Yuri Bezmenov, 1939-1993, Former KGB Agent, 1983.
1. Religion
2. Education
3. Social Life
4. Power Structure
5. Labor Relations
6. Law & Order
1. RELIGION
So we have religion. We have education. We have social life. We have power structure. We have labor relations, unions. And finally, we have Law and Order. These are the areas of application of subversion.
What it means exactly in case of religion? Destroy it. Ridicule it. Replace it with various sects, cults which bring people's attention. Faith where there it is naive or primitive, it doesn't really matter, as long as they basically accepted religious dogma [while it] is being slowly eroded and taken away from the Supreme purpose of religion--to keep people in touch with a Supreme Being. That serves the purpose. Therefore replace accepted respective religious organizations with fake organizations. Distract people's attention from the real faith, and attract them to various different faiths.
2. EDUCATION
Distract them from learning something which is constructive pragmatic efficient instead of mathematics, physics, foreign languages, chemistry, teach them history of urban warfare, natural food, home economy, sexuality, anything as long as it takes you away.
3. SOCIAL LIFE
Replace traditionally established institutions and organizations with fake organizations. Take away the initiative from people, take away the responsibility from naturally established links between individual groups of individuals and Society at large and replace them with artificially, bureaucratically-controlled bodies. Instead of social life and friendship between neighbors, establish social workers institutions. The people who are on payroll of whom? Society? No, bureaucracy. The main concern of the social worker is not your family, not you, not social relations between groups of people. The main concern is to get the paycheck from the government. What will be the result of their social work? Doesn't really matter. They can develop all kinds of concepts to show to the governments and to the people that they are useful.
4. POWER STRUCTURE
The natural bodies of administration, which are traditionally either elected by people at large, or appointed by elected leaders of society are being actively substituted by artificial bodies the bodies of people groups of people who nobody elected Never As a matter of fact most of the people don't like them at all and yet they exist. One such group is the media. Who elected them? How come they have so much power, almost monopolistic power, on your mind. They can rape your mind but who elected them? How come they are, how do they have the nerve to decide what is good and what is bad for the elected by you, the president and his administration? Who the hell are they? They think they know. They don't. The level of mediocrity in a big establishment, like the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, major television networks. You don't have to be excellent journalists. You have to be exactly a mediocre journalist. That's easier to survive. There's no competition anymore. You have your cool nice income, $100,000 a year. That's it. Whether you're better or worse doesn't really matter anymore, as soon as you are smiling for the camera and do your job.
[He skipped over Labor Relations]
6. LAW & ORDER
Together with that there is another process law enforcement more in order organization and structure is being eroded for the last 20 25 years if you see all the movies and new movies you can see that a new movies a policeman an officer of the United States Army looks dumb Angry psychotic paranoid a criminal looks nice kind of well he smokes hash and shoots whatever drug but basically he's a nice human being he's creative and he's unproductive only because Society oppresses him where by a general at the Pentagon is always by definition at them a warmania a policeman is a big rude policeman he abuses his power the hatred the mistrust to the people who supposed to protect you and enforce Law and Order moral relativity the angel of warn the process last 2 years in Los Angeles and yet there are still some lawyers who say look he's a nice character as a matter of fact. There were some witnesses who said, also a criminal who said, "Well, he's a nice guy. I asked him one day to burn a house with my enemy, and he wouldn't do it. He's a nice fella." A slow substitution of basic moral principles whereby a criminal is not a criminal actually he's a defendant until his guilt is proven there is still a doubt to kill or not to kill to be or not to be thy shall not kill, yes but this line may not necessarily be applicable to a murder. "I shall not murder." That should be the presumption, not that this I shall not do.
