Tuesday, February 25, 2025

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: FASAB-56 [Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board] was a Trump Administration policy in 2018

I kept saying that we have to attest to this.  If we don't deal with the $21 trillion, they're going to depopulate.  So guess what happened . . . with the pandemic?

COVID-19.  You're backed up by Dr. Mark Skidmore, who is the brilliant PhD at Michigan State University, expert in public policy, numbers guy, he actually started doing this going . . . he heard you say they stole $6 trillion from at the Pentagon . . . 

00:25.  He heard me say it was $12 trillion, and he and his students did a survey, and what he discovered is that it was $21 trillion.  So he added $9 trillion.  

00:37.  And we're not hearing anything about that with the D.O.G.E.  We're not hearing anything about . . . you mean there's $21 trillion missing that we don't know where it is and you took the books dark?  This is all your stuff, and we took the books dark? Shouldn't D.O.G.E look into that, and the answer is yes.  Where is that damn money?  

01:00.  FASAB-56 [Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board] was a Trump Administration policy in 2018.  It was 2018, and if you look at how the money works they could never have done the "Going Direct Reset" without FASAB-56.

01:17.  It was during the Kavanaugh hearing, 2018.  You said everybody right and left, Democrat and Republican, the Swamp, got together and said this is a great idea as they're bitching about Kavanaugh and his fake stories that he had that he has orgies or fake crap that they were doing.  But the real story was that they were taking the books dark while this whole stupid charade was going on.

01:40.  I hired two attorneys to write a whole big paper about it and then after we wrote that paper I kept educating Skidmore.  Then he realized, "Oh, my God!" they're not only taking the books of the 24 covered agencies and the Treasury, and that includes the Pentagon, they are taking 156 other governmental entities.  And when you include the classification laws and the National Security laws, all the big contractors who do business with the government, which means the whole . . . not only the whole Treasury bond market is dark, but all the large-cap US stocks are dark.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

RYAN DAWSON: Israel just bombed an entire population homes and all. Where's the condemnation?

I think there were more survivors at Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  The U.S. ran its "fear the Japanese" campaign in WWII.

Where is the condemnation?  Instead, we've got President Trump facilitating the rebuilding of the area? For whom?  Who is going to pay for it?  Who is going to benefit from it?  

"It's a very dangerous place to be and it's only going to get worse."  --U.S. President, Donald J. Trump. 

Yeah, thanks to your ally standing next to you. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

PETER ST ONGE: Business confidence hits fresh records as 63% of CEO’s now expect a boom. Under Biden it was just 19%.

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, February 24, 2025

FRANKIE STOCKES: Oh lovely. Pam Bondi and Donald Trump are going to take your guns with no due process, after your ex-wife calls the cops and tells them that you’re mentally ill.

One of our long-standing major issues with
@realDonaldTrump
is that he holds the record for the most federal gun control enforcement - in history.

"We the people" should never tolerate that.  --Tenth Amendment Center

Interesting that she called it a "civil commitment," and not by its more common and frightening term of involuntary commitment, meaning that someone, anyone, can call the County and tell them that they think you're mentally ill.  

They'll ask, what evidence do you have?  

The malignant narcissist, or Bolshevik snitch, will make it up.  "Oh, I saw him peeing in a public park" or whatever.  

Doesn't take much.  This has happened to people who've made comments in an online forum.  Brandon Raub in 2012, thirteen years ago, understands this experience first hand.       

you, a neighbor, a security guard, a librarian, a restaurant owner, etc.  The most famous gentleman that I know who fell victim to this was Brandon Raub.    

Grok even pipes in. 

One striking example is the case of Kenneth Donaldson in the United States. In 1957, Donaldson was involuntarily committed to a Florida psychiatric hospital by his parents, who claimed he was paranoid. Despite no evidence of severe mental illness or danger, he was held for 15 years, often in appalling conditions, with little treatment. He fought his confinement legally, and his case reached the Supreme Court in 1975, O'Connor vs. Donaldson.  The ruling established that harmless mentally ill individuals cannot be confined against their will without treatment, marking a shift in civil commitment standards.

Another extreme instance involves the Soviet Union's use of "psychiatric imprisonment" during the Cold War. Dissidents like Vladimir Bukovsky were labeled with "sluggish schizophrenia"—a vague, politically motivated diagnosis—and confined to psychiatric wards for years. Bukovsky, arrested in 1963 for anti-Soviet activities, endured forced medication and isolation until his release in 1976 after international pressure. This wasn’t about mental health but silencing dissent, showing how civil commitment can be weaponized.

In a more modern U.S. context, consider "sexually violent predator" (SVP) laws. In states like California, individuals who’ve served prison sentences for sex crimes can be civilly committed indefinitely if deemed likely to reoffend. One case is Brian DeVries, committed in 2004 after his sentence ended, based on psychological evaluations predicting future risk. As of recent reports, he and hundreds of others remain in facilities like Coalinga State Hospital, sometimes for decades, with release contingent on subjective assessments. Critics argue this blurs punishment and prevention, raising ethical questions.

Then there’s the case of Typhoid Mary (Mary Mallon), an early 20th-century example. An asymptomatic typhoid carrier, Mallon was forcibly quarantined by New York health officials in 1907 for three years, released, then recommitted in 1915 for the rest of her life—23 years—after she continued working as a cook. Though not a mental health case, it’s an extreme use of civil commitment for public safety, with no real "treatment" offered.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Bowel dysfunction from fentanyl poisoning. Remedy? Cannabinoid opioids


Yes, fentanyl poisoning can cause bowel dysfunction. Fentanyl, like other opioids, affects the body's opioid receptors, which are found not only in the brain but also in the gastrointestinal tract. When these receptors are activated, they can slow down gut motility—the movement of food and waste through the digestive system. This can lead to a range of bowel issues, including constipation, bloating, or even more severe conditions like ileus (a temporary paralysis of the intestines) in cases of overdose or poisoning.   

In the context of fentanyl poisoning specifically—where someone has been exposed to a toxic dose, intentionally or accidentally—these effects can be amplified. The body's systems, including digestion, can start shutting down or malfunctioning as the drug overwhelms the central nervous system. Constipation is a well-documented side effect of opioid use, and in extreme cases of poisoning, you might see complete bowel obstruction or dysfunction as part of the broader systemic collapse.

That said, the exact symptoms depend on the dose, the individual’s tolerance, and how quickly medical intervention happens. If you’re looking for specifics—like whether it’s temporary or permanent, or how it compares to other poisons—I’d need more context about what you’re digging into. Anything particular on your mind?

Disclaimer: Grok is not a doctor; please consult one. Don't share information that can identify you.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)