Soros working with the Anti-Communist Reagan to undermine the USSR makes far more sense than just Soros as opportunistic insider.

Now let's strip out the ideology and just look at Soros as a political operative. If @realrichardpoe is correct then Soros working with the Anti-Communist Reagan to undermine the USSR makes far more sense than just Soros as opportunistic insider.

In short, who gave Soros the… https://t.co/am0Qcvpaix

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) March 25, 2024

📣 New Podcast! "Episode #171 - Richard Poe and Why All Roads Really Do Lead to London" on @Spreaker #british_empire #communism #london #trotsky #war https://t.co/0Ia4aG2fkF

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) March 3, 2024

Captured white horse? 

Weird symbolic cultural things built

The Grim Reaper appears at Charles' coronation, in 2023. 

Does it mean they're being removed?  I don't see any reason to expect that due to my own worldview, the ancient aristocracy is still running things, like the 4th Industrial Revolution, and the Great Reset.  It's not conceivable to me that they would take themselves out of their own plans.  What we're seeing is a distraction, a little red meat for the masses.  Nothing more than a game.  Forgive me if that's too much of a black pill.  

I tend toward the same conclusion.  Process of reification.  We're very good at seeing patterns and ideas that aren't there and using them to make sense of them.  

We're all so filled with such anxiety that our threat assessment system are off the charts.  The world of overlapping psyops.  

8:50. Churchill gave a famous speech on September 6, 1943, that the next incarnation of the British Empire would be an empire of the mind.  The power struggle would be fought in the mind.  the Cold War struggle for hearts and minds to win people over from communism to Trotskyism, the chosen ideology of the intelligence community in the West.  People don't realize it but when they see the prevalence of Trotskyism in Left Liberal circles, today, a lot of that was generated by Western intelligence programs.  It's usually called the CIA program, of course, but it was actually initiated by British Intelligence.  The whole idea was as we entered the Cold War, the British had this idea that somehow we, being the West, the new Western alliance, the new permanent NATO alliance, which has taken form, that we had to offer the world something just as attractive as communism supposedly was, excitingly and nicely packaged with just as many social perk and benefits but something that was better.  They basically wanted to offer communism or socialism but in a better form, a Western form. So they created a movement which they called the Non-Communist Left, the NCL for short. 

1945, End of WWII.

1947, National Security Act, NSA, created a separate Air Force, and the CIA

1949, NATO

There have been books written about this; it's a real thing.  Totally verified from declassified documents.  They recruited Leftists, primarily Trotskyites, the criterion for these recruits was people passionately of the Left but who hated Stalinism, who hated Soviet communism as it then existed in the USSR.  These were the people and this was the type of ideology that Western Intelligence in particularly the anglosphere, British Intelligence, and its fledgling child, the brand new American CIA that they embraced; they embraced this program called the non-communist left.  What they sought to do throughout Western Europe within the United States even was to inculcate in cultural and intellectual circles and ultimately political circles with this doctrine of a better form of socialism, not capitalism or other such anticommunist doctrines as we were led to believe.  Those of us who grew up amid the Cold War that wasn't their doctrine at all; what they were trying to do was introduce socialism with a Western face.  Socialism or communism that was mysteriously anti-Soviet.  And they actually managed to find people like this and indoctrinate people like this.  And there are actually still a lot of people like this in the government and in insensitive positions who are still programmed this way.  That somehow the Left is good, but Russian communism emanating from Moscow is somehow the epitome of all evil.  And it's basically an in-fight between the Left is the very source of the strange unexplained Leftism that we see being so heavily promoted and protected within our so-called deep state.  

POE, 13:50. It's not an accident and it's not even because of infiltration.  It was actually a deliberate plan that was set in place at the end of World War II and was executed, and, as far as I can tell, it never ended.  I mean supposedly it ended, books were written, documents were declassified, disavows were disseminated to the public, and it was said that supposedly this program had been a failure and was being abandoned but I think when we look around us  it's pretty obvious that some form of Communism is now the mainstream ideology of the militant West. 

LUONGO, 14:45. Interesting as you were saying that, I was jotting some notes down, something that I don't normally do.  But what popped into my head was the idea something like you're describing the Third Way.  When I was growing up I heard a lot of this, "Well, there's a third way between communism and capitalism, and socialism is that third way, where we can have kind of free markets, but we have to put controls on it," and, you know, in those terms my mind immediately goes to economics, and economic theory, Keynesianism or another way of saying technocracy, where we manage the economy.  And then we manage the economics sphere through government creating guide rails for how we're going to do things and whatnot and that this is . . . but it really is just a repackage, this is the same repackaged Leftism in order to get to where we are today with this more perfect technocratic future.  And we saw it with, my friend and business partner, Dexter White, talks about McNamara and the technocratic state within the DOD that ran the Vietnam War and these people that believe in their spreadsheets.  And if you look at the European union today, there . . . it's, it's like the full flower of this idea embodied by the technocracy of the European Union.  I don't know what you think about that.  

POE, 16:17. Yes, that's all part of it. I think it goes deeper than that, and, you know, to my constant bias is always to believe that history repeats itself; history rhymes with itself; history echoes itself.  We can go back to the 60s with McNamara and the technocrats, but we can always go back further and that the same ideas are still there, no matter how far back we go just under different names.  For example, I wrote an article called "How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews)," January 10, 2023, and in that article one of the subjects I explored was how Karl Marx was actually recruited by British intelligence.  He was given a handler who was a Scottish nobleman, [named] David Urquhart, who was actually a very famous British spy of the day.  He was kind of a Lawrence of Arabia of his day.  He had a great love for Middle Eastern culture.  He became very close to the Sultan of Turkey.  He went out into the Caucuses area and whipped up Muslim revolts among tribesmen in the Caucuses against the Czar, and he received the name El Doud. He was a kind of early precursor of Lawrence of Arabia and in many ways the same kind of person.  But he was also part of the high nobility of Scotland and he adopted, reached out his hand to Karl Marx who had supposedly taken refuge in England after he was kicked out of several European capitals for his supposed revolutionary activities.  And Marx himself married a noblewoman back when he was still in Germany, he married a woman of Prussian nobility but was also directly descended from the high nobility of Scotland.  I'm still researching this, but I've seen some hints, some indications that this David Urquhart may have been a relative of [Marx's] wife, so he was really in like Flint in the British establishment and the British Royal Establishment.  

British intelligence in his opinion is the best in the world. The most effective is a ruthless intelligence service. Any form of coercion and blackmail.

And Seeley, in particular, pointed to the growing empires of Russia and the United States, which then were land empires, they were growing by expanding their territory organically from the center and moving out into contiguous lands, and getting bigger and bigger, but with their lands, all connected together. And Seeley pointed out that empires of this sort were innately easier and less expensive to defend than the British Empire, that ultimately Britain was going to have to face Russia and the US as enemies, and that England would lose this battle, precisely because of its, the vulnerability, the way that its colonies were spread out around the world. [25:07]

Here is a transcript of the interview.  

When did globalism start, and who started it? 

Globalism, the idea of establishing a world government that rules the entire planet, was put into form by the British, first emerged in Victorian England and it quickly was adopted by the Fabian socialists and these groups. 

How the British Invented George Soros, Color Revolutions and Communism: Noor Bin Ladin Interviews Richard Poe. 

W. T. Stead, a journalist who put forward the main plan for British globalism.  The Americanization of the world argued that for it to continue with its great power place in the world it would have to merge with the United States.  A superstate under British control.  This ensured that the British could control the super state.   NATO, Five Eyes Intelligence Treaties, most people know that the US and Great Britain are locked together in institutional frameworks to the point that they're not independent countries.  Size does not mean dominance.  India, Brazil, and Russia are all big countries.  Bigness does not equal power in the world.  It never did.  Britain is small.  Small production base.  Brits learned to be powerful as a small country.  The lessons they learned amidst larger countries, the Brits know these lessons, put them into practice, and know how to make them work.  British are managing the US as they've managed the whole rest of the world for centuries.  They've merged exactly the way that Stead suggested they merge.  Our interests are locked together.  Britain can control the US by . . . 

England is often described as the obedient lapdog.  It's the other way around  W. T. Stead planned to merge with the US.  Brits planned it.  They implemented it, they had the jump on us, and had the initiative along their lines that serves them.  US polices the world, relieving that burden by England.  1882, a book by Sealy, argues British Empire was unsustainable at that time, far-flung, colonies on many different continents, etc. spread out empire, ocean goign empires, made it vulnerable to attack.  Sealy pointed to the empires of US and Russia, land empires, growing their territories from the center contiguously.  Sealy said empires of this sort were easier and less expensive.  England would face these enemies and lose.  Solidified by groups, Roundtable, Fabians, etc.  From a British standpoint, self-interest, they were logical and solid.  To join forces with the US, arrange transnational institutions that would give England power over the think tanks, and policies.  Chatham House in London, and Council on Foreign Relations, two sister organizations, formed in 1919.  by 1921, they were 2 organizations but with the same purpose.  Back channel for coordinating foreign policy to set up British dominance over the whole set up.  Continues to function today and is the basis for UK/US relations but also for the entire world.  W. T. Stead's vision is the world that has come to pass.  Orwell's 1984 is dominated by Oceania, a country formed by the combination of the British Empire with the United States.  Orwell's vision of the future was similar of British statesmen like W. T. Stead and Rhodes.  We see this a lot in British statecraft.  H. G. Wells and Orwell, write novels and write documents for intelligence.  It's a marvel of organization.  Why are the British, a small country, able to dominate us, a large country.  Because their banking, education, and media systems are coordinated tightly.  Very focused system.  British intelligence in his opinion is the best in the world.  most powerful, most ruthless agencies in the world.  No other competitor.  Who is the superpower, hyperpower, or hegemony?  It's not the ballistic missiles or aircraft carriers.  The most effective is a ruthless intelligence service.  Any form of coercion and blackmail.  Other intelligence services may hesitate to go that far.  Brits conceal their power by portraying their own intelligence services as being incompetent.  Playing possum.  

"How the British Sold Globalism to America," Richard Poe, @LewRockwell.com, May 6, 2021.

To this day: all roads lead to London.

To this day: all roads lead to London. https://t.co/ATOgPwo4IQ

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) August 7, 2023

"How the British Caused the American Civil War"

This is 18 months old but fascinating.  I would say it's worth your time.  Here's the audio, and here is the transcript.

"Secret History of the Civil War: Noor Bin Ladin Interviews Richard Poe" is the title of Noor Bin Laden's podcast with Richard where they discuss Poe's article, "How the British Caused the American Civil War," @ Lew Rockwell, December 31, 2021.

1:03  So Richard, as you and I have both followed, there’s been a lot of talk the past few months on this question of, quote, “national divorce,” and, as you know as well, there’s been a recent poll, published, I think, by the University of Virginia. They claim that 41 percent of Biden supporters and 52 percent of Trump supporters are now supposedly in favor of secession. And, as you’ve seen as well, a lot of media, talking heads, and political pundits, they keep pushing this narrative over and over, also on social media. And, well, the last time there was talk of secession it led to the Civil War, which is the topic of your latest article, entitled, “How the British Caused the American Civil War.” And in your piece, you reveal fascinating aspects of the conflict, which have been suppressed and outright lied about. I’m quoting now from your piece, “War came for the same reason it always does, because powerful men wanted it, and stood to gain by it.” And you also rightly pointed out, “Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.” For this reason, and, you know, considering the current predicament the U.S. finds herself in, I think it’s really crucial that this part of history be examined, and we can really all be grateful that you’ve endeavored to shine light on the true motives and instigators of this war. So I’d like you to tell us a bit what you’ve uncovered, and what you exposed in that latest article of yours.

Richard Poe: Sure. Basically, what I uncovered is that our Civil War was instigated by foreign, European powers, primarily by the British. They were the prime instigators and the ringleaders, and they got other European powers involved. The British, in particular, had a very strong economic interest in the South. British scholars Gallagher and Robinson, in their famous 1953 paper, “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” they actually refer to the American South as a “colonial economy” of Britain. And that’s quite accurate.

What happened was, after the American Revolution, the British succeeded in reestablishing a classic colonial economy based on the cotton trade from the South. Basically how that worked is the South sold most of its cotton, about 70 percent, to England, and, in return for this, the British sold them manufactured goods.

This is a classic colonial relationship, in the sense that the raw materials and foods are created in the colonies, sent to the mother country, sold very cheaply, then the mother country sells manufactured goods back to the colony, which the colony needs because they can’t make their own manufactures, either because they’ve been forbidden by law to make them, as was the case in America before the Revolution, or, as in the case of the antebellum South, they couldn’t make their manufactures simply because all their resources and money were taken up in producing cotton to supply England, the mother country.

The South understood very well that the British did not want them building factories, and so they didn’t. They obeyed the British, as every good colony does, because it was in their economic interests.

The class of wealthy planters who raised cotton in the South, their interests were in doing whatever the British wanted them to, and what the British wanted was for them to produce cotton as cheaply as possible, which is why they had to use slave labor, because the British had other sources of cotton, and were constantly trying to develop other sources, in places like British India, Brazil, Egypt. The British always kept that price pressure on the South. The South understood they had to keep their prices low or they might lose their livelihood.

So these Southern planters, the kind of people we see in Gone with the Wind, Scarlett O’Hara, and her family, people like that, we see they were very wealthy. They were wealthy on English money, from selling their cotton to England. Now, typical of a colonial economy is that you have a colonial elite which are the Southern planters, but then everyone else is subsisting at a very low level, and these would be the slaves; these would be the poor whites. And so everyone else becomes a serf or a slave in some form or another. This is the colonial predicament, all over the world. Basically, the British had re-colonized the South after the Revolution and reestablished economic control over the South.

6:55  So the North was trying to cure this situation. The North was building its own textile mills, to compete with the British textile mills. What the North wanted was to replace England as the primary trade partner of the South, and the way the North put this pressure on the South was to impose tariffs on foreign trade which made it prohibitively expensive for the South and Britain to trade with each other. The South resented this very much, the British resented it even more, and this led directly to secret negotiations between the British government and the South, encouraging the South to secede from the Union and promising diplomatic and even military support, if necessary.

George Soros was a shareholder of FOX News

How come the United Kingdom is left out of every story geopolitically?  Somehow, they're like the hidden hand that nobody ever talks about anymore.

First, we know what just happened with Tucker at Fox, and there's a slight parallel in history that might give us some insight.

POE, 00:53: Well, back in 2013, Glenn Beck did a 3-part series called The Puppet Master, exposing George Soros, and shortly after he was kicked off Fox News.  Dan Bongino's show closed, and shortly after Tucker Carlson's, and both of them had been going after George Soros quite a bit.  

Dan Bognino's content manager is Matt Palumbo, author of The Man Behind the Curtain: Inside the Secret Network of George Soros, February 2022.  He's been pushing that book quite a lot, he's been going on shows, and his boss Bongino has been very supportive.  This begs the question, is the shutting down of Beck, Carlson, and Bongino the result of the hidden hand of Soros in conjunction with the hidden hand of the UK?  Are they one in the same?

Settlement for the Dominion lawsuit.  

Dominion is in cahoots with Smartmatic in this whole election thing.  Smartmatic, originally a Venezuelan company, was bought up by a British consortium whose CEO was Mark Molloch-Brown, a long-time friend and collaborator of George Soros who now is president of Soros' Open Society Foundations.  So it's a tight little world, and in this tight little world we have a lot of nefarious UK-connected figures.  

MEL, 4:20 Rupert Murdoch is vehemently opposed to ever seeing Trump back in office.  Staple Street owns Dominion now.  The guys who started Staple Street are Carlyle Group guys, which connects back to Bush, Cheney, and once again it's the small neocon intel group who have collaborated in some way.  Money changed hands.  It looks like a merger of the one-party rule crowd, billionaire elite class capture of America.  

5:40, POE, Soros was a shareholder of Fox News.  He certainly was when the Glenn Beck show was on at Fox.  That affected me directly because the Puppet Masters series that Glenn Beck did was based on my book, The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and 60s Radicals Sieized Control of the Democratic Party, 2010, which I co-wrote with David Horowitz.  Even after the Puppet Master, Glenn continued having me on his show repeatedly, talking about Soros and all kinds of related subjects.  So it was definitely a big blow to me when Glenn got kicked off, and anyone else who wants to know the truth about these subjects.  I do remember that that was one of the issues that Soros bought into Fox News, so I haven't followed that.  I don't know if he's still a shareholder.  The thing about Soros, from all my research which goes back to the early 90s, everything that I have learned about him continues to support my contention that he is a British asset, certainly an agent of influence for the British Foreign Office.  Whether he is formerly an asset for other British agencies or institutions, I can't say or I can't prove, but it is very clear that he is an instrument of British Foreign Policy, consciously and formerly so, due to his . . . well, the British Foreign Office has a formal program; it's public, it's not a secret.  But they take UK alumni, such as Soros, who've graduated from UK universities, reach out to them, monitor them, maintain communication with them, and basically try to get them to network with other UK alumni for the rest of their lives.  And those who become prominent, like Mr. Soros, are recruited to help advance British foreign policy agendas.  Again this is not some secret.  I read this in a white paper from the British Foreign Office in 2015.  It describes this program in great detail and very proudly announces in their humble opinion that the UK is the world's greatest "soft power" as they put it, directly because of this program of recruiting foreign students to study in the UK, as young George Soros did, and then following them throughout their lives.