They will deploy the Army against the population that continues to object to their own destruction. There will be no voting their way out of this, our Gov'ts won't let us. Folks should embrace the horror and get to work. --Linuxhippie
Following the horrific stabbing of a 17-year-old girl in Brierfield.
Alex Phillips has a powerful message for Keir Starmer.
Well said.@ThatAlexWoman @talktv pic.twitter.com/4xeuwXgztp
7 min interview w/ former head of MI5. No mention of immigration, no mention of Marxism, no mention of Islam.
— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 13, 2026
Neither mention foreigners that the British Gov't imported to do exactly what those foreigners ARE doing to British Subjects.
It's always the external threat. Does… https://t.co/qnzP4oCJDM pic.twitter.com/Fz4QrrtN9v
7 min interview w/ former head of MI5. No mention of immigration, no mention of Marxism, no mention of Islam. Neither mention foreigners that the British Gov't imported to do exactly what those foreigners ARE doing to British Subjects. It's always the external threat. Does not mention the obvious "ongoing" threat to the British people from their own leadership that has "prioritized" the replacement of British subjects with Islam. Reduces current leadership to the level of "student activists" (completely under-inclusive to the threat they are) and refers to this a "left wing of the Labour Party" dispute (as if the entire Labour isn't Marxist). This is the UK Counter-State completing the opposite side of the dialectic. Close the circle to churn the British population into non-existence. He knows exactly what he's doing and his language was carefully chosen (al la Discourse Theory praxis) to close the circle of allowable opinion in order to paint those citizens who seek to defend themselves from annihilation by their own Gov't as "extreme". Next up, they will deploy the Army against the population that continues to object to their own destruction. Remember the SPLC case? It's happening in the Ireland / UK right now. If the people don't commit, go all in, they will be crushed and doomed to the fate their King has set for them. There will be no voting their way out of this, our Gov'ts won't let us. Folks should embrace the horror and get to work. US Politicians do the same thing see slides below.
The Most Powerful Debate Technique pic.twitter.com/HBTJjats7o
— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 13, 2026
I have spent years studying psychology, NLP, persuasion, influence, and the most powerful debate technique I have ever found isn't it a comeback, it isn't a fact, it isn't an argument. It's a question. The most powerful debate technique ever is a question. And the funny thing is almost nobody uses it because it doesn't feel as satisfying as attacking someone. It doesn't feel as satisfying as proving someone wrong. And it definitely doesn't feel as satisfying as winning. The most powerful debate technique is this, I'm going to tell you. Ask people to define their terms. That's it. That's the technique because most arguments aren't actually arguments, they're collisions. They're collisions between different definitions. Take almost any controversial issue that people spend hours arguing, days arguing, years arguing, and then eventually you discover they are using the same word to mean completely different things. Words like freedom, justice, equality, rights, violence, man, woman, harm. Nobody stops to ask, "What exactly do you mean by that?" And until you answer that question, the debate can't even begin. One person is playing chess and the other person person is playing checkers. And both think they're winning. The reason this technique is so powerful is because definitions expose assumptions. They expose assumptions the moment someone defines a word. They reveal the hidden beliefs underneath it. Suddenly you're no longer arguing about conclusions, you're examining the foundation those conclusions were built on. And sometimes something amazing happens. You discover that you don't actually disagree about the facts; you disagree about the meaning of a single word. So most people think debate is about having better answers. I think great debate is about asking better questions. And one of the best questions you can ever ask is "What do you mean by that?" Because clarity is Kryptonite to manipulation. If you're trying to think more clearly in a world full of propaganda, persuasion, and psychological manipulation, check out my guide, Breaking the Spell.
from Andrew Branca.
He's like, oh, let's look at all these poor black victims. Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman was acquitted.
Tamir Rice: no indictment. Michael Brown: no indictment.
Philando Castile: officer was acquitted.
Freddie Gray: officers were acquitted or charges dropped.
Terrence Crutcher: officer was acquitted.
Sylville Smith: officer acquitted.
Chikei "Rick" Chao was found not guilty after the shooting death of 14-year-old Cyrus Carmack-Belton in South Carolina.
The "returning wallet" case could not be verified, but many people confuse it with Ralph Yarl, the black teen shot after going to the wrong house. In that case, the shooter later pleaded guilty, so it was not a not-guilty verdict.
00:31. And it's a mystery to her. The reason these people were not convicted or sentenced must be racism. It has to be racism. All these poor black boys. All these poor black boys. It must be racism. Well, let's take a look, shall we, Genius?
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman was acquitted. George Zimmerman went to trial on a charge of malice murder. Here is what he looked like at the scene. Trayvon Martin was trying to murder him to beat his head through a sidewalk. Those are pictures of George Zimmerman's face. His nose is broken sideways on his face. The back of his head was against the sidewalk, so every punch was actually two blows: the punch to the front of his face with Trayvon Martin mounted on top of him, and then the blow of the back of his skull against the sidewalk. George Zimmerman's face and the back of his head immediately after Trayvon Martin stopped trying to beat Zimmerman to death by beating Zimmerman's skull through a concrete sidewalk stopped Trayvon Martin was stopped only because of a 9 millimeter round shot by Zimmerman through Martin's demonic little heart murderous, little heart. Zimmerman's nose was broken sideways on his face. By the way, when the media printed these photos for the public, did you know they printed them in black and white, so you wouldn't know what you were seeing was blood? Contemptible eyewitness testimony describe Trayvon Martin mounted on top of a fallen Zimmerman, beating him viciously. The witness testified, "MMA ground and pound style." Testified Zimmerman was screaming for his life, for help that never came. A world-class Medical examiner in the trial testified that the beating was "absolutely likely to inflict death or serious bodily injury." That makes it a deadly force attack, justifying Zimmerman's deadly force defense.
Did Karmelo Anthony suffer a beating like this or anything everyone is testifying to the contact of Austin Metcalf to Carmelo characterized it as a "soft push." And they were not in the dark alone they were surrounded by dozens of people including many black people we're supposed to believe we're supposed to believe that Carmelo Anthony had a reasonable belief that Austin Metcalf and Hunter Metcalf we're going to be allowed to be him to death in front of all those black people?
What about Tamir Rice? Tamir Rice was a 12-year-old in Cleveland shot dead by police. And you might be thinking to yourself, "Oh my God! That sounds . . . how could police officers do that? And there wasn't even an indictment?" They shot a 12-year-old black boy, a little child . . .
What if the EU leadership does know, and that's why they did it? Because the do and they did. https://t.co/wK9zGbj22H
— Stephen Coughlin (@S_Coughlin_DC) June 12, 2026
