Hey @ArizonaMirror and @DillonReedRose: preserve your documents! If I get any free time after winning my elections then you’re getting sued, and I’ll easily prove actual malice. Gawker found out the hard way and you will too. https://t.co/HPBD0ZOYsr pic.twitter.com/Vp68ScJaTp
— Blake Masters (@bgmasters) May 9, 2022
Monday, May 9, 2022
ArizonaMirror: you’re getting sued, and I’ll easily prove actual malice. Gawker found out the hard way and you will too
Imagine if Trump had "a call to arms" instead of "protest peacefully." He'd be in jail w/ the rest of the 1/6 protesters
Imagine if Trump had "a call to arms" instead of "protest peacefully." He'd be in jail w/ the rest of the 1/6 protesters. https://t.co/ca31jgFxfd
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) May 10, 2022
Comic Relief
Babylon Bee hitting it home 😂 pic.twitter.com/EwsCaD7HwS
— Mr LB (@cuckingfutz) May 6, 2022
The W.H.O. Seeks Political and Sovereign Medical Power Over the U.S. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
Ashutosh Pathak asked me about the WHO Pandemic Treaty which seeks legally binding participation, funding, and sovereignty over a broad array of pandemic response measures including information flow, testing, treatments, and prevention. Here is my analysis. @ashutoshpkanak pic.twitter.com/OGAVwD01dn
— Peter McCullough, MD MPH (@P_McCulloughMD) May 9, 2022
Not exactly. The UN and the W.H.O could only have limited power WITH the U.S. if the U.S. Congress and these organizations sign a mutually binding treaty.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)