Saturday, November 30, 2024

MARTIN ARMSTRONG: Trumps Proposal for Tariffs Will Fail

[Bitcoin is] not a store of wealth.  If it's a store of wealth, it doesn't rise and fall.  You can lose 40% on it very quickly, okay.  That's not a store of wealth.  It's not going to replace the dollar as a reserve currency; that's another propaganda thing.  A currency cannot be fixed.  That's what took Brenton Woods down. --Martin Armstrong

105:19. The majority always has to be wrong, because they are the fuel that makes it happen.  Everybody is long, and they panic.  They investigated the 1987 crash.  They called up the fund managers.  "Why did you sell?"

Basically the overwhelming reason was . . . They called the floor, "What's going on?"

"I don't know."  That was the worst response possible.   

The DOW is down a thousand points, and you don't know why it went down?

The rumors started flying, "Russia just invaded Europe and communications are down so we don't know yet."  Rumors got really wild.  So they sold, and that's really prudent.  If you don't know what's going on you get out.  If you read the Brady Commission Report at the bottom, I got them to at least not do anything against the private sector.  But at the end of the report, they said "Well, we think that foreign exchange had something to do with it."  I warned them.  I went to President Reagan, I said, "You just lowered the dollar after the G5 meeting formation at fosa court.  You lowered the dollar by 40%.  You just sold 1/3 of of the national debt to the Japanese.  They're going to sell."

"Oh, why would they?"

"Because they're going to lose money in the Japanese Yen.  Don't you understand that?"

These people have no clue how the world economy works.  Every body responds based on their own net view of the world.  We take the dollar down 40%, and all the foreigners are going to be selling.  Just look at why the dollar goes up during war.  World War I, all the money came here.  Europe was blowing itself up.  World War II, same thing.  That's what made the dollar the reserve currency.  In 1896, we were broke.  JP Morgan had to lend a $100 million.  So from 1896 to 1945, we became the largest economy in the world.  All capital flows.  Europe thinks the third time is the charm where you can defeat Russia.  Very nice.  You're going to blow up everything.  So effectively what do you got?  Capital is flowing to the US again.  

BITCOIN

108:20. You talked about the tremendous growth in Bitcoin.  Where do you see all that going?

It's a trading vehicle.  It got started, if you dig a little bit, the bulk of the transactions were coming out of China.  The Chinese government called in all the Bitcoin people.  Why?Because they figured it out, "Gee, I can buy Bitcoin here and I can sell it over there."  They were using it to get money out of the country.  It was a money laundering scheme and then the government finally figured it out and called in all the same Bitcoin guys you're looking at the same thing it's an internet like gold.  So it's the same thing if it's traded in Europe the same thing as traded in China or here. So you're not talking about different quality. It's not like Brent crude versus Texas Crude.  It's the same thing.  It's basically digitized gold in a way.  It's the same commodity. So it lends itself basically to money laundering.  It's been doing well because largely a lot of Europeans had been using it to get money out of Europe the same way that the Chinese did to get it out of China.  Eventually the government will figure it out it's a trading vehicle.  It's not a store of wealth.  If it's a store of wealth, it doesn't rise and fall.  You can lose 40% on it very quickly, okay.  That's not a store of wealth.  It's not going to replace the dollar as a reserve currency; that's another propaganda thing.  A currency cannot be fixed.  That's what took Brenton Woods down.  They fixed gold at 35 dollars but you continued to print the amount of dollars.  Eventually the system's gotta . . . I think a 3 year old with a pocket calculator could have figured out that was going to go bust,all right.  The money supply must expand and contract with the economy; otherwise, . . .  The problem with people who got behind Bitcoin is that they were saying, "Oh, it's going to replace the dollar."  You don't even understand the economy.  If you had $10 and 10 people, we all can have $1.  If there are 20 people and still $10, what happens?  Now we're down to 50 cents.  It's deflationary, not inflationary.  You're creating the exact opposite.  You're creating a global depression.  Money has to be able to expand with the population and economic growth.  It's the politicians that . . . it's their spending.  It's the political system that's the problem.  Vote for me, and I'll steal it from this guy and give it to you.  That's what's wrong.  It's prohibited by one of the Ten Commandments.  It's been going on for thousands of years .Assyria, Babylon, all these legal codes.  Hammurabi's code is wages and price controls, fixing how much you can charge interest. Obviously there were economic problems or you wouldn't come up with laws that dealt with it.  This is human nature.  It has not changed in 6,000 years. 

Friday, November 29, 2024

KHALISSEE: Israel destroyed the mausoleum of Simon Peter, Apostle of Christ, in the village of Shamaa in southern Lebanon

Israel destroyed the mausoleum of Simon Peter, Apostle of Christ, in the village of Shamaa in southern Lebanon.  

From NewArab

The village of Shama is considered to be a strategic location because it overlooks the city of Tyre and is located around 5.7km from the border.

"Simon, by the way, is one of the disciples of Jesus Christ. He is also the cousin of the Virgin Mary. Today the Zionists are destroying it," one social media user wrote.

"Akhbar correspondent says that the Israeli enemy threw smoke bombs towards Shama to cover up their soldiers withdrawing after they were targeted by the resistance, but they failed and are still being besieged in the shrine of Prophet Shimon while being exposed to gunfire from all sides," another wrote.


Immigration to the US is now heavily subsidized by government handouts, and it’s a no-brainer that all welfare for immigrants must be abolished. It's also important to limit citizenship. But some aspects of the Trump plan dangerously empower government agencies in ways similar to the state-building legislation of the post-9/11 days. We don’t need more federal power in the US. We need less.

Let's talk about the Trump immigration plan plans from both a free market laissez-faire classical liberal perspective and look at what's good and bad about the plan some aspects of it are great no brainer they protect private property rights some aspects essentially expand Federal police powers and that's not a good thing. 

GOOD PART OF TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION PLANS 

00:29.  Cutting out welfare dollars.  In recent decades, the US Immigration system has become a government subsidized scheme.  Show up, get free money, access to schools.  All sorts of free stuff get thrown at migrants.  Even those who go through the legal system after only 5 years they get access to a wide variety of welfare programs.  Also get access to citizenship they're at least begin the process after 5 years. 

Also, brand new immigrants showing up and have money thrown at them, like these five-star New York hotels subsidized by the government to turn them into fake "refugee shelters."  You see this in cities like New York but really across all US cities.  Debit card with thousands of dollars on it; free housing in luxury hotels; free food, as well as free natal care.  Americans saw it as a problem.  Huh.  That's why they're voting for Trump.  So no downside to cutting all that immigration welfare in this scheme of subsidizing migration.  Nothing wrong with true private sector migration where someone gets invited, offers a job to these people or the private sector supports these people and these people have to be productive in return.  Situation when we're facing.

02:12.  Citizenship is not a property right there is no natural righteous citizenship in any particular place except for the tiny number of people who would be rendered truly stateless where they denied you a citizenship none of these people arriving would be stateless without being granted you as citizenship they already have citizenship in the countries they came from when a lot of them get citizenship in the US they don't renounce their old citizenship they now have dual citizenship showing that they were never at risk being stateless but by not having citizenship are not forfeiting any property rights we should expand the time Horizon for citizenship to at least 10 years maybe 20 this requires a person to be far more invested in the local community to contribute a lot more to the local economy before they can start to extract resources in the form of social benefits programs and that doesn't endanger anyone's property rights you don't have to be a citizen to acquire property to keep it to have legal contracts with others.

MASS DEPORTATION

03:40.  How do you accomplish Mass deportation?

Border agents don't have special powers to determine who is legal or illegal.  How do you determine this?  You have to conduct investigations. How do you conduct investigations you ask people what their citizenship status is you investigate them you spy on them essentially You observe them demand they provide proof of citizenship ask people for their papers I know we're going to be told by many conservatives if you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to fear that's what these people told us with regards to the Patriot Act, the NSA spying, and the war on terror, in general, those vast expansions in the surveillance state, that a lot of conservative supported said "Hey, it's no big problem, because the government would never abuse its power."  Of course, we know, they always do.  So any scheme to go out and start investigating people more closely to determine what their citizenship status is, it's problematic.  Some migrants will volunteer themselves for deportation; these people are criminals in many cases.

05:54.  Since World War II, the US created this whole new idea of a "Border Zone."  [Border Patrol was created in 1924, and became part of US Customs & Border Patrol, CBP, in 2003.  This 25-mile wide border zone was created in 1952.] It's no longer just the border with a wall checking to see if a migrant is a felon; that's one thing that virtually nobody has a problem with.  But since World War II this new invention of the federal government, the obviously unconstitutional, 20th-century thing created was this 25-mile "Border Zone," where border agents can wander around asking people to prove their citizenship.  That was unilaterally extended without approval from Congress up to 100 miles and more recent decades.  You've seen videos with this on YouTube where people are just driving through the American Southwest and they're being stopped and asked about their citizenship.

07:20.  Going around asking citizens to justify their existence with paperwork is a problem.  We can't have a society that punishes private citizens for trying to rent an apartment to a person who doesn't have the correct government paperwork.  Or for someone who's paying a migrant to mow their lawn and they don't have the correct government paperwork.  These are all examples and excesses of Federal power expansion beyond a border issue.  Cutting off welfare dollars is the best start.  Or changing the citizenship situation that actually limits Federal power

None of these people arrive stateless.  By not having any citizenship, these people are forfeiting any property rights.  They have citizenship in their old country.  They are dual citizens.  We should expand the 

You don't have to be a citizen to acquire property, to keep it, to   

03:56.  The reality is that this is a foreign policy that team that at worst is going to be pro-Israel.  

I look at somebody like Marco Rubio and I don't see Rubio as any kind of mask massive hockey I see him as Little Marco he does what he's told and that's that Marco Rubio planning on making Latin America is planning on making Latin America and North America is priority for his term and that is a clear signal to the rest of the world that are foreign policy is going to shift radically away from the Asian pivot of the Obama Administration I don't think for a second Trump wants anything to do with a confrontation I don't think Trump really wants a confrontation Iran I don't think for a second he's going to get us involved into a war with Iran.

05:35.  That's an impossibility this is a distraction from what is the most important thing which is Ukraine if it's true that Elon went up and met with Iranian the Iranian ambassador to the uniformly

JEFFERSON AIRPLANE, 1969: Feed your head