Dr. Carrie Madej on C-19 Vaccines Under Development: "One tiny little change can make a disastrous result."

Who is Dr. Carrie Madej? 

Dr. Madej is a DO, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, and Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA who has over 19 years of experience in the medical field.  She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001.

Her Twitter page is @DrMadej.  

Her Facebook page.  

Her YouTube Channel. 

Here is my transcript of the first 6 minutes of this 29-minute interview.  She is excellent; the interview is excellent and time well spent if you're at all concerned about the short, but more importantly, the long-term effects of the C19 vaccines.  

We are skipping safety trials.  We are skipping animal trials.  And people need to know that this is not a safe vaccine; this has not been proven to be safe.  The reason why they're skipping the animal trials is that the previous attempts in the last 20 years, to try a very similar vaccine because this is a very different one, has been a failure to the animal studies.  For instance, with the animal studies in the past when they gave this kind of modified mRNA or modified mDNA, the animals looked very robust with their immune systems at first.  Wow!  It looked like a success.  Antibody levels went up in the blood cells as well as the T-Cells response improved.  Great.  But in animal studies, they do something called a challenge test; that's not ethical in human tests, only animal tests.  Meaning after they look good on the blood samples, they then give the animals the virus or the bacterial or they expose them to the virus or the bacteria, and that's when we saw a lot of problems happen.  Every time the animals actually had a cytokine response, an inflammatory response, meaning they had a worsened response when they were exposed to the virus or bacteria.  They were sicker.  They had more lung inflammation, more liver issues, and more deaths happened.  So if this happened almost every time with previous vaccines of this nature, we can expect this to happen with this one, this very one they're trying to introduce on us.  Let's say they do give this vaccine--everything looks fine on everybody, right?  And then what if they're exposed to the common cold or the common flu or the CV-20 or whatever?  I expect, as well as my colleagues, there will be more deaths, more morbidity, more issues, and I would suspect that they wouldn't blame it on the vaccine, because the vaccine manufacturers have no liability right now.  They would say "Well, that's the nature of the new viruses that's out."  They would blame it on that.  We need to be very careful because this vaccine is not safe based on previous data that we have.  Also, this vaccine is new on the human race.  Never before has it been unveiled.  They are messing with the DNA, the RNA, the genome, the genes--these are all the same kinds of words to be used on the very same thing.  Our genome is what makes us human.  It's the blueprint for us: what makes us grow, what makes us reproduce, what makes us evolve, what makes us heal.  It's everything the body needs to know what to do.  So when they are manipulating that in any way, one tiny little change can make a disastrous result.  It can result in cancers, mutagenesis, mutant genes, auto-immune disorders, so this could be later term effects from this.  This is brand new.  The studies aren't being done propertly. 

Thanks to Robert Wenzel's post "A Warning About COVID 19 Vaccines" at TargetLiberty.  

TENNESSEE NURSE GETS COVID VACCINE, 17 MINUTES LATER SHE PASSES OUT

A nurse who got the COVID vaccine in Chattanooga, Tennessee today passed out while speaking to media about the vaccine shortly after receiving it. pic.twitter.com/Odv6fA1IVa

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) December 18, 2020

Thanks to Robert Wenzel at TargetLiberty. 

The chatter following this tweet is that of vax-defenders bending over backward to explain that the vaccine DIDN'T cause the nurse to faint and pass out on the floor.  The excuses reasons range from syncope to panic before a televised audience to pain in her arm.

Nurse Manager Tiffany Dover had been speaking to the media about the city’s first vaccinations of front-line health workers when she collapsed, according to video posted by WTVC-9, the Chattanooga ABC affiliate.

About 17 minutes after receiving the Pfizer-made vaccine against COVD-19, she started feeling dizzy, apologized and fell over before she was caught by doctors standing behind her.

“It just hit me all of a sudden, I could feel it coming on. I felt a little disoriented but I feel fine now, and the pain in my arm is gone,” Ms. Dover said.

She soon recovered and spoke again with WTVC, saying she has a condition where she often faints when she feels pain.

“It’s common for me,” she said.

And then in an attempt to CYA,  

WTTC reported that the doctors at CHI Memorial said the fainting episode was not related to the Pfizer-made vaccine. 

This is just incredible.  A nurse is hired despite a medical condition where her pain causes fainting spells?  You would put her in charge of any unit, including a COVID unit?  Really?  I mean if you're going to have a spokeswoman or spokesperson, why select her?   Wouldn't the optics be, like, terrible?  So this is either an indictment of vaccines or it's an indictment of medical and or bureaucratic incompetence.  What faith does anyone have in licensed medical services?  

 

Los Angeles Superior Court Victory Against Lockdowns

Los Angeles Superior Court struck a blow against medical cartel's ongoing coup d'état against democracy.  The Court granted a preliminary injunction barring the LA County Department of Public Health Department (LADPH) from enforcing its ban on outdoor dining. 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted this on his Instagram account today:

Today the Los Angeles Superior Court struck a blow against the global medical cartel’s ongoing coup d’etat against democracy. The Court granted a preliminary injunction to the California Restaurant Association Inc (“CRA”) and Mark’s Engine Company No 28 Restaurant barring the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Department (LADPH) from enforcing its ban on outdoor dining. The CRA argued that LACDPH’s own data provide no support for the shutdown; the County’s own testing shows that only 3.1% of COVID cases originate in public restaurants. The Court agreed that the closure is not realistically designed to halt of COVID’s spread and that Health officials failed to give CRA a fair hearing. A June order allowed restaurants to provide outdoor dining if they cut seating in half, and separated tables by 8 feet. On Nov 20, the LACDPH revised its order to prohibit all outdoor dining.

The Court held that LA officials they had no concrete data to justify the rule. CRA’s expert witnesses challenged the county’s use of PCR tests accusing LACDPH of using “false positives” to fraudulently exaggerate both COVID cases and deaths. They charged that the county was using “diagnostic substitution” to blame COVID for deaths actually caused by influenza, viral pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, and pneumonia from other strains of coronavirus and other diverse pulmonary diseases and heart attacks. To preserve its deception, the County refused to provide data that would allow the restaurant association experts to compare hospitalization rates from respiratory infections for the same dates in prior years. That maneuver made it impossible to accurately attribute what percentage of the rise in hospitalization is due to COVID-19.

LACDPH experts also reached their highly speculative and questionable predictions by feeding false assumptions to defective and unreliable mathematical models.

This Court decision is one small but heartening victory against the tyrannical medical forces that are destroying America’s economy and obliterating its the middle class with arbitrary fiats that are not science based.

Thank you to Lew Rockwell.  

"If the antibodies are falling . . . the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling"

SAGE, the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, took the view that because SARS COV2 was a new virus that they believed that there wouldn't be any immunity at all in the population  SARS 2 is 80% similar to another virus you may have heard of--SARS that moved around the world a bit in 2003.  There are four (4) common cold-causing coronaviruses, and that I think that quite a lot of the population had been exposed to one of those viruses and probably have substantial protective immunity.  To explain why I was so confident, everybody knows the story of Edward Jenner, vaccination, and the story of cowpox and smallpox.  Milkmaids were exposed to a more benign form of smallpox called cowpox, which did not leave their skin scarred.  "If it's cowpox that saves the fair maid, he reasoned that giving a healthy person a vaccination, he would be able to protect them against smallpox.  Vaccination comes from vacca, the Latin name for cow.  So we are really familiar with the principle of cross immunization.  The vulnerable people in care homes, there's an awareness that caregivers are really careful and using PPE and so on.  But that's only going to go so far in a hothouse environment where people are pretty close together in a care home.  So they questioned Once one or two people got the coronavirus in a care home, why wouldn't almost everyone get infected?  And, of course, the truth is they didn't.  One interpretation of that distinction is that a large proportion of the people in the care homes had pro-apt immunity.  

Big story in the media recently (September 2020) was that a percentage of the population with antibodies against the virus, 4.4%, was falling.  This was cast as a concern that immunity to SARS CO2 doesn't last very long.  Anyone with knowledge of immunity would simply reject that.  That's not the way that immunity to the virus works: that would be T-cells.  So if the antibodies 

Immunity to the virus is created by T-cells, not by antibodies.  If the antibodies are falling, gradually over time which they have from spring to present, the only plausive explanation is that the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling and that's why the production of antibodies in the body gradually subsides.   

Less than 40% of the population was susceptible.  Even theoretical, epidemiologists will tell you that that's too small a number to support and consolidate a growing outbreak.  Community immunity: herd immunity.  So when SAGE says that 

Resounding, Worldwide Renunciation of a COVID Vaccine

https://t.co/YFroz6NJfr

— Mike Walgenbach (@mwalgen44) December 11, 2020

Thank you, Robert Wenzel.