Monday, April 27, 2026

PETER GIRNUS: What I cannot tell you is how 147 of those bottles left the building during an active shooter evacuation.

I am a senior coordinating producer for the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. I have worked eleven of these. I was backstage at the Washington Hilton when the shots were fired. The first thing I heard was not the gunfire. It was glass. A champagne flute hit the floor of the International Ballroom at approximately 9:47 PM. Then a second. Then the sound that I have since been told was a 12-gauge shotgun, which from inside the ballroom sounded like a heavy door slamming in a parking garage. Then the Secret Service moved. They moved the President, the Vice President, the First Lady through the east corridor in under ninety seconds, which is protocol, which is practiced, which is the one part of the evening that worked exactly as it was designed. Everything else was improvised. I know this because I ordered the wine. 94 tables. Two bottles per table. 188 bottles of a Willamette Valley pinot noir that the Association selected in February after a tasting committee spent three meetings debating between Oregon and Burgundy. Oregon won. The budget was $14,200. I signed the invoice. I can tell you the vintage. I can tell you the distributor. I can tell you the per-bottle cost because I negotiated it down from $89 to $76. What I cannot tell you is how 147 of those bottles left the building during an active shooter evacuation. I can tell you what I saw. A correspondent from a network I will not name picked up two bottles on her way to the east exit. Full bottles. One in each hand. She was wearing heels and she did not spill. A man in a tuxedo tucked one inside his jacket the way you'd shoplift a paperback at an airport bookstore. A woman picked up a bottle, looked at the label, put it back, and took a different one. She checked the vintage. During an evacuation. That's editorial judgment under pressure. The theme of the dinner was "A Free Press for a Free People." The banners were still hanging when the evacuation began. I know because I hung them. Twenty-three banners, navy blue, gold serif lettering, $11,400 for the set. They were still hanging when 2,600 guests were directed to the exits by Secret Service agents, one of whom had just taken a shotgun round in his ballistic vest and walked to the ambulance on his own feet. The agent's vest costs approximately $800. The wine that left the building was worth $11,172 at Association cost. At restaurant markup, roughly $29,000. The guests saved more in wine than the vest that saved the agent. That's priority. The video went viral by 10:15 PM. Not the video of the evacuation. Not the Secret Service response. The wine. Three guests in formalwear grabbing bottles off white tablecloths while being told to move toward the exits, while a man with a shotgun stood in the same motor entrance where John Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan 45 years ago. A woman near the service entrance was crying. She said "I just wanna go home." She was not holding wine. She was holding her phone. She was the only person I saw that night who looked afraid rather than inconvenienced. That's the distinction. The rest of the ballroom did not look afraid. They looked interrupted. An active shooter at the WHCD is a logistical problem. The dinner was disrupted. The timeline was off. The after-party at the French Ambassador's residence would need to be rescheduled. These are contingency matters. Contingency matters have solutions. Fear is for people who attend events without security details. I have produced eleven of these dinners. I have managed seating charts that require diplomatic-grade negotiations. I have handled comedians, cabinet secretaries, network anchors, and the editor of a major newspaper who once threatened to leave because his table was behind a column.

I have never, in eleven years, seen a guest leave a $76 bottle on the table during an evacuation. I have also never seen a guest check the label first. Both observations are consistent. The bottle is worth taking. The evacuation is worth surviving. The instinct is to do both simultaneously.

188 bottles placed. 41 recovered. 147 unaccounted for. One agent shot. Zero guests injured. Zero bottles broken. A free press for a free people. The press is free. The wine was $76 a bottle. They took it anyway.

Brazilian scientist Tatiana Sampaio discovers a protein, Polylaminin, that can regenerate spinal cord.

An assassination on Trumps life, and Norah O'Donnell calls the President a pedophile and racist

Does Norah O'Donnell carry water for the City of London? 

The so-called Manifesto is a stunning thing to read Mr. President he appears to reference a motive in it he writes this quote Administration officials they are targets and he also wrote this I'm no longer willing to permit a pedophile rapist and traitor to coat my hands with his crime what's your reaction to this?

Well I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you're horrible people horrible people yeah he did write that I'm not a rapist I didn't rape anybody.

Oh, do you think he was referring to you?

Excuse me.  I'm not a pedophile you read that crap from some sick person I got associated with all stuff that has nothing to do with me I was totally exonerated your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones that were involved with let's say Epstein or other things but I said to myself you know I'll do this interview and they'll probably and I read the Manifest you know he's a sick person but you should be ashamed of yourself really because I'm not any of those things.

Mr President, these are the gunman's words.  

And I was never . . . .  Excuse me.  Excuse me.  You shouldn't be reading that on 60 Minutes.  You're a disgrace, but go ahead.  Let's finish the interview.

The other thing that he wrote . . . 

You're disgraceful.

PAUL WESTON: Now there's a striking contrast between subverted Britain and countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary, which overthrew communist rule in 1989.

They maintain strict Asylum policies and this is because they lived under real, genuine, practiced communism and so they developed a cultural immune system that instantly recognized the multiculturalism, open borders, and Native self-hatred, . . .  --Paul Weston

I recently talked about the Revolutionary Left's planned subversion of Britain and the West, but I barely touched on their ace in the pack which is of course mass immigration from the least Westernized countries that our traitor class could possibly find.  Now, many speak of an anti-white ethos dominating our institutions driven by a sort of racial hatred but I disagree.  From a revolutionary communist perspective, skin color secondary, what mattered was that the Christian, or post-Christian, capitalist West was never going to submit wittingly to communist rule because westerners were too educated, too comfortable, too affluent, and too culturally conservative therefore they had to be replaced a la Bertolt Brecht.  Now there's a striking contrast between subverted Britain and countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary, which overthrew communist rule in 1989.  And today these nations refuse the UN migration compact.  They refuse the EU relocation quotas.  They built border fences.  They maintain strict Asylum policies and this is because they lived under real, genuine, practiced communism and so they developed a cultural immune system that instantly recognized the multiculturalism, open borders, and Native self-hatred was just a softer more Insidious form of the same communist Soviet ideology.  Western Europe however took the opposite path Muslim populations in the UK, France, Germany, and Sweden now stand at 6% to 10% and rising with disproportionately higher birth shares.  And the white British birth now hover near or below just 15%, believe it or not.  So many Poles and Czechs who came to Britain decades ago are now returning home to countries which are racial and cultural utopias compared to the fragmented tents and broken Britain.  

2:32.  And what renders this Western betrayal it is a total betrayal historically unparalleled is that it has no historical precedent no previous civilizations especially one at the peak of it's well technological achievement and Global power has deliberately accelerated its own demographic replacement through Mass immigration from culturally totally opposite regions and nor have they done this while simultaneously be building an Institutional apparatus of Critical Race Theory, DEI, and equality laws that demonize its own historical native majority.  And epochal moments in history, like the 7th and 8th century Islamic conquest of the Persian Empire, or German migration into collapsing Rome, had they occurred under military victory or interior weakness, the host societies did not invite them in and they did not enact propaganda laws which told their own people to hate their own traditions, history, and very founding identity.  The modern Western case is unique a prosperous and militarily on unbeatable Society is destroying itself as moral justification for alleged historical evils, alleged by the Revolutionary Left, of course.  And equally telling is the complete absence of any role reversal.  No non-white majority country anywhere in the world is importing large numbers of whites while granting the protected status in criticizing its own native population as inherently oppressive.  The flow remains decidedly one way only.  And the post 1989 divergence reveals a profound irony.  The half of Europe that suffered real communism is now preserving civilization continuity, while the half that believed itself free has succumbed to cultural subversion and is sleepwalking toward one of two choices: confrontation or collapse.  And in human terms this hinge point moves slowly.  In civilizational terms, it's happening with breathtaking speed and history offers no precedent for these pathological times. But history does indeed offer warnings.  

On Bertolt Brecht,

One notable statement is from his essay "The Radio as an Apparatus of Communication," 1932, where he discusses the role of the bourgeoisie and the necessity for societal change. However, the most direct and well-known articulation is from his 1938 poem "The Song of the German Mother," [Dear God, take your Prozac before listening] and his writings during the 1930s where he emphasizes the need to overthrow bourgeois values and structures.

A specific quote often attributed to Brecht is:

"The bourgeoisie must be replaced by a new class, the working class."

While this precise phrase may not appear verbatim in a single, famous quote, it encapsulates Brecht's consistent Marxist stance: the overthrow of bourgeoisie dominance and the establishment of a proletarian society.

Key source:

Brecht's writings and speeches from the 1930s and his Marxist essays articulate the need for the bourgeoisie to be replaced by a new societal order based on socialist principles.

If you're looking for a particular quote or speech, I recommend reviewing Brecht's "The Measures Taken" or his essays in collections like "Brecht's Collected Plays" or "Reflections on Theatre."