She’s lost her voice, her chest, and doesn’t know if she can ever have kids.
— Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸 (@BillboardChris) October 4, 2022
She has BPD, so doctors cut off her breasts and gave her T.
“There’s how many mental health disorders that make you hate your body, and the solution isn’t to change your body, it’s to fix your brain.” pic.twitter.com/JUg7UF0uKL
Monday, October 3, 2022
Trans community targets vulnerable kids. This woman is saddened by the fact that she never gave herself time, the years it takes, to be a woman
REP. PAUL GOSAR: Anthony Fauci lied about that fact and hundreds of thousands died because of his malpractice and dishonesty. He belongs in prison.
More and more folks are waking up to the fraud perpetrated by our captured health agencies. They work for Big Pharma, not for you. https://t.co/ZzL4s0kFEe
— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) October 3, 2022
CLIMATE CHANGE: Yeah, what he said
What he said!!!!! pic.twitter.com/CLmaAIbINt
— Theo Fleury (@TheoFleury14) October 2, 2022
Dr. Eric Cohen: Remember this criminal's name
Dr. Eric Ruben is an immoral, unconscionable critter. If there ever is a Nuremberg 2.0 [and there won't be], he needs to sit right next to Fauci, Collins, Gottlieb, Walensky, and others.
Criminals!!! We’ll just see how it goes they say🤬 pic.twitter.com/F1z8qetqY4
— Jamie Sale (@JamieSale) October 2, 2022
This is the ghoul. He calls it a close call "
based on what the prevailing conditions are? (What prevailing conditions is he talking about?) But you're never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless you start giving it."
Hasn't he heard of clinical trials? You know, trials that take 10-15 years? Proof the idiot doesn't know what he's talking about. But as Dr. Pierre Kory pointed out, so many of the vaccine advocates were merely foot soldiers to defeat vaccine hesitancy.
FDA Advisory Meeting COVID Vaccine for Children Ages 5-11
— J.Cherry (@JCherryWESU) October 29, 2021
"We wont know how safe a vaccine is unless we start giving it." Dr. Eric Ruben pic.twitter.com/hvI0pOAgpQ
Remember when Congress used to declare war?
Translation:MI6 start the false flag operation STAT! https://t.co/y3TFDmPI5T
— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 3, 2022
Article 1, Section 8 enumerates war powers of Congress. Unfortunately, the U.S. Congress has only declared war only 5 times. Think of how many wars the U.S. has been involved with . . . exactly . . . scores of wars without Congressional declaration. Those five wars were declared by Congress under their constitutional power to do so were the
War of 1812 [1812-1814], Mexican-American War [1846-1848], Spanish=American War, World War I [1916-1918], and World War II [1941-1945].
The first war the U.S. engaged in without a declaration was the 1950, Korean War.
The Korean War was the first modern example of the U.S. being taken to war without a formal declaration, as has been repeated in every armed conflict since.
Here is Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 11 through 16:
“The Congress shall have Power . . . To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
“To provide and maintain a Navy;
“To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
“To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
“To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”
—U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 8, clauses 11–16
only Congress has the authority to declare war. Yet Congress in general, and the committee in particular, have done everything possible to avoid making such a declaration. Why? Because members lack the political courage to call an invasion of Iraq what it really is – a war – and vote yes or no on the wisdom of such a war.
What's sad is that the United States has effectively surrendered this Constitutional power to the UN by waiting for a UN resolution to tell the president to go to war rather than Congress. Pity. So, when you hear "resolution" or "Resolution Wars Act," just note that the U.S. has surrendered its constitutional authority to declare war over to the United Nations.
Though it's Congress's authorization to declare war, some have argued that the President has the powers to direct hostilities. Tom Woods breaks this down thoroughly.
But what the framers actually meant by that clause was that once war has been declared, it was the President’s responsibility as commander-in-chief to direct the war. Alexander Hamilton spoke in such terms when he said that the president, although lacking the power to declare war, would have “the direction of war when authorized or begun.” The president acting alone was authorized only to repel sudden attacks (hence the decision to withhold from him only the power to “declare” war, not to “make” war, which was thought to be a necessary emergency power in case of foreign attack).
So I think Tom Luongo above is correct. The British MI6 will craft a story that will push the U.S. through a UN resolution into war.