— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) June 16, 2023
HERE IS THE VIDEO. WATCH IT. LATYPOVA'S REMARKS BEGIN AT THE 5:50 MARK.
PREP Act was a law launched in 2002, and amended in 2005 that allows the HHS Secretary to issue a declaration to expand this liability shield for using unapproved medical interventions, devices, pharmaceuticals, all sorts of things, diagnostics, therapeutics, anything, using the Emergency Use Authorization essential to bypassing the normal regulatory frameworks and consumer safeguards, which are quite extensive today for very good reasons because we want to make sure that the medications are being used as safe. So this is a shield essentially that the government uses and now, specifically, the DoD is using extensively to shield themselves and anyone that they hire for the task from any liability from using these poorly tested, untested, experimental, and completely black box, devices, and technologies.
8:50 Dr. Meryl Nass. The Defense Department has been accustomed to doing whatever it wants and has a history of using untested products on soldiers. In the Gulf War, they got a memorandum of understanding with the FDA that allowed them to use products that were unapproved and unevaluated by the FDA and at other times in the past also. The DoD is kind of a law unto itself. So for them, this was nothing new. It was just happening on a larger scale. It wasn't just 2 million soldiers, but it was also 134 million Americans. But then this method was shipped out to the rest of the world, so 8 billion people.
9:42 Polly Tommey. Why have we called this program, "Willful Misconduct"? What is the purpose behind that?
9:48 Latypova. I think it's because of the George Watts case v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, in other words, the DoD. His estate is suing the Dept. of Defense for his death. The only basis that we have to break this liability shield, a very extensive one, is based on willful misconduct. So the case complaint was that the willful misconduct was essentially a bait-and-switch scheme that the Department of Defense and Health and Human Services, HHS, ran on the American public.
11. PREP provides blanket immunity for covered persons such as the DOD with a sole exception for willful misconduct the enumerated sovereign immunity for the United States and an agency such as the DOD (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(f)) is unconstitutional since for closing all redress violates due process enshrined in the 5th Amendment and it's central promise and assurance that all levels of American government must abide by the law and provide fair procedures particularly in instances such as this where Mr Wash was "deprived of life." The enumerated sovereign immunity for the United States and an agency such as the DOD has is also an unconstitutional taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment. A "legal cause of action is property within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment."
So, now we have a death of a civilian from disregard for safety and using this PREP Act liability shield, and his attorneys are stating that "Well because this was willful misconduct because knowingly the Department of Defense administered, distributed the experimental product while telling everyone it was FDA approved. And that was the lie that they perpetrated on this young man who died as a result of it.
11:00 Dr. Meryl Nass. The way that the PREP Act is written, there are almost no requirements for safety or efficacy. What it requires is that the FDA, and the FDA issues it, simply believe, with or without evidence, that the benefits are going to be greater than the risks. But it does say that the FDA needs to disclose the known significant risks. And the FDA did not do that. So the FDA was hiding many of the known risks. But the other thing that happened was a bait-and-switch. So in August of 2021, the Federal government announced all these mandates but only at the time that FDA approved a license for the Pfizer vaccine. So on August 23, the FDA issued a license for the Pfizer vaccine for adults, but none of that product was made available in the United States. So every body continued to get the Emergency Use product with a huge liability shield and the only potential way to litigate against them was to prove willful misconduct which was they knew they were doing something wrong but they hid it. So what we're saying is, yes, they knew that the product being administered to George Watt and to everybody else in the country was not licensed, but the FDA, the DoD, and the rest of the Federal government pretended that it was.
12:32 Tommey. And this is Children's Healt Care case, correct? Yep.
And the reason you're on here is because your lawyer can't talk about it.
12:50 Latypova. I think it's a great case because, finally, in my opinion, a correct defendent is named, in other words, which is the DoD and Lloyd J. Austin, III, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, who were the head of the operation, while the pharmaceutical companies are complicit and knowingly administered poisons because they are experts and they understand exactly what they are doing and know what consumer safeguards have been subverted. But they are operating under the Department of Defense who was heading Operation Warp Speed, OWS, now it's been renamed to Acceleration of Countermeasures, another name but essentially the same thing.
[Huh. The federal government is notorious for renaming projects and programs. Remember when the Iraq invasion was initially named Operation Iraqi Liberation with the acronym of O.I.L.? They're always trying to show how clever they are when in reality they're stupid monsters.]
This was at the time that these shots were rolled out and relevant to George Watts' case this was headed by the Department of Defense, Chief Operation Officer was General Gustave F. Perna, reporting directly to President Trump. Structurally, the same reporting system reporting to Biden. The Dept. of Defense leadership represents about 2/3 of Operation Warp Speed, most of them without any health care experience. So this was all orchestrated from there, using several legal framework of several laws, so the PREP Act is one of them. But there are others, such as Public Health Emergency Declaration to begin with, and the Emergency Use Authorization
No comments:
Post a Comment