Showing posts with label Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff). Show all posts

Sunday, February 5, 2023

TOP 10 HAZARDS OF GLYPHOSATE

Saturday, July 9, 2022

SORRY DR. HANNAH ROSENBLUM, C0VID-19 SAFETY MONITORING IS NOT THE MOST ROBUST IN THE U.S., or THE WORLD

Well, Dr. Moybeen Syed is angry.  Why did it take him so long?  He's angry with this statement by Dr. Hannah Rosenblum, M.D., at the CDC.  See it below.  From the Borinquagato report, titled, "All-Cause Mortality Effects of COVID.  

COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring is the most robust in U.S. history and the two complementary surveillance systems used in this study should bolster confidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe,” said co-author Hannah Rosenblum, MD, also of the CDC, in a statement.  

In my day, we used to call these people bobbleheads, critters whose heads would bobble uncontrollably and incessantly.  And as I read this, all I could do is think of other mouths somewhere deep inside the alphabet agency soup.  It's a moral challenge to call these doctors and M.D.s bobbleheads, for what professional would allow himself or herself to be reduced to being a yesman just so that they can run cover for the deadliest vaccines in world history?  What would make them become this?  Money?  Blackmail?  We know, or at least we're learning what an unmitigated disaster the medical-industrial complex is and has been ever since the Flexner Report.  

Dr. Mobeen is smart, there's no doubt about that.  None.  But once anyone begins to accept the different categories of vaccines as operational language in some mass health plan, they've lost me.  Health is too personal, way too personal. to be left up to some mass plan.  Never accept anything that is perceived or run on a mass scale.  Ever.  Ever.  

Here is Peter Marks, Director of the FDA

As with all vaccines for any population, when authorizing COVID-19 vaccines intended for pediatric age groups, the FDA ensures that our evaluation and analysis of the data is rigorous and thorough.  Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research, June 17, 2022. 

Here is Pfizer's representative, Dr. William Gruber, Pfizer’s VP of vaccine clinical R & D

Yeah, I’ll leave it to Moderna to describe how they address their vaccine dosage.  But I think . . . “Obviously, we don’t have a complete understanding of the nature of the way the vaccine works.” In producing an immune results.   You have to go by the results!  Do these remarks sound like anyone is in control of vaccine quality control AT ALL!!!!!!  I mean at all!!!!!!

Tuesday, July 5, 2022

How is it that Pfizer could run trials of their vaccine on babies and toddlers before any vaccine was approved by the FDA for these age groups?

Question: How is it that Pfizer could run trials of their vaccine on babies and toddlers before any vaccine was approved by the FDA for these age groups?  

there was not a single life-threatening event recorded in the entire pediatric trial. not one

many children in the VAERS reporting had massive responses with multiple effects.

and then they seem to have had no or conflicting follow-up. 

and they seem to be nowhere in the trial results.

these numbers are terrifying and if all were in the trial would imply an over 1% life-threatening AE rate. that’s easily 100X the risk of covid to this group, probably more like 1,000 or even 10,000X.

I just don't think it can or will ever be explained why parents sacrificed their babies to Moloch. 

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

A review of how [the CDC] tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease.”

Imagine providing public statements like these and the receiving media doesn't question, doesn't push further, or deliver devastating contradictions.  Just imagine.   

Imagine saying things like this and not having to correct or revise your statements.  Imagine saying things like and being self-deluded that your statements are a public service.  Just imagine.  Imagine the bankrupt ethics, the deliberate lies that go unchallenged.  Imagine that. 

Imagine this being standard operating procedure . . . for 20 years. 

As I have noted periodically for twenty years, and it was roundly confirmed 4 weeks ago in the NY Times, CDC spins and cherry-picks the data it presents to the public, hiding most of what it has. Then it blames its 'outdated' IT systems for the problems, if it gets caught. As the NYT noted

The C.D.C. has received more than $1 billion to modernize its systems, which may help pick up the pace, Ms. Nordlund [CDC's spokesperson] said. “We’re working on that,” she said. 

So imagine having a record like that while receiving $1 billion with a B from the taxpayer you're purported to serve.  Make no mistake, there is no purporting, no purportment going on at all.  

Some have claimed that the CDC is a vaccine company.  What?  Some have claimed that it is a PR branch for the FDA or any pharmaceutical company peddling its latest unchecked medicine.  Nass goes even further, affirming that it's a PR firm with its own TV studios replete

CDC is not a public health agency.  It is a public propaganda agency that collects a massive amount of data. CDC marshals its huge data library to create presentations that support the current administration's public health policies.  

CDC also has state-of-the-art PR staff, as well as TV studios, and produces videos, radio spots, and an enormous number of press releases that are distributed to the media.  CDC hosts many journalists at its Atlantia headquarters. Free junkets successfully cultivate US health reporters.

And finally, to end this preface,

A 2007 Senate oversight report on the CDC noted the agency spent $106 million on the Thomas R. Harkin Global Communications (and Visitor) Center, and summarized its 115 page report with the following: “A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease.”

Sunday, April 24, 2022

. . . spike-containing exosomes travel from the spleen to the heart, liver, gut and brain, along the vagus nerve

What is the Vagus Nerve and where is it located in the body?  For one, it is the longest of the 12 cranial nerves.  Think about that for a minute, cranial nerve, meaning that it starts in the brain and weaves its way down through the body.  Two, it is responsible for 75% of the parasympathetic function.  So it plays a key role in keeping you alive.  The Cleveland Clinic explains

The vagus nerve, also known as the vagal nerves, are the main nerves of your parasympathetic nervous system. This system controls specific body functions such as your digestion, heart rate and immune system. These functions are involuntary, meaning you can't consciously control them. 

Here is what the vagus nerve does and what it's connected to.  If you're interested in strengthening the vagus nerve, it looks like meditation and exercises are your best bet.  

You can massage the vagus nerve to improve its function.  So that's good.  Yoga, meditation, and biofeedback are also good techniques to tone the vagus nervous system.  I've tried all three.  They're good remedies.     

Thursday, March 10, 2022

BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION BIOTECH TO RELEASE GMO MOSQUITOS IN CALIFORNIA & FLORIDA

BUT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THAT JEFFREY EPSTEIN IS EVIL, NOT BILL & MELINDA

Millions of genetically modified mosquitoes are set to be released in California and Florida in an effort to reduce the number of real, disease-carrying invasive mosquitoes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Monday approved [the] use of the genetically-engineered insects in pilot projects in specific districts across both states. 

The mosquitoes were made by UK-based biotechnology firm Oxitec, which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in an effort to combat insect-borne diseases such as dengue fever, yellow fever, and the Zika virus.

According to Oxitec, its “sustainable and targeted biological pest control technology does not harm beneficial insects like bees and butterflies and is proven to control the disease-transmitting Aedes aegypti mosquito, which has invaded communities in Florida, California, and other U.S. states.” 

Since it was first detected in California in 2013, the Aedes aegypti mosquito has spread rapidly to more than 20 counties throughout the state, increasing the risk of mosquito-borne diseases being transmitted to humans.

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

"grain-fed cows develop metabolic diseases due to both excess deuterium in their feed and . . ."

Wednesday, November 17, 2021

"Foods imported from Mexico are 70 times cleaner than Canadian foods and over 40 times cleaner than foods originating in the United States."

"imported foods from China, averaging 3 ppb contamination, are 28 times cleaner than foods produced in the US, and over 45 times cleaner than foods produced in Canada.

6)  Foods imported from Mexico are 70 times cleaner than Canadian foods and over 40 times cleaner than foods originating in the United States."



from the Amazon description of the book: 

This book is one of a kind with an analysis of near 8000 records of foods tested in Canada for glyphosate by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA recently. Tests cover foods from over 60 countries, the bulk of which were foods produced in Canada and the United States, followed by India and China. No other country has conducted this many tests on food for glyphosate and no other analysis exists on this data as of now.

North American foods are most contaminated by glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer, the most used herbicide in the planet.

The book is over 380 pages long, with over 90,000 words, and nearly 400 tables. The data is sorted in chapters, on glyphosate in food according to country of origin, and separately as per food types, such as grains, beans, flour, lentils, fruits, vegetables, and ready-made meals, organic and gluten-free foods. A lot of raw data figures are included.

Attention is given to foods produced in North America, which contribute a bulk of the samples, followed by foods from India and China and a comparison between them.

Some of the findings were as expected while some are totally unexpected and often shocking.

Here are a few examples:

1)  Canada and USA produce the most toxic foods on the planet, with regard to glyphosate contamination.
2)  Within North America, Canada produces foods with significantly higher levels of glyphosate.
3)  Within Canada, the west is where one can find more glyphosate-contaminated foods than from other regions within Canada. Western Canada is ground zero, for finding nasty foods.
5)  Cleanest of food suppliers are Peru, Thailand, France, South Africa, Mexico, and China. China apparently exports cleaner foods than what locals consume inside China. For example, imported foods from China, averaging 3 ppb contamination, are 28 times cleaner than foods produced in the US, and over 45 times cleaner than foods produced in Canada.
6)  Foods imported from Mexico are 70 times cleaner than Canadian foods and over 40 times cleaner than foods originating in the United States.
7)  Conventional foods desiccated by glyphosate are far more contaminated with glyphosate than roundup ready GM crops.
8)  Out of the main cereals, rice is about the only one that is more or less without any glyphosate, except for some rice and rice products produced in North America.
9)  Lentils and chickpea (garbanzo) produced in North America, as well as foods made with these ingredients are highly contaminated with glyphosate.
10)  Although soy flour may contain high glyphosate, tofu made out of soy has none.
11)  Wheat bran produced in Canada has an average of around 2,500 ppb of glyphosate in every sample.
12)  Organic foods are much better than conventional foods but are not completely free of glyphosate. Gluten-free foods are a mixed bag since some of them are high in glyphosate content, while others are clean.

The author maintains that as long as safety data based on which glyphosate was approved for use in agriculture is kept out of reach of the public, and as long as independent verification of the results is denied, there is no proof that glyphosate is safe at any level of contamination.

This book is meant to be a useful guide for people that have already reached a conclusion that glyphosate is an unwanted chemical to be in their food and would rather have a tool that helps them avoid it in their selection of foods to buy and eat.

Retired EPA scientist Dr. Vallianatos wrote a review on Huffington Post:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tainting-the-cornucopia-of-north-america_us_58decd30e4b0ca889ba1a5cf