Dr. Fauci throwing out the first pitch as a symbol of our government’s prowess and capability to address #COVID19 and.... doh! pic.twitter.com/mPzaI06Xrl
— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) July 23, 2020
That was followed up with Senator Rand Paul's questioning on Fauci's mitigation measures on September 23, 2020, where Rand Paul effectively called Fauci, his crew, and policies the nanny-state. I love the hutzpa.
Fauci has known since at least July that most Covid “cases” are false. The US routinely uses 42-45 cycles, Fauci says any positive test above 35 cycles is a false positive. This is what the whole pandemic is based on – fake test results. Watch Fauci admit it.
Fauci has know since at least July that most Covid “cases” are false. The US routinely uses 42-45 cycles, Fauci says any positive test above 35 cycles is a false positive. This is what the whole pandemic is based on - fake test results. Watch Fauci admit it. pic.twitter.com/XatH5OzE6E
— Jeff Nelson (@vegsource) October 30, 2020
Instead of listening to frauds, like Fauci, one should listen to folks who actually read the scientific literature on COVID, on lockdowns, on quarantines, on masks, and on the goofy 6-feet distancing. The best way to protect everybody is via herd immunity. The folks that I encourage you to learn from are John P. A. Ioannidis from Stanford University. Here is his introduction at Wikipedia
John P. A. Ioannidis is a Greek-American physician-scientist, writer and Stanford University professor who has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, and clinical research. Ioannidis studies scientific research itself, meta-research primarily in clinical medicine and the social sciences
Stanford researcher Jay Bhattacharya.
Harvard Professor, Martin Kulldorff.
And Oxford epidemiologist, Sunetra Gupta.
Fauci is just trying to scare folks and get them to accept horrific events down the line. And the scare has worked. Try getting American businesses back from the brink of terror of a cold virus. People have surrendered their civility and being absolutely nasty because they believe their survival is at stake when confronted by someone 50 years and older. This is a revolting ethic.
Give this podcast a listen, where Tom Woods reviews the political positions of the names listed above. Here are Tom's show notes. He links some great articles.
No comments:
Post a Comment