— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 25, 2026
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
MJ MURPHY: Dude. The real disgrace would be telling women their boundaries don't matter. Dignity is not hatred. Privacy is not bigotry. Safety is not discrimination, and protecting sex based spaces does not ruin lives.
Another male crying victim for being excluded from a female sex based space. pic.twitter.com/ORDF7WOw8M
— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 24, 2026
TRANS KANSAS LAWMAKER SLAMS BILL BANNING BIOLOGICAL MEN FROM WOMEN'S BATHROOMS
Thank you, Mr Speaker. On its face, this bill obviously discriminates against transgender people.
00:09. No, it separates bathrooms by biological sex. That is how bathrooms have operated for generations. Protecting female spaces is not discrimination. It's recognizing sex differences.
In ways that make our lives exponentially more difficult and dangerous . . .
00:29. Dangerous for whom? Women are statistically at far greater risk of sexual assault than men. Sex-segregated bathrooms exist because of that reality. Not because of cruelty.
Good morning seriously it is yet another way of policing women and our bodies . . .
00:52. Sir, women are not being policed. Women are asking for boundaries. Female privacy is not oppression, it's a basic civil right.
In the absence of men and masculinity being subjected to the same scrutiny.
01:10. No, Sir. Men's spaces are not the issue because men are not physically vulnerable to female in the same way females are vulnerable to males. That's not ideology. That's biology, Sir.
There's no outrage about trans boys playing in sports.
01:31. And that's because female athletes lose opportunities when male bodies compete in women's categories. The performance gap matters. That's why this debate exists.
There's no hand ringing about husbands and Sons sharing their bathrooms with trans men.
01:54. Correct. Because women are the sex with higher rates of sexual victimization. Policy follows risk.
This is about blaming women for the bad behavior of men.
02:11. No sir. It's about not forcing women to absorb the consequences of male behavior. Women didn't create male violence. We shouldn't have to surrender our spaces to accommodate it.
And we may be done with this travesty in the Statehouse but now we've just Unleashed it upon our families and our friends.
02:40. No, sir. What's being unleashed is clarity. Bathrooms are separated by sex. That standard protects everyone without requiring women to override instinct or privacy.
And our colleagues, and this is an embarrassment and a disgrace, and it is going to no doubt ruin lives.
03:03. Dude. The real disgrace would be telling women their boundaries don't matter. Dignity is not hatred. Privacy is not bigotry. Safety is not discrimination, and protecting sex based spaces does not ruin lives. It maintains clear, neutral standards that protect everyone's rights without forcing women to surrender theirs. Calling this "life ruining"? Come on, that's dramatic. No one's life is ruined by not entering a woman's restroom. Women's rights however are eroded when male access becomes mandatory.
JOHN GUANDOLO: What is going on is the intentional outcome of a 100+ year communist movement and a 60+ year Islamic movement in the United States. Not much more complicated than that.
What is going on is the intentional outcome of a 100+ year communist movement and a 60+ year Islamic movement in the United States. Not much more complicated than that. pic.twitter.com/tWDc9IXwBO
— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) June 24, 2026
TREASURY SECRETARY, SCOTT BESSENT: "I think we're going to have a strong dollar because our economy is pulling away from the rest of the world."
Yes. Deregulation and revamped taxation at every level along with investment is long term dollar positive but more importantly overwhelmingly positive for PEOPLE Not OLIGARCHS https://t.co/yXn4l2xbtV
— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) June 24, 2026
TREASURY SECRETARY, SCOTT BESSENT: We have rediscovered at great cost what America’s first @USTreasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton taught us: the nation that depends on its adversaries for critical inputs is neither truly sovereign nor truly prosperous.
from Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent,Hamilton you say? https://t.co/PomYmKy72l
— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) June 24, 2026
We have rediscovered at great cost what America’s first Secretary Alexander Hamilton taught us: the nation that depends on its adversaries for critical inputs is neither truly sovereign nor truly prosperous.As we approach 250 years of American independence, we would do well to remember that our founders left us more than a Republic—they bequeathed a roadmap powerful enough to sustain it for two and a half centuries and beyond.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)