improved.  Great.  But in animal studies, they do something called a challenge test; that's not ethical in human tests, only animal tests.  Meaning after they look good on the blood samples, they then give the animals the virus or the bacterial or they expose them to the virus or the bacteria, and that's when we saw a lot of problems happen.  Every time the animals actually had a cytokine response, an inflammatory response, meaning they had a worsened response when they were exposed to the virus or bacteria.  They were sicker.  They had more lung inflammation, more liver issues, and more deaths happened.  So if this happened almost every time with previous vaccines of this nature, we can expect this to happen with this one, this very one they're trying to introduce on us.  Let's say they do give this vaccine--everything looks fine on everybody, right?  And then what if they're exposed to the common cold or the common flu or the CV-20 or whatever?  I expect, as well as my colleagues, there will be more deaths, more morbidity, more issues, and I would suspect that they wouldn't blame it on the vaccine, because the vaccine manufacturers have no liability right now.  They would say "Well, that's the nature of the new viruses that's out."  They would blame it on that.  We need to be very careful because this vaccine is not safe based on previous data that we have.  Also, this vaccine is new on the human race.  Never before has it been unveiled.  They are messing with the DNA, the RNA, the genome, the genes--these are all the same kinds of words to be used on the very same thing.  Our genome is what makes us human.  It's the blueprint for us: what makes us grow, what makes us reproduce, what makes us evolve, what makes us heal.  It's everything the body needs to know what to do.  So when they are manipulating that in any way, one tiny little change can make a disastrous result.  It can result in cancers, mutagenesis, mutant genes, auto-immune disorders, so this could be later term effects from this.  This is brand new.  The studies aren't being done propertly. 
Thanks to Robert Wenzel's post "A Warning About COVID 19 Vaccines" at TargetLiberty.