MARK GROUBERT: 500 groups with $3B in revenues are behind the #NoKings protests and communist call for 'revolution'

500 groups with $3B in revenues are behind the #NoKings protests and communist call for 'revolution' https://t.co/uNjZQP6lY7 #FoxNews

— Mark Groubert (@lordbuckly) March 29, 2026

RYAN HOLIDAY: The Stoic Abilities That Determine Your Entire Life

The Stoic Abilities That Determine Your Entire Life pic.twitter.com/v2UxG74ZqI

— Ryan Holiday (@RyanHoliday) March 27, 2026

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: 18 U.S.C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with designated federal officers or employees while they are performing official duties.

@linuxhippie Clearly, the Philly DA Larry forgot his ConLaw class on the Federal Pre-emption clause of the Constitution.

He also seems to have forgotten that Title 18 USC Section 111 makes it a felony for him to interfere with a federal officer in the execution of his office.… https://t.co/RDMY3p09fz

— Stephen Coughlin (@S_Coughlin_DC) March 25, 2026

@linuxhippie. Clearly, the Philly DA Larry forgot his ConLaw class on the Federal Pre-emption clause of the Constitution.

He also seems to have forgotten that Title 18 USC Section 111 makes it a felony for him to interfere with a federal officer in the execution of his office. Question? Has the FBI or DHS ALSO forgotten Section 111? Because, from where many stand in the cheap seats, the moment a state or local actor interferes with a federal officer in the conduct of his duties, those persons should be arrested, as should any and all individuals ordering that activity. And yes, it's really as simple, and as simply clear, as that. From the AI distillation of Section 111:

18 U.S.C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with designated federal officers or employees while they are performing official duties. Penalties range from 1 year (simple assault) up to 20 years (use of a deadly weapon or infliction of bodily injury.

For Larry Krasner's political grandstanding,

Note: this is sedition. https://t.co/9yh2OV34sK

— Tactical Wisdom (@DolioJ) March 25, 2026

ARTURO MCFIELDS YESCAS: During the 10th Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, organized by Colombia, Xi Jinping had hoped to deliver a virtual address to 33 heads of state from the Americas. But the event managed to attract only three Latin American presidents.

The Americas turn their backs on Xi Jinping. https://t.co/nBjEdPpgnV

— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) March 28, 2026

Just a few days ago, China suffered yet another major political defeat. During the tenth Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, organized by Colombia, Xi Jinping had hoped to deliver a virtual address to 33 heads of state from the Americas. But the event managed to attract only three Latin American presidents. This was a significant embarrassment, given that this organization is China’s version of the U.S.-created Organization of American States. "China Is Losing Ports, Power, and Presence in Latin America," Arturo McFields, The Hill, March 25, 2026.

TRANSODIUS: California is a bigger national security threat than Iran is.

So California is the Australia of North America?

California is a bigger national security threat than Iran is. https://t.co/gjKkvlg5Us

— TransOdius (@TransOdius) March 27, 2026