I had no idea that Type II Diabetes produced misfolded proteins

I had no idea that Type II Diabetes produced misfolded proteins.  

https://t.co/OHJpHUG35K #T2DM #T2D #PD #AD #Alzheimers all can involve #misfoldedproteins pic.twitter.com/hrzRzJtYhn

— Jen RD (Fan account) (@deCofactors) June 17, 2022

 

BONNY NICHOLS, WIFE OF J6 PRISONER, RYAN NICHOLS, CONDEMNS DOJ & J6 COMMITTEE

The DOJ is leading the real insurrection against our system. Americans have a right to due process.

The DOJ & regime needs the J6 narrative but fears real J6 trials b/c that would expose this for what it is, political theater & the shredding of our system. https://t.co/rlIQ9ewHFm

— Joe Kent for WA-3 (@joekent16jan19) June 16, 2022

DR. CLARE CRAIG: So [Pfizer] ignored that data. . . . several weeks after the third dose . . . that in the end they had ignored 97% of the COVID during the trial

🧵 1/ Dr Clare Craig explains why the FDA should NOT have granted approval for roll-out in the 6 month to 4 yr old children cohort

This trial should have been deemed null and void. The regulators are failing to do their job.

Share widely & follow @hartgroup_org for updates pic.twitter.com/jnfojQ8gCH

— HART (@hartgroup_org) June 16, 2022

She's discussing the evidence that Pfizer presented to the FDA regarding their trial for vaccines eligible to 6-month-olds to 4-year-olds.  Instead of experimenting on animals, Pfizer experimented on children, and how do you think that FDA views that activity? That alone should be the damning detail to bring an end to the Grand Jury testimony and move the proceedings directly to the sentencing phase.  But call a macabre experiment "Science," and voila, you've got all the funding you could dream of and all of the approval you had no idea could exist.  So as a DRUG trial, and even more hallowed, a VACCINE trial, we are all asked to kneel, please, in reverence.  

PART 1/2  4,526 children, ages from 6 months to 4 years old.  3,000 of these children did not make it to the end of the trial.  That is a huge number.  Two-thirds of them.  Why was there this drop off?  That needs to be answered and without an answer to that, and on that basis alone, this trial should be deemed null and void.  So what did the trial show?  They severe COVID as children who had a slightly raised heart rate or  a few more breaths per minute.  There were 6 children, ages 2 to 4, who had severe COVID in the vaccine group, but only 1 in the placebo group.  So on that basis, the likelihood that this vaccine is actually causing severe COVID, is higher than the likelihood that it isn’t.  there was actually one child who was hospitalized in this trial.  They had a fever and a seizure.  They had been vaccinated. 

So now let’s turn to what they define as any COVID, and what they did was to utterly twist the data.  They vaccinated the children and they waited 3 weeks after the first dose before the second dose.  In that 3-week period, 34 of the vaccinated children got COVID and only 13 in the placebo group.  [Does this mean that the placebos are contaminated too?] which worked out to a 30% increased chance of catching COVID in that 3-week period if you were vaccinated.  So they ignored that data.  And then there was an 8-week gap between the second dose and the third dose, and again children were getting plenty of COVID in the vaccine arms.  So they ignored that data.  There was then several weeks after the third dose, which they also ignored, which meant that in the end they had ignored 97% of the COVID during the trial and they just looked at tiny numbers, so tiny, that in the end they were comparing 3 children in the vaccine arm who had COVID with 7 in the placebo arm and they said that this showed that the vaccine was effective.   

🧵 2/ Part 2

It should be noted, the FDA voted unanimously to approve the drug for this age group. Given the problems outlined, this is unbelievable.

Follow @hartgroup_org for further updates. Please share widely@MaajidNawaz @DrAseemMalhotra @vacsafety @EthicalSkeptic pic.twitter.com/7ntI5QYSo7

— HART (@hartgroup_org) June 16, 2022

PART 2/2   So they measured how many of these children who actually managed to catch COVID in the 2-month follow-up period, and there were 12 children who had COVID twice, and all but one of them were vaccinated, mostly with 3 doses.  So you have to wonder what on earthy they're thinking when the claim of reduction in COVID was only 4 children, and here we got 12 childnre who got COVID twice, 11 of them vaccinated.  

So let's just recap.  They recruited 4,500 children.  3,000 dropped out.  And in the end, they're claiming this vaccine works on the basis of 3 COVID cases in the vaccinated group and 7 in the placebo group, on the difference of 4 children only.  And all of this, against the backdrop of a disease that DOESN'T affect children and with no long-term safety data.  We have to ask how an ethics committee could have approved this trial in babies. Babies are not at risk of COVID, and now we have Pfizer who is presenting this evidence to the FDA in order to apply for an Emergency Use Authorization.  Emergency Use Authorization is meant for a situation where there's a risk of serious injury or death.  Now, children under 5 are not at risk of serious injury or death from COVID.  In fact, in their own trial, they had to make up other ways of measuring the problem because there was no risk of serious injury or death.  Now, originally these products were sold as actually also reducing transmission.  Now, it would be completely unethical to use young children as a human shield but we now know that they don't reduce transmission.  The W.H.O. has stopped claiming that they reduced transmission.  [question: how can the W.H.O. speak on behalf or against a company's vaccines?  Do they know them that well?]  So that argument doesn't apply either.  Now, if we just turn to safety, what they did is that they followed up the patients for 6 weeks before unblinding them and vaccinating them.  So the children who had a placebo, the control group, were followed up for an average of 6 weeks and then given the vaccine.  So that's your safety control gone forever.  The fact that this trial existed at all is unbelievable.  There are other issues in there which I haven't highlighted but those are the key ones.  Parents should be demanding that the decision-makers explain themselves.  

Extreme heat and humidity kill up to 10,000 cattle in Kansas

Extreme heat and humidity kill up to 10,000 cattle in Kansas | AGDAILY https://t.co/VjygwUaQ6T

— Ginger Breggin (@GingerBreggin) June 16, 2022

We do have visuals of this slaughter on location.  What impressed me was the dripping blood from the necks and chests of these cattle.  That doesn't spell dying from "extreme heat and humidity."  Besides, doesn't humidity cool the earthy?  Plus, cattle have been enduring the heat on the plains, even extreme heat forever.  What changed?  What was different?  Who was involved?  Gates?  

Check out the comments below this video from people in the area and from cattle farmers.  No one is convinced this is a natural disaster caused by extreme weather conditions.  Not 10,000.  You might have a handful but not 10,000.  I have a few questions.  One, did someone want to buy that grazing land?  Two, what's going to happen to these fattened cattle?  Why aren't they being slaughtered for beef?  Three, who wants to buy that grazing land?  Were they reluctant to sell to a particular investor, and now that their herds have been devastated it makes the owner a little more amendable?

10,000 head of cattle don’t just drop dead from heat. It’s Kansas. It’s not hell. Maybe Bill Gates has an answer since he’s the biggest farmer in America and wants you eating his synthetic meat. https://t.co/s0BSwRrc2H

— Chad Prather (@WatchChad) June 16, 2022

NIACIN HELPS CLEAR INFLAMMATION

This is 3 hours long. Who has the time?  Listen to what you can, and you will learn a lot about the importance of Niacin and its flush and how it helps to expel toxins from the cells.  

The Niacin flush creates a thermogenesis response.  Your body needs energy to detox.  Inflammation over accumulates which uses up the Butyrate into down-regulation into silencing of this Niacin GPR 109A receptor.  Niacin should be used for Parkinson's too.

The niacin flush is anti-inflammation, a cooling down, a release if kinetic heat energy out of the system. It's not as hot there as it was before, The flush is literally blood-clot killing.  This is the first level of anti-inflammatory actions. 

If you're not tackling the inflammation, oxidative stress, if you don't clean that out with homeostasis metabolism that excess energy from the cells, it's going to accumulate and the more the cells fail.  With COVID, it's a rapid, complete phenotypic shift of energy.  The Niacin receptor informs how much Niacin you need.  Could be 10 years of little mini-COVIDs or one big COVID exposure.  If you don't tackle that inflammation, it leads to cellular failure.  If you want to get the inflammation out of your cells, you can only get out ehat it is signaling through its receptor. It's limited by the cells failing and not being able to signal as much.  

11:00. You talked about the first flush is so intense because

Where is the butyrate coming from, the colon rather than being systemically activated?  Rather than immune activation, you have butyrate being used as the primary tool.  Colonic Butyrate fuels the whole endothelium system.  Modulates systemic inflammation by the GPR 109A receptor. Intestinal homeostasis keeps butyrate in abundance.  Probiotics maintain GPR 109A in abundance.  Accumulative insults and over-accumulation of energy degrade butyrate, GPR 109A receptors, gut lining, etc. 

Kats' emphasis on niacin is different that what the mainstream says about niacin.  You need Niacin to make NAD, necessary for energy metabolism.  Molecules like NAADP get brushed into a secondary or tertiary line of importance.  GPR109A activates the flushing response.  People are trying to boost their NAD levels.  Institute of Medicine on niacin where they established the RDAs, Kats initially thought that the niacin flush was niacin getting into the cells and causing exfoliation of inflammation out of the body.  A fever response is trying to burn off fat of a stearified cholesterol.  Also when you exercise and release energy bonds that counter out free radicals and kinetic energy that goes downstream and you push it out, and that is what Niacin is doing.  Exercise allows you to exorcise excess energy out of the body.

  

Dietician, Jennifer Depew, explains the importance of niacin and references Dr. Kats's site.

Niacin (nicotinic acid) Protocol against COVID-19, shared with permission of the author, Dmitry Kats, Ph.D. *His website:  niacincurescovid.com.  *The apples and antihistamines can decrease the flush effect if it seems like too much and should be fine at other times of the day, than taken with or shortly after the niacin dose.

I like what Dr. Kats says here on his website,

Efficiently restores health from remnant damage in long-haulers.  Reduces inflammation, cholesterol, aches & pains.  Increases blood oxygen levels, increases energy, Help heal lung tissue, vessels, and much more. 

FYI, Kats does point you to his other website, Hom3ostasis.com.  There he offers a membership with a forum where you can comment and leave posts and whatnot.  The beginning price is worth it.  Price to clicking on the "Getting Started" button, check out his links first to get a lay of the land.  Kats says at the 40:25 mark to look up "kidney-niacin research."  Not great or specific direction, but okay.  I knew about kidney and baking soda, or sodium bicarbonate, but never heard about how Niacin AND Baking Soda have a powerful effect on the kidneys.  I thought his point about how COVID was exhausting the kidneys was good.  I am just having a hard time figuring out where he's coming from: purely nutritional compound, or does he have some special insight about COVID-19 that I've not heard yet?  I'll have to keep searching his sites.  

This was interesting, 

Supplementation with daily low-dose niacin reliably reverses a large amount of the functional loss. This simple treatment is effective and critically important. Mortality rates with CKD are striking, as the 5-year survival rate for patients doing long-term dialysis is 35% compared to 25% in those with diabetes [T2DM] in the USA. 

I have now personally observed more than 25 documented cases of individuals having their CKD progression not only halted but reversed with the addition of 3 to 5 cents worth of niacin, per day (with 1.8-2.4g/day sodium-bicarbonate with/without 250-500mg/day calcium-carbonate). 

I did not know this about phosphorous.

I was lucky to have been mentored by Dr. William F. Finn. [46]. Even if a patient has not already been scheduled for dialysis, he explained, and especially if they are currently on dialysis, you must get the serum phosphorus down. Excessive phosphorous is toxic to the kidneys as well as virtually every organ system and the entire body. [47,48] Phosphorus is a primary initiator of vascular calcification, among several other pathologies. If the kidneys start to lose a certain fraction of their normal function, the body can no longer efficiently clear phosphorous. When phosphorous serum levels reach abnormal levels, then you begin to saturate the tissues. Then phosphorous binds to calcium and it's the phosphorous, not the calcium that starts the pathology leading to calcium phosphate stones.