Showing posts with label Dave Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dave Smith. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

FIVE TIMES AUGUST TO CHRIS CUOMO: you attempt to rebrand yourself as some new independent and unbiased Cuomo while you half-heartedly feature vax injury stories for ratings

Um, Dave Smith spent three hours with you the other night literally showing and telling you with *your own words* replayed right back to you in front of your face how astronomically wrong you’ve been throughout Covid and clearly absolutely none of it connected. So, I recognize there’s nothing I or anyone else can do or say at this point. Just understand how badly you’ve blown it. Know that you’re out, Chris. You’re not coming back from this. You simply can’t (or more likely won’t) accept being wrong on any of it, and that’s the issue here. You disingenuously advocate for some 9/11-style COVID commission so we can “understand what happened” but you refuse to start with yourself. Instead, you attempt to rebrand yourself as some new independent and unbiased Cuomo while you half-heartedly feature vax injury stories for ratings, and then smugly brush aside the very people who warned that all this would happen. You whitewash past remarks and reframe what you said back on CNN, you downplay the worldwide government tyranny you helped enable… anything to avoid accountability and responsibility. You can’t even man up enough to say “Guys, I made some terrible mistakes along the way, I’m sorry.” — Pro Tip: THAT’S WHERE YOU BEGIN, CHRIS. You don’t get to repackage yourself and expect us all to forgive and forget where you came from. It doesn’t work that way. You are no better than an abusive husband expecting to be thanked by your wife because you’ve stopped hitting her. You abused the public with your position in media, and until you take a good hard look in the mirror and accept that? Nobody is buying your bullshit. It’s done, man. We all see it.

Here is the interview.

Saturday, April 13, 2024

Dave Smith sings a song about COVID tyrants 🎢🎡

Sunday, February 4, 2024

RFK Jr. being a critic of the NeoCons, yet supporting the same policies in regard to Israel.

"Clean Break," by Richard Pearl and David Wormser, 1996, was written to Benjamin Netanyahu.

It does seem like Dave Smith found the question to short circuit RFK, Jr., al la Mitch McConnell, with the question "Do you have concerns about the level of influence of Israel in the politics of the United States?” 

Thursday, November 16, 2023

DAVE SMITH: The Middle East has suffered 1,000s 9/11s at the hands of US foreign policy.

Here is the full debate.  

My first real look at how retarded Laura Loomer is. 

Dave Smith is destroying the inflammatory Laura Loomer with facts.  He cites the 1947 UN charter that allocated 56% of Palestine via the British Mandate to the Zionists, who prior to the charter owned about 10% of the land.  See the 138:45 mark.  Zionists accepted the agreement, and the Arabs said no, which by the way the UN had no authority to just create nations out of thin air.  There I might disagree with Smith, otherwise, what binding value can treaties have?  A civil war broke out immediately, and Israel won.  And 750,000 Arabs were driven out of their land and never allowed to come back to their homes.  So then Israel took over 80% of Palestine.  At first, it was the UN that recommended 56% of Palestine be given to the Zionists, which they had no legitimate right to claim.  And then they took over 80%.  This was in 1948 when they declared their independence.  In 1967, Israel launched a preemptive war as they call it, and they won that again, and then they took control over 100% of it and they've had it ever since.  It has happened throughout history in war.  140:00  But, no, the entire tradition of modern Western civilization, particularly post-WWII, has been to reject the idea that you can annex territory through war.  Again, I'm not saying that we didn't do that with the Native Americans, and there were other examples that happened a lot earlier when that was more permissible.  And since 1967, both Gaza and the West Bank have been completely dominated by Israel.  And if we're going to pretend that that is not even a factor as to why there is this hatred toward Israelies and that it's just "Islamism" and has nothing to do with the policy of the Israeli government, I think we do that at our own peril.

At 141:20, Loomer cites Article 8 of the 1988 Hamas charter.  

Allah is its target.  The prophet is its model.  The Quran its Constitution.  Jihad is its path.  And death for the sake of Allah, the loftiest of its wishes.

The very beginnings of the opening statement of the Hamas charter, which a majority of the Palestinian people support, says, 

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it. 

It doesn't say until Hamas will obliterate it, it says "until Islam will obliterate it."   just as it obliterated others before

Friday, April 28, 2023

NATO EXPANSI0N INTO UKRAINE IS THE BRIGHTEST OF RED LINES FOR RUSSIA

George Kennan, U.S. Ambassador to Russia, was the architect of Russia's containment program.

Wednesday, November 16, 2022

DEAR LIBERALS: When it came down to the biggest scientific crisis in our life times, you got everything wrong . . .

When it came down to the biggest scientific crisis in our life times, you got everything wrong, and those rubes were so much more right than you were.  I know that's a bitter pill to swallow, but you just have to swallow it.  There's no argument left at this point.  Lockdowns were wrong.  And mask mandates were wrong.  And closing schools was wrong.  And banning church services were wrong.  My God, they closed playgrounds.  They closed parks.  They ran people off of beaches to go back in their home.  They closed down universities.  They sent college kids, who were living amongst themselves, back home with their grandparents.  It's just insane.  The vaccines were not what the national "experts" were sayin that "you couldn't get it or spread it," they were wrong.  [Doesn't matter.  Many schools are still requiring the vaccines, including Notre Dame.]  And then people were mandating it when it didn't even effect how much you spread the virus, they were wrong.  You were wrong about all of this, and the people opposing you on it were right.  And that's a difficult thing to accept.  And that's what interesting about this article, it's like acknowledging that without having the moment that you're supposed to have when you acknowledge that.