— Amazing Polly Isn't Here to Compromise (@FringeViews) February 17, 2024
So Musk is behind micro-homes, eh?
Everything about these billionaires is creepy.
Check out the name of this micro-home developer, Boxabl. CEO is Paolo Tiramani. Boxabl, a $3 billion start-up [who gets $3 billion for start-up capital, and from whom?] from North Las Vegas, advertisement calls these homes, "Boxabl Casitas." Ooh, how quaint. Think of yourself as a migrant farm worker parked in some remote neck of the Rockies or Sonora Desert.
No way in the world, you cynical capitalist, will these homes be turned into a 5G nightmare. No way. We promise. To seduce, I mean entice customers, Boxabl has set up their warehouse, get this, like a Jurassic Park or a Disney ride. Which one, Mr. Toad's Wild Ride? Some folks are buying these @ $50,000 and using them as backyard granny units.
Looks like the company was having communication and production problems. Apparently, $3 billion in start-up capital doesn't buy you much.
Insider's Daniel Geiger and Alex Nicoll found thatBoxabl's factory has only produced 400 homes during its first year of operations. Some 8,000 customers have made down payments on Casitas, a 375-square-foot model that folds like a suitcase and costs about $60,000 apiece.
Of the $5.4 million Boxabl pocketed from those payments, over $1 million has been given back at customers' request, the company's cofounder, Galiano Tiramani, said.
One Arizona-based prospective buyer, Max, told Insider that he put $2,400 down for two Boxabl homes in 2021.
It’s not just that @elonmusk is doing more than @POTUS and @VP to address and raise awareness about the border crisis… Those two nincompoops won’t even take the 18 minutes to watch the work that Elon has done.
04:00 Twitter is by far and away the intelligence agency, the State Department, the Defense Department, and the NGO-plex, social media platform par excellence. They much prefer the intel they can scrape from Twitter than from any other social media company. And there's good reason for this, other than LinkedIn, I would say, and they would say. And part of that is because Twitter is not a walled garden like Facebook. Facebook is also a social media platform, obviously, but most private accounts you can only access if you are friends with that person or friends of a friend. Twitter did not have that. And YouTube there's a giant divide between producers and consumers. Consumers on YouTube are not content creators. That's not the case on Twitter. Every Twitter user is a content creator when they click the retweet button. And so you can map real-time narrative emergence on Twitter in a way that you can't do on any other social media platform. And that has been used by the CIA, the State Department, the Defense Department, hundreds of censorship, government-funded NGOs, centers, non-profit foundations, "university research centers," and the works. In order to build their social media censorship Death Star, they need to be able to scrape hundreds of millions of tweets. And what Musk is doing here is very interesting, because on the one hand, you could argue it's a sort of, kind of form of, I wouldn't say censorship necessarily, because it's not like a particular person is singled out, but you are limiting the openness of the internet by doing this. But on the other hand, you are actually, potentially preserving the openness of the internet by preventing the construction of this censorship Death Star that is getting more and more refined every day and is getting funded by your tax dollars to the tune of tens of millions of dollars from DARPA and the National Science Foundation to say nothing about the State Department and USAID, and National Endowment for Democracy grants. so it's all very interesting. That's just one thing to keep in mind on top of the fact that this is obviously going to be a revenue generator for Musk as he sees it. He drew a distinction between verified accounts and unverified accounts, where you can sort of have normal Twitter if you have a verified account because that 8,000 rate limit is pretty substantial. But 800 is not a lot, so it's highly incentivized for people to get Verified Accounts, so obviously this could . . . I'm not sure that Elon Musk is doing this to throttle the AI Censorship Death Star constructed out of the censorship industry. He may just be doing this for cynical business reasons in order to pump up the subscription base, or a privacy reason independent of censorship. But whether he knows it or not, there are going to be hundreds of censorship operatives housed in the University research centers this week, howling at the moon that this is an attack on democracy for Musk to limit their access because it has been for years now a big bugaboo for all of the university censorship operatives who cloak themselves as "researchers" when what they are is operatives. That if they lose access to the underlying data on which their AI censorship models are built, then they will not be able to do their jobs as effective as fast, precise, and comprehensive as social media censors. So they've been having a big fight about this exact issue in Europe because of Europe's GDPR laws, their data privacy laws, and other sovereign European state restrictions on 3rd party access to social media user-level data. And so they tried to get around that by having certain journalists and researchers they've sort of designated "privileged class" to get so that only they can be sort of the trusted keepers of this information that used to be public but now is not. So the fact that Musk is doing this now and here in the United States, you are going to hear the censorship industry howl all over this. Whether Musk knows this or not, he has stepped on a rattlesnake. We'll see how it plays out, but I am very curious to see how this rattlesnake reacts to this new boot. And in a weird way, even though the boot may be cutting off some amount of openness of Twitter, it may also represent, in some way, the boot of freedom. 8:52
The whole Twitter disclosure makes me feel like some Ruskie in a Soviet outpost emerging from totalitarianism after decades of benighted stupor.
I am amazed that this topic gets any traction anywhere. Elon may not be your favorite person, but he certainly is shining a very bright light on the communist revolution that was operating at Twitter for as long as it had.
Bringing the national security state to heel includes breaking up big tech, as we can now see, big tech & the natsec state are the same entity focused on suppressing freedom. @elonmusk should just release all twitter files wikileaks style for full transparency. https://t.co/btpW0DSjx4
And it makes me think that once the whole Russia interference hoax succeeded and lingered in the minds of the public after the 2016 elections, a successful hoax followed by a series of existential political attacks against Trump, not the least of being impeachment, the national security state saw their opportunity for an even more deadly and thorough assault on Trump and a clampdown on his populist, or peoples', movement. They had motive, means, and opportunity. That opportunity was the great reset. They invented the motive: COVID-19. And they've always had the means: propaganda. Americans' ignorance of the history of vaccines, a history dominated by the positive PR from Jonas Salk, allowed the cultish preservation to rule in our daily lives.
We will be publishing next year a special report on . . . how [the United States] will separate as was the case for every civilization historically. Like the Roman Empire, the United States will separate into three regions [and] to the surprise of many, this will also include Canada
It is becoming clear[er] day by day why the mainstream media has been so against Elon Muskbuying Twitter, for as they say in law enforcement, there is a “Blue Code” where cops do not rat on cops. The same is true about judges. Mainstream media is so LEFT it has forgotten how to walk a straight line. They are no longer the free press – they are propaganda organizations for the takeover of our country, and in the process, they will cause civil war and the collapse of Western culture. The Biden Administration clearly violated the law by telling Twitter to delete photos of Hunter smoking crack cocaine which anyone else would be in prison.
The chaos and confusion behind closed doors at Twitter in the immediate aftermath of the October 2020 surface of Hunter Biden’s Laptop from Hell has exposed that the very top-level execs at Twitter decided to label the New York Post’s story as “hacked material” without any evidence — behind the back of then-CEO and founder Jack Dorsey. Historically, those on theLEFThave always done whatever it takes to win for their very basic philosophy is to dominate society and to shut down all resistance. [You can't imagine how far they will go to destroy anybody who resists.]
The New York Timescalled on President Biden to create a “Reality Czar” to shut down all dissent, which they immediately label conspiracy theories without any real investigation.CNNhas called on cable companies to dropFox Newsas if everythingCNNsays is the gospel. We are living in a world where mainstream media has become the enemy of the people pushing a political agenda no different than theNew York Timesduring the 1930s was urging Roosevelt to adopt communism.
New York Times cheered Stalin and constantly reported that this was the way to the future – Stalinism. They seem to be preaching that again with a “Reality Czar” right out of Stalin’s handbook. They are supporting once again this move to a Marxist Utopia. The New York Times hid the truth about Stalin because they were in favor of Communism during the Great Depression. Stalin’s great economic miracle was achieved by taking all the food from Ukraine to pretend Communism was working in Russia causing over 7 million to starve to death. Today, they are cheering World War III to destroy Russia once more in hopes of adopting this Great Reset and imposing upon the world their cancel culture with a one-world government headed by the United Nations.
I strongly recommend you watch the movie, Mr. Jones. This exposes the TRUE STORY of how the New York Times tried to support Communism in the United States back then, with their top journalist, Walter Duranty (1884-1957), who was their main man in Moscow. The New York Times promoted him to be awarded the Pulitzer Prize for reporting on how Communism was Utopia and our future. When Gareth Jones (1905-1935) in March 1933 reported this was all a lie, the truth finally began to appear.
It took the New York Times until 1990 to admit that their reporting covered up the truth about Stalin and the massive starvation in an effort, like Schwab, once again, to sell “equality” as our salvation. The New York Times covered up the more than 7 million people who died of starvation in the Ukraine famine. The New York Times wrote that their reporting on the Russian Revolution constituted “some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper.” They never revoked his Pultizer Prize for writing fake news about Stalin.
Homeland Security and the FBI both said that Russia’s hack of the DNC did not involve altering the vote. In fact, it was his own paper that reported on November 25, 2016, “The Obama administration said on Friday that despite Russian attempts to undermine the presidential election, it has concluded that the results “accurately reflect the will of the American people.” So, were four years of stating the Russians put Trump in the White House, not misinformation?
The constant lies the press has spun about Russia invading the US elections in 2016 and manipulations seem intent upon creating war, exactly as took place with the Spanish American War. We have returned to yellow journalism, which is based on sensationalism and crude exaggeration. Pulitzer and Hearst went head to head. I remember grade school history class blaming the Spanish American War on fake news. There is one such story that male Spanish officials were strip-searching American woman tourists in Cuba looking for claimed messages from rebels. This was the front page of Hearst’s newspaper showing what has become known as “yellow journalism” whereby the illustration was by Frederic Remington and published in the New York Journal, on February 12th, 1897.
Hearst’s New York Journal was called out for this fake news by its rival Joseph Pulitzer’s, New York World, reporting that this story was erroneous and its graphically illustrated strip-search of a woman aboard a U.S. passenger steamer was fake. The Journal article was written by Richard Harding Davis, who reported that Spanish authorities boarded the U.S. steamer, the Olivette, as it prepared to leave Havana and searched several passengers for contraband. Among the passengers was a young Cuban woman named Clemencia Arango, whose brother was a leader in the insurgency against Spanish rule. The Journal’s article was ambiguous, implying the woman was strip-searched by men, which was created by the accompanying illustration of Frederic Remington.
The New York World attacked the Journal’s fake news, quoting Arango as denying that men had strip-searched her. That task, she said, had fallen to a matron, or “inspectress.” The Journalist Davis, in a letter to the World, then blamed Frederic Remington for having drawn “an imaginary picture” and insisted his dispatch had not reported that men had conducted the search.
Nevertheless, this story of the strip search discredited the Journal as being unreliable and prone to publishing “fakes” and other thinly documented reports. Welcome to the present where the New York Times and Washington Post seem to be carrying on in the same unreliable manner as well as ABC, CBS, NBC, and of course – CNN.
We will be publishing next year a special report on what the computer is projecting for the Decline and Fall of the United States and how it will separate as was the case for every civilization historically. Like the Roman Empire, the United States will separate into three regions. However, to the surprise of many, this will also include Canada. We will let everyone know when this report is ready.
‘Mr. Lithium’ Warns There’s Not Enough Battery Metal to Go Around A mining company consultant with decades of experience doubts the industry will be able to support all the electric car production planned. https://t.co/rJiyaPhC6x
Lithium carbonate prices hit a new RECORD HIGH in China today
China: - Refines 60% of the world’s lithium - Controls 77% of global battery cell capacity - Controls 60% of the world’s battery component manufacturing
If you'd like to see the transcript of this interview released back on May 7, 2020, find it here at the 1:27:29 mark. But anybody who's anybody who has tracked anything about COVID knows that the hospitals have been diagnosing everybody with COVID in 2020 because Medicare paid out on it. And further, if you read the transcript, you'll also see what Elon Musk got wrong.
In fact, the first person that I'd heard tell on this was Dr. Scott Jensen who explained this back on April 10, 2020.
In fact, back then I wrote,
His name is Dr. Scott Jensen, a former Minnesota state senator. Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 diagnosis, the hospital where that diagnosis is made gets $19,000 from Medicare. If a patient is put on a ventilator, that hospital receives $39,000. A nurse friend of mine said that one of the reasons that the hospitals have closed up their COVID wards is that they need to make money. The money isn't in COVID for most of these; it's in elective surgeries.
Jensen said, "Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it's a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for – if they're Medicare – typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it's COVID-19 pneumonia, then it's $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000."
This interview by Laura Ingraham of Alex Berenson and Phil Kerpen goes into even greater detail, where I explained that
