ROGUSKI: PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive . . . and health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test."

James Roguski (@jamesroguski)… pic.twitter.com/AUIRJKWGa2

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 29, 2024

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test." James Roguski (

@jamesroguski

) reiterates during a conversation with

@ChildrensHD

's Polly Tommey how the so-called "PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive. Roguski notes that by using false-positive test results, specifically based off of PCR "tests," health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing. "I've tried to explain that math in [a] video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, 'Wait a minute: a positive result could be wrong 50% of the time.' And quite frankly, it could be even more than that," Roguski says. He adds that "if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive." "The error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test," Roguski adds. "That's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests." Partial transcription of clip: "If you remember, good old Deborah Birx, who was a member of the COVID Task Force, early on, she presented you know, Donald Trump was standing right by her side and she was presenting to the nation. She said something that I think went right past almost everybody. She said, well, if the specificity of the test is 99 percent, which means it's wrong 1 percent of the time and 1 percent of the population is actually infected if you believe the contagion myth, then a positive result is fifty-fifty. It might be a true positive. It might be a false positive. "And you just go, how does that math work out? Well, I've tried to explain that math in the video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, wait a minute. A positive result could be wrong 50 percent of the time. And quite frankly, it could be even more than that. And if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive. And so number one, the math at some point, you go, oh my god. They're just tricking me with statistics. There's a famous picture of Bill Gates with a book in the background, you know, how to lie with statistics. Well, this is how they do it. If you had a pregnancy test and it was 99 percent accurate and you gave it to, you know, a million men. Now I know, you know, in today's world, men can get pregnant. But if any test is wrong one percent of the time, if you gave it to, you know, a hundred or a thousand or a million men, one percent of them would be told by the test that they're pregnant. Now that's a, you know, silly little answer or or analogy, but the error rates in any test and in the PCR process, it's a hundred percent. "But the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing to millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test. Once people realize that that is how big medicine tricks you, take a cholesterol test, a high blood pressure test, a sugar test, a mammogram, a PSA, you know, prostate-specific antigen test. It's a customer acquisition tool. They go, "Oh, you have to take this high-technology test that you don't understand." And that's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests, you know, quite frankly. 

pcrfraud.com.  PCR Tests cannot identify any active variant.  Don't submit to these or any other tests.  Their margin of error is too high for them to be used ethically or reliably, and will only be used by your doctor to justify some suspicion they've already concocted to prescribe you something.

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: Diversity is used as a way of pushing out the Patriots

Catherine Austin Fitts is warning of the very same thing...https://t.co/ZhiazqCafz

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) July 23, 2024

So you know my big concern is the Republicans are now going to be used to market the control grid to conservatives and I think my message looking at what's been happening is we have to double down on our efforts to stop the control grid so if somebody tells you that we need Biometrics for digital ID to deal with election fraud or the Border don't believe them don't believe it it's a marketing job for conservatives.  Any comments on any of those meetings?

00:33, POLLY TOMMEY. Can you just expand on that Catherine I'm at Biometrics just explain that to our people a little bit more thoroughly. 

00:41. AUSTIN FITTS. So if I want to go to an all-digital financial system, which is where I get the power . . . I mean what we're looking at is a coup d'etat, and the coup d'etat is changing control of fiscal policy and the legislative and executive branches from representing the people to being controllable by the bankers.  What an all-digital financial system allows the bankers to do is run all of that fiscal policy and all of the legislative policies through the financial system so the bankers . . .  literally, it's a coup of the bankers to take control of the whole government instead of the banking half.  So traditionally we've had the people's representatives in the legislative branch and the executive branch and then we've had the bankers run the monetary policy.  Now, the people who run their monetary policy, you know, grossly oversimplified, can take over the rest.  

It's exactly what we saw in that great video of Carstens from the Bank of International Settlements, saying, "You know, we can make the rules centrally and we can enforce the rules centrally and that includes taxation without representation."  And so the question is how can you sell this?  Chairman Powell has said he needs legislative, new legislation, and legislative authority to do that, and, of course, you need a way of selling conservatives on, you know, I hate to say this, giving up their 1st Amendment rights, giving up their 2nd Amendment rights, giving up their guns or having gun control radically increased.  But most of all, they need to be sold on digital IDs and biometrics, and, you know, what Trump and that group is really good at doing it and saying is "Oh, we have to stop immigration on the border, so everybody needs an ID so we can stop [the inflows].  We can send the immigrants home and stop immigration."  That's number one.  You know, or "We need more surveillance and more control and that includes the digital IDs and election fraud."  So there is a real push to get conservatives to buy into the control model, you know, for different reasons that are used in different sorts of marketing to people of different political persuasions.  And what we're seeing you know and I'm just reading between the lines of the RNC, we're using all sorts, it's really beautiful, seeing diversity used as a way of pushing out the Patriots.  And there's a real effort now, I think, you've seen a lot of factions coalesce around a Republican sweep of both Congress and the presidency, and on that sweep they would love to push through the control grid.  

$21 Trillion Missing from the DoD?

🚨REMINDER: THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HAS SPENT **$20 TRILLION** OF U.S. TAXPAYER MONEY THAT IS UNDOCUMENTED AND UNACCOUNTED FOR (1/5)

In this clip from a recent episode of the Children's Health Defense series, Financial Rebellion, Investment banker and former HUD official… pic.twitter.com/LuilJjkP2z

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 10, 2024

In 1994, the New York Fed and the Federal Reserve bought shares in the Bank of International Settlements.  The Bank of International Settlements is the Central Bank of central banks, located in Switzerland, and operates above the law; they have sovereign immunity and enjoy it in many respects and they can receive and hold money secretly.  They can keep money on their balance sheet secretly so the FED box shares and made the relationship with the BIS much closer in 1994.

In 1995, a budget deal basically crashed and burned in October, and it was then that one of the largest pension funds . . . the president of the largest pension fund in the country, he said to me, "They," whoever they is, "have given up on the country and moving all the money out starting in the fall."  And it was that fall, October 1997, when money started to go missing from HUD, as well as the Department of Defense.  As of today, there is $20 trillion between 1998 and 2015 that are missing from the DOD and $1 trillion from HUD.  The other thing that started to happen when that money started to go missing, Polly, was what I called the Great Poisoning.  So literally, it was the next month after the budget deal crash that the Oxycontin was approved and the HUD predatory lending started and the pill-mill started and really the targeting of the low-income neighborhoods started including the roundups coming from the private prison movement.  So undocumentable adjustments then skyrocketed coming into 9/11 we had been working with a reporter in Washington who was writing story after story about the missing money and we had a huge spread coming out in Insight Magazine, the cover story going to all the Congressional and Senate offices talking about what was then $3.3 trillion missing and demanding accountability including who were the private corporations and Banks running all those payment systems and we expected that story was going to be run on September 15, 2001.  That Monday, the day before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference at the Department of Defense.  You can see the video on the missing money website at Solari and he announced that the Department of Defense was missing $2.3 trillion.  Well, we know that wasn't true.  The next day, 9/11 happened.  James Corbett has a wonderful video called "911 Trillions," where he describes how many of the offices that were blown up at the Pentagon of the World Trade Center related to Securities and other financial operations very much connected to the money that was disappearing, in fact, we were told that the office is at the Pentagon was blown up or one of the offices was the location for the Office of Naval Intelligence Research Group that was investigating the missing money.  And so the rest is history, the PATRIOT Act had passed, and then the DoD got huge appropriations, and nobody really cared about the missing money.  

3:22. So let me go back to the chronology again.  So fast forward, Carolyn and I kept tracking the missing money and kept tracking and tracking, and then in 2015 the financials came out and it was the greatest missing money in one year.  The DoD was missing $6.5 trillion in one year, and I started to talk about it publicly you know.   I kept talking about it but needless to say, nobody was really picking up on it after James Corbett made that great video and so Dr Mark Skidmore who was a professor expert in budgeting at Michigan State University heard me and said oh wow she must be wrong.  You can't possibly be you know the Department of Defense can't be missing you know $10 plus trillion times its total budget in a year.  And so he went to the financials on the DoD website and discovered actually that I was right there was $6.5 trillion of undocumented adjustments at the Army and the Department of Defense, and so he called me and he said, "Is there anything I can do to help?"  And I said yes.  We've never done a complete survey of all the financial statements in all the years from fiscal 1997 to 2015.  Would you get some of your students and do a complete survey, and sure enough, he did.  And to his shock and amazement, I had the number of missing money at $12 trillion.  He got it to $21 trillion.  Interestingly enough, Holly, when he published his big report in 2017, again, up at missingmoney.solari.com, what did we discover?  We discovered that the amount of money missing from the U.S. Treasury was the same amount as the total debt of the United States on the books of the United States.  When Dr. Skidmore published that report, there was $21 trillion missing from the U.S. government and there was $21 trillion of outstanding debt, and I'll explain why that's important in a second.  A lot of pressure was brought on the Department of Defense to produce audited financial statements.  Once again they refused, and when they refused, remember the Kavanaugh hearings, remember, Polly, during the Kavanagh Republican and the Trump White House got together and issued a policy called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, Statement 56?  I refer to it in short as FASAB 56.  We have a great article that describes this in detail.  Maybe if you could bring that up, Lou.  So, FASAB 56 you can find that at the missing money and in the links for the show, and what does FASAB 56 say?  It says very shortly, that secret books are a matter of administrative policy, thus, refusing to obey the financial management rules, regulations, and laws including the Constitutional provisions for disclosure of financial operations.  They extended it along with classification laws to private companies in banks doing business with the federal government, which means when you look at the U.S. Securities cap section of the U.S. market, you know, most of the disclosure is meaningless.  You have no idea how the money works at many of these companies and the government because they're so intertwined.  That was an astonishing event.  In my opinion Polly the COVID-19 operation could never have happened without that because I put the Department of Defense and some of the agencies in a position amount of secret money.  It was a so somebody once told me it was a wet dream secret money for secret operations and if you look at the money that flowed out, it was interesting it was I think one month after that FASAB 56 passed that suddenly raised $500 million dollars.  Quite a coincidence,

Full video.  The "Missing Money" segment begins at 28:48.

The PREP Act allows the government and the DoD to bypass the normal regulatory frameworks and consumer safeguards,

https://t.co/PhzRwfXZba

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) June 16, 2023

HERE IS THE VIDEO.  WATCH IT.  LATYPOVA'S REMARKS BEGIN AT THE 5:50 MARK.

PREP Act was a law launched in 2002, and amended in 2005 that allows the HHS Secretary to issue a declaration to expand this liability shield for using unapproved medical interventions, devices, pharmaceuticals, all sorts of things, diagnostics, therapeutics, anything, using the Emergency Use Authorization essential to bypassing the normal regulatory frameworks and consumer safeguards, which are quite extensive today for very good reasons because we want to make sure that the medications are being used as safe.  So this is a shield essentially that the government uses and now, specifically, the DoD is using extensively to shield themselves and anyone that they hire for the task from any liability from using these poorly tested, untested, experimental, and completely black box, devices, and technologies.

8:50  Dr. Meryl Nass.  The Defense Department has been accustomed to doing whatever it wants and has a history of using untested products on soldiers.  In the Gulf War, they got a memorandum of understanding with the FDA that allowed them to use products that were unapproved and unevaluated by the FDA and at other times in the past also.  The DoD is kind of a law unto itself.  So for them, this was nothing new.  It was just happening on a larger scale.  It wasn't just 2 million soldiers, but it was also 134 million Americans.  But then this method was shipped out to the rest of the world, so 8 billion people.  

9:42  Polly Tommey.  Why have we called this program, "Willful Misconduct"?  What is the purpose behind that?  

9:48  Latypova.  I think it's because of the George Watts case v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, in other words, the DoD.  His estate is suing the Dept. of Defense for his death.  The only basis that we have to break this liability shield, a very extensive one, is based on willful misconduct.  So the case complaint was that the willful misconduct was essentially a bait-and-switch scheme that the Department of Defense and Health and Human Services, HHS, ran on the American public.  

11.  PREP provides blanket immunity for covered persons such as the DOD with a sole exception for willful misconduct the enumerated sovereign immunity for the United States and an agency such as the DOD (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(f)) is unconstitutional since for closing all redress violates due process enshrined in the 5th Amendment and it's central promise and assurance that all levels of American government must abide by the law and provide fair procedures particularly in instances such as this where Mr Wash was "deprived of life."  The enumerated sovereign immunity for the United States and an agency such as the DOD has is also an unconstitutional taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment.  A "legal cause of action is property within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment." 

So, now we have a death of a civilian from disregard for safety and using this PREP Act liability shield, and his attorneys are stating that "Well because this was willful misconduct because knowingly the Department of Defense administered, distributed the experimental product while telling everyone it was FDA approved.  And that was the lie that they perpetrated on this young man who died as a result of it.  

11:00  Dr. Meryl Nass.  The way that the PREP Act is written, there are almost no requirements for safety or efficacy.  What it requires is that the FDA, and the FDA issues it, simply believe, with or without evidence, that the benefits are going to be greater than the risks.  But it does say that the FDA needs to disclose the known significant risks.  And the FDA did not do that.  So the FDA was hiding many of the known risks.  But the other thing that happened was a bait-and-switch.  So in August of 2021, the Federal government announced all these mandates but only at the time that FDA approved a license for the Pfizer vaccine.  So on August 23, the FDA issued a license for the Pfizer vaccine for adults, but none of that product was made available in the United States.  So every body continued to get the Emergency Use product with a huge liability shield and the only potential way to litigate against them was to prove willful misconduct which was they knew they were doing something wrong but they hid it.  So what we're saying is, yes, they knew that the product being administered to George Watt and to everybody else in the country was not licensed, but the FDA, the DoD, and the rest of the Federal government pretended that it was.  

12:32  Tommey.  And this is Children's Healt Care case, correct?  Yep.

And the reason you're on here is because your lawyer can't talk about it. 

12:50  Latypova.  I think it's a great case because, finally, in my opinion, a correct defendent is named, in other words, which is the DoD and Lloyd J. Austin, III, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, who were the head of the operation, while the pharmaceutical companies are complicit and knowingly administered poisons because they are experts and they understand exactly what they are doing and know what consumer safeguards have been subverted. But they are operating under the Department of Defense who was heading Operation Warp Speed, OWS, now it's been renamed to Acceleration of Countermeasures, another name but essentially the same thing.  

[Huh.  The federal government is notorious for renaming projects and programs.  Remember when the Iraq invasion was initially named Operation Iraqi Liberation with the acronym of O.I.L.?  They're always trying to show how clever they are when in reality they're stupid monsters.]

This was at the time that these shots were rolled out and relevant to George Watts' case this was headed by the Department of Defense, Chief Operation Officer was General Gustave F. Perna, reporting directly to President Trump.  Structurally, the same reporting system reporting to Biden.  The Dept. of Defense leadership represents about 2/3 of Operation Warp Speed, most of them without any health care experience.  So this was all orchestrated from there, using several legal framework of several laws, so the PREP Act is one of them.   But there are others, such as Public Health Emergency Declaration to begin with, and the Emergency Use Authorization

SUE YOUR DOCTOR: They've Violated Their Oath and Failed to Give Informed Consent

"Sue Your Doctor" - They've Violated Their Oath and Failed to Give Informed Consent

Dr. Ryan Cole: "If you are injured by a shot or you know somebody who's injured by a shot, you need to file a suit against a physician, because nobody in the world got informed consent." pic.twitter.com/xvgcXjXhGe

— The Vaccinated Fox 🦊 (@VaccinatedFox) June 19, 2022