16-year-old bomber gunner, enlisted at 14 years-old, flew 22 combat missions before the Army found out his real age.

Now 16-year-olds today think they’re a cat. pic.twitter.com/zd6Mnw1YMb

— Steve 🇺🇸 (@SteveLovesAmmo) February 3, 2026

Clifford R. Wherley, 1927-2013.  Awarded a WWII Honoree. 

The New Deportations and Silver Manipulation. Tom Luongo and E.M. Burlin... https://t.co/0SzWsEG34H via @YouTube
Please like, share and discuss!@TFL1728 @EMBurlingame
These Gentlemen give us the most clear understanding and perspectives concerning current events! TUNE IN🔥

— Quincy Butler (@Freedom4Quincy) January 31, 2026

2:49. My Ghost 2 weeks ago told me to rewatch Patton. And rewatching Patton and then doing a deep dive on him and deepening my understanding of who he was . . . ah, yeah, yeah.  I'm  pretty much in a, "We're American.  Fuck you" mode.  I think everybody needs to rewatch Patton as a biased version of a man who understood just how important winning wars is not necessarily the bloodshed and that he understood that war was about winning it wasn't about killing it was about glory and honor and reasserting civilization and protecting the innocent and getting out of a crisis. Decisively and that's the way he fought across Europe and then he was restrained by political forces at the end the movie glosses over everything after the Battle of the Bulge to after the war and it's that first three months 1945 that are the most important.

4:23.  I think the most important years of patent where he and Eisenhower's friendship between World War I and World War II I believe that what we are seeing now, the Roosevelt's and the patents because Patton was American nobility Blue Blood family they had identified in Eisenhower a leader capable of all of the complex sophisticated, kind of like Trump.  And they we're setting up through the 1930s this removal of the British system as a warning to Eisenhower.  They killed his best friend who was a blue blood and just the same they tried to continue with the Kennedys and so they killed them.

5:27.  The Kennedys being Irish is there a lineage of any note? 

5:31.  Well but we have to look at with the Irish is that that's a mixing of people's you've got Scott's you've got Vikings and some of those Noble families and then you've got English as well so when you say anything you got to look that's there is a mixing of genetic peoples many of which go back to the Normans or Viking nobility and so even though you have and Irish family with an Irish name you have to look at their genetics and you have to look at their family lineage and often you'll find that they have a portion of their genetics that are Irish other than that they're either Scottish nobility Norman's that got their sometimes after 1066 or after Cromwell or they come from Viking nobility Scandinavian ability.

6:27.  Those nobility lines are they traced back are they of consequence does that lineage going so far back and diffuse is that relevant especially in the Kennedy's case?

6:49.  That depends on the mattress lineal side of the family how much do the mothers teach their daughters to love and Revere their family history and their family line because the mothers teach the sons from the moment they're born so when you look at Patton you look at you listen to his writings he very much understood his ancestry he very much recognized himself particularly in the American case but going all the way back to your question it really matters and this is my own family what the mother teaches their sons and daughters if the mother is the lineal side which is the one that generally goes Unbroken like Clint Eastwood is actually through his mother a descendant of the second or third is oldest American family Guy 1606

7:04.   

CHRISTOPHER WALKEN: Because every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is. It's too late to be scared. It's time to kill.

Were we not told exactly what would happen?

The jackals and the hyenas are circling. Rs and Ds alike have blocked every single attorney appointment.

It's coming. Mark my words. It's coming.  https://t.co/KfCPHrD3Nz

— Fred Bastiat (@fbastiat17) February 2, 2026

You ever watch those nature documentaries on the cable? 
Yeah. 
You see that one about lions? Look at this lion. He's the king of the jungle, huge mane out there. He's laying down under a tree in the middle of Africa. He's so big, he's so hot . . . he doesn't want to move.
Now the little lions come, they start messing with him, biting his tail, biting his ears. He isn't doing anything. The lioness, she starts pestering 'em, coming over and making trouble. Still nothing.
Now the jackals and hyenas, they start to move in. They're barking at him, laughing at him. They nip his toes and eat the food that's in his domain. They do this and get closer and closer and bolder . . . until one day, that lion gets up and tears the shit out of everybody. Runs like the wind, eats everything in his path.
Because every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is.  It's too late to be scared. It's time to kill.

I'm going to the other room. You come out when you're ready. Don't beat him . . . kick his ass. 

STEPHEN MILLER: There are no “asylum seekers” on the Southern Border. “Asylum” is limited to individuals fleeing extremely narrow categories of state persecution (eg high-ranking Soviet defectors during the Cold War) — none of the groups illegally crossing the border fit that criteria.

Thank you to Tom Luongo. 

A little primer on “asylum”:

1. There are no “asylum seekers” on the Southern Border. “Asylum” is limited to individuals fleeing extremely narrow categories of state persecution (eg high-ranking Soviet defectors during the Cold War) — none of the groups illegally crossing the…

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) February 2, 2026

A little primer on “asylum”: 1. There are no “asylum seekers” on the Southern Border. “Asylum” is limited to individuals fleeing extremely narrow categories of state persecution (eg high-ranking Soviet defectors during the Cold War) — none of the groups illegally crossing the border fit that criteria. No one in Mexico or Ecuador or Honduras etc live in nations where there is any state persecution of any protected class. It’s all fake, all the way down.

2. All non-Mexican illegals have transited through additional countries on the way to America where there are no forms of state persecution, thereby further disproving any hypothetical claim.

3. As yet further proof the claims are fake, aliens turn down the opportunity to avoid this fabricated persecution by being safely resettled in another nation.

4. Illegal aliens receive free and functionally unlimited legal services. When facing deportation, they and their lawyers (as a matter of course) automatically file fake asylum applications. It’s a multibillion dollar fraudulent industry. It’s gross, unethical, and deeply immoral. Everyone involved in this system understands and knows these claims are false. Adjudicating these knowingly false claims is a full-time job for thousands of people.

5. Federal law requires illegal aliens to be detained pending a hearing for their (fake) asylum claim. These are not prisons. They are not being punished. No one is being sentenced. Civil detention and removal is not part of the Article III justice system (in fact, Congress stripped Article III of jurisdiction over civil immigration procedure). The goal of the US government is to send aliens home immediately (they get cash and a free plane ticket) with the fewest days in custody as logistically possible. Any delay is caused by the fake asylum claim.

6. When the fake asylum claim is heard on the “non-detained” docket, the illegal aliens rarely show for their hearings. Those few who do show stay in the country regardless after losing (unless placed into detention). Removal orders are ignored as a matter of course. If and when absconders are eventually found (at great time and expense) they still have to be detained to actually effectuate the removal. At this point in time their lawyers will file a motion to reopen their asylum claim or otherwise appeal the finding and seek release again. Regardless, no removal of any alien anywhere can occur unless in a detained setting. If the alien has children they are, by law, supposed to stay in a family residential center (that costs more per night than a high-end hotel, and includes full medical, dental, scholastic and other services). 

7. Biden officials did not even bother with the pretext of performing intake interviews for the millions and millions and millions they released into the US. The aliens were simply released on sight, no questions asked, with court dates years away, in the hope and expectation that by the time their fake asylum claims were adjudicated and rejected years later, Democrats would be able to scream that these illegals have now lived here for X years and they and their children must be allowed to stay at our permanent expense. No one in the prior Administration responsible for these decisions actually believed the or now this has anything to do with asylum. To them, it is just useful propaganda in service of infinite mass migration. 

MASSIMO: Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes.

Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes.

Researchers followed a group of healthy women who routinely used common personal-care products containing parabens and phthalates—chemicals found in everything from shampoo and lotion to makeup and… pic.twitter.com/w8K1nj494g

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) February 2, 2026

Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes. Researchers followed a group of healthy women who routinely used common personal-care products containing parabens and phthalates—chemicals found in everything from shampoo and lotion to makeup and fragrance. These compounds can act like estrogen in the body, and excess estrogen-like activity has long been tied to higher breast-cancer risk. For 28 days, 36 women did one simple thing: they switched to paraben- and phthalate-free alternatives. No drugs, no diet changes—just cleaner cosmetics and toiletries. The results were striking: urine tests confirmed that levels of the chemicals’ breakdown products plummeted, proving exposure had been sharply reduced. But the bigger revelation came from breast-tissue biopsies taken before and after the switch. In just four weeks, the women’s breast cells began behaving less like precancerous or cancerous cells. They regained the ability to respond to normal “cell-death” signals (a safeguard tumors often disable). Protective estrogen receptors, which are typically shut down in breast cancer, switched back on. Gene-expression patterns shifted away from high-risk profiles and toward healthier patterns. This is the first human evidence that routine exposure to these everyday chemicals can nudge normal breast cells in a cancer-like direction—and, crucially, that removing the exposure can begin to reverse the process remarkably quickly. It’s not definitive proof that changing your body wash will prevent breast cancer. But it does show that the body notices—and starts to repair itself—almost immediately when you stop putting these substances on your skin.

["Reduction of daily-use parabens and phthalates reverses accumulation of cancer-associated phenotypes within disease-free breast tissue of study subjects," Chemosphere, 2023]