Monday, September 2, 2024

WARNER MENDENHALL: Like I said, California is a special place because it's incorporating the Nuremberg Code.

The dismissal standards in California are actually better for plaintiffs than the federal standards.  Like I said, California is a special place because it's incorporating the Nuremberg Code.  It has some better court rules, and we are past the motion to dismiss and that allows us to get Discovery on what they were doing.  --Warner Mendenhall

We are past the dismissal of the case, and I think people have seen that happen with cases around the country.  The defendants typically file a motion to dismiss . . . you don't have standing, or you can't make your case, and I think that's the beauty of where we are.  The dismissal standards in California are actually better for plaintiffs than the federal standards.  Like I said, California is a special place because it's incorporating the Nuremberg Code.  It has some better court rules, and we are past the motion to dismiss and that allows us to get Discovery on what they were doing.  And one of the things that we have alleged is essentially that the University of California system has been running an experiment on all of its own people and it's collecting data, it's analyzing that data, and we want to see that data, and we want to understand the experiments and the studies that they're doing on their own population.  And they know how many people of those 220,000 that have been fired over this, that were injured over this, what are their health issues, and that's the kind of data that we want to follow up on.  With the system, it's a very expensive process.  I can tell you that we would love to have some people assist on this because it is unbelievably expensive.  When you have a big system like this, and you have to go into complex computer databases, and you have to hire people who understand medical statistics, Medical Datamatics, all of that stuff.  So I know you're going to link to his LinkedIn page at GiveSendGo/NurembergNow, and we really do need to raise money to have a successful fight over all the data that we want to get from the University of California.  So that's GiveSendGo.com/ NurembergNow.  

from that website, it reads,

With the help of our assiduous lawyers (Warner Mendenhall, Jeremy Friedman, et al), we filed a class action suit against the UC: Rake et al v Regents of the University of California.  In the suit, we are seeking justice for the perpetrators of violence against the human body and against humanity itself.  Their violations of the Nuremberg Code, the right to medical privacy, the right to be free from retaliation by employers who disagree with your personal medical choices, and the right to free speech cannot and will not go unpunished. 

An overview of Medical Datamatics

POLLY ST GEORGE: Zev Baumgarten bought the property 4 years ago. He's normally a Brooklyn, NY slumlord.

[RG911Team]: "Speaking out on 9/11 is pointless," they said. “Don’t waste your time fighting the system," they said

Sunday, September 1, 2024

ALEX KRAINER: The imperial, colonialist system, ALWAYS: mayhem abroad, misery at home

Two lads, London, 1902, at the height of the British Empire, when wealth abounded.  Understand that they've never looked after "their own" and they're never going to.  They look after themselves.  There were no "good ol' days."  It's Bollix.  Blame the right people, not those with even less than you. 

CORRUPTION IN THE BUSINESS OF AMERICAN FOOD

You might have come across this recent Time Magazine article that says "What If Ultra-Processed Foods Aren't as Bad as You Think," and maybe go "Oh, really?"  Well, I'm about to break it down for you because it's worse than you think.

This article cites a dietitian named Jessica Wilson, and this is Jessica Wilson.  You can see she's promoting something called #UltraprocessFridays.  She also makes posts like this, playing the race card to basically run cover for Big Sugar by saying an ad like this, which is warning Latino children that drinking Coke will lead to diabetes, and saying this is racist.  Well, let me introduce you to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, "Your trusted source of food and nutrition information."  The Academy represents more than 112,000 credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners and the Academy's "helpful eating messaging had reached approximately $25 billion people last year," except they are really just the propaganda arm of Big Food.  They take money from the who's who of Big Food.  You've got companies like,

ConAgra, Inc

PepsiCo, Inc 

Coca-Cola 

Hershey's Co 

General Mills 

Kellogg's, etc

The leaders of this Academy are also tied to big food Sylvia Rowe member of the Academy Foundation board of directors she is the former vice president of communications for the Sugar Association of the Academy Foundation board of directors and she is also a former consultant for Monsanto.

Hope Warshaw, former chair of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation and member of the Academy's Board of Directors, said she used to promote artificial sweeteners like Splenda.

The list literally goes on and on and on and on.  Yeah, just a little revolving door action.  No worries.

Let's keep going.  Records obtained through FOIA requests show that they are also invested in Big Food, companies like PepsiCo.

An email also obtained through a FOIA request sent by a prominent Academy spokesperson named Donna Martin says that 

everything looks good to me.  The only flag that I saw was that PepsiCo was one of our top 10 stocks.  I personally like PepsiCo and do not have any problems with us owning it but I wonder if someone will say something about that.

Well, I'll say it doesn't look good, but even if Donna developed a conscience and wanted to speak out, she could actually get into a lot of trouble.  In 2013, Carol Bartolotto, a registered dietitian in California, was removed from an Academy of Nutrition Dietetics panel.  At the time, she was working on a panel charged with setting policy on genetically modified foods for the Academy and she was removed for pointing out that two of its members had ties to Monsanto and for pointing out that they wanted them to write the paper before the work group finished it's review of the scientific materials.  She said at the time,

Why have a work group if it's conclusions are not going to be the basis for the position paper? 

Sounds like corruption