Our government was intentionally trying to confuse Americans, so they wouldn't take Ivermectin in order to promote fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. It's terrifying to think that our government was doing this. But I can tell you the agencies and organizations that were doing this were most vehemently trying to suppress Ivermectin are the same ones trying to promote the vaccines with equal enthusiasm. --Dr. Peter A. McCullough
This interview was published on September 12, 2022. The caption reads,
David Gornoski is joined by Dr. Peter McCullough for a conversation on media designated "experts," the misinformation regarding Ivermectin, the Moderna COVID-19 patent, the few politicians who are willing to address the vaccine issue, what really happened at the Wuhan lab, the odd case of pushing vaccines onto wealthy countries, which of the vaccines have been proven to be the worst, and more.
Scientific experts appeal to the mid-wits: you're smart, but you're not as smart as you think you are.
Early treatments, hey, that's an anti-parasitic. They'll throw out a generic drug, like azithromycin, and they'll say, "Oh, that's an antibiotic. It can't touch viruses." That's weaponized ignorance because people who look at scientific literature know that antibiotics have been used for anti-viral effects for so long. And anti-parasites can have anti-viral effects that have been demonstrated way before this pandemic ever came along and that's something that anybody educated in the science knows very well. That's not a controversial opinion. But for folks who feel that they're smarter than they are, and the government kind of uses that to their advantage and say "Hey, these people are dumb; if you use an antibiotic for a virus, that can't do anything." That's what I call weaponized ignorance.
4:55 I call it the government intentionally misleading people. We call that the false narrative. The methods by which that is done is standard propaganda methods. It's called "flooding the zone." So, last fall when the CDC and NIH and FDA came out and said that Ivermectin is only a veterinarian horse dewormer. This was then parroted by all the media hosts. Sanjay Gupta was called out on Joe Rogan, and Joe Rogan schooled him on Ivermectin [referring to the October 13, 2021 interview]. Of course, Ivermectin is a human medicine. It's a drug that's a broad spectrum anti-parasitic. It's more safe than Tylenol; it actually has fewer safety reports than Tylenol. And on Ivermectin, through the full breadth of studies, has won a position on government and non-government supported guidelines to treat COVID-19 in several dozen countries. It's been in the second, updated version of the McCullough Protocol, published in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, Peter A. McCullough, December 2020. Note that I cite the data. Note that my precision on the data on Ivermectin, and it's completely different than uncited propaganda put forward by the government intentionally to confuse Americans. Our government was intentionally trying to confuse Americans, so they wouldn't take Ivermectin in order to promote fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. It's terrifying to think that our government was doing this. But I can tell you the agencies and organizations that were doing this were most vehemently trying to suppress Ivermectin are the same ones trying to promote the vaccines with equal enthusiasm. So, for example, in the fall of 2020, the American Medical Association launched a campaign to abolish the use of Ivermectin. Abolish the use! Now why would the AMA, a physician support group, want to abolish the use of one drug that we use for a variety of applications? Why would they care? That is the same organization that is wildly promoting COVID-19 vaccination with no analysis on safety.
7:20 You see them start to turn the narrative a little bit. They're testing the waters.
8:31 This is what we've learned. Billionaire CEO of Moderna, Stephane Bancel, was the former CEO of CEO of French diagnostics company BioMérieux, he helped the Chinese Communist Party build the bio-security lab in Wuhan, China, and then he left BioMerieux in 2011 and joined Moderna, and Moderna co-wrote the patent with the National Institutes of Health, NIH, on the Moderna vaccine in the years that followed. Then in 2015, Vineet Menachery and Ralph S. Baric is senior author who published two papers in Nature Magazine and that proceeded to the National Academy of Science.
Ah, yes, your tax dollars at work.
This is all available in the National Library of Medicine., where the title of the paper indicates that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in human populations. This was U.S. government funded, U.S. academic institutions: Universities at North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Harvard, Swiss Institute, and the Chinese Communist Party in Wuhan, China, collaborated on these projects to weaponize SARS-CoV-2 to make those spike proteins far more invasive and dangerous. They were able to keep tweaking it until it could invade a humanized respiratory endothelium in a mouse model. They were also working on a solution, a killed vaccine of monoclonal antibodies in these papers. Now, these were published in 2015. The work was done in the years prior. Recall that President Trump didn't go into office until 2016, so Trump didn't actually had nothing to do with the development of vaccines. And we knew this was the case because when the crisis was announced within 3 days of announcing the crisis, Moderna says "We have a vaccine." You can't cook up a vaccine in 3 days. So all Trump has to do is say, "Listen, these were developed far, long before I got into office. It turns out they didn't work; they weren't safe. America doesn't want them. We should drop the vaccine mandates, pull the vaccines off the market, and the entire country would swing behind him and he'd have a crushing victory if he ran for president. But the longer he stays out there, not answering questions on the vaccine, saying he supports it, the deeper he gets into trouble and his public support will erode. The biggest issue out there is the vaccines. When he talks and he wants to talk about Hunter Biden's laptop, people could care less. The single greatest thing they want to hear about is the vaccines and his not addressing it is a giant political mistake.
11:00 And you know what, nobody running in the midterms is addressing it
Gornoski asked DeSantis at a press conference if he would be able to investigate criminally some of these vaccine manufacturers especially after the Pfizer documents have come out showing what happened to pregnant women with the product? No direct answer, but he seemed to be very affirmative of it, and he had his surgeon general and attorney general come out and speak, so he's the only political figure that I see doing anything to push this into the conversation, which is the biggest issue.
J & J vaccine is more thrombogenic. Oh, God.
16:40 This was not intentional by the gov't to put this in the population, we don't have any information about that, right?
16:47, MCCULLOUGH. No, I haven't seen any memos that it was intentional. It just looks like a totally botched program from the very beginning. The biggest disappointment were the vaccines. They were a total bust. It's interesting, that the very first vaccine that they tried in the Menachari papers; they didn't do anything either. It was a kill vaccine that caused what's called hypersensitivity pneumonitis, but the vaccines are absolutely the wrong idea. You know there's never been a shot in the arm that's stopped an infection in the sinuses. Never. So it was just a bad idea from the beginning.
17:24, GORNOSKI So why are they doubling down on such a bad idea? Is it when they came up with this idea, this oligarchic product, where a few companies are going to push it out, the government is going to protect them all the way; it's going to be kind of a fusion of government and business together. Did they really think that that was their best shot at protecting the people?
This is kind of bad optics for McCullough. He's a dodger, a hem and hawer, an oscillator, a red herring baiter. Not good.
