SAMA HOOLE: Every time: Traditional high saturated fat = healthy. Modern "healthy" diet = disease. At what point do we admit the pattern is clear? Answer: Never. Because admitting it means admitting 70 years of error.

2000s-2010s: Researchers study Mongolian herdsmen.

Diet: Mutton, dairy (yogurt, cheese, butter tea), fermented mare's milk.

Estimated 60-70% of calories from animal fat. Mostly saturated.

Very little vegetables. Almost no processed food.

According to saturated fat hypothesis:… pic.twitter.com/gdzrQT6qyI

— Sama Hoole (@SamaHoole) December 7, 2025

2000s-2010s: Researchers study Mongolian herdsmen. Diet: Mutton, dairy (yogurt, cheese, butter tea), fermented mare's milk. Estimated 60-70% of calories from animal fat. Mostly saturated. Very little vegetables. Almost no processed food. According to saturated fat hypothesis: Should have catastrophic cardiovascular disease. Reality: - Low cardiovascular disease rates despite high cholesterol - Good metabolic health - Low diabetes - Robust physical condition into old age Researchers: "This is surprising given their high saturated fat intake." Translation: "Our hypothesis predicts they should be dead, but they're thriving." When Mongolian herdsmen move to cities and adopt modern diet: - Cardiovascular disease increases - Diabetes appears - Obesity emerges Same genetics. Different diet. Different outcomes. Traditional high-fat diet: Healthy. Modern low-fat processed diet: Diseased. This pattern has been observed in: Maasai → City migration Inuit → Southern migration Aboriginal → Colonization Mongolian → Urbanization Every time: Traditional high saturated fat = healthy. Modern "healthy" diet = disease. At what point do we admit the pattern is clear? Answer: Never. Because admitting it means admitting 70 years of error. So each population is studied, the pattern is observed, it's called "interesting," and then filed away. The Mongolian herdsmen prove the hypothesis wrong. Along with the Maasai, Inuit, Kitavans, Aboriginal, Tokelauans, and traditional populations globally. But one more study that disproves the hypothesis just gets added to the pile.

SAMA HOOLE: Eat lean cuts of meat . . . and you'll also get--worse digestion, lower nutrient absorption, no flavour, less energy, and perpetual hunger

This is the state of fitness nutrition in 2025.

"Eat lean cuts of meat and throw away the yolks so you can get plenty of protein for fewer calories!"

And you'll also get:

- Worse digestion
- Lower nutrient absorption
- No flavour
- Less energy
- Perpetual hunger

These aren't… pic.twitter.com/VLF1jHCibF

— Sama Hoole (@SamaHoole) December 8, 2025

PAINT BY NUMBERS

Immigrants from Somalia overwhelmingly rely on government welfare

- Norway: 73% of Somali immigrants are on government aid
- Sweden: 64% of Somali immigrants do NOT have jobs or education
- Denmark: 69% of Somali immigrants are on public benefits
- America: 88% of Somalians… pic.twitter.com/7F8HdyKD1o

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) December 7, 2025

God Bless Poland

God Bless Poland

pic.twitter.com/ItPMasnqs7

— Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) December 7, 2025

ALEX KRAINER: . . . this is the reason why they have vacuumed up all of these tens of millions of immigrants from everywhere. I think that this is why they have been pouring so much money into things like Black Lives Matter and LBGTQ, Antifa, . . .

And so you now have perhaps millions of people who are ready for a revolution they need a catalyst a catalyzing moment, like a polarizing moment, and then you'll probably throw in a good number of Jihadis that the Brits control and you're going to get a good number of Azovites from Ukraine who are going to take charge. --Alex Krainer

29:25.  You were talking about the Russian Revolution the Bolsheviks, the Civil War, both of the Revolution, numbers of people killed, you were talking about the United States, and the United States primed for it, and I think you're absolutely right.  So do most of the guys coming from my world, the Special Operations Intel world, not so much the financial world, those guys seem to not get it.  But one of the things I wonder about it is that I suspect as the Europeans know that they can't defeat Russia in a fight but that's not the intent.  The intent is to use Russia as the excuse to cover for the collapse and to use the build up for war as an excuse but the real intent is the United States and to unleash Civil Wars there and to back it with logistics, manpower, Azov, leadership, highly experienced warfighting experience all of that and they're trying of course in Eastern Europe they are getting their marching papers handed to them at the border.

30:45.  I agree entirely, EM. It's almost obvious that they're doing it because they're not going to stop.  The whole empire doesn't even make any sense without the United States being a part of it.  And so now Trump doing course correction, especially now on Thursday with the publishing of the new National Security strategy 2025, it's very clear that he's basically abandoning them. And for them, this is completely existential.  So they will do everything in their power to try to topple Trump and maybe even completely topple the American constitutional order.  And I think that this is the reason why they have vacuumed up all of these tens of millions of immigrants from everywhere.  I think that this is why they have been pouring so much money into things like Black Lives Matter and LBGTQ, Antifa, and all of these people, including arming some of them and training them how to use arms.  And so you now have perhaps millions of people who are ready for a revolution they need a catalyst a catalyzing moment, like a polarizing moment, and then you'll probably throw in a good number of Jihadis that the Brits control and you're going to get a good number of Azovites from Ukraine who are going to take charge.  And then you have a recipe for disaster and, of course, they also control the media, so everything is wrapped into this "No Kings," "Trump is overreaching," and on and on.  So I see great danger because the playbook is almost exactly the same as the way they overthrew the Czarist regime.  People in the United States, feeling untouchable, might feel a little bit relaxed because "you can't overthrow . . . you can't do that s*** over here."  Well, you know, they overthrew a 300-year regime that had a continual government under Romanov and everything intertwined with the, with their cultural norms, and traditions, and the Orthodox Church, so it was a very unlikely success, but it was a success.

33:50. . . . because of how they did it.  

33:53.  Yeah because they've been building up for decades.  Look at all the prosecutors, the district attorneys, Sheriffs, look at all the ports in this country, the main ports.  If I was going to do whatever . . . a revolution, if I was going to overthrow the United States and the inertia days, they don't care which one of these factions come out dominant in the end, because they're going to control them and they're going to take them out Stalin style and shoot them.  So they don't really care which factions.  If I'm, you know, as an unconventional warfare, dirty warfare trained guy, an Intel guy, a targeting guy, when I look at the United States we are completely and totally and absolutely primed to be taken down and primarily by being not invaded by armies but by logistically, but by our enemies logistically supporting local forces that are led by foreign because by the most, likes by the way did bring in people from all over the world, even guys that had fought in the Boer Wars, and elsewhere, they brought British-leading or British-connected people from all over fighting in these kinds of dirty wars and sending them in there.  They weren't Bolsheviks.

35:10.  They sent probably as many as 25,000 people before the Revolution took place.  And then when the Civil War took off, it was 300 to 400,000 troops-- Japanese, American, British, Czech, Greek.  

35:33.  Which at the time was a disproportionate number today that would be millions, right?  

35:40.  One of the things that Richard Poe is bringing up on the podcast last time we talked about the sheer number of multiple wars, and multiple armies fighting in the years after the initial Revolution . . .

35:50. . . . for 20 years

35:51.  And it was Churchill actually managing a lot of the White Russian forces because he was being told to manage White Russian forces to fail because they really wanted . . .

36:03.  Yeah because they pretended to be allied, pretended to be allied with them because supposedly because they were against the Bolsheviks and the Communists, but they managed them to failure, kind of like maneuvered them off the cliff.

36:20. No different than when we watch places like Syria.  It's the same thing. Whenever these conflicts look incomprehensible, they're not incomprehensible they just don't fit into a simple narrative whatever the narrative we've been told is it's always something far more ugly than that and it's designed that way on purpose.

36:41.  You put the City of London into the puzzle, and suddenly the whole picture makes sense.

36:49.  The encryption key.  But it's not just the city of London right that's just where things flow through this goes to the Hague to Amsterdam this goes to Rome this goes to the other places that they're centered you know you were talking about Venezuela and you're absolutely right and I've articulated this before that Venezuela is city of London HQ in the Western Hemisphere just the same as they had set up for their Devil's Legions, which is this composite Intel, paramilitary, terrorist organizations, cartels, they've all been brought together under this same umbrella, same leadership structure, same financial structure in the global war on terror.  That's what it really was.  It was a mob war.