Ultrasound Hurts Your Baby and Damages Your Tissue
First let me say that when the ultrasound technician places the sonar probe on top of your stomach, they usually add a gel to facilitate transmission of sound inside your abdominal cavity through the ultrasonic transducer. The technician, or sonographer, tends to keep the transducer in one place instead of moving it around on your abdomen. Because they're using the transducer to generate a picture, they will keep it in place until a picture emerges, the same way that a ham radio operator might hold the channel to pick up another operator. So because the sonographer keeps the transducer in one place for too long, combined with the fact that the ultrasound produces ultra high frequency sound waves, the two forces generate heat. The heat is deep; it is not topical, so you won't feel a burning sensation on your skin. You will get dressed, leave the room, and exit the office. But within 30 to 60 minutes or more you will begin to feel penetrating, residual burn deep inside your abdomen. But where? Which organs are affected? Most likely your intestines. It could be other organs too. It's hard to know. That residual heat is cooking one or two or more organs inside your abdominal cavity. This is dangerous.
What's so bad about a little heat? It's not just heat that you're feeling. That heat is cooking, burning, perhaps singeing organ tissue in a kind of cauterizing effect. That can't be good. It's got to interrupt your organ's functions.
Writing for Natural News, Megan Heimer explains that ultrasound
Apparently, cavitation also provides some benefits. Could have fooled me. All I experienced was that dizziness and fatigue and nausea. Ugh. But apparently, is can also play a role in destroying kidney stones.
This broad acceptance on the benign affects of utlrasound does appall me. It's just an innocent, harmless tool used only to divine any problems getting in the way of your best, strongest self. Look, even Gwen Stefani used it with her baby! Awwww. And then ZAP!!! BURN!!! And then when you complain that it burned you, these physicians and healers all look at you as though you're speaking Russian or Swahili. And the one surgeon to whom I did complain and he claimed that he'd done a 1000 ultrasounds without a single complaint, he did happen to have his assistant in the room as witness or denier, whichever would be most expedient in a lawsuit.
And if Natural News and Wikipedia are not damning enough, there are reports in other countries, like China. Against the horrific fallout from the one-child policy, even the Chinese know of the hazards of ultrasound.
Confirmed in China:
Ultrasound may not burn your skin but it definitely cooks your organs. And that cooking causes DNA damage that seems irreparable for a few generations in your family lineage. So beware and be aware as to what you're dealing with. Doctors won't tell you. Doctors can't tell you. They rely on what the industry manufacturer tells them--reports that come directly from salesmen or from a brochure. It is this bad. Do not expect anything better. Do not expect your doctor to be as informed as you would think a doctor might be or could be. They're not. They have a business to run.
So ultrasound cooks your organs, and it cooks your fat as it produces pockets that trap gas and heat within your intestines, thereby interfering with and disrupting the normal function of neurotransmitters within your intestines. The neurotransmitter damage to your stomach will register with your mind. Your thinking will be altered.
Your abdominal cavity is the most important part of your body. Did you know that when dolphins anticipate a shark attack they turn their stomach away from the shark's jaws and instead present him with their dorsal fin. They can afford to lose part of a dorsal fin, but they cannot survive with a huge bite in their stomach. That kind of injury is fatal. My point? Don't agree to do an ultrasound and don't let the monsters in white coats conduct a test on you that they tell you is harmless. Perhaps you need more evidence that ultrasound is a real hazard. Doctors tell us that ultrasound is harmless. The pop culture gets a hold of that notion and associates it with childbirth. They do this so that any objection to anything associated with childbirth is thought of as anti-life or worse, abortion. Manufacturers benefit from this as well. They get to tag their product with the adorable awwww's, purity, and innocence of babies. Pop culture reinforces this by entertaining us with ultrasound X-rays. Here's a super example:
Gwen Stefani, whose songs I like, promotes and represents on behalf of ultrasound technologies without a word or note of caution on what the high frequency soundwaves produce. They cause a lot of heat. A lot. A hell of a lot. Ouch a lot. No, the ultrasound is not hot to the touch. You don't feel the burn or the cooking when it is happening. Some may. But generally it is an after-effect. So a day or two later when you find yourself a little furmished, you start asking yourself "Is that because of the ultrasound the other day? But my doctor said it was harmless." Why can't Gwen stop and make the smallest of concessions about the damaging effects of ultrasound? Would that somehow cut into record contracts? Would you subject your baby to this:
Further evidence that the heat generated by ultrasound is terrible:
How else will a doctor get an X-ray without an ultrasound? Good question. Ask them "When was the last time they had an ultrasound?"
If they say they have never had one, then ask them "Then how do you know it's harmless?" You have to defend yourself with reasoning. Use this reasoning. Doctors are not above other professionals who have a penchant for saying things without knowing things. They can't know the reactions of all drugs. Have they tried all the drugs that are available? I hope not. Same thing then with any medical procedure. You are defending your life. No one else can do that for you like you can.
See the picture above? See how the two are smiling? That propaganda. That's an increase in the number of ultra sound machines to the local hospitals. That ultrasound is an X-ray machine. Just with this X-ray machine, you don't get to wear a lead vest; instead only get a thin layer of gel that facilitates the sounds and increases the amount of heat that penetrates through your gut. What, your doctor didn't tell you that? Hmm.
HOW DOES ULTRASOUND GENERATE HEAT?
Shame on him!
Shame on her!!
Don't get an ultrasound. Like most things in medicine, they are unnecessary. Doctors love prescribing diagnostic tests. They rely on the tests and don't do the hard work of looking at a constellation of markers. They've surrendered the genius of analysis, of intuition from assessing different marker. Instead, they rely on electrical machinery. Tools are valuable. Don't get me wrong, but when the tools you use begin harming people, then you need to discard them for something NOT HARMFUL. Not less harmful but completely harmless. Why do we allow medicine to be bad for us? "We may not like our vegetables but they're good for you." Okay, but couldn't you put them in a sauce, like butter and garlic, to make them taste better? Cough syrup, same thing.
Note, too, in the picture how the technician is pointing away from where the ultrasound comes into contact with the expectant mother and throws pictures in your face, pictures that you can't make out and certainly aren't qualified to read. But the technician is there to narrate what is happening for us. I get that it's a photo-op, a commercial. It's not supposed to show accurate use of an ultrasound machine. This is the kind of picture that would get used in a brochure advertising the latest in ultrasound technology.
Technicians care only about themselves. They're not medical doctors. All they're trained to do is read data from a machine. They fashion themselves very smart but they know nothing and certainly aren't capable of telling the uncomfortable truths of ultrasound and their holy hardware.
Everywhere you go or everything you see regarding ultrasound make it sound like it is an ordinary, effective, and harmless machine to examine an unborn baby and inside the mother's stomach. We see ultrasounds advertised through movies and television series we watch on our favorite shows. It's almost serves the function of a midwife, showing us at first the baby's sex then spotting, if any exist, foreseeable problems. And we are to assume that no harm is done to baby or mama. Harmless? Hardly. It damages the muscle tissue that covers your abdominal cavity. It weakens it. It compromises your tissue.
Gas generated from the ultrasound gets trapped in tissue. Your tissue becomes porous or cavitation develops and fluids get trapped in their. Does this make your lymphatic system work harder to drain these fluids? I can't say with certainly but my guess would be yes. Here is the article.
(NaturalNews) It is common for a pregnant woman to undergo several routine ultrasounds during her 40-week pregnancy. What many don't know, and despite what popular medical and government websites state, ultrasound scans have never been proven safe for pregnant women or babies and aren't recommended for routine use and non-high risk pregnancies.
An ultrasound is a diagnostic scan that emits ultra-high-frequency sound waves at tissues or bones. As the echo waves return to the machine, a picture is created. In the 1970s it was thought that ultrasounds were safe for pregnant women because of the very low scanning intensities; however, since 1993 the FDA has allowed high-output machines to scan babies at eight times the tolerable level without conducting any epidemiological studies. In addition, each scan heats surrounding tissues and bones up to six degrees higher than the maximum determined level of safety and can cause cavitation, where gas pockets in tissues and body fluid collapse. This can lead to a disruption in cell function and permeability, bleeding, and can have adverse effects on early fetal development.
Ultrasound studies done on animals have shown cell abnormalities to several generations, brain hemorrhages, lung damage, slow locomotor and learning abilities that worsened with longer exposure, and neuronal migration abnormalities consistent with autism and dyslexia in humans. Mice exposed to 600 minutes of ultrasound survived no longer than ten days.
Despite convincing evidence in animals that ultrasounds are dangerous, few studies have been conducted on humans, most of which are from other countries who limit ultrasound use. These studies have shown the following adverse effects including preterm labor, miscarriage, low birth weight, poorer birth condition, perinatal death, dyslexia, inner ear damage, and delayed speech development. An Australian randomized Doppler study involving high-risk mothers found more fetal distress in labor and lower APGAR scores at birth. Another Australian study showed that babies given five or more ultrasounds during pregnancy were 30 percent more likely to develop intrauterine growth retardation consistent with the findings in animal studies.
The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine advises patients to make an informed decision concerning possible adverse risks. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology recommends scans only for specific reasons, and along with the FDA, discourages the use of ultrasounds for non-medical purposes. A review in the U.S Journal of Epidemiology suggests that continued research is needed to evaluate the potential adverse effects of ultrasound exposure in pregnancy. Unfortunately, women are led to believe that ultrasounds are harmless and properly studied. This is clearly not the case.
Article originally appeared at Natural News.
The great Jon Rappaport cites James West's findings on ultrasound. This is a must-read.
First let me say that when the ultrasound technician places the sonar probe on top of your stomach, they usually add a gel to facilitate transmission of sound inside your abdominal cavity through the ultrasonic transducer. The technician, or sonographer, tends to keep the transducer in one place instead of moving it around on your abdomen. Because they're using the transducer to generate a picture, they will keep it in place until a picture emerges, the same way that a ham radio operator might hold the channel to pick up another operator. So because the sonographer keeps the transducer in one place for too long, combined with the fact that the ultrasound produces ultra high frequency sound waves, the two forces generate heat. The heat is deep; it is not topical, so you won't feel a burning sensation on your skin. You will get dressed, leave the room, and exit the office. But within 30 to 60 minutes or more you will begin to feel penetrating, residual burn deep inside your abdomen. But where? Which organs are affected? Most likely your intestines. It could be other organs too. It's hard to know. That residual heat is cooking one or two or more organs inside your abdominal cavity. This is dangerous.
What's so bad about a little heat? It's not just heat that you're feeling. That heat is cooking, burning, perhaps singeing organ tissue in a kind of cauterizing effect. That can't be good. It's got to interrupt your organ's functions.
Writing for Natural News, Megan Heimer explains that ultrasound
heats surrounding tissues and bones up to six degrees higher than the maximum determined level of safety and can cause cavitation, where gas pockets in tissues and body fluid collapse.Okay, so there's evidence that ultrasound produces cavitation in your tissue. It can't do this without the heat expanding your tissue and that same heat getting trapped inside your tissue. This may sound like some kind of microscopic process. It could be. But the problem are the symptoms of this heat. That cavitation causes gas to roam in your tissue. I felt lightheaded and discombobulated with a loss of balance. Even Wikipedia admits that
Ultrasound treatments and/or exposure can create cavitation that can potentially "result in a syndrome involving manifestations of nausea, headache, tinnitus, pain, dizziness, and fatigue."That's not good. What's disturbing is that I shared my concern with a surgeon, a general physician, and an acupuncturist. The surgeon shook his head while telling me that he'd literally done a thousand ultrasound and never had a single case of burning. So when you go out and talk with your doctor, know that he is not your advocate. He is committed to the regulatory boards that govern that allow him to stay in business and pay his staff. That is who you are facing when you go to your doctor looking for help and to be healed. I don't know what good a doctor is any more. Don't think I've ever had one, a good doctor that is. I've had health insurance most of my adult, working life. Perhaps they can identify problems. But too often for that they have to subject you to horrendous diagnostic exams that nobody likes. The general physician was surprised to hear that ultrasound causes burning or dizziness or any of the symptoms listed by Wikipedia. So was the acupuncturist. So all three were surprised. That's because they're all relying on what they've READ about ultrasound and not about what they've experienced. Big, big difference, folks. Big difference.
Apparently, cavitation also provides some benefits. Could have fooled me. All I experienced was that dizziness and fatigue and nausea. Ugh. But apparently, is can also play a role in destroying kidney stones.
Cavitation plays an important role for the destruction of kidney stones in shock wave lithotripsy. Currently, tests are being conducted as to whether cavitation can be used to transfer large molecules into biological cells (sonoporation). Nitrogen cavitation is a method used in research to lyse cell membranes while leaving organelles intact. Cavitation plays a key role in non-thermal non-invasive fractionation of tissue for treatment of a variety of diseases. Cavitation also probably plays a role in HIFU, a thermal noninvasive treatment methodology for cancer.Find more on the risks of ultrasound from Natural News here.
This broad acceptance on the benign affects of utlrasound does appall me. It's just an innocent, harmless tool used only to divine any problems getting in the way of your best, strongest self. Look, even Gwen Stefani used it with her baby! Awwww. And then ZAP!!! BURN!!! And then when you complain that it burned you, these physicians and healers all look at you as though you're speaking Russian or Swahili. And the one surgeon to whom I did complain and he claimed that he'd done a 1000 ultrasounds without a single complaint, he did happen to have his assistant in the room as witness or denier, whichever would be most expedient in a lawsuit.
And if Natural News and Wikipedia are not damning enough, there are reports in other countries, like China. Against the horrific fallout from the one-child policy, even the Chinese know of the hazards of ultrasound.
Confirmed in China:
Unknown to Western scientists, the hazards of ultrasound have been confirmed in China since the late 1980s, where thousands of women, volunteering for abortion, thousands of maternal-fetal pairs, were exposed to carefully controlled diagnostic ultrasound and the abortive matter then analyzed via laboratory techniques.
From these human studies, Professor Ruo Feng, of Nanjing University, published guidelines in 2000:
Commercial or educational fetal ultrasound imaging should be strictly eliminated. Ultrasound for the identification of fetal sex and fetal entertainment imaging should be strictly eliminated. For the best early pregnancy, avoid ultrasound.”
Feng is very clear. He is also gentle. He could have written bluntly, “For a lesser quality pregnancy, use ultrasound.” He could have written “fetus” or “child” instead of “pregnancy”.
So ultrasound cooks your organs, and it cooks your fat as it produces pockets that trap gas and heat within your intestines, thereby interfering with and disrupting the normal function of neurotransmitters within your intestines. The neurotransmitter damage to your stomach will register with your mind. Your thinking will be altered.
Your abdominal cavity is the most important part of your body. Did you know that when dolphins anticipate a shark attack they turn their stomach away from the shark's jaws and instead present him with their dorsal fin. They can afford to lose part of a dorsal fin, but they cannot survive with a huge bite in their stomach. That kind of injury is fatal. My point? Don't agree to do an ultrasound and don't let the monsters in white coats conduct a test on you that they tell you is harmless. Perhaps you need more evidence that ultrasound is a real hazard. Doctors tell us that ultrasound is harmless. The pop culture gets a hold of that notion and associates it with childbirth. They do this so that any objection to anything associated with childbirth is thought of as anti-life or worse, abortion. Manufacturers benefit from this as well. They get to tag their product with the adorable awwww's, purity, and innocence of babies. Pop culture reinforces this by entertaining us with ultrasound X-rays. Here's a super example:
Gwen Stefani, whose songs I like, promotes and represents on behalf of ultrasound technologies without a word or note of caution on what the high frequency soundwaves produce. They cause a lot of heat. A lot. A hell of a lot. Ouch a lot. No, the ultrasound is not hot to the touch. You don't feel the burn or the cooking when it is happening. Some may. But generally it is an after-effect. So a day or two later when you find yourself a little furmished, you start asking yourself "Is that because of the ultrasound the other day? But my doctor said it was harmless." Why can't Gwen stop and make the smallest of concessions about the damaging effects of ultrasound? Would that somehow cut into record contracts? Would you subject your baby to this:
Further evidence that the heat generated by ultrasound is terrible:
Fetuses are not the only ones effected by the possibly damaging effects of ultrasound. One of the most well known effects of ultrasound is that as Ultrasound waves pass through a tissue they tend to heat it up. (Are you listening?) The tissue can easily be warmed to 40 degrees Celsius. Although in vivo the heat is usually easily carried away by blood circulation or simply dissipated into surrounding tissues, this regiment can be applied in a technique called Ultrasound therapy where this heat is used to stimulate repair to damaged internal tissues. Another well known effect of Ultrasound are cavitations. Cavitations are small bubbles of gas that are released upon exposure to extreme pressure. These bubbles can cause cells or even tissues to rupture. This effect is used in a form of non-invasive liposuction, in which adipocytes are burst suing ultrasound waves. Although Ultrasound cannot be heard by humans, at high decibels it can still cause direct damage to human ears. [That can't be good.] Ultrasound in excess of 120 decibels may cause hearing damage. Exposure to 155 decibels causes heat levels that are harmful to the body. 180 decibels may even cause death.The landing page for General Electric's Ultrasound states:
Extraordinary images. Specialized systems. Innovative solutions. Every GE Healthcare ultrasound system is designed with you, your specialty, and your patients in mind. You're devoted to providing the best patient care. We're committed to providing technologies to help you excel every day.That doesn't tell us much. It's a sales page. And anyone living long enough knows these are empty statements and broken promises. But apparently doctors don't. The machines are cheap, starting from $1,000 and up from there.
How else will a doctor get an X-ray without an ultrasound? Good question. Ask them "When was the last time they had an ultrasound?"
If they say they have never had one, then ask them "Then how do you know it's harmless?" You have to defend yourself with reasoning. Use this reasoning. Doctors are not above other professionals who have a penchant for saying things without knowing things. They can't know the reactions of all drugs. Have they tried all the drugs that are available? I hope not. Same thing then with any medical procedure. You are defending your life. No one else can do that for you like you can.
See the picture above? See how the two are smiling? That propaganda. That's an increase in the number of ultra sound machines to the local hospitals. That ultrasound is an X-ray machine. Just with this X-ray machine, you don't get to wear a lead vest; instead only get a thin layer of gel that facilitates the sounds and increases the amount of heat that penetrates through your gut. What, your doctor didn't tell you that? Hmm.
HOW DOES ULTRASOUND GENERATE HEAT?
Ultrasound wave energy (phonons) injected into a substance causes the substance's molecules and or atoms to vibrate more rapidbly. This produces more friction generating new phonons of higher energy producing a higher temperature.That picture not only makes ultrasound appear harmless but entertaining. These are not high-frequency or mid-range frequency sound waves. These are ultra-high-frequency sound waves that penetrate through the tissue that is the lining of your stomach. That lining is vitally important for your ability to stand up, to bend down to pick something up, for sitting painlessly, and to protect your abdominal cavity, and your doctor doesn't know any better.
Shame on him!
Shame on her!!
Don't get an ultrasound. Like most things in medicine, they are unnecessary. Doctors love prescribing diagnostic tests. They rely on the tests and don't do the hard work of looking at a constellation of markers. They've surrendered the genius of analysis, of intuition from assessing different marker. Instead, they rely on electrical machinery. Tools are valuable. Don't get me wrong, but when the tools you use begin harming people, then you need to discard them for something NOT HARMFUL. Not less harmful but completely harmless. Why do we allow medicine to be bad for us? "We may not like our vegetables but they're good for you." Okay, but couldn't you put them in a sauce, like butter and garlic, to make them taste better? Cough syrup, same thing.
Note, too, in the picture how the technician is pointing away from where the ultrasound comes into contact with the expectant mother and throws pictures in your face, pictures that you can't make out and certainly aren't qualified to read. But the technician is there to narrate what is happening for us. I get that it's a photo-op, a commercial. It's not supposed to show accurate use of an ultrasound machine. This is the kind of picture that would get used in a brochure advertising the latest in ultrasound technology.
Technicians care only about themselves. They're not medical doctors. All they're trained to do is read data from a machine. They fashion themselves very smart but they know nothing and certainly aren't capable of telling the uncomfortable truths of ultrasound and their holy hardware.
Everywhere you go or everything you see regarding ultrasound make it sound like it is an ordinary, effective, and harmless machine to examine an unborn baby and inside the mother's stomach. We see ultrasounds advertised through movies and television series we watch on our favorite shows. It's almost serves the function of a midwife, showing us at first the baby's sex then spotting, if any exist, foreseeable problems. And we are to assume that no harm is done to baby or mama. Harmless? Hardly. It damages the muscle tissue that covers your abdominal cavity. It weakens it. It compromises your tissue.
each scan heats [. . . ] tissues and bones up to six degrees higher than the maximum determined level of safety and can cause cavitation, where gas pockets in tissues and body fluid collapse.Did you get that?
Gas generated from the ultrasound gets trapped in tissue. Your tissue becomes porous or cavitation develops and fluids get trapped in their. Does this make your lymphatic system work harder to drain these fluids? I can't say with certainly but my guess would be yes. Here is the article.
(NaturalNews) It is common for a pregnant woman to undergo several routine ultrasounds during her 40-week pregnancy. What many don't know, and despite what popular medical and government websites state, ultrasound scans have never been proven safe for pregnant women or babies and aren't recommended for routine use and non-high risk pregnancies.
An ultrasound is a diagnostic scan that emits ultra-high-frequency sound waves at tissues or bones. As the echo waves return to the machine, a picture is created. In the 1970s it was thought that ultrasounds were safe for pregnant women because of the very low scanning intensities; however, since 1993 the FDA has allowed high-output machines to scan babies at eight times the tolerable level without conducting any epidemiological studies. In addition, each scan heats surrounding tissues and bones up to six degrees higher than the maximum determined level of safety and can cause cavitation, where gas pockets in tissues and body fluid collapse. This can lead to a disruption in cell function and permeability, bleeding, and can have adverse effects on early fetal development.
Ultrasound studies done on animals have shown cell abnormalities to several generations, brain hemorrhages, lung damage, slow locomotor and learning abilities that worsened with longer exposure, and neuronal migration abnormalities consistent with autism and dyslexia in humans. Mice exposed to 600 minutes of ultrasound survived no longer than ten days.
Despite convincing evidence in animals that ultrasounds are dangerous, few studies have been conducted on humans, most of which are from other countries who limit ultrasound use. These studies have shown the following adverse effects including preterm labor, miscarriage, low birth weight, poorer birth condition, perinatal death, dyslexia, inner ear damage, and delayed speech development. An Australian randomized Doppler study involving high-risk mothers found more fetal distress in labor and lower APGAR scores at birth. Another Australian study showed that babies given five or more ultrasounds during pregnancy were 30 percent more likely to develop intrauterine growth retardation consistent with the findings in animal studies.
The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine advises patients to make an informed decision concerning possible adverse risks. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology recommends scans only for specific reasons, and along with the FDA, discourages the use of ultrasounds for non-medical purposes. A review in the U.S Journal of Epidemiology suggests that continued research is needed to evaluate the potential adverse effects of ultrasound exposure in pregnancy. Unfortunately, women are led to believe that ultrasounds are harmless and properly studied. This is clearly not the case.
Article originally appeared at Natural News.
The great Jon Rappaport cites James West's findings on ultrasound. This is a must-read.
No comments:
Post a Comment