Mercury is the cause of Alzheimer's Disease. But Glutathione is a potent mercury chelator

Here's the Facebook page to discuss NBMI.

EDTA doesn't get into the cells very effectively either.  It doesn't pull mercury off a protein.  It just doesn't have that much affinity for mercury.  Good to know.  Instead it does have a strong affinity for lead and cadmium.  

DMPS and DMSA.  What are these compounds?  These compounds take the mercury out of the blood, not out of the brain tissue or out of the bone marrow.  

In this video, he gets more into chelating mercury from the body.  He says that EDTA is not a great mercury chelator.  The chelating method of his product, his approach, is for it to attach to the mercury inside the cell.  So his method doesn't actually remove the mercury from the cell but it renders it inert, meaning nontoxic to the cell.  Still there just nontoxic to the cell

His chelating product saw readings at 90 to 140 and after 3 tries he got the mercury down to 14.  Interesting.  His product is a good antioxidant that raises the glutathione levels, and the glutathione levels.  Glutathione gets into all of your cells.  So it's glutathione that is a potent mercury chelator.  Good to know.  

 Thank you to Dr. Mark Sircus.

Mercury can also be bound to sulfhydryl groups in garlic or to sulfur in the form of organic sulfur (MSM).  

Mortality from cancer was reduced 90% during an 18-year follow-up of 59 patients treated with calcium-EDTA. Only one of 59 treated patients (1.7% ) died of cancer while 30 of 172 non-treated control subjects (17.6%) died of cancer (P=0.002).[6]   Dr. Walter Blumer

The mercury is there, but there's no sign of toxicity from the mercury.  That's what you want.  

Jake Tapper Sold His Soul to Pharma

This quotation made an impression on me,

the fact that the cumulative mercury levels in all those new vaccines they had recommended had overdosed a generation of American children with mercury concentrations over a hundred times the exposures the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considered safe.

I don't know what it takes to get institutions to take action on behalf of the well-being of the citizens of this country.  

Excerpts from Kennedy's article:

Verstraeten’s initial data run suggested that mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines — administered during the first month of life — were associated with a wide range of neurological injuries, including a dramatic 1,135% rise in autism risks among vaccinated children.

Verstraeten’s findings propelled CDC into DEFCON 1. The agency’s top vaccine officials summoned 52 pharmaceutical industry leaders, the foremost vaccinologists from academia and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and public health regulators from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CDC, World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency to a secret two-day meeting at the remote Simpsonwood retreat center in Norcross, Georgia, to strategize about how to hide these awful revelations from the public.

Most of these individuals were physicians and regulatory officials who had committed their lives to public health out of idealism and deep concern for children. Verstraeten’s data confronted them with the fact that the cumulative mercury levels in all those new vaccines they had recommended had overdosed a generation of American children with mercury concentrations over a hundred times the exposures the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considered safe. 

Not everyone in government had surrendered their convictions, 

In the tense days leading up to the Simpsonwood conclave, children’s health champion Dr. Ruth Etzel of the EPA pleaded with her fellow public health leaders to publicly admit they made a terrible mistake by inadvertently poisoning American children, and to repair the damage.

Read this expose of how CDC covered up expose of the huge number of children who were brain damaged by mercury in vaccines especially the hepatitis vaccine (That no child was in danger from).
Read Jake Tapper's role.  https://t.co/uBnL4nfq0D

— Own Silver to say: I do not comply ! Steve_AG WSS (@RightsSpiritual) January 8, 2022

MERCURY COMES OFF FILLINGS EVERY TIME YOU STIMULATE THEM, EVEN FROM A CUP OF COFFEE

Let's start with a quotation from the following video: 

Using amalgam for the first filling requires removing a lot of tooth substance [one-third of the tooth], not only diseased tooth substance but healthy tooth substance as well.  So in making the undercuts, you sacrifice a lot and this results in a weakened tooth.  The next thing you know the tooth breaks off and you need a crown, then you need to repair the crown.  So it continues to the stage where there is no more to repair and you pull the tooth

Undoing all the damage that was done to us growing up can be a life-long endeavor. And even our uninformed attempts at restitution only make it worse, which is why most of us would rather just leave well-enough alone.

     

The sponsor of the video is the iaomt.org or the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.  Linked here is the longer version of the presentation, Smoking Teeth = Poison Gas.  

But when you see this mercury vapor emitting from the slightest chafing or abrasion, say, of a pencil eraser, one can only imagine that amount of vapor emitted from chewing during a single meal or even a snack.  Even drinking a cup of coffee or grinding teeth at night or during the day or chewing gum?  Each of these activities releases mercury from the fillings.  It does tend to make one sick, not just the chemistry of it but the conspiracy of it.  Who can deny the conspiracies within dentistry?  The training of dentists has to be the most abominable study with cures exacted via extraction, drilling, filing down, capping, chemically dosing up patients, taking advantage of patients while prostrate.  What kinds of monsters would define this work as a service to your fellow man or to the community? 

So, what's the big deal about vapor?  What harm can it produce?  Because I answer that question, you should know that all dentists will treat the extraction and then replacement of fillings as though they are certified members of the Atomic Energy Commission.  

2:46-2:52
Mercury accumulated in the jaw, stomach, liver, and kidney of the sheep in just 30 days.  Then they learned that the sheep's kidneys dropped by 60% to clear inulin, an indication of kidney malfunction.  Whole body imaging of monkeys found exactly the same thing.  Proponents of amalgam fillings claim that sheep chew too much.  But what's the problem with monkeys?  They had mercury in their jaw, kidneys, liver, intestine, and heart.  

"Mercury released from dental silver fillings provokes an increase in mercury and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in primates oral and intestinal flora." Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Volume 37, pp 825-834, 1993. 

That's more than 26 years ago that they've known this.  This certainly seems to me would take away some of the plasticity of brain function.  And what I noticed is that the comparison between the sheep and monkey that at least in the graphs presented that very little of the mercury saturated on the brain, yet the brain is the cite first and most-cited as being affected by mercury vapors.  Isn't it really the justification for the removal of the amalgam fillings and replacing them with polymers that are more eco-friendly to your mouth?  

In 1991, the World Health Organization, WHO, acknowledged that the predominant source of human exposure to mercury is from your fillings . . . 

Not seafood or other foods, not air or water but from the fillings inside your mouth.  Oh, what wonders!  And yet people are always and everywhere discount the existence of conspiracies.  Does your dentist inform you of this?  Does he even know?  Is he an idiot?  Probably.  If this hasn't scared you yet, then you're not paying life-saving attention.  Check this out: the mercury in the mother's amalgam fillings is passed onto the child, rendering that child, ah, compromising that child's inherent intelligence.  "Maternal-fetal distribution of mercury released from dental amalgam fillings."  Is anybody looking out for the health of loved ones?  Does it make any sense at all to look to the mouth and teeth, the orifice and enamel fixtures that are so close to the brain, teeth which are, in fact, lodged right between your heart and your brain?  I mean is anybody paying attention?  I know that dentists are not.  You want cleaning or something fixed?  Ha!  The best that you can hope for is a nutritional compound that removes mercury and minimizes the effects of the vapors.  

4:28
Experiments on sheep showed that mercury from sheep's fillings transferred immediately to the placenta, to the unborn fetus, and to every conceivable portion of the fetus' body.  It even increased in the lamb higher after birth from mercury in the mother's milk.  There's no such thing as a safe mercury filling.  All mercury fillings leak mercury.  

An article is pictured just as he finishes this point.  The title of that article is "Combined Effects in Toxicology--A Rapid Systematic Testing Procedure: Cadmium, Mercury, and Lead" by Jack Schubert found in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Volume 4, 1978, Issue 5-6.  

5:16
Mercury and lead is more toxic than just mercury alone.  These black, corroded, pitted mercury fillings are used where you must drill away a third of a tooth in order to fill a pinhead-sized cavity.  Even if you love mercury, it's the wrong thing to do to the children.  It leads to broken, diseased, root canal, extracted throughout the rest of their life.  It's a blunder that costs the child all through [their] life.  Millions and millions of dollars are spent annually fixing teeth again and again.  And dentists don't follow the manufactured recommendations.  The use of [mercury] amalgam [fillings] is contraindicated in the following circumstances:

In expectant mothers.In children 6 and under. In proximal or occlusal contact to dissimilar metal restorations. In patients with severe renal deficiency. In patients with known allergies to amalgam.For the retrograde or endodontic filling. As a filling material for cast crown. 

They pack mercury in children, around gold crowns, underneath bridges, they stuff it around the gum line in contact with tissues.  There's mercury spreading from this gold crown to every tissue in that patient's body.  Even if you like mercury fillings, putting mercury in the tooth is simply the wrong thing to do.  

6:15
Dr. Harald Loe, Director of The National Institute of Dental Research, wrote back in 1993, the first filling is a critical step in the life of the tooth.  Using amalgam for the first filling requires removing a lot of tooth substance, not only diseased tooth substance but healthy tooth substance as well.  So in making the undercuts, you sacrifice a lot and this results in a weakened tooth.  The next thing you know the tooth breaks off and you need a crown, then you need to repair the crown.  So it continues to the stage where there is no more to repair and you pull the tooth [root and all].  With the first filling, you should do something that can either restore the tooth or retain more healthy tooth substance.  Use new materials, or composites, or materials that can bond to the surface without undercuts.  You can do this with little of the tooth substance so that the core of the tooth is still there.  I would add that the cost of all that dental repair over and over again, makes the cost of mercury fillings enormous even if you don't consider the neurological impairment and the brain damage that they surely cause in dental personnel and the infertility and the heartbreak that they cause to so many families.  

"Urinary Mercury After Administration 2,3 dimercapto propane 1 sulfonic acid: Correlation with Dental Amalgam Score," FASEB Journal, Volume 6(6): pps, 2472-2476, 1992 Aposhian, H.V.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, V. 51, 28-34, 1994.
"The Effect of Occupational Exposure to Mercury Vapor on the Fertility of Female Dental Assistants," Rowland AS, et al.  

The conviction at the end of this video went horribly awry.  Here they were pointing out horror after horror of mercury amalgam fillings, and then at the end offer up an opinion, a hope really, that the government will fix the problem?  Talk about your disappointment. 

It is the opinion of this academy that responsible government agencies should prohibit the use of these fillings until such time as their manufacturers produce the alleged evidence of safety. 

GET MERCURY OUT OF YOUR BODY
Garlic might be your most reliable compound for leeching mercury and other toxic metals out of the tissue of your intestines, kidneys, brain, heart, etc.  Bill Sardi points out how garlic may be even more potent at removing toxic metals than metal chelators. 

Garlic controls heavy metals such as lead, copper, cadmium  and  iron.  Garlic is a remedy for fatty liver by virtue of its ability to remove iron. Garlic removes some heavy metals better than mineral-chelating drugs.  While some herbal dietary supplements may increase circulating lead levels, garlic does not.   

Sardi adds that

Garlic’s active ingredient is not generally yielded from garlic pills because stomach acid negates the necessary enzyme needed to produce allicin.  A buffered allicin pill that resists stomach acid has been shown to yield real allicin.  

REMEDIES & SOLUTIONS
Find mercury-free dentistry in a city near you here.  
Find the Holistic Dental Association here.  
Find the Dental Amalgam Mercury Solutions here. 
Martie Whittekin recommends a Dallas dentist, Dr. Phillip Kozlow.  He says that the alcohol in mouthwashes, like Listerine, dries out the gum tissue which makes it easy for bacteria and plaque to form.  Instead, use hot water and salt to clean your teeth in the morning or after every meal.  Remember how you did that after you lost a tooth as a kid?  Then . . . . Dr. Kozlow recommends the use of O3, ozone water.