DANE WIGINGTON: Blue skies almost never. Almost never have dew on the ground; that's a known consequence of geoengineering, if they did it which they appear to be. It sucks the moisture out of the atmosphere. It doesn't descend and form dew.

Thanks to Wendy McPhail for the video. 

Please watch & learn if you haven’t seen it so you sound informed when trying to explain it to those who have thus far proven themselves incapable of noticing on their own or caring even if they do notice. Many who notice just don’t care. https://t.co/B2VEGOoJ46

— Vectom (@Osbournegreen) May 5, 2025

Dane Wigington website, GeoEngineering Watch.  Climate Engineering.  Wigington YouTube channel.

12:15  Chemtrails are absolutely required to impact whatever weather event they were designing, and the trails were an absolute necessary ingredients for them to achieve their weather modification goals. So we are finding the aerosols, the metal particulates, all of those can be used and leveraged to create weather events that are several standard deviations for outside what would be typically normal.  When the geoengineering really got underway with the Russians in the mid 70s, we ended up with snow in Miami. We ended up with frost deep into Mexico.  The bizarreness with the weather really exploded on the scene when weather engineering got going in the mid 70s.  The Dakotas in winter, they recorded a temperature of almost 100°, 94°.  It broke the former record by 32°. There are very profound things that people don't notice.  Blue skies almost never.  Almost never have dew on the ground; that's a known consequence of geoengineering, if they did it which they appear to be.  It sucks the moisture out of the atmosphere.  It doesn't descend and form dew. We have massive temperature disruptions.  People are starting to wonder, why is it 80° one day, and then snowing the next day at 50°, or 45°, and then back up to 80° the day after that.  When you push and pull the climate with these manipulation programs, which there is a mountain of data to corroborate their existence, then you start to have massive fluctuations in the system.  And we saw in March in the continental US, there were 15,232 temperature records broken.  That's profound.  Some of the daytime highs, the former records were broken by as much as 32°.  Don't people wonder what in the world is going on?  

14:03.  Whether they want to make snow at 45°, 46°, 47°, I remember when 38°, 39° was a big deal, that's snowfall in the upper 30s and now that's been pushed into the 40s.

14:15.  There is a patent called "Ice Nucleation for Weather Modification."  This is a patent from NASA.  It can be found online and it's full form.  This patent is for the creation of artificial snow storms from what would have been rainstorms.  However preposterous this sounds, to people, if they look up "Chinese creates snow storms," they will find a long list of articles where the Chinese Bureau of weather modification openly admitted that they were creating snow storms until they did a billion dollars worth of damage in Beijing.  So, my question would be, if the Chinese can do this and NASA has a patent for the same purpose, why would we believe similar events here are natural when it's snowing now regularly at 45°, sometimes 50°, heavy, wet concrete, snow that is full of aluminum, full of barium, full of strontium, considered the ice pack in their first aid kit that can sit dormant at room temperature for decades until the chemicals are mixed together at which time it creates ice.

15:15.  As an honorary meteorologist, I had a responsibility to my audience.  There were storms that were not behaving as they were mottled as they historically would have responded.

15:27.  If you can control where moisture is collected and where it is dropped so to speak, in the form of rain or any kind of precipitation, then you can do everything you can steer the weather system.  If you want to be able to manipulate the weather, one of the things we know about the materials that are being used in the aerosols, we've seen everything from aluminum oxide, barium salts, strontium, copper sulfate, potassium iodide, a number of different kinds of things, each of which have different levels of reactivity with the moisture in the air.  Some, like aluminum oxide, tend to sequester the moisture the aluminum oxide which are microscopically fine in the air and conduct a nucleation process

1. Longevity in humans is linked to optimal solar exposure. The reason is simple. This protects the 7 layers of energy generation inside a cell. The more sun human gets the more diseases they can avoid and the #1 risk of most diseases is AGE. Solar exposure effectively… pic.twitter.com/XrF7mioI5u

— ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 (@DrJackKruse) May 19, 2023

And blocking the sun is the idea they are selling you to get to a one-world government. Once you block the sun, you become more reliant on the state because your TCA cycle will spin counter-clockwise chronically, and once that happens, they have you in your own self-induced… https://t.co/Zc4yI89COC

— ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 (@DrJackKruse) May 5, 2025

PETER ST ONGE: Jobs are booming. And they’re real jobs — not government jobs.

Jobs are booming.

And they’re real jobs — not government jobs.

Media's praying for a Trump recession. The reality is jobs — and wages — are soaring as investment explodes. pic.twitter.com/XYqWFYTUu7

— Peter St Onge, Ph.D. (@profstonge) May 5, 2025

First amendment does not apply to physicians in Texas.

First amendment does not apply to physicians in Texas. https://t.co/asmslTN2x5

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) May 4, 2025

THE SOLARI REPORT: When governments make it illegal for people to buy food and give corporations legal protection to poison people with pesticides, the message could not be clearer as to why and how a Great Poisoning is underway.....and why the honey bees are disappearing and life expectancies are…

When governments make it illegal for people to buy food and give corporations legal protection to poison people with pesticides, the message could not be clearer as to why and how a Great Poisoning is underway.....and why the honey bees are disappearing and life expectancies are… https://t.co/rA1UN2IBrq

— The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts (@solari_the) May 4, 2025

MARCIA ANGELL: Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit

"I vaccinated all my children. Why? Because... I was an idiot... I even pushed vaccines in pregnant women, influenza and DTAP, and shame on me. Mea culpa. Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa. I probably hurt a lot of mothers and fetuses, and, for that, I'm very sorry."

Dr. James Thorp… pic.twitter.com/eBY8HfPqO3

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) May 4, 2025

Marcia Angell, Editor of New England Journal of Medicine, 1979-2000 and author of the article, "The Truth About the Drug Companies," New York Review, Marcia Angell, July 15, 2004. 

Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myths, Anonymous (Author), Zoey O'Toole (Editor), Mary Holland J.D. (Editor, Foreword), 2022.

50% or more of the income from the FDA and CDC comes from vaccines. 

In her 2009 article "Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption", published in The New York Review of Books magazine, Angell wrote:

...Similar conflicts of interest and biases exist in virtually every field of medicine, particularly those that rely heavily on drugs or devices. It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.

CRITICISM OF THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

Commenting on the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act which allowed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to collect fees from drug manufacturers to fund the new drug approval process, Angell has stated,

It's time to take the Food and Drug Administration back from the drug companies...In effect, the user fee act put the FDA on the payroll of the industry it regulates. Last year, the fees came to about $300 million, which the companies recoup many times over by getting their drugs to market faster.

CRITICISM OF U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEMem

Angell has long been a critic of the U.S. healthcare system. The American healthcare system is in serious crisis, she stated in a 2000 PBS special: "If we had set out to design the worst system that we could imagine, we couldn't have imagined one as bad as we have." In the PBS interview, she urges the nation to scrap its failing healthcare system and start over,

Our health care system is based on the premise that health care is a commodity like VCRs or computers and that it should be distributed according to the ability to pay in the same way that consumer goods are. That's not what health care should be. Health care is a need; it's not a commodity, and it should be distributed according to need. If you're very sick, you should have a lot of it. If you're not sick, you shouldn't have a lot of it. But this should be seen as a personal, individual need, not as a commodity to be distributed like other marketplace commodities. That is a fundamental mistake in the way this country, and only this country, looks at health care. And that market ideology is what has made the health care system so dreadful, so bad at what it does.

CRITICISM OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

Angell is a critic of the pharmaceutical industry. With Arnold S. Relman, she argues, "The few drugs that are truly innovative have usually been based on taxpayer-supported research done in nonprofit academic medical centers or at the National Institutes of Health. In fact, many drugs now sold by drug companies were licensed to them by academic medical centers or small biotechnology companies." The pharmaceutical industry estimates that each new drug costs them $800 million to develop and bring to market, but Angell and Relman estimate the cost to them is actually closer to $100 million. Angell is the author of The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It.

In her 2004 article "The Truth About the Drug Companies", published in The New York Review of Books, Angell wrote,

The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion) [in 2002]... Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself. (Most of its marketing efforts are focused on influencing doctors, since they must write the prescriptions.) If prescription drugs were like ordinary consumer goods, all this might not matter very much. But drugs are different. People depend on them for their health and even their lives. In the words of Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), “It’s not like buying a car or tennis shoes or peanut butter.” People need to know that there are some checks and balances on this industry, so that its quest for profits doesn’t push every other consideration aside. But there aren’t such checks and balances.

Richard Friedman, director of the psychopharmacology clinic at Weill Cornell Medical College, and a regular contributor to the New York Times science pages, criticized Angell's views as unbalanced. "Dr. Angell is now doing pretty much the same thing the industry she assails has done, just the converse. Pharma withheld the bad news about its drugs and touted the positive results; Dr. Angell ignores positive data that conflicts with her cherished theory and reports the negative results.”

VIEWS ON ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

Marcia Angell is also a critic of the current categorization of alternative medicine. In a 1998 NEJM editorial she wrote with Jerome Kassirer, they argued:

It is time for the scientific community to stop giving alternative medicine a free ride. There cannot be two kinds of medicine — conventional and alternative. There is only medicine that has been adequately tested and medicine that has not, medicine that works and medicine that may or may not work. Once a treatment has been tested rigorously, it no longer matters whether it was considered alternative at the outset. If it is found to be reasonably safe and effective, it will be accepted.