Dear Editor“The best decisions are based on the best science”, the article quotes.
However, the CDC states on page 39 of its 13th July 2020 document entitled,’ CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions for Use’ (1) :
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen”.
What does this mean? And is it the “best science”?
And here is the document he refers to published in EuroSurveillance. As a preface to reading from the article, Cowan explains that a virus is a thing, like a fork. We're not talking about a thought or a feeling but rather a thing, like a chair or a fork. If you say no quantifiable virus, you've never isolated the virus from anybody with COVID-19. Further prefacing, he adds that Christian Drosten other virologists who were tasked with developing a test for this new Coronavirus were caught in a dilemma because they found nothing despite reports around the globe of vital contagion. So let's see what they say. Cowan reads the first sentence under "Background,"
The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable . . . .
Then he reads the stated Aim of the study. Jaw-dropping. I recommend you read it twice.
We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.
They had no virus to make a test to find a piece of the virus. Therefore, the PCR test, the test which is being used all over the world to document cases, is a complete fraud. They have never isolated a virus and said, "This is a unique piece of that virus," because they have no virus.
Ah, are they the only ones?
Then he quotes from a Pfizer document about making their mRNA vaccine.
To build an RNA vaccine, scientists do not need the actual virus.
In other words, Pfizer admits they have no virus with which to make a vaccine against. They call it an actual virus as opposed to, I guess, a theoretical virus. Now, I would change the word "theoretical" to say "an imaginary virus" or "a make-believe virus." So they're using a make-believe virus, which they have never isolated, they don't know the sequence of, they don't know the components of to make a vaccine against this virus and God only knows what they're making a vaccine against.
Here's another one, a paper published in Nature, which was one of the first papers published describing a novel coronavirus. And a friend of mine, named Torsten Engelbrecht, asked him because he said he isolated the virus. People have sent me about 20 different peer-reviewed articles, claiming they isolated the virus. When you look at the paper, it's very clear that nobody has ever isolated the virus. It's a fraud. And we asked him, "Did you isolate the virus?" and he said,
We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.
In other words, they didn't do what every peer-review journal, article has to do, which is to say, "Here are the steps we did. Here's the pictures showing we have an isolated virus, . . ." They didn't even take a picture and they admit they didn't isolate the virus.
Here's another one. Same thing: identification of a coronavirus isolate from a patient in Korea with COVID-19. This was published by the Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention, called the KDCA for Korean Disease Control Agency. Essentially, it's the CDC of Korea. So, we asked him, did you isolate the virus, because that's what it says in the title. The answer was, "We could not estimate the degree of purification because we did not purify and concentrate the virus." In other words, they have no virus.
Here's another one. Again, Isolation of the New Virus, "We showed seven virus particles not purified one. The Canadian Health Ministry in a Freedom of Information Request, "Do you have any information on an isolation of this virus?" Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we are unable to locate any records responsive to your request." None of these groups who are organizing this have any example of an isolated virus. If you've never isolated the virus, you have no way of knowing whether it causes disease. Period. And the test to identify a virus that you've never isolated, it's not false positive or false negative, it's just good, old-fashioned false. It's meaningless. So that's where we are. I could go into how they misled themselves into thinking that they have this virus, but this is a scientific fraud. And interestingly just three days ago, a group of European virologists and pathologists dissected this Drosten study and said this--the basis of using this study, which is the basis of all the PCR tests, all the testing is pure scientific fraud and they demanded that this journal retract the article.
So, explain to me what's going on. There are case reports, death reports, how all this happening and being reported on if there's not a virus?
First of all, what are these people seeing at the site? What is a virus? So that's where it gets very interesting because that's where it leads you into understanding what is going on because in certain cases, like Chicken Pox, you do see these particles--I can show you a picture of them if you want--and they are at the site of the disease. But we already know that just because you have strep in your throat, doesn't mean it's causing disease. In order to prove causation, you have to isolate the virus, you have to take the Chicken Pox out, you have to prove you don't have anything else in there--no poisons, no snot, no nothing--just the virus, expose an animal to it. They did that for 20 years and couldn't make any animal sick. So the question is, "What is it doing there?" and it's a very interesting question because it gets into the question of how do we even know that it's coming from the outside? Because it turns out when you have tissue, as I've described earlier, and you starve it and poison it, it packages up little pieces of degraded DNA and packages them up in particles as a detoxification and communication strategy. In other words, if you break down the tissue, there's a poison-relief mechanism that we have erroneously called viruses. They're coming from the inside: they're called exosomes, or intracellular vesicles. Now, there's an article in a journal called Viruses, which looked at this question--how do we know that these are from the outside and not from the inside? And they said something very interesting, "However, to date, a reliable method that can guarantee a separation of exosomes from viruses does not exist." Everything that's a thing can be separated and isolated from every other thing. If I had a fork here, I can separate it from a spoon because they're different. There's only one reason I can't separate an exosome, which is a detoxification strategy from the inside from a pathogenic virus from the outside and that's because they're the same thing. Something is poisoning the tissue. The tissue packages up this degraded genetic material, and we mistakenly call those pathogenic viruses.
FASCINATING
And here's where it gets interesting because we now know that those pieces of genetic material can resonate out into the world as a signal to other organisms that something bad has happened, that poisoning has happened and you should defend yourself. This is how trees communicate. If you get beetles eating a tree, they put out chemicals and other signals that communicate to the other trees that there are beetles around and you should defend yourself. This is because the Darwinian model of evolution based on mutations and survival of the fittest is pure nonsense because it's way too slow. If you were exposed to Glyphosate and one person had a mutation that allowed them to survive from that exposure, do you know how long that would take to spread through the whole population? Like 10,000 years, if that even from Boston, for God's sake. So, nature has another mechanism, which is called viruses, or exosomes. So you package up this genetic material. The DNA and RNA have a resonance just like women who communicate with their menstrual cycles through resonance. A lot of unseen energy communicates through resonance. That's what we call life. And then the other organisms can make the same piece of genetic material and turn that into proteins to defend themselves. So viruses are the mechanism of evolution. They're the mechanism of adaptation. A war on viruses is basically a war on evolution and adaptation. It's a war on life. So the question now is what is poisoning us? Now when you look at the symptoms of the disease called COVID-19 and you forget about the virus--because the virus has never been isolated--it's basically imaginary. So any therapeutics, or so-called maneuver, wearing a mask or social distancing or washing your hands to get rid of something that hasn't even been proven to exist is just nonsense. It doesn't work at all, it just makes you sicker.
So what do we know about the disease? Most of it are what are being called "Cases" are just PCR tests which mean nothing. And I mean, mean nothing. There are no false positives here because you cannot use that test without having compared it to an intact virus. So a case means nothing. Now, there are sick people. Now, most of the sick people are just the usual sort of sick people. But there are some sick people who are hypoxic and what's called a hyper-inflammatory state. Now, how do they get hypoxic, it has nothing to do with viruses--viruses don't make you hypoxic. But we do know from clear, scientific research, going back to the 1970s, the Naval Intelligent Research Institute did this, the Soviets did it. There are recent papers on it . . . that if you expose a place to millimeter waves, otherwise known as 5G, three things will happen: one, you'll degrade the oxygen in the atmosphere, so you're essentially, this one ER doctor said, it's like these people are walking up the Himalayas. His name is Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, [who seemed to spot problems early on] he said they're in a low-oxygen environment, but they're in New York City or Wuhan or on a cruise ship that just had 5G installed. And what's happening is the millimeter waves are degrading the oxygen in the atmosphere, so it's actually like they're on top of a mountain. The second thing is 5G interferes with certain pathways in your mitochondria, which are organelles in your tissues that use oxygen to make fuel [energy]. We know this again, going back to research in the 1970s. So you become tissue hypoxic, you're starving of oxygen because a) there's less oxygen in the atmosphere, and b) you can't use the oxygen that you do have and turn it into fuel which is the whole point of oxygen in the first place. Exposure to millimeter waves, along with aluminum in the air, air pollution, fear, bad food, lots of things. But millimeter waves is the new kid on the block. And the third thing it does is that we know that it creates a hyper-inflammatory response, otherwise known as a cytokine storm, which is the body's way of getting rid of diseased tissue. It's not a disease, but if you . . . basically, we're talking about radiation sickness. So you radiate the tissue with millimeter waves, it breaks down, the body says "I have to get rid of this," it uses the same mechanism that we use to get rid of cigarette smoke or splinters. You create an inflammatory response, which the unfortunate doctors, alternative and otherwise, say, "Oh, you have too much inflammation. That's your disease." Inflammation is your body's way of getting rid of dead and diseased tissue, but it can be so overwhelming that it actually kills you. So you die from hypoxia and an over-enthusiastic inflammatory response and that is exactly what fits with COVID-19 from millimeter waves. Now, I would point out that we have the epidemiology for this, we have the mechanism which I just went through, but people have criticized me for being very particular about viral causation. We know that the virus has never been isolated, so you can't possibly know if caffeine is causing high blood pressure if you've never isolated the virus and never made any animal or person sick. So we know that's not the case, and I actually think we should do clear research to show once and for all whether millimeter waves, otherwise known as 5G, hypoxia and inflammatory, cytokine storms as basically the reason for this problem.
