ROGUSKI: PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive . . . and health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test."

James Roguski (@jamesroguski)… pic.twitter.com/AUIRJKWGa2

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 29, 2024

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test." James Roguski (

@jamesroguski

) reiterates during a conversation with

@ChildrensHD

's Polly Tommey how the so-called "PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive. Roguski notes that by using false-positive test results, specifically based off of PCR "tests," health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing. "I've tried to explain that math in [a] video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, 'Wait a minute: a positive result could be wrong 50% of the time.' And quite frankly, it could be even more than that," Roguski says. He adds that "if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive." "The error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test," Roguski adds. "That's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests." Partial transcription of clip: "If you remember, good old Deborah Birx, who was a member of the COVID Task Force, early on, she presented you know, Donald Trump was standing right by her side and she was presenting to the nation. She said something that I think went right past almost everybody. She said, well, if the specificity of the test is 99 percent, which means it's wrong 1 percent of the time and 1 percent of the population is actually infected if you believe the contagion myth, then a positive result is fifty-fifty. It might be a true positive. It might be a false positive. "And you just go, how does that math work out? Well, I've tried to explain that math in the video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, wait a minute. A positive result could be wrong 50 percent of the time. And quite frankly, it could be even more than that. And if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive. And so number one, the math at some point, you go, oh my god. They're just tricking me with statistics. There's a famous picture of Bill Gates with a book in the background, you know, how to lie with statistics. Well, this is how they do it. If you had a pregnancy test and it was 99 percent accurate and you gave it to, you know, a million men. Now I know, you know, in today's world, men can get pregnant. But if any test is wrong one percent of the time, if you gave it to, you know, a hundred or a thousand or a million men, one percent of them would be told by the test that they're pregnant. Now that's a, you know, silly little answer or or analogy, but the error rates in any test and in the PCR process, it's a hundred percent. "But the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing to millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test. Once people realize that that is how big medicine tricks you, take a cholesterol test, a high blood pressure test, a sugar test, a mammogram, a PSA, you know, prostate-specific antigen test. It's a customer acquisition tool. They go, "Oh, you have to take this high-technology test that you don't understand." And that's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests, you know, quite frankly. 

pcrfraud.com.  PCR Tests cannot identify any active variant.  Don't submit to these or any other tests.  Their margin of error is too high for them to be used ethically or reliably, and will only be used by your doctor to justify some suspicion they've already concocted to prescribe you something.

02:54, DAN ASTIN-GREGORY.  Who makes the rules who controls the global Health governance at this moment in time it's the World Health Organization and despite a car crash of a response to the global pandemic the World Health Organization is seeking to accumulate even more powers to direct and coordinate Global health governance with a specific reference to the way that pandemics are prepared and responded to now this is moving forward at a pace without any form of independent inquiry into the World Health Organizations role was in the COVID-19 chapter in the response to COVID-19 yet this new set of international Health Regulations, IHRs, in Pandemic Treaty are steamrolling ahead now we've recently covered this on the Elevate podcast but we're here today with James rogusky who is an author researcher and activist who's written quite literally countless articles on this particular issue

Important update on the WHO with James Roguski | Noor Bin Ladin Calls

 

ROGUSKI, 7:00.  Pure old colonialism.  Most people working in a cobalt mine can't buy a Tesla.  If you exchange the raw materials of gold, or forest tree products, mining, and all these other things with genomic sequences and pathogens, one of the things that they are arguing for is tied to a 1992 conference for biological diversity, which sets up essentially access to Natural wisdom, like indigenous people who learned about a certain plant and then the pharmaceutical companies come in and they get the knowledge, they isolate a chemical, they tweak it a little bit so they can patent it and then they go and make billions.  The convention for biological diversity says no, no, no.  You've got to share the benefits.  So that idea is now being applied to pathogens.  What they are negotiating in this Accord, I'm not going to call it anything other than what it currently is, which is a framework convention, they want to set up a pathogen access and benefit sharing system where they feel that they are obligated, they're being forced to go seeking out pathogens all around the world and have to hand over any genomic information for the pathogen that they find.   They want to set up a central W.H.O. hub.  Do we really need more Wuhan Institutes of Virology?

BOTSWANA, & AN AFRICAN COALITION, RESCUED AMERICANS FROM W.H.O. TREATY. CERTAINLY WASN'T JOE BIDEN

The United States is culturally and politically worthless, a weak nation that does not know how to protect its people.  Like Scott Horton said, "This government is not fit to be our security force."  Seen the southern border lately?  Neither have I.  It's been obliterated.  

Seen a bump in personal wealth from all of the foreign wars we've been engaged in since the Vietnam War?  No?  Neither have I.  

Seen an improvement in the quality of any of the disciplines, except for vaccine development?  No?  Neither have I. 

Seen an improvement in food safety where glyphosate is removed from crops?  No?  Neither have I. 

Have you seen the federal government of the United States stand up for its citizens . . . in any way . . . whatsoever?  No?  Neither have I. 

Instead, what country has to come to the rescue of American life?  Botswana.  

Here’s the latest—a bit of good news. We are not yet politically impotent and help often comes from unexpected places, and history is full of surprises and unexpected plot twists. Recent news from the May 2022 WHO meeting suggests the pandemic treaty, which appeared to be an unstoppable juggernaut, is hitting roadblocks. The Biden Administration’s proposed changes to the International Health Regulations met significant resistance.

Opposition was coordinated by, of all places, Botswana, which led a coalition of African countries and other concerned nations. Official delegates from developed nations, including Australia, the U.K., the European Union, and the United States spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them. But they have apparently not succeeded in persuading Brazil, Brunei, Namibia, Bangladesh, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Iran to embrace the West’s biomedical neo-colonialism. Brazil indicated it would abandon the WHO entirely rather than subject its people to these amendments. While this fight is far from over, the proposed IHR changes, at least for now, have been tabled for a future meeting. You can find more details here: 

Check out this video:  James Roguski is his name, and he references the site leavethewho.com that belongs to James Roguski and it's where he parks all of his videos and resources in his fight against the W.H.O.  Here is his personal blog.  Why am I only hearing about him now?  

3:25  "They don't vote if they can get away with it."  

Here is a short list of resources on the topic of the W.H.O. Treaty from Lew Rockwell.  

https://aaronkheriaty.substack.com/p/who-pandemic-treaty-update

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/we-won

https://blog.heartland.org/2022/06/thorner-biden-attempts-to-cripple-us-sovereignty-foiled-at-who-conference/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/globalist-elites-beg-for-trust-despite-an-unending-stream-of-covid-lies-and-massive-censorship/