TREASON! TREASON! THE PREP ACT IS TREASONOUS. Unfortunately, no lawsuits are coming because--what do you know!--all the corporate law firms are tied to the Defense Department

But, yeah, treason is levying war against the United States or adhering to their enemies.  I'm looking at it . . . "giving them aid and comfort within the United States while owing allegiance to the United States."  --Katherine Watt

The PREP Act, which has allowed for the C19 death jabs to be made available to slaughter Americans en masse, IS LITERAL TREASON

Katherine Watt: "Congress...[overthrew] the U.S. Constitution and laws by passing the PREP Act and by not repealing it."

TREASON. TREASON. TREASON.… pic.twitter.com/cUBiMFjYN5

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) April 28, 2025

00:00.  Would you just really clearly outline to my audience how the people who push these COVID measures committed treason and how many did it knowingly?

00:15.  I don't know how many did it knowingly but I tend to think it's a lot more than I used to think since I read that December 21, 2005 Senate record because within 2 days of it being slipped into that Defense Appropriations Bill, they already had a very good legal analysis that said, this is clearly unconstitutional.  This is clearly a violation of the separation of powers between the different branches of the federal government and clearly a violation of the Federalist separation of powers between the federal government and the states, and they voted for it anyway.  So everyone who gave his speech certainly knew that they were committing treason.  Everyone who heard the speech or read the letter that Edwin Chemerinsky wrote also knew that what they were doing was committing treason.  And as for people who have been voting on some of the measures since then, I don't know; it depends how much they understood and how much they were just like, "I'm here in Congress.  I do whatever they tell me to do.  I vote when they tell me to vote, and I vote in the way that they tell me to vote."  But, yeah, treason is levying war against the United States or adhering to their enemies.  I'm looking at it . . . "giving them aid and comfort within the United States while owing allegiance to the United States."  And to whatever extent people can start to examine the actions of the members of Congress and the president and the cabinet secretaries and the judges as far as who do you owe allegiance to if this is what you think is what you should be doing and watching what they do clearly they are not thinking of themselves as owing allegiance to the United States they think they owe allegiance to somebody else and that's why they are making war against the people of the United States.

OATH OF OFFICE IS AWOL FOR HIGH-LEVEL PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS

02:11.  Yes, interestingly, a law firm, a law firm that we've talked to you before, they FOIA'd the records of oath of office for a bunch of high level official. In the Biden Administration, in the first Trump Administration and the Biden Administration, so they FOIA'd like other records of their Properly Executed Oath of Office.  Most of them did not have it.  Like Rochelle Walensky didn't have it.  Javier Becerra didn't have it.  There's a bunch of, you know, of these health and related high level officials did not have those Oaths of Office executed while they were doing this.  And that may be because they knew that they were committing treasonous Acts.

02:55.  There are several laws related to that main treason one, like it is also a crime if you know of treason not to disclose it.  It's also a crime to incite rebellion, which you can construe with the HHS secretaries have been doing as form of rebellion or seditious conspiracy.  And then there is another one that prohibits advocating the overthrow of the US Government Constitution and laws, and Congress basically did that overthrow the US Government Constitution and laws by passing the Prep Act and by not repealing it.  Like every day that goes by that they are sitting in there and they know about this, which they do, and they don't put forward bills to repeal it, they're adding their own ratification of the treason.  And that's the ones who are there now, even if the ones who were there in 2005 are out of office now. 

The full interview.

SASHA LATYPOVA: most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense

9:58.  So I wondered between 2022, as I kept working on it, I kept writing about it, and April of 2022, I sent the information, because the reader suggested that I send it, I sent it to Aaron Siri.  I got no response from him.  I got a cursory response from Elizabeth Frame, who is one of his colleagues and then I didn't hear anything else. And by the middle of 2023, I came to the conclusion that they weren't talking about it either because they were totally in support of the overthrow, and they just want to get their piece of the financial whatever money is to be made in the process of continuing to fool people into thinking that the constitution is still operative, they wanted to get their piece.  Or they were so terrified by the implications of what it was and thought that there was nothing beneficial to be done, so they didn't even try.  They didn't speak up.  They didn't file cases.  They didn't, they just thought close your eyes, put your head in the sand, keep your mouth shut because this is too big and not to talk about it.  So those are my two guesses at this point about why the legal profession to whatever extent you can think of it as a monolithic thing, most of the prominent legal firms do not talk about this and I think that's why.

11:24.  In addition to that most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense, too, and they will not take these cases because the Department of Defense is behind this separation.  Also, besides being conflicted, even the individual practitioners will for the small individual practitioners, money, access to money and funding these cases is the first thing that comes to mind to prevent them from taking them because they see it and they're like you know there's no way I can raise so much money.  This takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and some cases might take millions of dollars to prosecute.  So they look at it, and say no way.  Large legal firms that have resources are conflicted and finally everyone is incentivized to ignore the Prep Act on both sides.  I just published an article this morning about 25 States, or 23 States and two governors, suing HHS and Kennedy for clawbacks of the COVID pandemic. 

SASHA LATYPOVA: Masking induces acidosis within 30 minutes, and that triggers positives for PCR. So the numbers of COVID PCRs went up to give the impression that the pandemic was real

"Know why they were so set on masking?... masking induces acidosis because you're re-inhaling your own CO2... and that triggers positives for PCR. That's the thing that PCR measures, is acidity levels... and they knew it."

This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova… pic.twitter.com/NFpAOjlQOU

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) April 26, 2025

This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (

@sasha_latypova

) is taken from a recently posted interview with Feds for Freedom (@feds4freedomusa).

Do you know why they were so set on masking?  They were so, you know, masking was like one of the most important pillars of this whole thing because we just now, we're just now finding out from another collaborator who is working on identifying all these PCR tests, and so forth.  So masking induces acidosis because you are re-inhaling your own CO2.  In fact, it induces acidosis within like 30 minutes of masking.  You re-inhale your own CO2, and depending on your own health status and vulnerability, age, and so forth, and it's more prevalent in children and in the elderly.  You are going to get dehydrated and you're going to get acidified, and your mouth and nose are going to get acidified, and that triggers positives for PCR.  That's, that's the thing that PCR measures is acidity levels.  So that's how they were getting the, that was their mechanism to . . . and it also can trigger, you know, in a vulnerable state and during winter for some people, it can trigger the cold.  So actually it is the mechanism to induce common cold and also to undo it.  It is to de-acidify quickly.  So that's a demonstrated in clinical studies.  And so they knew it, and that was the mechanism to make people sick and also trigger false positives for those people who were not sick.

Full interview.  Feds for Freedom.

KATHERINE WATT: 🔥"Civil disobedience...[now means] not ever taking another vaccine...not ever advocating that anyone else take a vaccine, not vaccinating your children ever...because you can see that the laws around vaccine development, manufacturing, and use are completely illegal."🔥

🔥"Civil disobedience...[now means] not ever taking another vaccine...not ever advocating that anyone else take a vaccine, not vaccinating your children ever...because you can see that the laws around vaccine development, manufacturing, and use are completely illegal."🔥

This… pic.twitter.com/WeR6sC17xf

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) April 24, 2025

WHAT IS A VIRUS? They are harvesting toxic materials and then claim that these materials exist INDEPENDENTLY as CAUSATIVE AGENTS, and fly in the air, posing danger from even a slight casual contact (a massive lie to the public perpetuated for centuries)

What is a 'virus'?

This is the best quick-and-dirty summary of what a virus is that I've ever seen.

From a reply by Katherine Watt (@Bailiwicknews on substack) to a substack article by @sasha_latypova.

Links next post.
h/t to @4Ramusjoy pic.twitter.com/FjJqM10SuQ

— The Milgram experiment had an exit door (@milehijules) February 17, 2025

 

Read-aloud: The Summa Simplified for Everyone, pages 9-12 by Katherine Watt

Read-aloud: The Summa Simplified for Everyone, pages 9-12 by Katherine Watt

Read on Substack

DR. JANE RUBY: The cockroach sued me and @AmericanMD for $25 million in a fake defamation case that got tossed by a federal judge is now going after Katherine Watt & @sasha_latypova for establishing evidence that the Covid shots were

.@RWMaloneMD TRIES TO DAMAGE GOOD PEOPLE AND HIDE THE TRUTH

The cockroach sued me and @AmericanMD for $25 million in a fake defamation case that got tossed by a federal judge is now going after Katherine Watt & @sasha_latypova for establishing evidence that the Covid shots were… pic.twitter.com/VNsgNjJvfQ

— DR JANE RUBY™️ (@RealDrJaneRuby) December 10, 2024

SASHA LATYPOVA: And, in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates [the vaccines], and that's been the case since forever...

"None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]."… pic.twitter.com/iqX6py1O3a

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) October 9, 2024

"None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Dr. Drew (

@drdrew

) how "vaccines" are not actually regulated in the U.S. by the FDA but rather only "pretend regulated." The pharma insider notes that the injections were entirely unregulated prior to 1973, and then, by 1986, protected by The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act—meaning there's no liability and thus, in effect, still no regulations. "My colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US as it applies to all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated," Latypova says. "And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever..." "In the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973," Latypova adds. "Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service." "After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and] that shielded all the manufacturers from liability; that was under Reagan." "Since then, the manufacturers of vaccines [have] had no liability. And if you have no liability for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences," Latypova notes. Partial transcription of clip: "So the manufacturing, those remain great concerns. In fact, I've I've gotten additional information that it's even worse, than I thought, and the problem actually goes a long time back. Even my colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US, as it applies to vaccines, all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding, about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated. And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever... "So the law research is ongoing, and, Katherine and one of the colleagues are writing a big report on relevant law tracing back to, as I said, late 1700s when, you know, vaccination as we kind of know it in a modern world has, started being used more or less in mass subjects. Now, in the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973. Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service. And, they were sort of, you know, you could order order the samples or whatever you needed, the box. You could even, like, order it in the mail from the US government, and they would send it to you. "And so up until 1973, there were no regulation and no standards for manufacturing, for purity testing, for contaminants, for, characterizing what you have made in the pharmaceutical process, which is standard for anybody who works in pharma making drugs. That didn't exist, really. It wasn't anything codified. After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was a national vaccine, I forget the correct name of the law, but basically, the act that came in that, shielded all the manufacturers from liability that was under Reagan. "And since then, the manufacturers of vaccines had no liability. And if you have no liability, for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences."

LATYPOVA: Three days after the DOD/USAMRDC announced that they began growing the stock of “covid virus”, the CDC captured 3000+ people from two cruise ships, Diamond Princess (arriving internationally) and Grand Princess (domestic travel, the ship never left CA)

Note that Fort Detrick was the center of the U.S. biological weapons program from 1943 to 1969. Since the renaming of the biological weapons program into “infectious disease research”, it has hosted most elements of the United States biological defense program. 

During the presser on March 5, 2020, Col Wendy Sammonds-Jackson [director, of USAMRDC's Military Infectious Diseases Research Program, 2018-2020] announced that “we (the DOD/USAMRDC) have received the pathogen (SARS-Cov2) and we are growing it”:

Find the VIDEO after a few paragraphs.

She’s got THE SAMPLE! Yippee! We are off to the races. The DOD team stated that the alleged sample of the pathogen came from to 1 (one!) US patient from Washington state. Even if that really happened, a sample of one is absolutely meaningless for anything - diagnostic, treatment or vaccine development. I believe that 1 “sample” was only necessary to check the exemption box that allows to classify the activities that followed as “defense, infectious disease research”, rather than making of the internationally prohibited bioweapons. The production of these prohibited substances was necessary for seeding the subsequent “pandemic” and the deadly OWS EUA Countermeasures theatrics that it enabled. Prior to March 5, 2020, there had been no “COVID” disease in the US. CDC claims there were about 200 “cases” by that time, although nobody except the CDC could have tested or verified anything. Immediately after Col Wendy Sammonds-Jackson started making stocks of it (whatever “it” was) at Ft. Detrick, the “pandemic” materialized in the US:

Three days after the DOD/USAMRDC announced that they began growing the stock of “covid virus”, the CDC captured 3000+ people from two cruise ships, Diamond Princess (arriving internationally) and Grand Princess (domestic travel, the ship never left CA). The detainees were lied to, sold a sci-fi script about an asymptomatic deadly disease, and, for good measure, threatened with prosecution, and placed into a military prison (quarantine camps) at several US Air Force bases around the country with no means to appeal other than to the same people who imprisoned them, the CDC.

A quarantine order requires a sign-off by a medical doctor. The original order for all passengers on the Grand Princess was issued by Nicole Cohen, MD, on March 8, 2020.

There are several almost identical orders and re-issues in this package. They were signed by the following individuals:

All of these doctors are employed by the CDC. The justification provided by Dr. Cohen boils down to the following statements.

She issues a “professional judgment” (she is the sole judge and jury here) that the detainees are in the “qualifying stages of COVID-19”:

She says that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) is defined by executive orders 13295 (2003 Bush), 13375 (2005 Bush) and 13674 (2014 Obama):

Note that an executive order is a directive issued by the President of the United States that manages the operations of the federal government. It is a written and published instruction that has the force of law, typically based on existing statutory powers. Executive orders do not require Congressional approval or legislative action to take effect, and Congress cannot overturn them. Executive orders have the authority of law, binding on executive branch agencies and employees.

I am not offering any legal advice here, just pointing out that this is a circle jerk of federal government that issues directives to itself that are only “law” to itself. In this case, the federal government decided that it needed to hunt and imprison anyone with signs of seasonal cold or flu, or anyone they think MIGHT one day have signs of seasonal cold or flu. That’s called “qualifying stages of Disease X”. Whatever disease they want to claim. By these EOs, the executive branch has authorized anyone to be put in military detention on their say-so. There is no need for actual illness to be demonstrated at all. Nice that they carved out influenza separately. No test has ever been clinically validated to differentiate influenza from COVID.

Also note that the endless internet fights about “virus no isolated” are irrelevant to how the HHS announces pandemics or how CDC issues quarantine orders. No virus needs to exist at all! The pandemic illness is defined by a presidential executive order as basically fever and cough that in the sole opinion of one CDC employee can potentially be world-ending. As long as they think that and assert it in writing, no other proof is necessary. Thus, filing a thousand FOIA requests asking CDC for proof of virus is a waste of time and a distraction from what is going on in reality.

Please read Katherine Watt’s detailed historical analysis of the relevant law, going back to the 18th century:

"Federal communicable disease control, quarantine, and biological product law, 1798-1972; orientation through Founding of Marine Hospital Service," Katherine Watt, August 5, 2024

For example, here is an act from the 51st Congress, 1890 (way before substantial body of virology was developed and way before computerized fakery such as PCR was introduced). They simply state that whenever the President thinks that cholera, smallpox, or plague exists… then the Sec of the TREASURY can make whatever rules and regulations he likes.

Incidentally, fake pandemics are still the tools of the central bankers. Listen to the clip of Catherine Austin Fitts here. Transcript and clip by Sense Receptor News:

"Bird flu has nothing to do with health. It's a tool of the central bankers...when you're printing monetary inflation you need a way to create deflation on demand."  Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report) Catherine Austin Fitts describes

At the time of the Grand Princess quarantine orders, in March 2020, the CDC (that had merged with the DOD via “the whole of government approach”) was the sole possessor of the “test” to determine if someone has “SARS-cov-2”. Therefore, they had the magic wand to wave around the quarantine ships, and, Eeny, meeny, miny, moe," into the military prison you go!

They further state that between January 2020 and March 2020, there has been sufficient “scientific” evidence collected showing that COVID-19 is SARS by the definitions of the cited EOs:

But of course! “Fever and signs of respiratory illness” is all that was needed, and the rest could be just asserted.

Next, they cite that by March 7, 2020, 200 “cases” (by CDC’s secret magic PCR wand that nobody else could scientifically check, validate, or verify) were found in the US (out of 300M+ population):

And because they found 20 “cases” on board the ship, everyone on the ship was now tagged “pre-communicable stage of COVID-19”:

The quarantine orders are basically an arrest without due process based on an imaginary cause.  In several countries, including Canada, the EU, Australia, and New Zealand, military and police-enforced quarantine was already used in 2020. The Blob is planning the next phase of global terrorism. Under a fake/PHEIC public health emergency declaration - they can round up people into indefinite detention, like they did with the cruise passengers, or shut down any city/town/community this way. 

I am publishing this material because you will not find this information in any mainstream media. Most of the “freedom community leaders” ignore this, too. Having this information and sharing with your friends and family will prepare you to face the government goons who might try to bluff their way into detaining you. Traveling and crossing international borders, especially by cruise ships, puts you in a vulnerable position. Knowledge is power.

To help you think through this matter and prepare, here is a discussion that Katherine, I, and one of our readers:

For example:

"Courts have held, however, that not all types of searches and seizures necessarily require probable cause and a warrant.

Searches and seizures conducted with the consent of an authorized person and those searches and seizures that are conducted to avert an imminent threat to health or safety do not run afoul of the Fourth Amendment even when conducted without probable cause and a warrant."

It's meant to look like a form of probable cause, warrant, due process, and judicial review, without being substantive, but instead being fake, like everything else.

After being taken into detention, a detainee can file a habeas corpus petition for judicial review under 28 USC 2241, like any other criminal, [except they haven’t been charged with a crime, but are detained for “non-law enforcement” reasons], and can also request an administrative hearing, not for constitutional or due process issues, only for medical and scientific issues. 

Katherine’s post:

On habeas corpus, probable cause, warrants, detention, and extrajudicial state killing under declared public health emergencies. by Katherine Watt

Read on Substack

From my own very simple perspective (informed by the history of totalitarianism), I can state with certainty that following the “health” commissars to the secondary crime scene (detention center) is a bad idea no matter what law you think applies. In theory, there may exist some remnants of the constitutional procedure for you to theoretically appeal your undue imprisonment. But once you are locked up by the Red Guards, do you think that the judges that have sided with the Red Guards to date will look at your case fairly and apply the Constitution? I personally would not test this theory.

Please subscribe, comment, and if you would like to support [Sasha's work], become a paid subscriber.

DR. JANE RUBY: Everyone's finally figuring out that you're in a permanent kill box, a mass genocide operation being run by the United States Department of Defense…

Everyone's finally figuring out that you're in a permanent kill box, a mass genocide operation being run by the United States Department of Defense…

At the end she tells you how to defeat it (Hint: LOCAL) pic.twitter.com/fgVSz5EWeh

— DR JANE RUBY (@RealDrJaneRuby) August 6, 2024

Yeah, local does seem like the answer, and it sounds good, but some of us still need restitution from the international invasion of sinister forces from outside who've been left damaged.  But local government sure has the "go local" wrapped up too from years, decades of federal funding that has turned quiet rural and suburban roads into streamlined boulevards with all the major national chain eateries--Subway, Taco Bell, Carl's Jr., Starbucks, 7-11s, nail salons, and pet stores-- and grocers, not to mention how they've converted the lighting with glaring yellow light poles every 40 feet that double as video and audio surveillance on what were locally maintained quiet streets.   Now streets and city services are local counties and city restrictions to Blackrock, State Street, et al controlling companies via DEI.  So the instruction may be to go local, but feds have already set up shop.  And the courts are owned.  You won't find justice anywhere, which explains all the street violence.  And you won't find a lawyer worth his salt.  Who can you trust in a low-trust society?  Not to mention the added level of surveillance, Facebook groups created by high-octane Karens and Kens and the immigrant population who actually took Janet Napolitano's "If you see something, say something" as their mission statement in the service of a virtuous actor.  

KATHERINE WATT: Naomi Klein, who [. . . supported] those pro-sovereignty/anti-globalist street-level fighters, collapsed under the Covid propaganda and lined up to call for starvation of vaxx refusers.

I just wanted to drop this here.

Latypova asked: “Can this be viewed as invasion, i.e. takeover of legislature of sovereign states by the DOD-Pharma cartel?  Are the buyers effectively signing away their rights to make laws in their own countries?”

I replied:

Yes. But also, there are many, many precedents for that signing away of sovereignty over the last few decades, especially through the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (1947) as updated and institutionalized in the World Trade Organization (1995) to override laws protecting domestic industrial production rights, labor and environmental standards and intellectual property rights held by formerly-sovereign nations and people.

It can and has been viewed as invasion, mostly by people like the 1999 Battle for Seattle, anti-WEF, anti-WTO organizers and demonstrators and those who still try to demonstrate at Davos every year. 

But the Soros team captured and marginalized most of those groups, especially by infiltrating and weakening the Occupy Wall Street movement just at the point OWS on the left was starting to make common cause with the Tea Party on the right through their shared critique of the corporate-state. 

And then most of the public intellectuals like Noam Chomsky and Naomi Klein, who were supporting those pro-sovereignty/anti-globalist street-level fighters, collapsed under the Covid propaganda and lined up to call for starvation of vaxx refusers. (Klein wrote a 2007 book about how the Shock Doctrine works in every country around the world, and then couldn’t see it when it happened to her in her own country in real time: she condemned the Canadian truckers for fighting for humans to be free from corporate-government oppression.)

US Gov't using health emergencies to legislate its way to permanent tyranny

Please understand that pandemics are scams.  They are only declared as a way to authorize tyranny.  

Know this: the United States Government's Chemical and Biological Warfare Program is currently housed in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  Where was it before that?  Why did they move it? Are we searching for Carmen Santiago, Waldo, or the Holy Grail?  Where is it NOW?  Our bioweapons program [yes, it's ours; we're paying for it] USED TO BE HOUSED in the Department of Defense (DOD).  Wow!  Maybe they changed locations out of convenience to us.  Instead of being alarmed at the bioweapons, our government is making them like medicine.  How considerate of them.    

Katherine Watt explains, 

Through gradual, covert statutory reclassification and program transfers, reinforced through Presidential Executive Orders and related executive branch declarations, and implemented through hundreds of regulatory amendments, the US Government's Chemical and Biological Warfare Program originally housed in the Department of Defense (DOD), became the Public Health Emergency [PHE]-Emergency Use Authorization [EUA]-Medical Countermeasures program housed in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

Everybody gets the following wrong or states it only peripherally, but you ought not to forget it.  The next paragraph answers the question "Who is behind the biowarfare against the American people?"  Asking "Who" used to be one of the 5 basic questions journalists asked.  But that dates me.  

Read it a few times if you need to:

The bioterrorism program is now jointly operated by DOD, HHS, Department of Homeland Security, Department of State, most other US federal agencies and their subordinate departments, divisions, offices, authorities, enterprises, committees, advisory boards and employees, in collaboration with the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and other public, private and public-private hybrid institutions around the world…

In 2022 Attorneys General of 15 states sued HHS trying to repeal the HHS’ definitions of “public health emergency”.  --Sasha Latypova

What Does It Mean When Pandemics Are Declared?

Historically, epidemics could only be recognized AFTER the fact: after a substantial number of people became ill, died, and after a significant economic impact. Examples of real epidemics include mostly water-born, crowding/poor sanitation, and vermin-related diseases such as cholera, plague, typhus, and smallpox. All of these diseases are eliminated by proper sanitation of water, hygiene, and improvement in living conditions. It is not possible to predict an epidemic unless one purposefully takes measures to poison water or cause significant deterioration of people’s living standards.

In the clown-infested reality that we currently inhabit, the international government-military blob is claiming that they can predict pandemics and declare emergencies based on one fake PCR case of a made-up virus somewhere in the world.

HHS refused to amend its definitions of a pandemic and insisted that they can claim absolutely anything is a pandemic. HHS ultimately prevailed, the case was re-filed by OK and TX, the judge dismissed it and it was not appealed. In the refusal to amend its definition of a pandemic, HHS stated that “any communicable disease event” - this means a single case of anything they claim “communicable” anywhere in the world (for example, a single cow that “tested positive” for “avian flu”), once announced by the WHO, can qualify for forced testing, tracing, detention and injections of humans or animals in any town or village in any state of the US!