Dr. Yeadon explains that
Following the Wuhan protocol, I learned this from friends in Northern Italy, that's where it started in Europe. They were told that the Wuhan protocol said that the sooner you get your patients sedated and ventilated, the better your chances of saving their life. So people would turn up having a panic attack, they thought they were having respiratory symptoms, and rather than take a proper history, they sedating and ventilating them and over 90% of them would be dead within 10 days. Ventilation, especially for a frail person, is a very aggressive procedure. When it's lifesaving, it's worth those risks. When you're right it's worth those risks. But if you arrive and you're free breathing and your airwaves are open, you never do what they did unless they had 60% burns and are in agony, then you probably would do it. But none of the others. And I know here, where I am in Florida, literally, within a couple of kilometers from here, the Sarasota General, Memorial General, whatever it is, I know a person who was very senior in the Emergency Room, or A&E, he was busy trying to save lives at the front end, but people who were admitted weren't coming out again. And after a while he explored it and ended up in a shouting match with his clinic colleagues, and more or less said, like I've said, "What the hell are you doing ventilating people with open air waves and conscious?"
"Well, we've got to do it. This is what we've been told."
They were given money to put people on ventilators. They were given money if they got Remdesivir. They were given money if they died after a diagnosis of COVID. So they followed the money and gave up.
