Thursday, June 18, 2026

MASSIMO: Surgeon Chen Jingyu Lung Transplantation Team rejected a pair of lungs from a 52-year-old brain-dead donor due to severe, tar-like blackening, mild emphysema, bullae, and tuberculosis calcification.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

MJ MURPHY: The goal isn't to win. The goal is to wake up because questions interrupt trances. Questions force reality back into the conversation.

THE CONSENSUS TRANCE

00:00.  The most powerful force you've never heard of. Have you ever looked around and wondered how did so many people end up saying the same thing not just agreeing, using the same words, repeating the same phrases, arriving at the same conclusions sometimes seemingly overnight.  Many people assume this happens because the evidence became overwhelming.  But what if that's not always what's happening?  What if people are not primarily responding to evidence?  What if they're responding to something much older and much more primitive?  The need to belong.  

Today I want to talk about a phenomenon I call, The Consensus Trance.  And once you understand that you'll start seeing it everywhere.  You're going to start seeing it everywhere.  So the ancient survival mechanism for most of human history, being rejected by your tribe wasn't uncomfortable, it was dangerous.  Being expelled from the group could mean starvation, exposure, death. Our ancestors didn't survive by being right.  They survived by remaining part of the group.  And because of that, human beings evolved an incredibly sensitive social radar.  We are constantly scanning [the room, asking], "What do people think?  What is acceptable?  What can I say?  What should I not say?" This isn't weakness.  It's Human Nature.  It's just human nature.  There is a hidden question.  Most people think, they ask, "Is this true?" But very often a different question appears first, a question that stays hidden.  The question is, "Am I allowed to believe otherwise?"  Think about that.  Not "Is it true?"  Not "What is the evidence?" But "What happens to me if I disagree?"  That question changes everything.  It changes everything.  Because the trance begins.  The Consensus Trance begins when social approval becomes more important than accuracy when fitting in becomes more important than figuring things out.  And here's the scary part. The consensus doesn't have to be real.  It only has to appear real.  If enough people think everyone agrees, they start acting as if everyone agrees, which makes the illusion stronger which convinces more people that everyone agrees. And the cycle feeds itself. Everyone's commenting that The Emperor's New Clothes.  This is why the story of The Emperor's New Clothes has survived for centuries.  Everyone can see the emperor is naked.  He's naked but nobody wants to be the first person to say it because each person believes everyone else must be seeing something they aren't.  So they stay silent until one person breaks the spell.  Then suddenly everyone sees what was there the entire time.  The emperor didn't change.

4:05.  Reality didn't change only the perception of consensus changed here's a historical example history is full of examples in authoritarian countries, we disagree people often privately disagree with the regime while publicly supporting it.  Then one day the regime collapses and everyone asks where did all these dissenters come from?  The answer is: they were there the whole time.  They simply believed that they were alone.  The consensus was weaker than it appeared, but nobody knew because no one wanted to risk being first.  So modern social media.  Let's think about that, okay?  Social media creates a very powerful illusion.  You don't see what most people think.  You see what gets amplified.  You see what gets rewarded.  You see what people are willing to say publicly.  These are not the same thing.  A thousand people silently disagreeing can be completely invisible.  10 loud people can look like a movement.  And once people perceive, perceive a consensus, the trance starts, that hypnotic trance.  

And so why [do] smart people fall for it?  One of the biggest mistakes people make is assuming only unintelligent people fall into this trap.  And actually intelligent people maybe even more vulnerable because intelligent people are often highly socially aware.  They understand consequences. They understand incentives. They understand reputational risk, which means they can become experts at rationalizing why silence is a smart choice.  But there's a cost, and the cost is enormous.  Bad ideas can survive longer, and good ideas are never spoken.  Questions go unasked.  Evidence goes unexamined and entire societies could end up operating on assumptions that very few people genuinely believe.

HOW TO BREAK THE TRANCE

So how do we break it?  How do we break it?  You ask questions.  You ask simple questions.  What do you mean by that?  How do you know?  What evidence would change your mind?  What happens if the opposite is true?  The goal isn't to win.  The goal is to wake up because questions interrupt trances.  Questions force reality back into the conversation.  So the consensus trance maybe one of the most powerful forces in human psychology.  It shapes politics.  It shapes culture.  It shapes organizations, families, friend groups, and sometimes even entire civilizations.  So the next time you find yourself agreeing with everyone around you, pause, pause and ask yourself, Do I believe this because it's true, or do I believe this because everyone around me seems to?  Because those are very different things, and learning to tell the difference might be one of the most important skills you'll ever develop.  And if, if these kind of psychological patterns fascinate you the way they fascinate me, that's exactly why I made Breaking the Spell and the new homeschool Edition, How Language and Social Pressure Framing Shape What People Believe often without them realizing it.

Breaking The Spell: Language, Social Pressure, and Psychological Framing in Modern Discourse: A Field Guide for Clear Thinking Under Social Pressure, MJ Murphy, 2025.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
 Find it way more interesting.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON: 2,000 of the 6,000 versus [in the Quran] are hate verses. It's a religion of hate and certainly not of love. It's a barbaric religion.

Bishop Richard Williamson, 1940-2025, a traditionalist Catholic bishop, formerly associated with the Society of St. Pius X.  

There's something satanic about Islam.  It's a fabrication Muhammad himself is a fabrication.  The Quran is a fabrication.  The Quran has about 6,000 verses.  I was reading recently a French book, 2,000 of the 6,000 versus are hate verses.  It's a religion of hate and certainly not of love.  It's a barbaric religion.  It's not even really a religion.  It's a caricature of a religion. But it's by golly it has a grip. It's a punishment from God. Go back in history, it arose in the 600s when the Christians of the Middle East and the Christians of North Africa were undoubtedly decadent and even the Christians in Spain at that time.  And therefore God allowed that Muhammadism to, Islam to arise as a punishment and it's been a punishment ever since of unfaithful Catholics. Whenever Catholics are faithful, then they conquer the Mohammedans without too much trouble. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)