Public Health Emergencies Are Nothing More Than Camouflaged Power Grabs

Why am I not surprised that you're not surprised?  You mean you've known this all along?    

Here is Katherine Watts's 30-minute video presentation.

The biomedical injections raise the legal question, "Are they medicine?"  mRNA/DNA injections and other Emergency Use Authorized products are biochemical compounds exempt from U.S. regulations governing drug development, manufacturing, and distribution.  

LEGAL QUESTION 

Are they medical treatments authorized for economically/socially/psychologically coerced administration under international and federal Public Health Emergency Laws, PHE?

Or, are they toxic weapons prohibited under international and federal Weapons of Mass Destruction Laws?  

Answer: BOTH.

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program, Katherine Watt, Bailiwick News, April 28, 2022.

Building the case to prosecute members of Congress, presidents, HHS and DOD secretaries and federal judges for treason under 18 USC 2381.  Her article about is a timeline of changes in U.S. law that made it possible for this intentional use of intentionally toxic products which are weapons to be camouflaged as a public health emergency response that work product and other posts that she's done we're seen by the organizers of this conference Amrei and Sylvia and they invited her to participate by email in November 202tge construction of the 

Work product seen by Amrei and Sylvia:

Timeline tracing the chronological development of changes to US law that enable the camouflaging of an intentional democide as a public health emergency response. First posted April 28th 2022. Updated regularly. 

Congressional activity intensified 1910s, then 1930s and 1940s (the construction of the administrative state); 1960s and 1970s (DoD R&D in chemical and biological weapons); and from the 2000s, right around 9/11, to present (Public Health Emergency program build up).

12:55. The implications are extremely distressing.  People who have followed all of these different paths to get to the same main finding refer to people who have not got there yet as "normies."  And people who have not seen it yet and continue to think that there is actually something called a public health emergency for which global coercion coordinated responses are the are the proper response call  people like Catherine Watts "conspiracy theorists." And then there are a third category of people who try not to pay attention to it, find it very upsetting if they think about it at all, and just try to get on with their lives.  And I think that's a very valid way to proceed.