"When the George Floyd riots were happening [public health experts] said...we don't believe rioting is bad for covid. It's so important that you have to do it. But if you're protesting lockdowns...then you can't do that. And that's when I knew these people are a bunch of frauds." pic.twitter.com/2ls8NRgZ9T
— Christina Pushaw π πΊπΈ (@ChristinaPushaw) August 3, 2022
GET NUTRITION FROM FARM-DIRECT, CHEMICAL-FREE, UNPROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEIN. SUPPLEMENT WITH VITAMINS. TAKE EXTRA WHEN NECESSARY
Wednesday, August 3, 2022
DeSantis Summarizes the Summer of Love
BREAKING: Anti-US Protesters In Iraq Storm US Military Base With Bulldozers And Excavators To Tear Down The Base
BREAKING: Anti-US Protesters In Iraq Storm US Military Base With Bulldozers And Excavators To Tear Down The Base π¨
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) August 3, 2022
Protesters have also taken control of parliament multiple times in the past week. Iraqi authorities are losing control of the country.
π pic.twitter.com/bjfOvmi30u
Stakeholder Economics: "everyone sends in money. I will give you shares in return and then say OMG, there are people starving in Africa!”
Milton Friedman, back in 1970, exposed how Stakeholder Economics was inefficient and stupid. He laid out that such a role was that of government, not corporations, whose #1 fiduciary obligation was to its shareholder.
— Armstrong Economics (@StrongEconomics) August 3, 2022
Under Schwab, I could say, “OK I will go public; everyone sends in money. I will give you shares in return and then say OMG, there are people starving in Africa!” So, I decide to give 50% to them and not my investors. This is Stakeholder Economics.
LA County's Board of Supervisors has voted to give themselves the power to remove the elected Sheriff
LA County's Board of Supervisors has voted to give themselves the power to remove the elected Sheriff. Some might call this a threat to democracy.
— Kevin Kiley (@KevinKileyCA) August 3, 2022
A lawyer who recieves privileged material by mistake is ethically obligated to return it, not review it, and not use it.
A lawyer who recieves privileged material by mistake is ethically obligated to return it, not review it, and not use it. This is the plaintiffs lawyer in #AlexJones case admitting in open court a disbarment level ethical violation, and the court doing nothing. Kangaroo court! https://t.co/J7ZXYRTm0u
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) August 3, 2022