📣 New Podcast! "Episode #171 - Richard Poe and Why All Roads Really Do Lead to London" on @Spreaker #british_empire #communism #london #trotsky #war https://t.co/0Ia4aG2fkF
— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) March 3, 2024
Weird symbolic cultural things built
The Grim Reaper appears at Charles' coronation, in 2023.
Does it mean they're being removed? I don't see any reason to expect that due to my own worldview, the ancient aristocracy is still running things, like the 4th Industrial Revolution, and the Great Reset. It's not conceivable to me that they would take themselves out of their own plans. What we're seeing is a distraction, a little red meat for the masses. Nothing more than a game. Forgive me if that's too much of a black pill.
I tend toward the same conclusion. Process of reification. We're very good at seeing patterns and ideas that aren't there and using them to make sense of them.
We're all so filled with such anxiety that our threat assessment system are off the charts. The world of overlapping psyops.
8:50. Churchill gave a famous speech on September 6, 1943, that the next incarnation of the British Empire would be an empire of the mind. The power struggle would be fought in the mind. the Cold War struggle for hearts and minds to win people over from communism to Trotskyism, the chosen ideology of the intelligence community in the West. People don't realize it but when they see the prevalence of Trotskyism in Left Liberal circles, today, a lot of that was generated by Western intelligence programs. It's usually called the CIA program, of course, but it was actually initiated by British Intelligence. The whole idea was as we entered the Cold War, the British had this idea that somehow we, being the West, the new Western alliance, the new permanent NATO alliance, which has taken form, that we had to offer the world something just as attractive as communism supposedly was, excitingly and nicely packaged with just as many social perk and benefits but something that was better. They basically wanted to offer communism or socialism but in a better form, a Western form. So they created a movement which they called the Non-Communist Left, the NCL for short.
1945, End of WWII.
1947, National Security Act, NSA, created a separate Air Force, and the CIA
1949, NATO
There have been books written about this; it's a real thing. Totally verified from declassified documents. They recruited Leftists, primarily Trotskyites, the criterion for these recruits was people passionately of the Left but who hated Stalinism, who hated Soviet communism as it then existed in the USSR. These were the people and this was the type of ideology that Western Intelligence in particularly the anglosphere, British Intelligence, and its fledgling child, the brand new American CIA that they embraced; they embraced this program called the non-communist left. What they sought to do throughout Western Europe within the United States even was to inculcate in cultural and intellectual circles and ultimately political circles with this doctrine of a better form of socialism, not capitalism or other such anticommunist doctrines as we were led to believe. Those of us who grew up amid the Cold War that wasn't their doctrine at all; what they were trying to do was introduce socialism with a Western face. Socialism or communism that was mysteriously anti-Soviet. And they actually managed to find people like this and indoctrinate people like this. And there are actually still a lot of people like this in the government and in insensitive positions who are still programmed this way. That somehow the Left is good, but Russian communism emanating from Moscow is somehow the epitome of all evil. And it's basically an in-fight between the Left is the very source of the strange unexplained Leftism that we see being so heavily promoted and protected within our so-called deep state.
POE, 13:50. It's not an accident and it's not even because of infiltration. It was actually a deliberate plan that was set in place at the end of World War II and was executed, and, as far as I can tell, it never ended. I mean supposedly it ended, books were written, documents were declassified, disavows were disseminated to the public, and it was said that supposedly this program had been a failure and was being abandoned but I think when we look around us it's pretty obvious that some form of Communism is now the mainstream ideology of the militant West.
LUONGO, 14:45. Interesting as you were saying that, I was jotting some notes down, something that I don't normally do. But what popped into my head was the idea something like you're describing the Third Way. When I was growing up I heard a lot of this, "Well, there's a third way between communism and capitalism, and socialism is that third way, where we can have kind of free markets, but we have to put controls on it," and, you know, in those terms my mind immediately goes to economics, and economic theory, Keynesianism or another way of saying technocracy, where we manage the economy. And then we manage the economics sphere through government creating guide rails for how we're going to do things and whatnot and that this is . . . but it really is just a repackage, this is the same repackaged Leftism in order to get to where we are today with this more perfect technocratic future. And we saw it with, my friend and business partner, Dexter White, talks about McNamara and the technocratic state within the DOD that ran the Vietnam War and these people that believe in their spreadsheets. And if you look at the European union today, there . . . it's, it's like the full flower of this idea embodied by the technocracy of the European Union. I don't know what you think about that.
POE, 16:17. Yes, that's all part of it. I think it goes deeper than that, and, you know, to my constant bias is always to believe that history repeats itself; history rhymes with itself; history echoes itself. We can go back to the 60s with McNamara and the technocrats, but we can always go back further and that the same ideas are still there, no matter how far back we go just under different names. For example, I wrote an article called "How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews)," January 10, 2023, and in that article one of the subjects I explored was how Karl Marx was actually recruited by British intelligence. He was given a handler who was a Scottish nobleman, [named] David Urquhart, who was actually a very famous British spy of the day. He was kind of a Lawrence of Arabia of his day. He had a great love for Middle Eastern culture. He became very close to the Sultan of Turkey. He went out into the Caucuses area and whipped up Muslim revolts among tribesmen in the Caucuses against the Czar, and he received the name El Doud. He was a kind of early precursor of Lawrence of Arabia and in many ways the same kind of person. But he was also part of the high nobility of Scotland and he adopted, reached out his hand to Karl Marx who had supposedly taken refuge in England after he was kicked out of several European capitals for his supposed revolutionary activities. And Marx himself married a noblewoman back when he was still in Germany, he married a woman of Prussian nobility but was also directly descended from the high nobility of Scotland. I'm still researching this, but I've seen some hints, some indications that this David Urquhart may have been a relative of [Marx's] wife, so he was really in like Flint in the British establishment and the British Royal Establishment.
