Tuesday, December 2, 2025

The President and the Sec. of War have entire panels of attorneys who advise them on the legality of the smallest little nuance of what they're doing.  Otherwise, they get impeached.  Otherwise, they get removed.  Notice how there isn't a single movement to impeach the President over this?  Because it's all lawful, Constitutionally and otherwise.   --EM Burlingame
China kills drug dealers.  Russia kills them.

The Venezuela oil is lousy.  The war there is not about Venezuela oil.  Heroine was a huge deal in Russia until the russians went' scorched earth no it.  

Fentanyl doesn't come from Mexico, it comes from Canada.

Second coup the CIA ever did was Venezuela.  The first one was Iran. 

13:00  The Seditious Six calling to disobey an unlawful order was a call for civil war, for hot civil war.  They were calling for military personnel.  Who determines what the lawful orders are?  The Commander in Chief and the Secretary of War are the ones who determine what is lawful and what is and what is not, not all the middle-level managers.  The President and the Sec. of War have entire panels of attorneys who advise them on the legality of the smallest little nuance of what they're doing.  Otherwise, they get impeached.  Otherwise, they get removed.  Notice how there isn't a single movement to impeach the President over this?  Because it's all lawful, Constitutionally and otherwise. 

What this is is the princes of the world, the elite, the few remaining have finally decided that this praetorian regime has to end and that these Devils' legions have to be destroyed.  And it's already happened in Ukraine.  Ukraine's destroyed. 

NATO is disarmed.  

Qatar has been taken off the table.  

Next we're going to go after illicit funds that are stored in UAE.

We have to finish Columbia and we have to take out Venezuela and the Caribbean at the same time because all of those conduits go up through the Caribbean and then all the money comes back through the Caribbean banks.  That's the spider's web.

What are we doing?  We are destroying the last vestiges of the British empire, which is all this illicit shadow wealth, self-funding para-militarian intelligence capabilities of the British Empire.  We are finally getting rid of it all around the world.  Now, the Russians have already done it all the way across Russia.  They're still working through Eastern Europe.  They've done it through most of Central Asia.  

China has done it in China.  They're working on Burma. They're working on Thailand.  They're working on other areas right now to get rid of this British infrastructure.  That's really what the whole kerfuffle in Hong Kong was about about a decade or so ago.  It's this ability to sow chaos and conflict around the world on demand all self-funded through illicit businesses and quasi licit businesses.  Because what was happening China?  Why did the Chinese kick us and the British out?  People should watch the China Hustle, 2018, video, right?  What was happening was that over 60, 70% of the China miracle that funding never happened in China.  It came right back out in the form of all of these fraudulent four stock listing companies in foreign markets.  And then vast amounts of real estate in China all funded and supported by
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

SAMA HOOLE: Grains are just civilised famine food. High-calorie, low-nutrition, survival rations that keep populations alive but don't optimize individual health.

Humans are facultative carnivores.

We can eat plants when necessary. We thrive on animals.
This is a survival advantage. When hunts fail, you can fall back on plants and survive until the next kill. But fallback foods aren't optimal foods. During famines, people ate grass, tree bark, leather. Their bodies adapted enough to survive. Barely. That doesn't make those foods healthy. It makes humans resilient enough to tolerate starvation rations. Grains are just civilised famine food. High-calorie, low-nutrition, survival rations that keep populations alive but don't optimize individual health. Your body can process them. Your body cannot thrive on them. There's a difference between "technically compatible with life" and "optimal for human function."
Posted by at No comments:

Monday, December 1, 2025

Posted by at No comments:

SAMA HOOLE: Finally, desperate, Kane accepts the blubber. Orders his men to eat it. Within one week: Strength returns. Hunger stops. No more deaths. Lean protein kills. Fat saves.

1856: Arctic explorer Elisha Kent Kane's expedition to find Franklin.

His men are hunting Arctic hare. Unlimited supply. Eating 10-12 pounds daily per man. They're starving anyway. Kane's journal: "The men are eating enormous quantities yet growing weaker by the day. Their bellies are full but they cry out with hunger." One crew member dies. Autopsy shows: "Well-fed appearance, full stomach, but complete metabolic collapse." He died with food in his stomach. From starvation. Because the food was too lean. The Inuit watching this are baffled. They offer whale blubber. Kane's men refuse it as "savage food" and "uncivilised." Three more men die eating unlimited lean meat. Finally, desperate, Kane accepts the blubber. Orders his men to eat it. Within one week: Strength returns. Hunger stops. No more deaths. Kane writes: "I do not understand the mechanism but the native food has restored the men in days after months of our provisions failed them." He didn't understand it. But he documented it perfectly. Lean protein kills. Fat saves. The Inuit had known this for 4,000 years. British naval command read Kane's journals, noted it was interesting, then sent the next Arctic expedition with the same lean rations. Same results. More deaths. They kept doing this for 40 years. "Savage food" kept saving "civilised men" from dying on "civilised rations." Eventually someone noticed the pattern. By then, dozens of explorers had died eating unlimited food. Because it was the wrong food.
Posted by at No comments:

ADAM JOHNSTON: After the Johnson-Reed Act passed in 1924, the U.S. essentially shut down immigration until 1965, which lowered the foreign born population from around 15% to 4.7%.

It’s not “un-American” to favor immigration from specific regions or even to restrict immigration completely.

Don’t fall for this guilt trip, which is designed to dispossess Americans of their nation. For about 175 years, up until 1965, U.S. law deliberately favored immigration from European regions, specifically Northern and Western Europe. Were all those who enacted these polices, including the founding fathers, “un-American?” After the Johnson-Reed Act passed in 1924, the U.S. essentially shut down immigration until 1965, which lowered the foreign born population from around 15% to 4.7%. (See chart) The House voted 322–71 and the Senate voted 62–6 to pass the Johnson-Reed Act. Were these Americans who voted for immigration restrictions also “un-American?” America isn’t the world’s refugee camp. America is for Americans. We are a nation and a people - but we won’t remain so if we don’t fight for both.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)