Thursday, December 31, 2020

"The vaccines themselves are a conveniently short-lived solution even if they do work."

By Brandon Smith

For many months now I have been warning that the design behind the pandemic lockdowns is a perpetual one; meaning, the lockdowns are MEANT to last forever. We can see this in the very commentary of the establishment elites that are pushing for the mandates; their most frequent argument being that the pandemic restrictions are the “new normal”. This assertion is outlined by globalists like Gideon Lichfield of MIT in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’. In it he states:

“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.

…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public transport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been vaccinated against the latest virus strains.”

In my article ‘Waves Of Mutilation: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, I dismantled Lichfield’s arguments and outlined why the controls the establishment is attempting to put in place have been planned far in advance. The so-called “great reset” and “Fourth Industrial Revolution” has been in development since at least 2014 when the terms were first being injected into the mainstream economic media. The ideas of a cashless society, the “sharing economy”, biometric mass surveillance, social credit scores, etc, have all been part of the globalist agenda for decades. The coronavirus is merely a useful crisis for them to exploit as a rationale for the draconian measures they have always wanted.

The plan was so predictable that I even pointed out at the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak that lockdowns would not end even if a working vaccination was developed because all they have to do is declare that a “new mutation” of the virus has been found which is resistant to existing treatments. Or, they could engineer a whole new virus and release it into the population in order to keep the Reset machine rolling forward.

Not surprisingly, just as news hit the wires that the barely tested and highly suspect Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were being released to the public, reports have begun to trickle in of more infectious” Covid mutations found in places like the UK, India and South Africa.

I’m not sure how much more transparent the elites can get.

Take the Pfizer vaccine now and you might receive an immunity passport for a few months, and then it will become void with every new mutation of the virus. So, you must then submit to ENDLESS vaccinations, many of then untested and potentially hazardous. As the former VP of Pfizer and other medical professionals have warned, these vaccines are like Russian Roulette and could cause an autoimmune response that leads to sterility or other harmful reactions.

The vaccines themselves are a conveniently short-lived solution even if they do work. They require multiple doses over the course of a month, and renewed vaccinations are to take place possibly every few months. Basically, it never ends. With the mutations and limited antibodies from the vaccines, the elites could keep the lockdowns and mandates in place for many years to come.

The World Health Organization is making it clear that vaccination will not necessarily be considered a solution to viral spread. Meaning, even if you are vaccinated you will still be considered a potential carrier and transmitter of Covid, therefore the lockdowns and mask mandates will not stop. This begs the question – What’s the point of the vaccine?

The WHO chief scientist cites the fact that there is not enough evidence to prove that the vaccines prevent transmission. By that logic, we could also argue that there is no evidence that the vaccines are 95% effective, or that they are safe in the slightest.

In the meantime, the WHO and our friendly neighborhood fascist Dr. Anthony Fauci are consistently spreading the narrative that the “worst outbreak” is yet to come. Gotta keep that fear train chugging forward on the track to the “Great Reset”, right?

For the people that actually believe that the covid crisis will end after mass vaccinations, I’m sorry to say, but you have been duped. Every single element of the establishment response and every public statement they make indicates that they plan to violate your civil liberties for a long time to come. Those promises of relief right around the corner? All lies. The claim that if you go along to get along everything will go back to normal? It’s a con. It is hollow rhetoric designed to make you shut up and submit to medical tyranny for just long enough that it becomes irreversible.

I suspect they are hoping they can condition the public over the next few years to simply adapt to the controls until we forget what life was like before the pandemic and the reset. It seems, however, that the globalist reset plan is not going very well.

The vaccines and the mutation news feel rushed, to say the least. Initially, the establishment said that it would take at least 18 months just to develop a vaccine for trials and testing, and that the lockdowns would continue well beyond that time frame until a majority of the population was shown to have immunity. Instead, they tossed out multiple vaccines within 6 months and the mutation narrative is already in the news.

I believe this is because resistance to the pandemic lockdowns is growing and the number of people refusing to take the vaccines appears to be high. As they say, the revolution will not be televised, but it is still impossible to hide completely.

In Europe, a huge percentage of the population (around 50% or more depending on the country) are hesitant to take the vaccine. In the US, polls show that at least 30% of the population will refuse outright, while 60% of people are hesitant about effectiveness.

Even large numbers of health care workers are refusing the vaccine, and these are the people with the most pressure to submit or face consequences.

Hilariously, the media is arguing that though there have been “some allergic reactions” to the shot, there is “no evidence of serious long term side effects”. Perhaps that is because there are NO STUDIES of the long-term effects and there were minimal trials before the vaccines were released? I mean, is this not basic logic? Do they really think we are that dumb?

So far it seems hundreds of millions of people are not that dumb. Surprisingly, even sheriffs and police across the country are openly refusing to enforce mandates and carry out color-of-law punishments against citizens that do not submit. This is really a huge obstacle for the globalists and their reset.

The virus has produced a 0.26% IFR (Infection Fatality Ratio) among anyone not in a nursing home with preexisting conditions. Over 40% of Covid deaths are attributed to elderly people that were already suffering from numerous ailments. Only around 10% of people that end up hospitalized for covid suffer from long term health concerns (more than three months). And, only around 15% of ICU beds are in use across the US, meaning that the claims of over-capacity and full hospitals were nothing more than fear-mongering all along.

Consider the fact that hundreds of thousands of people already die each year from infectious diseases like the flu and pneumonia and Covid starts to seem far less threatening. It is certainly not an excuse for medical lockdowns and Orwellian contact tracing measures.

On top of that, numerous studies are revealing that the lockdowns and the masks are completely ineffective in stopping the spread of the virus. The states and countries with some of the most strictly enforced mandates also tend to be the places with the highest infection spikes.

Because of this, it makes sense that many people are refusing to comply with the mandates. The media claims we are conspiracy theorists that believe the virus “doesn’t exist”; this is not the case. In fact, I have long suspected that the narrative that the virus “doesn’t exist” was a psyop or strawman that would be used against the liberty movement later to discredit our resistance to medical lockdowns.

Most of us are well aware [that] the virus exists. Some of us have already dealt with it and recovered from it. What we are saying is that the CDC, the WHO, and the medical community’s OWN STATISTICS show that Covid is not a threat to more than 99% of the population. If we are to accept their stats as even remotely accurate, then Covid becomes a non-issue for most people.

Again, I will ask the question that the mainstream refuses to ask:

Why is 99% of the population being told they must sacrifice their jobs, their businesses, and their liberties in the name of making less than 1% of the population feel safer? Why not ask the 0.26% of the people under threat from the virus to volunteer to stay home so that the rest of us can get on with normal life? Why are we doing the opposite of what makes the most sense?

The answer is that the pandemic response is about dominance, not public health. People are starting to recognize this, and they are about to revolt.

So, the next logical step for the establishment if they really want to institute their reset agenda is to introduce a new threat. Meaning, they need a “mutation” of the virus or a completely new virus in order to create the kind of fear that is required to manipulate the public into going along with further control.

Will a new and deadlier virus be found? Maybe. In most cases, viruses tend to evolve into less deadly strains of the original. They also tend to balance out their rate of spread versus their rate of mortality. In other words, like any other creature, viruses evolve to survive, and a virus cannot survive if it kills off a majority of its potential hosts. So, they mutate to become more infectious, but invariably less deadly.

If a “mutation” does show up on the scene that is more deadly than the current form of Covid-19, then I would be highly suspicious of its origins. What is most likely is that that the elites are in a panic and they are using the mutation narrative as a propaganda tool to illicit terror and conformity in the public. There may be no mutation at all, or the mutations will have no significant bearing on the death rate.

Ironically, by rushing out the vaccines as well as the mutation stories, the elites have sabotaged themselves. They wanted to blitzkrieg the public with the lockdowns and they met heavier resistance than they expected. So, they put the vaccination program on a bullet train, and now the public is wary of being injected with a vaccine model that is barely tested. Now, they are promoting the mutation bogeyman and this only makes people question why they should take any vaccine at all? If the virus is going to continually mutate then why take a questionable vaccine that could be useless in a matter of months?

All the mutation narrative does is further expose what the true agenda is – What the elites want is never-ending lockdowns. There is no program to save lives or flatten the curve. The entire health argument is utter nonsense. Nothing that has been done so far supports the notion that public health is the priority. Instead, what we are seeing is a mad dash towards totalitarianism using Covid as the excuse, and the effort is failing.

If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch.  Learn more about it HERE.

With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.

 


How can a vaccine be of any value if viruses mutate?

Monday, December 28, 2020

Two lawsuits . . . challenge the root of the problem: the emergency itself.

By Spiro Skouras

Ever since the world became aware of Covid-19 in early 2020, we have warned of the possibility that the government response may turn out to be worse than the condition itself.

Many have described this response as a form of medical tyranny, sold to us as a temporary measure for the greater good. Two weeks to flatten the curve they said.

Four months into the lockdowns, some of us half-jokingly said things like, “I hope they lift the lockdowns before the 4th of July, so we can celebrate our freedoms.”

Now we find ourselves eight months into a two-week lockdown with no end in sight, despite the fact that a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled the shutdowns were unconstitutional. The Michigan Supreme Court also ruled that the Governor’s emergency orders had violated the Constitution. So why hasn’t anything changed?

In this interview, Spiro’s guest Dr. Pamela Popper discusses two new lawsuits that she believes could end Covid-1984. The two lawsuits, one in Ohio and one in New Mexico, challenge the root of the problem: the emergency itself.  

Will the Karens stop socializing personal responsibility? Physician, heal thyself.

The fact that Americans are following the mask mandate is the best example of an American psychosis.  Notice how the store clerk offers her a mask AFTER she's already told the clerk that she's not going to wear one.  This is a clear example of these Karens presuming that they know more about disease, health, and immunity than you do.  

At the 00:12 second mark, the masked woman says, 

Whenever there's a flu, there are only two or three patients in the ICU at a time.  Literally, the entire hospital is a COVID unit and this has never happened.  

The trouble with remarks like these is that they lack context and authority.  Everyone is trying to grasp some authority in their efforts to police and force others to comply with their desired aversion to any risk.  They've been given just enough information to turn them into street epidemiologists, but that just ain't working.  

I was in a grocery store last summer that required masks.  I wore a mask because there was something in the store I wanted.  But I wore the mask off my nose.  The clerk who knows me and has been friendly with me says, "You know, the masks only work if you wear them properly."  I looked at her with her mask covering her face and said, "Well, you're wearing a mask, aren't you."  That absolutely crushed her.  She replied, "That's not how it works," as though wearing the mask was a charade and the game in which "we're all in this together" comes with a set of prescribed rules.  Suddenly, the health benefits of the mask were reduced to a charade.  So the wearing a mask was a game, and wearing them properly meant following certain rules set by SOME unknown authority.  This is American psychosis.  

The lead up to this current medical psychosis began the day that Donald Trump was elected.  The barrage of attacks against him have been unremittant--from the Russian collusion to the Russian hoax to Stormy Daniels to his dodging impeachment, his attackers have been legion and unrelenting.  The four years since his election consisted of a psychosis that only primed Americans for further derangement during the 2020 COVID.   

Asymptomatic spread has been shown to be a myth.

Correct.  Asymptomatic means you're healthy.  Period.  Dot.

00:24

Fewer deaths overall in 2019 than there were in 2018.  

I think she misspoke.  I think she wanted to compare 2020 deaths to 2019 deaths, meaning that there were fewer deaths in 2020 than in 2019.  To the point, she's asking, "Where is the pandemic?"  

All they've done is recategorize all the deaths.  This is not what they're telling us what it is.  It's a lie. 

Then at the 00:53 second mark, in walks, a mummified American or zombie, holding out a mask, her voice muffled by her virtue-signaling deviant narrative and deadened by her following orders given to her by the media.  The masked woman has adopted an uncritical narrative that she feels compelled to force on others FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.  When will these Karens stop socializing personal responsibility?  the woman offering a mask is wearing both a plastic visor AND a mask.  Oh, God.  What a frightened kitten.  Has she ever heard of zinc, vitamin D or vitamin C? 

1:00 

For everyone to put all this stuff on their face when they're healthy is insanity.  

And then the real idiocy erupts with the statement, "You're willing to risk people's lives?"  That is the most evil statements I've heard surrounding this cold virus.  

I'm not risking anyone's life.  I'm healthy!  

True.  

How do we know that you're healthy? 

What a monster.  That masked monster is only baiting the young gal and forcing her to defend herself, while not crediting a single point that she's making.  Truly mummified women in masks.

Look at me.  Asymptomatic spread is not a thing. They've already shown there is not asymptomatic spread.  I don't have symptoms.  I'm fine.  I'm not a carrier of a disease.  This is what I am saying--they're treating us like we're diseased.  You just said, "How is this treating you like you're diseased, but you're   It's not just the mask.  It's the social distancing.  It's the lockdowns.  It's everything.  I'm not doing it anymore.  I'm not doing it anymore.  I'm done. 

And here is the coup de grace by the masked Karen, 

You're not in a position to be careful with other people's health.  

That masked mummy is psychotic, either that or a criminal  She would do well in the old Soviet Union.  

And then the nastiest of the nasties, 

You're moving tomorrow, right? 

I guess that the masked moron is giddy with destroying civilization.  

Saturday, December 26, 2020

"Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE"

Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE?!?!?!?

If a company is private and is entitled to creating any policy it wants, then why are companies complying with CDC recommendations?  By deferring to a pseudo-government/private entity, the CDC, companies put more muscle behind their policies whether it’s a mask mandate, six-feet apart, or taking 2 Tylenol as a condition for entering their store.

Is this a way to give any policy they create more weight

33 mins. 

Why are they citing the CDC and the public health orders, that are not even laws, that they have to comply with?  You guys got to think this through, and I hope that the sheriff is listening and I hope the police are listening: you guys are part of the problem.  Think!  And I know you know what the truth is anyway.  I know you do, and you’re just afraid to lose your job and that is pathetic.  You should be fired!

You are practicing medicine without a license.

35 mins.

Is it fancy pants and lollipops?  Is it a bribe that you’ve received?  Is it a promise for a promotion?  Do they have something on you?  Have you compromised yourself?  Whether it’s sexual, whether it’s theft, I just don’t know.  What I do know is that each of you is . . . what I can’t reconcile in my mind is how you can sell out your own children and grandchildren, throw them right under the bus. 

38 mins.

How much money do you think they got in April from the disaster funds?  Palm Beach County with a 2020 population of 1,510,660 received $261 million.  Over a quarter of a billion dollars.  That’s just to start in April.  I don’t know what else they received.  Chapter 252: Disaster funds.  In Florida statutes.  You’ve got the Florida mutual aid plan.  You’ve got FEMA.  Emergency Management Systems Compact.  Emergency Use Authorization.  The CARES Act.  Other things, including insurance monies.  That’s what they’re doing.  They’re bailing themselves out. 

If these counties rescind any of the mandates, they need to return the federal relief funds. 

40  just file a complaint.  And submit it to whom?  They will try to head you off by sending you on a fool’s errand. 

49  The department heads are lying.  The judges are lying.  They’re all lying.  They’re overtly lying and they know it.  They know the law.  It’s no mystery. 

Start with an administrative agency, the Human Rights Commission.  You have something like this in every state.  The state agency is not going to help you at all.  They’re part of the problem; they’re perpetuating the problem.  But you still have to do that, because the court can’t hear it.  Because the court’s gonna say, “you still have to do something with the state agency; otherwise, I don’t have jurisdiction.

Don’t listen to these people; go ahead and make your complaint.

If your gov’t agency is acting outside of its mandate, that means that they’re not immune. 

52  The Uncle Odd Show’s “Notice of Liability.”  Notice of liability is conditional acceptance of their offer.  A mandate is an offer.  They have to prove, 1) that the virus exists, 2) that social distancing is medically effective, and 3) that masks work.  And they have 21 days to be able to do that.  When they don’t, which they won’t, then you send out a second notice, because that’s the honorable thing to do.  You give them another 14 days to comply.  The 14 days will pass and they will not have responded.  At that point, at the end of the 14 days, they will be in default.  So I’ll send a notice of default.  There are 8 or 9 steps to this process, but the end of that it will be their conditional acceptance of my notice of Liability.  Now they are liable.  Their office is liable.  And they are liable as a man or a woman, where I understand it, I can file liens against their office and against them personally.  

SOURCES

Fakeologist.  

Fakeologist Home Page


"Vaccination does not confer a true, genuine immunity. . . . It only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead . . . "

The positive benefits of vaccines are always presented as a slam dunk.  Vaccine expert, Dr. Richard Moskowitz, MD and Homeopath, points out that 

the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.


A brilliant analysis of vaccination, by Richard Moskowitz, MD, and homeopath

Dec 24 by Jon Rappoport

by Jon Rappoport

December 24, 2020

(To join Jon Rappoport's email list, click here.)

BACKGROUND ON VACCINES

In the age of COVID, vaccination looms large. As in mandatory. And of course, toxic.

I’ve already covered two new vaccine technologies, one of which has already been pushed forward, to “protect” people from a virus that has never been properly proven to exist.

DNA vaccines, aka gene therapy, permanently alter recipients’ genetic makeup in unknown ways. RNA vaccines (Pfizer’s and Moderna’s, just approved for COVID) can cause auto-immune reactions—which means the body attacks itself. [1] [2]

In this piece, I want to take a look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.

WHO IS DR. RICHARD MOSKOWITZ?

From his bio [3]: “Richard Moskowitz was born in 1938 and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York University (M.D.). After medical school, he did 3 years of graduate study in Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel Fellowship.”

“He took his internship at St. Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967, as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”

In 1987, while writing my first book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation on the phone with Richard about vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system suppression.

I had already seen that AIDS was actually a lumping together of various immune-system problems, none of which needed HIV as an explanation.

I still recall that phone conversation with Richard Moskowitz. I came away from it with an idea about how vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a very different thing.

If vaccines were lowering immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).

Vaccination equals no cases of measles, the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is going on in the body.

I’m printing here an excerpt from Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter, about which I’ve spoken and written in other places. [4] [5]

Note: Although the RNA COVID vaccines deploy a technology different from classical vaccines, they still rely on antibody response as the key to “producing immunity.” But that response is only one of many natural reactions in the body which maintain health and ward off disease.

From Dr. Richard Moskowitz’s brilliantly articulated article, The Case Against Immunizations: [6]

“It is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’ to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker, but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following administration of the measles vaccine.”

“…Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’ organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.”

“By the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.”

“Such splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.”

“By contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, bypassing the normal port of entry and set[ting] up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no ‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring. By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.”

“The result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient. Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”

“Far from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.”

This is an explanation of vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they eliminate cases of disease.

With experimental RNA COVID vaccines, who knows how long the injected RNA lingers in the body, and what effects it produces over time? The relatively short clinical trials certainly don’t offer useful conclusions. [7] [8] The CDC blithely assures us that once the injected RNA offers “instructions to cells of the body,” the cells destroy the RNA. Sounds magical. The cells wait, receive instructions, THEN destroy the messenger.

And again, as I stated above, RNA technology has, in the past, caused auto-immune reactions, in which the body basically attacks itself.


SOURCES:

[1] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/

[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/26/vaccine-for-the-china-virus-the-planet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/

[3] https://healthy.net/author/richard-moskowitz-md/

[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/08/08/what-youll-never-read-about-virus-research-fraud/

[5] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/08/01/remember-the-pandemic-that-was-going-to-wipe-out-humanity-were-still-here/

[6] https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/richard-moskowitz-m-d-the-case-against-immunizations/

[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/21/why-you-shouldnt-believe-the-covid-vaccine-is-effective/

[8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/24/covid-vaccine-clinical-trials-doomed-to-fail-fatal-design-flaw/


Japan, like Sweden, is a crucial control country with no lockdown. Japan got almost no impact.

Ivor Cummins.  Who is he?  

Find him on Twitter at @FatEmperor

Japan and other Asian countries had incredible low death rates.  And they matched New Zealand, but nobody wants to talk about them.  

Tom reviewed some of the headlines in April at the time that the death rates were falling off in Asia, explaining that all of the mainstream media had grim predictions for Japan and absolutely none of them occurred.  

Did we get an apology, a re-think of this?  No, they're onto the next country.  Or if they have to talk about Japan, they'll stumble around and say they wore masks or something.  They don't even know what happened.  

"Japan's Coronavirus Is Too Little, Too Late," William Pesek, WaPo, April 10, 2020.

"Did Japan Miss Its Chance to Keep the Coronavirus In Check?" Dennis Normile, Science Magazine, April 22, 2020.  

Japan, like Sweden, is a crucial control country with no lockdown.  So Japan, in a brief summary, Japan got almost no impact.  Wow!  So if you look at the graphs in Europe for the deaths per million, the big curves, and you plot Japan, you can't see it.  It's that low.  And even the most dedicated mask-o-path, whose pushing the mask, will acknowledge that it will reduce some forms of transmission . . . maybe.  So it's not masks in Japan, because look at the mortality curves.  It's basically huge humps (in Europe) versus nothing (in Japan).  So it's not masks.  

I really liked this quote of his: 

Then there was this on December 7th, 2020.  

Friday, December 25, 2020

"Dr. Anthony Fauci doesn't mind going on television . . . and lying directly into the camera"

Thanks to Robert Wenzel's "The Inventor of the PCR Test on the Lying Fauci," @ TargetLiberty. 

Commenters to this thread point out that Mullis was talking about the HIV virus and not COVID as though that were some meaningful difference to point the severity of COVID over HIV.  In Chapter 5, "AIDS: The Virus Hunters Converge," of Peter H. Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, he points out that "Now came the big question: Which virus to blame?  Finding one would be the easy part; since AIDS patients were inherently full of infections, virus hunters would almost have too many choices."  Duesberg's conclusion was that AIDS is not the result of a specific virus but rather the destruction of different immune functions from lifestyle and diet.  For the cancers associated with AIDS, nitrite inhalants were cited as the primary culprit.  

Interestingly, the areas where absorbed concentrations of volatile nitrites would be expected to be highest--the skin surrounding the nose and in the nasal/pulmonary mucosa-are also reported to be the areas in which KS occurs in persons with AIDS. 


Monday, December 21, 2020

Dr. Carrie Madej on C-19 Vaccines Under Development: "One tiny little change can make a disastrous result."

Who is Dr. Carrie Madej? 
Dr. Madej is a DO, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, and Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA who has over 19 years of experience in the medical field.  She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001.
Her Twitter page is @DrMadej.  

Here is my transcript of the first 6 minutes of this 29-minute interview.  She is excellent; the interview is excellent and time well spent if you're at all concerned about the short, but more importantly, the long-term effects of the C19 vaccines.  
We are skipping safety trials.  We are skipping animal trials.  And people need to know that this is not a safe vaccine; this has not been proven to be safe.  The reason why they're skipping the animal trials is that the previous attempts in the last 20 years, to try a very similar vaccine because this is a very different one, has been a failure to the animal studies.  For instance, with the animal studies in the past when they gave this kind of modified mRNA or modified mDNA, the animals looked very robust with their immune systems at first.  Wow!  It looked like a success.  Antibody levels went up in the blood cells as well as the T-Cells response improved.  Great.  But in animal studies, they do something called a challenge test; that's not ethical in human tests, only animal tests.  Meaning after they look good on the blood samples, they then give the animals the virus or the bacterial or they expose them to the virus or the bacteria, and that's when we saw a lot of problems happen.  Every time the animals actually had a cytokine response, an inflammatory response, meaning they had a worsened response when they were exposed to the virus or bacteria.  They were sicker.  They had more lung inflammation, more liver issues, and more deaths happened.  So if this happened almost every time with previous vaccines of this nature, we can expect this to happen with this one, this very one they're trying to introduce on us.  Let's say they do give this vaccine--everything looks fine on everybody, right?  And then what if they're exposed to the common cold or the common flu or the CV-20 or whatever?  I expect, as well as my colleagues, there will be more deaths, more morbidity, more issues, and I would suspect that they wouldn't blame it on the vaccine, because the vaccine manufacturers have no liability right now.  They would say "Well, that's the nature of the new viruses that's out."  They would blame it on that.  We need to be very careful because this vaccine is not safe based on previous data that we have.  Also, this vaccine is new on the human race.  Never before has it been unveiled.  They are messing with the DNA, the RNA, the genome, the genes--these are all the same kinds of words to be used on the very same thing.  Our genome is what makes us human.  It's the blueprint for us: what makes us grow, what makes us reproduce, what makes us evolve, what makes us heal.  It's everything the body needs to know what to do.  So when they are manipulating that in any way, one tiny little change can make a disastrous result.  It can result in cancers, mutagenesis, mutant genes, auto-immune disorders, so this could be later term effects from this.  This is brand new.  The studies aren't being done propertly. 
Thanks to Robert Wenzel's post "A Warning About COVID 19 Vaccines" at TargetLiberty.  

Friday, December 18, 2020

TENNESSEE NURSE GETS COVID VACCINE, 17 MINUTES LATER SHE PASSES OUT

Thanks to Robert Wenzel at TargetLiberty

The chatter following this tweet is that of vax-defenders bending over backward to explain that the vaccine DIDN'T cause the nurse to faint and pass out on the floor.  The excuses reasons range from syncope to panic before a televised audience to pain in her arm.

Nurse Manager Tiffany Dover had been speaking to the media about the city’s first vaccinations of front-line health workers when she collapsed, according to video posted by WTVC-9, the Chattanooga ABC affiliate.

About 17 minutes after receiving the Pfizer-made vaccine against COVD-19, she started feeling dizzy, apologized and fell over before she was caught by doctors standing behind her.

“It just hit me all of a sudden, I could feel it coming on. I felt a little disoriented but I feel fine now, and the pain in my arm is gone,” Ms. Dover said.

She soon recovered and spoke again with WTVC, saying she has a condition where she often faints when she feels pain.

“It’s common for me,” she said.

And then in an attempt to CYA,  

WTTC reported that the doctors at CHI Memorial said the fainting episode was not related to the Pfizer-made vaccine. 

This is just incredible.  A nurse is hired despite a medical condition where her pain causes fainting spells?  You would put her in charge of any unit, including a COVID unit?  Really?  I mean if you're going to have a spokeswoman or spokesperson, why select her?   Wouldn't the optics be, like, terrible?  So this is either an indictment of vaccines or it's an indictment of medical and or bureaucratic incompetence.  What faith does anyone have in licensed medical services?  

 

Thursday, December 10, 2020

Los Angeles Superior Court Victory Against Lockdowns

Los Angeles Superior Court struck a blow against medical cartel's ongoing coup d'état against democracy.  The Court granted a preliminary injunction barring the LA County Department of Public Health Department (LADPH) from enforcing its ban on outdoor dining. 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted this on his Instagram account today:

Today the Los Angeles Superior Court struck a blow against the global medical cartel’s ongoing coup d’etat against democracy. The Court granted a preliminary injunction to the California Restaurant Association Inc (“CRA”) and Mark’s Engine Company No 28 Restaurant barring the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Department (LADPH) from enforcing its ban on outdoor dining. The CRA argued that LACDPH’s own data provide no support for the shutdown; the County’s own testing shows that only 3.1% of COVID cases originate in public restaurants. The Court agreed that the closure is not realistically designed to halt of COVID’s spread and that Health officials failed to give CRA a fair hearing. A June order allowed restaurants to provide outdoor dining if they cut seating in half, and separated tables by 8 feet. On Nov 20, the LACDPH revised its order to prohibit all outdoor dining.

The Court held that LA officials they had no concrete data to justify the rule. CRA’s expert witnesses challenged the county’s use of PCR tests accusing LACDPH of using “false positives” to fraudulently exaggerate both COVID cases and deaths. They charged that the county was using “diagnostic substitution” to blame COVID for deaths actually caused by influenza, viral pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, and pneumonia from other strains of coronavirus and other diverse pulmonary diseases and heart attacks. To preserve its deception, the County refused to provide data that would allow the restaurant association experts to compare hospitalization rates from respiratory infections for the same dates in prior years. That maneuver made it impossible to accurately attribute what percentage of the rise in hospitalization is due to COVID-19.

LACDPH experts also reached their highly speculative and questionable predictions by feeding false assumptions to defective and unreliable mathematical models.

This Court decision is one small but heartening victory against the tyrannical medical forces that are destroying America’s economy and obliterating its the middle class with arbitrary fiats that are not science based.

Thank you to Lew Rockwell.  

"If the antibodies are falling . . . the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling"

SAGE, the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, took the view that because SARS COV2 was a new virus that they believed that there wouldn't be any immunity at all in the population  SARS 2 is 80% similar to another virus you may have heard of--SARS that moved around the world a bit in 2003.  There are four (4) common cold-causing coronaviruses, and that I think that quite a lot of the population had been exposed to one of those viruses and probably have substantial protective immunity.  To explain why I was so confident, everybody knows the story of Edward Jenner, vaccination, and the story of cowpox and smallpox.  Milkmaids were exposed to a more benign form of smallpox called cowpox, which did not leave their skin scarred.  "If it's cowpox that saves the fair maid, he reasoned that giving a healthy person a vaccination, he would be able to protect them against smallpox.  Vaccination comes from vacca, the Latin name for cow.  So we are really familiar with the principle of cross immunization.  The vulnerable people in care homes, there's an awareness that caregivers are really careful and using PPE and so on.  But that's only going to go so far in a hothouse environment where people are pretty close together in a care home.  So they questioned Once one or two people got the coronavirus in a care home, why wouldn't almost everyone get infected?  And, of course, the truth is they didn't.  One interpretation of that distinction is that a large proportion of the people in the care homes had pro-apt immunity.  

Big story in the media recently (September 2020) was that a percentage of the population with antibodies against the virus, 4.4%, was falling.  This was cast as a concern that immunity to SARS CO2 doesn't last very long.  Anyone with knowledge of immunity would simply reject that.  That's not the way that immunity to the virus works: that would be T-cells.  So if the antibodies 

Immunity to the virus is created by T-cells, not by antibodies.  If the antibodies are falling, gradually over time which they have from spring to present, the only plausive explanation is that the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling and that's why the production of antibodies in the body gradually subsides.   

Less than 40% of the population was susceptible.  Even theoretical, epidemiologists will tell you that that's too small a number to support and consolidate a growing outbreak.  Community immunity: herd immunity.  So when SAGE says that