MATT SHEA: the 14th Amendment clearly protects women. It says there's equal protection under the law, and yet under Sharia women are property.

A great and brief explanation of why Islam and sharia are completely incompatible with the US Constitution and American law from Matt Shea, a former US Army officer and combat veteran who served six terms as a Washington State legislator. Matt is also an attorney and a pastor.… pic.twitter.com/xWw6ErJPKq

— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) July 17, 2026

Definition allowing an ideological system, a field political construct, a complete way of life in to replace our constitution and our way of life, that is, by definition, sedition.  And I want to be, again, very specific on this.  

For example, Article 1, Sections 8 and 10 of the United States Constitution require a free market, and yet Sharia really if I was going to sum it up in one sentence talks about a one-world economy.

Article 4 section IV of the United States Constitution requires a Republican form of government, yet Sharia says it is the only system and the only form of government that can be in existence in a nation.

Article 6 of the United States Constitution says that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and as I mentioned Sharia says it has to be the supreme law of the land.  So anyone who is Sharia compliant cannot, as a matter of fact, then also take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution because one of those two things is a lie.

The 1st Amendment specifically protects our God-given inalienable right to free speech, to religion, to peaceably assemble, and yet Sharia says that only Islam can be the religion and any other religions must either convert or submit to Islam.  And if they are Jews or Christians or Zoroastrians, they need to pay the jizya or a tax to be under that system, and they must feel the submission of Islam.

The 2nd Amendment.  We take for granted I think especially in places like Texas the right to bear arms and yet under Sharia there is no ability to bear arms for the kaffir or for those who are infidels.

The 4th Amendment no unreasonable search and seizures and yet under Sharia property of kaffirs or infidels can be seized as part of just Warfare or even if there is really little reason can be seized.

The 8th Amendment: no cruel and unusual punishment, and yet under Sharia and specifically the hudood or the criminal code under Sharia people can be crucified or beheaded for causing mischief in the land.  That would be what we know as evangelism as Christians.

The 9th and 10th Amendments very clearly say that our rights come from the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and yet under Sharia, if you read it clearly, rights come from Sharia and it only gives rights to those who have submitted to Sharia.

You have the 13th Amendment which abolishes slavery and the incidences and badges of slavery, and yet under Sharia slave trading is allowed and is actually still practiced to this day in places like Africa.

The 14th Amendment really clearly, and I'm not going to get into Birthright citizenship even though that's a hot issue right now, but the 14th Amendment clearly protects women.  It says there's equal protection under the law, and yet under Sharia women are property.

JAYDA FRANSEN: "Christians aren't to be messed with!"

"Christians aren't to be messed with!"

Cross in hand, she stares them down: "You are my enemy!"

Time to stand up and show some real conviction!
Great job, @JaydaBF pic.twitter.com/M2fRs5fgJN

— Islam Invasion 🚨 (@IslamInvasion) July 17, 2026

Jayda Fransen.  

Jesus said,  

'I do not come in peace, but I come with a sword.  I come to turn mother against son, father against son, . . .'  Let me tell you, if you think because we're Christians and I'm holding this cross, that you can come here, that you can lie in our faces, and that you can attack our people, then you let your people know that us Christians are not to be messed with, and pick your own fight.  Now I suggest you go.

AKASH GUPTA: Last fiscal year, LADWP's goal was to replace 1.1 miles of trunk pipe. They replaced less than one. LA has roughly 550 miles of trunk line. Even at the department's new target of 3.5 miles a year, each mile gets replaced once every 157 years.

The 100 year old pipe that just sinkholed Sunset Boulevard was already on LA's replacement list. Construction was scheduled for 2031.

LADWP budgeted $280 million to replace 6.4 miles of this exact 36-inch trunk line. The project is still in the design phase. Work starts in 2031… https://t.co/vnfEhUiGZS

— Aakash Gupta (@aakashgupta) July 17, 2026

from Aakash Gupta,

The 100 year old pipe that just sinkholed Sunset Boulevard was already on LA's replacement list. Construction was scheduled for 2031. LADWP budgeted $280 million to replace 6.4 miles of this exact 36-inch trunk line. The project is still in the design phase. Work starts in 2031 and finishes in 2035. The pipe burst 5 years before the first crew would have touched it. The replacement math explains why this keeps happening. Last fiscal year, LADWP's goal was to replace 1.1 miles of trunk pipe. They replaced less than one. LA has roughly 550 miles of trunk line. Even at the department's new target of 3.5 miles a year, each mile gets replaced once every 157 years. Riveted steel pipe lasts about 100. And Sunset Boulevard has run this exact experiment before. In 2014, a trunk line from 1921 ruptured under Sunset near UCLA and sent roughly 20 million gallons through campus, submerging Pauley Pavilion. That break is what made LA's aging pipes national news and launched the current replacement program. Twelve years later: same street, same vintage of pipe, same aerial footage.

Cities schedule pipe replacement on political time. Pipes fail on material time. LA is replacing 100 year pipes on a 157 year cycle, and this morning is what the gap between those two numbers looks like. 

Dennis Keane adds, 

Los Angeles City steals  from LA Dept of Water & Power, which is funded independently thru utility fees. The stolen is used by the City 2 prop up it's general fund, so they can give it to illegals

SHOTS: EUGENICS TO PANDEMICS, 2022

Check this out on Tubi! https://t.co/ghvKzmuuA9

— Mike Walgenbach (@Walgenbach82743) July 17, 2026

The best documentary I’ve seen on Eugenics, Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics, 2022.  Thank you to Sasha Latypova.   

Some notes from 2023.   

14:24.  Still the oligarchs (John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, J. Pierpont Morgan) appeared to accumulate other motives by World War I after buying out the major newspapers the Eugenics folks put out much propaganda and put much pressure on President Woodrow Wilson's Administration to enter the first World War in 1917 when the government enters the war and implemented the draft that year the Eugenics minded oligarchs use the opportunity to test one to two dozen experimental vaccines on the soldiers these vaccines were created by the Rockefeller Institute for medical research.

14:59.  A one-time reporter who lived through the 1918 epidemic, Eleanor McBean, PhD, wrote about it extensively in several books, one being The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations, 1957.  McBean claimed that the influenza wasn't a flu started in Spain as the racist eugenics folks pushed, but actually a reaction to the vast amounts of vaccines the Rockefeller Institute used to experiment on millions of American and Europeans soldiers.  

Dr. McBean presented how part of the Surgeon General Army 1919, volume 1, page 37 gives the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1918 on account of vaccinia (vaccination disease) as 10,830.  The report of 1918 gave the number as 19,608 during 1917.  This does not take into account the thousands who were seriously ill but not critical enough to be hospitalized. 

In another book, Swine Flu Expose, 1976, McBean cited how the Army report stated,

7 men dropped dead in a doctor's office from vaccines.  

And 28,585 came down with cases of hepatitis as a direct result of the yellow fever vaccine during only 6 months of the war.  That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given to the soldiers. 

16:25.  Claus Kohnlein, a specialist in internal diseases wrote this book, Virus Mania, which covered the 1918 epidemic with contributions from preventative medicine expert, Joachim Mutter, MD. and Environmental Lawyer, Robert F Kennedy, Jr.  Kohnlein quoted McBean as saying that a soldier told her,

The Army hospitals were filled with cases of infantile paralysis [from polio] and he wondered why grown men should have an infant disease.  Now we know that paralysis is a common after-effect of vaccine poisoning.

As a one-time reporter turned investigative scientist, Dr. McBean also said,

As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu.  My family had refused the vaccinations, so we remained well all the time. 

Places that didn't use vaccines or drugs including non-medical hospitals we're getting Almost 100% healings.

And she added that one doctor who avoided the use of any problematic drugs or vaccines "didn't lose a patient in eight years from 1918 to 1926."

17:36.  After World War I ended the Rockefeller Institute and Rockefeller owned vaccine makers had stockpiles of vaccines so they drummed up the largest vaccination campaign in US history using the fear that these soldiers brought the flu from Spain.  Eleanor McBean claimed that those not vaccinated didn't die

KRZYSZTOF SZCZAWINSKI: The tyrant’s problem is the citizen. The citizen has history, has roots, has pre-existing loyalties to the republic that predate the tyrant and do not depend on him. He has opinions. He remembers what things were like before. He has standing to compare. The foreigner — admitted suddenly, dependent on the system that admitted him, owing his position to the current arrangement — enters with none of that.

https://t.co/GrKoG7tgrO https://t.co/gK8ddlPzu2

— Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 (@Kristof_Poland) July 16, 2026

Two quotes, twenty-one centuries apart, describing the same mechanism. Aristotle first: “Another mark of a tyrant is that he likes foreigners better than citizens, and lives with them and invites them to his table; for the one are enemies, but the others enter into no rivalry with him.” Jefferson second: “To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens would be nothing less than to admit the Trojan horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty.” Read them together and the argument assembles itself. The tyrant’s problem is the citizen. The citizen has history, has roots, has pre-existing loyalties to the republic that predate the tyrant and do not depend on him. He has opinions. He remembers what things were like before. He has standing to compare. The foreigner — admitted suddenly, dependent on the system that admitted him, owing his position to the current arrangement — enters with none of that. He is grateful rather than demanding. Dependent rather than sovereign. The tyrant does not prefer foreigners because he is cosmopolitan. He prefers them because they cannot yet rival him. Loyalty purchased through admission is more reliable than loyalty inherited through citizenship. Jefferson names the mechanism from the other end: indiscriminate admission is not generosity. It is the Trojan Horse – the gift that enters through the open gate precisely because the gate is open, bypassing every defense the citadel was built to maintain. The horse is welcomed in. The soldiers emerge at night. The citadel falls not to siege but to hospitality weaponized. Neither man was against foreigners. Both were against the political use of admission – the deliberate flooding of the civic space with people whose loyalties are unformed, whose dependencies are fresh, and whose gratitude can be directed. Aristotle observed it as a tyrant’s tool. Jefferson warned against it as a republic’s vulnerability. Both understood that a self-governing people requires a demos with shared history, shared stakes, and shared accountability – and that a ruler who bypasses the formation of that demos is not building a nation. He is building a tyranny.

And the Trojan Horse didn’t need to breach the walls. The citizens opened the gates. And then it was just administration.