"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test." James Roguski () reiterates during a conversation with 's Polly Tommey how the so-called "PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive. Roguski notes that by using false-positive test results, specifically based off of PCR "tests," health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing. "I've tried to explain that math in [a] video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, 'Wait a minute: a positive result could be wrong 50% of the time.' And quite frankly, it could be even more than that," Roguski says. He adds that "if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive." "The error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test," Roguski adds. "That's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests." Partial transcription of clip: "If you remember, good old Deborah Birx, who was a member of the COVID Task Force, early on, she presented you know, Donald Trump was standing right by her side and she was presenting to the nation. She said something that I think went right past almost everybody. She said, well, if the specificity of the test is 99 percent, which means it's wrong 1 percent of the time and 1 percent of the population is actually infected if you believe the contagion myth, then a positive result is fifty-fifty. It might be a true positive. It might be a false positive. "And you just go, how does that math work out? Well, I've tried to explain that math in the video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, wait a minute. A positive result could be wrong 50 percent of the time. And quite frankly, it could be even more than that. And if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive. And so number one, the math at some point, you go, oh my god. They're just tricking me with statistics. There's a famous picture of Bill Gates with a book in the background, you know, how to lie with statistics. Well, this is how they do it. If you had a pregnancy test and it was 99 percent accurate and you gave it to, you know, a million men. Now I know, you know, in today's world, men can get pregnant. But if any test is wrong one percent of the time, if you gave it to, you know, a hundred or a thousand or a million men, one percent of them would be told by the test that they're pregnant. Now that's a, you know, silly little answer or or analogy, but the error rates in any test and in the PCR process, it's a hundred percent. "But the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing to millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test. Once people realize that that is how big medicine tricks you, take a cholesterol test, a high blood pressure test, a sugar test, a mammogram, a PSA, you know, prostate-specific antigen test. It's a customer acquisition tool. They go, "Oh, you have to take this high-technology test that you don't understand." And that's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests, you know, quite frankly."If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test."
— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 29, 2024
James Roguski (@jamesroguski)… pic.twitter.com/AUIRJKWGa2
Thursday, August 29, 2024
ROGUSKI: PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive . . . and health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing
Father is talking to his baby in the womb…. Watch that face π
This father is talking to his baby in the womb…. Watch that face π pic.twitter.com/AXoHhABnYc
— Wejolyn πΊπΈ (@Wejolyn) August 29, 2024
WEJOLYN: We talk about the biome as gut health all the time here. But people don’t link that up with eyeball fluid, nostril mucus, and realize that the entire body is a biome.
And it takes about 12 hours for a streptococcus mutans to land on your tooth, call its buddies to come and join it and start developing into this infected mass. So you have to brush your teeth every 12 hours otherwise you are going to develop plaque but that is an ongoing process that never gets better. --Dr. Ellie Phillips
We talk about the biome as gut health all the time here. But people don’t link that up with eyeball fluid, nostril mucus, and realize that the entire body is a biome. Listen to the dentist explain why you don’t need to do the regular cleanings -https://t.co/oqPMxo2OUs
— Wejolyn πΊπΈ (@Wejolyn) August 29, 2024
π£ New Podcast! "Episode #190 - Alex Krainer and How All Financial Fuses Lead to London" on @Spreaker https://t.co/PQnASm1MOj
— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) August 29, 2024
04:00. I thought I'd lay out my observations. July and August have been extremely eventful, and all of these events had something very interesting and common and that is the well understood pending default by Ukraine, which was expected at the end of July. And there was frenzied activity around Ukraine's Bond Servicing, and between Ukraine's government and Starmer's cabinet. Here's what's been happening. 2024 has been very bad for Ukraine. It's become clear that they cannot win in their war against Russia, and already in January about 10% of people polled in Europe, on a sample of 17,000 people in 12 European countries, only 10% of them felt that Ukraine could win against Russia. Which tells you that's the True Believers, 10%, right? So things are looking bleak and then the aid package gets stalled in US Congress for months, the $61 billion aid package. And then in March, the World Bank gives Ukraine a $1.5 billion loan but what we learned from that is that the World Bank thinks that Ukraine state of finances is catastrophic and at the risk of dealing with Ukraine is extreme, meaning you can lend the money but you're not going to see it back. That's bank talk for that.
06:00. So there's a lot of anxiety between the private bondholders who hold about $20 billion dollars worth of _________ Ukraine bonds. When Russians launched their special military operation these private bondholders granted Ukraine a two-year grace period so you don't have to service your debt for 2 years. That expires when? It expired on the 1st of August, 2024, so 27 days ago. In May, according to the Wall Street Journal, they start this discussion between a bondholding committee representing people like Black Rock among the Pimco and who knows who else and they start negotiating with Ukrainians because they're like, "Hey, you need to start servicing those bonds. You need to start paying at least the interest," and so the Ukrainians are like, "We can't. If you take a haircut, like 60%, then maybe we can talk. And so there were negotiations going on, Ukrainians were demanding 60% reduction in debt and the bond holders were offering 22% so this gets to July then on 12th July they have these intense negotiations and by the 19th July they reached the agreement okay so ukrainians are going to start restructuring their debts they're going to be at 37% haircut for the bond holders and this happens in London on 18th July zelensky flies to London where the recently appointed Blair's salonski as his ambass ador as his ambassador to London who used to be the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces in Ukraine
1:16:40 Steve Hogarth put it in one of Marillion's songs, we don't even have the haves and the have nots, we have "the haves and the have-nothings."
That's Britain, man.
They had a poll in which 25% of the British people said they were going to have to switch off their heating this winter to survive financially. Off! And 48% of them said "Off or down," meaning maybe we'll heat a little bit, but that's half the population.
1:17:31 And their leadership, as you pointed out in your article, the leadership is telling them "Well, you're probably going to have to suffer and you probably don't deserve to heat your homes," like a number of them are like "this is what you're going to have to do to save England." Ah, no. Fuck you.
PAUL SALADINO, MD: What is actually in Doritos? Let's look at the ingredients
This is why we NEED a Donald Trump 2024 Victory, Our Food is Poison
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) August 29, 2024
RFK Jr. promised to stop these topic ingredients. If you eat Doritos Chips pay attention π¨
What is actually in Doritos? Let's look at the ingredients:
- 1st ingredient, corn, which is certainly covered in,… pic.twitter.com/FoPBwIM330