Possibly the most important lecture I've yet done. I just remade the video that I presented at CHD in 2023 for all to see. Please share if you like it. All my videos are now on Odysee and more will be coming now that I can make my own. https://t.co/E9caxAQMCf
— Suzanne Humphries (@DrSuzanneH7) March 6, 2025
If you don't know it, we've been dealing with the problem of vaccination for 226 years, and it's actually nothing to celebrate.
00:37. Here are the topics that I'm going to cover:
* dangerous components
* vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaccination [has been present since the 2nd year into the smallpox vaccine late 18th century]
* systemic corruption [regarding all vaccines]
* trial vaccine [was] different to the marketed product [in several cases]
* SV40 then and now [has been present in other vaccines besides the COVID jabs, injections; they're not vaccines]
* manufacture indemnity [more than once]
* [goal has been to protect the] vaccine program at all costs
* problems and vaccine reactions [have been outright] denied
* Lab leaks, and GoF [there have been laboratory leaks in the past; there's a famous 1916 one that I will talk about]
01:37. This cartoon might look like a joke, where we have three witches standing around a cauldron, and one of them says, "What potion are we making?"
So those things are actually all in vaccines, but other immunogenic injections, besides vaccines, have also been called "witch's brew" in the past, like the TB Test. If there was an old tuberculin and a purified tuberculin and they were both considered "witch's brews" because of the very vague chemical nature and relative merits of the product, according to this author. Note, the author did not believe there was anything in either brew that could be claimed to be desirable, because, as he said in 1951, "both contained non-uniform mixtures of unwanted byproducts," and yet were called the international standard, besides being substandard. That's nothing new, and it's also nothing old. But be encouraged, because 56 years later, in 2005, the New Scientist assured us that the new tuberculin blood test is better than the "witches brew" they injected for 100 years from 1905 to 2005. So, yes, vaccination is a form of incantation.
03:04. In a 2006 BBC News interview, a highly decorated professor of medical microbiology, Dr. Mark Enright, stated as much. When discussing a promising new vaccine for mRSA, and I don't know what happened to that vaccine, he said that,
Making a vaccine is a bit like witchcraft--you really need to put stuff in, stir the pot around and then see what happens. And you only really know what happens when you try it out in patience and humans . . .
as if they are too separate groups.
