Showing posts with label — Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 29. Show all posts
Showing posts with label — Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 29. Show all posts

Thursday, August 29, 2024

ROGUSKI: PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive . . . and health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test." James Roguski () reiterates during a conversation with 's Polly Tommey how the so-called "PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive. Roguski notes that by using false-positive test results, specifically based off of PCR "tests," health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing. "I've tried to explain that math in [a] video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, 'Wait a minute: a positive result could be wrong 50% of the time.' And quite frankly, it could be even more than that," Roguski says. He adds that "if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive." "The error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test," Roguski adds. "That's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests." Partial transcription of clip: "If you remember, good old Deborah Birx, who was a member of the COVID Task Force, early on, she presented you know, Donald Trump was standing right by her side and she was presenting to the nation. She said something that I think went right past almost everybody. She said, well, if the specificity of the test is 99 percent, which means it's wrong 1 percent of the time and 1 percent of the population is actually infected if you believe the contagion myth, then a positive result is fifty-fifty. It might be a true positive. It might be a false positive. "And you just go, how does that math work out? Well, I've tried to explain that math in the video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, wait a minute. A positive result could be wrong 50 percent of the time. And quite frankly, it could be even more than that. And if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive. And so number one, the math at some point, you go, oh my god. They're just tricking me with statistics. There's a famous picture of Bill Gates with a book in the background, you know, how to lie with statistics. Well, this is how they do it. If you had a pregnancy test and it was 99 percent accurate and you gave it to, you know, a million men. Now I know, you know, in today's world, men can get pregnant. But if any test is wrong one percent of the time, if you gave it to, you know, a hundred or a thousand or a million men, one percent of them would be told by the test that they're pregnant. Now that's a, you know, silly little answer or or analogy, but the error rates in any test and in the PCR process, it's a hundred percent. "But the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing to millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test. Once people realize that that is how big medicine tricks you, take a cholesterol test, a high blood pressure test, a sugar test, a mammogram, a PSA, you know, prostate-specific antigen test. It's a customer acquisition tool. They go, "Oh, you have to take this high-technology test that you don't understand." And that's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests, you know, quite frankly. 
pcrfraud.com.  PCR Tests cannot identify any active variant.  Don't submit to these or any other tests.  Their margin of error is too high for them to be used ethically or reliably, and will only be used by your doctor to justify some suspicion they've already concocted to prescribe you something.

JAMES LYONS-WEILER: autism...it often involves an autoimmune reaction...but it's simply the body's intolerance of toxins and the brain becomes overwhelmed

"Adults who were exposed to too much mercury because they ate fish from the Bay of Minamata... They started hand-flapping, they stopped talking...we call that mercury poisoning over [there], but if you poison a kid with mercury to their toxic level of tolerance, it's autism."

Scientist, CEO, author, and human rights advocate James Lyons-Weiler () describes for Stephanie Weidle (@ActiveSinger24) on a Feds for Freedom () podcast about how autism is caused by "a long list" of environmental toxins, which he refers to as "autismogens." "Like there are many carcinogens, there are many autismogens," Lyons-Weiler says. "These autismogens include any number of organic pollutants [including] mercury of both types." The scientist highlights the Minamata disaster in Japan, which saw citizens in the 1950s, in the city of Minamata, Kumamoto Prefecture, fall prey to mercury poisoning following the release of methylmercury into the ocean from industrial wastewater from a chemical factory. The methylmercury bioaccumulated in shellfish and when citizens subsequently ate them, they were poisoned. "Adults that were exposed to too much mercury because they ate fish from the Bay of Minamata after the Minamata disaster...[they] stopped making eye contact. They started hand-flapping, and they stopped talking, it's a one-to-one correspondence. We just call that mercury poisoning over here. But if you poison a kid with mercury to their toxic level of tolerance, it's autism, if it's mercury-based." Partial transcription of clip: "All of the literature up to 2015 showed environmental toxins that are associated with autism. It's a long list. "Like there are many carcinogens, there are many autismogens. These autismogens include any number of organic pollutants. They include mercury of both types. And proof of this is the Minamata disaster in Japan. Adults that were exposed to too much mercury because they ate fish from the Bay of Minamata after the Minamata disaster, [and] well, let's go through the symptoms of autism: you stop making eye contact; you can't speak; you lose the ability to speak; you don't interact with people socially; you act like they're not there in the room If it's severe, you might hand flap and do repetitive motions. "Anybody can identify a kid with autism that way or an adult. The adults that were exposed to high levels of mercury stopped making eye contact. They started hand flapping, and they stopped talking, it's a one-to-one correspondence. We just call that mercury poisoning over here. But if you poison a kid with mercury to their toxic level of tolerance, it's autism, if it's mercury-based.

The reference to Dr. Russel Blaylock's Chronic Microglial Activation.
So autism...it often involves an autoimmune reaction...but it's simply the body's intolerance of toxins and the brain becomes overwhelmed, can't do the things that the brain needs to do. "What happens in the brain if a brain cell dies due to the toxins that are present of any kind, it actually activates, it sends out cytokines that activate microglial cells, which are the scavengers and the immune cells of our brain. And those microglial cells will pick up the cellular debris and clean it up. They also do pruning of the brain during neurodevelopment and they have two roles. They're the trash collectors of the brain and they prune the brain for neurodevelopment. Well, if you fill the brain with toxins to the point where these microglia are so busy taking out the trash all day long, they can't build the brain properly. So we have altered neurodevelopment due to toxins. "So please, let's stop with, okay, for the greater good, you're taking on risks for to protect other kids, and what about these kids? What about these kids' rights to live in a world free from the ravages of pharmaceutical toxins to save some other kid from a mild childhood illness. That's where the balance of ethics should be and we need to revisit that as a society.